We work in the ordered field of real numbers, whose order is in particular a total order, and we write uβv for u+(βv).
Since A is bounded in (X,d), there are a point xβX and a real number R>0 such that d(x,y)β€R for every yβA. Fix such x and R, and let zβclXβ(A).
Suppose, for contradiction, that d(x,z)β€R fails. Since the order is total, this forces Rβ€d(x,z) and Rξ =d(x,z), that is, R<d(x,z). Put Ξ΅=d(x,z)βR. By claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied with the summand βR, the inequality R<d(x,z) gives RβR<d(x,z)βR, and RβR=0 by claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field; hence 0<Ξ΅.
Applying condition 3 of Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls at the point z, which lies in clXβ(A), with this Ξ΅, we obtain a point aβA with d(z,a)<Ξ΅. By condition 3 of the definition of a metric we have d(a,z)=d(z,a)<Ξ΅, and by condition 4 of that definition
d(x,z)β€d(x,a)+d(a,z).
Since aβA we have d(x,a)β€R. By claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied to the strict inequality d(a,z)<Ξ΅ and the inequality d(x,a)β€R, we get d(a,z)+d(x,a)<Ξ΅+R, and by commutativity of addition this reads d(x,a)+d(a,z)<R+Ξ΅. Combining with the displayed inequality by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives d(x,z)<R+Ξ΅.
Finally, by commutativity and associativity of addition and by claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field,
R+Ξ΅=R+(d(x,z)+(βR))=d(x,z)+(R+(βR))=d(x,z)+0=d(x,z).
Hence d(x,z)<d(x,z), which contradicts the fact that u<v requires uξ =v. Therefore d(x,z)β€R.
Since zβclXβ(A) was arbitrary, we have d(x,z)β€R for every zβclXβ(A), with xβX and R>0; by the definition of boundedness, clXβ(A) is bounded in (X,d).