TheoremBase

The permutation Phii(jPhi_i(j, tau) is built by cases from the inverse of sis_i, tau and sjs_j, and the map PhiiPhi_i from it as a defined set symbol; injectivity and surjectivity are checked through the deletion index maps, and the sign follows by splitting the inversions of Phii(jPhi_i(j, tau) into those avoiding i, which correspond to the inversions of tau, and those involving i, whose number has the parity of i + j.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Conventions. By The Index Map Skipping One Element of [n] §difference, m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and m+1=nm+1=n. For q∈{m,n}q\in\{m,n\}, the elements of SqS_{q} are the bijections [q]→[q][q]\to[q] by Permutations of a Set and the Set of Permutations of [n] §membership, and [q][q] is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §naturals. Subsets, unions and products of finite sets are finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §subset and Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §union; Boolean identities between classes follow from The Boolean Operations on Classes, Disjointness, and the Universal Class §operations and Axiom of Extensionality for Classes; and (x,y)=(x′,y′)(x,y)=(x',y') if and only if x=x′x=x' and y=y′y=y', by The Characteristic Property of Ordered Pairs and Nested Tuples of Sets §characteristic. For finite sets D,ED,E we count with: (N1) #(D∪E)=#D+#E\#(D\cup E)=\#D+\#E if D∩E=∅D\cap E=\emptyset, by Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products §union; (N2) #(D×E)=#D⋅#E\#(D\times E)=\#D\cdot\#E and #{x}=1\#\{x\}=1, by Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products §product and Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products §empty; (N3) #f(D)=#D\#f(D)=\#D for every injective map f:D→Cf:D\to C to a set CC, by Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products §image; (N4) #[k]=k\#[k]=k for k∈N0k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, by Counting: Intervals, Empty Sets and Singletons, Injective Images, Subsets, Unions and Products §intervals. For q∈{m,n}q\in\{m,n\} and σ∈Sq\sigma\in S_{q}, sgn⁡(σ)=(−1)#Inv(σ)\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^{\#\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma)} by Sign of a Permutation §sign with qq in place of nn, where Inv(σ)\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma) is the set of Inversions of a Permutation of [n] §inversions with qq in place of nn, a finite subset of [q]×[q][q]\times[q] by Inversions of a Permutation Form a Finite Set, and the Sign Map Exists §inversions; by Inversions of a Permutation of [n] §membership, its elements are the pairs (p,r)(p,r) with p,r∈[q]p,r\in[q], p<rp<r and σ(r)<σ(p)\sigma(r)<\sigma(p).

Step 0: the maps sjs_{j}. For j∈[n]j\in[n], sj:[m]→[n]s_{j}:[m]\to[n] is the map ss of The Index Map Skipping One Element of [n] §map with jj in place of ii, by The Deletion Index Map §deletion-index. Let j∈[n]j\in[n].

(D1) By The Index Map Skipping One Element of [n] §range with jj in place of ii, sj(k)≠js_{j}(k)\neq j for every k∈[m]k\in[m], and sj:[m]→[n]∖{j}s_{j}:[m]\to[n]\setminus\{j\} is a bijection; so sjs_{j} is injective, and every p∈[n]p\in[n] with p≠jp\neq j is sj(k)s_{j}(k) for some k∈[m]k\in[m]. By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §inverse and Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §composition, its inverse is a bijective map sj−1:[n]∖{j}→[m]s_{j}^{-1}:[n]\setminus\{j\}\to[m] with sj−1(sj(k))=ks_{j}^{-1}(s_{j}(k))=k for k∈[m]k\in[m] and sj(sj−1(p))=ps_{j}(s_{j}^{-1}(p))=p for p∈[n]∖{j}p\in[n]\setminus\{j\}.

(D2) For k,l∈[m]k,l\in[m]: k<lk<l if and only if sj(k)<sj(l)s_{j}(k)<s_{j}(l), by The Index Map Skipping One Element of [n] §increasing with jj in place of ii.

Step 1: extending a permutation. Let j∈[n]j\in[n] and τ∈Sm\tau\in S_{m}. For p∈[n]p\in[n] with p≠ip\neq i, si−1(p)∈[m]s_{i}^{-1}(p)\in[m], so sj(τ(si−1(p)))∈[n]s_{j}(\tau(s_{i}^{-1}(p)))\in[n]. By Maps Defined by Cases §cases, with the sets [n][n] and [n][n], the property p=ip=i and the expressions jj and sj(τ(si−1(p)))s_{j}(\tau(s_{i}^{-1}(p))), there is exactly one map σj,τ:[n]→[n]\sigma_{j,\tau}:[n]\to[n] with σj,τ(i)=j\sigma_{j,\tau}(i)=j and σj,τ(p)=sj(τ(si−1(p)))\sigma_{j,\tau}(p)=s_{j}(\tau(s_{i}^{-1}(p))) for p∈[n]p\in[n] with p≠ip\neq i. Then: (E1) σj,τ(si(k))=sj(τ(k))\sigma_{j,\tau}(s_{i}(k))=s_{j}(\tau(k)) for k∈[m]k\in[m], since si(k)≠is_{i}(k)\neq i and si−1(si(k))=ks_{i}^{-1}(s_{i}(k))=k by (D1); (E2) σj,τ(p)≠j\sigma_{j,\tau}(p)\neq j for p∈[n]p\in[n] with p≠ip\neq i, by (D1) for sjs_{j}; (E3) σj,τ∈Sn\sigma_{j,\tau}\in S_{n}. Indeed let p,p′∈[n]p,p'\in[n] with σj,τ(p)=σj,τ(p′)\sigma_{j,\tau}(p)=\sigma_{j,\tau}(p'). By (E2) and σj,τ(i)=j\sigma_{j,\tau}(i)=j, p=ip=i if and only if p′=ip'=i. If p≠ip\neq i and p′≠ip'\neq i, then sj(τ(si−1(p)))=sj(τ(si−1(p′)))s_{j}(\tau(s_{i}^{-1}(p)))=s_{j}(\tau(s_{i}^{-1}(p'))), so si−1(p)=si−1(p′)s_{i}^{-1}(p)=s_{i}^{-1}(p') as sjs_{j} and τ\tau are injective, and p=p′p=p' by (D1). So σj,τ\sigma_{j,\tau} is injective by Injective, Surjective and Bijective Functions between Classes §injective, hence a bijection by Finite Sets: Removing an Element, Injective Self-Maps, Infinite Sets, Sets of Permutations, Pairs and Extended Tuples §injective-self-map, [n][n] being finite, and σj,τ∈Sn\sigma_{j,\tau}\in S_{n} by Permutations of a Set and the Set of Permutations of [n] §membership.

Step 2: clause map. By (E3), Φi:[n]×Sm→Sn\Phi_{i}:[n]\times S_{m}\to S_{n}, (j,τ)↦σj,τ(j,\tau)\mapsto\sigma_{j,\tau}, is a map, σj,τ\sigma_{j,\tau} being the only set with the properties of Step 1. By Step 1 and (E1), Φi(j,τ)(i)=j\Phi_{i}(j,\tau)(i)=j and Φi(j,τ)(si(k))=sj(τ(k))\Phi_{i}(j,\tau)(s_{i}(k))=s_{j}(\tau(k)) for all j∈[n]j\in[n], τ∈Sm\tau\in S_{m} and k∈[m]k\in[m]. Let Ψ:[n]×Sm→Sn\Psi:[n]\times S_{m}\to S_{n} be a map with the same two properties, and let j∈[n]j\in[n] and τ∈Sm\tau\in S_{m}. Then Ψ(j,τ)\Psi(j,\tau) and Φi(j,τ)\Phi_{i}(j,\tau) have the value jj at ii, and every p∈[n]p\in[n] with p≠ip\neq i is si(k)s_{i}(k) for some k∈[m]k\in[m], by (D1), where both have the value sj(τ(k))s_{j}(\tau(k)). So Ψ(j,τ)=Φi(j,τ)\Psi(j,\tau)=\Phi_{i}(j,\tau), and Ψ=Φi\Psi=\Phi_{i}. This proves clause map. Below, Φ=Φi\Phi=\Phi_{i}.

Step 3: clause bijection. Φ\Phi is injective: if Φ(j,τ)=Φ(j′,τ′)\Phi(j,\tau)=\Phi(j',\tau'), then j=Φ(j,τ)(i)=Φ(j′,τ′)(i)=j′j=\Phi(j,\tau)(i)=\Phi(j',\tau')(i)=j', and for k∈[m]k\in[m], sj(τ(k))=sj(τ′(k))s_{j}(\tau(k))=s_{j}(\tau'(k)), so τ(k)=τ′(k)\tau(k)=\tau'(k) as sjs_{j} is injective; hence τ=τ′\tau=\tau', and (j,τ)=(j′,τ′)(j,\tau)=(j',\tau'). Φ\Phi is surjective: let σ∈Sn\sigma\in S_{n} and j=σ(i)∈[n]j=\sigma(i)\in[n]. For k∈[m]k\in[m], si(k)≠is_{i}(k)\neq i by (D1), so σ(si(k))≠σ(i)=j\sigma(s_{i}(k))\neq\sigma(i)=j as σ\sigma is injective. Let τ:[m]→[m]\tau:[m]\to[m], k↦sj−1(σ(si(k)))k\mapsto s_{j}^{-1}(\sigma(s_{i}(k))), with values in [m][m] by (D1) for sjs_{j}. Then sj(τ(k))=σ(si(k))s_{j}(\tau(k))=\sigma(s_{i}(k)) for k∈[m]k\in[m], by (D1) for sjs_{j}. If τ(k)=τ(l)\tau(k)=\tau(l), then σ(si(k))=σ(si(l))\sigma(s_{i}(k))=\sigma(s_{i}(l)), so k=lk=l, as σ\sigma and sis_{i} are injective; thus τ\tau is injective, hence a bijection by Finite Sets: Removing an Element, Injective Self-Maps, Infinite Sets, Sets of Permutations, Pairs and Extended Tuples §injective-self-map, and τ∈Sm\tau\in S_{m}. Now Φ(j,τ)(i)=j=σ(i)\Phi(j,\tau)(i)=j=\sigma(i), and every p∈[n]p\in[n] with p≠ip\neq i is si(k)s_{i}(k) for some k∈[m]k\in[m], by (D1), where Φ(j,τ)(si(k))=sj(τ(k))=σ(si(k))\Phi(j,\tau)(s_{i}(k))=s_{j}(\tau(k))=\sigma(s_{i}(k)); so Φ(j,τ)=σ\Phi(j,\tau)=\sigma. Hence Φ\Phi is a bijection by Injective, Surjective and Bijective Functions between Classes §bijective.

Step 4: clause sign. Let j∈[n]j\in[n], τ∈Sm\tau\in S_{m} and σ=Φ(j,τ)\sigma=\Phi(j,\tau), so σ(i)=j\sigma(i)=j and σ(si(k))=sj(τ(k))\sigma(s_{i}(k))=s_{j}(\tau(k)) for k∈[m]k\in[m]. Let Nσ=#Inv(σ)N_{\sigma}=\#\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma) and Nτ=#Inv(τ)N_{\tau}=\#\mathrm{Inv}(\tau). Let I0=Inv(σ)∩(([n]∖{i})×([n]∖{i}))I_{0}=\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma)\cap\bigl(([n]\setminus\{i\})\times([n]\setminus\{i\})\bigr), I1=Inv(σ)∩([n]×{i})I_{1}=\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma)\cap([n]\times\{i\}) and I2=Inv(σ)∩({i}×[n])I_{2}=\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma)\cap(\{i\}\times[n]), finite as subsets of Inv(σ)\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma). A pair (p,q)∈Inv(σ)(p,q)\in\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma) lies in I1I_{1} if q=iq=i, in I2I_{2} if p=ip=i, and in I0I_{0} otherwise; no pair lies in two of these sets, since the pairs of I0I_{0} have no entry ii and (i,i)∉Inv(σ)(i,i)\notin\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma). So Inv(σ)=(I0∪I1)∪I2\mathrm{Inv}(\sigma)=(I_{0}\cup I_{1})\cup I_{2} with I0∩I1=∅I_{0}\cap I_{1}=\emptyset and (I0∪I1)∩I2=∅(I_{0}\cup I_{1})\cap I_{2}=\emptyset, and by (N1)

Nσ=#I0+#I1+#I2.(1)N_{\sigma}=\#I_{0}+\#I_{1}+\#I_{2}.\tag{1}

The set I0I_{0}. Let h0:Inv(τ)→[n]×[n]h_{0}:\mathrm{Inv}(\tau)\to[n]\times[n], (k,l)↦(si(k),si(l))(k,l)\mapsto(s_{i}(k),s_{i}(l)); it is injective, by the characteristic property of pairs and the injectivity of sis_{i}. We show that its image is I0I_{0}. If (k,l)∈Inv(τ)(k,l)\in\mathrm{Inv}(\tau), then k<lk<l and τ(l)<τ(k)\tau(l)<\tau(k), so p=si(k)p=s_{i}(k) and q=si(l)q=s_{i}(l) lie in [n]∖{i}[n]\setminus\{i\} by (D1), p<qp<q by (D2), and σ(q)=sj(τ(l))<sj(τ(k))=σ(p)\sigma(q)=s_{j}(\tau(l))<s_{j}(\tau(k))=\sigma(p) by (D2) for sjs_{j}; so h0(k,l)=(p,q)∈I0h_{0}(k,l)=(p,q)\in I_{0}. Conversely, if (p,q)∈I0(p,q)\in I_{0}, let k=si−1(p)k=s_{i}^{-1}(p) and l=si−1(q)l=s_{i}^{-1}(q), so si(k)=ps_{i}(k)=p and si(l)=qs_{i}(l)=q by (D1); then p<qp<q gives k<lk<l by (D2), and sj(τ(l))=σ(q)<σ(p)=sj(τ(k))s_{j}(\tau(l))=\sigma(q)<\sigma(p)=s_{j}(\tau(k)) gives τ(l)<τ(k)\tau(l)<\tau(k) by (D2) for sjs_{j}; so (k,l)∈Inv(τ)(k,l)\in\mathrm{Inv}(\tau) and h0(k,l)=(p,q)h_{0}(k,l)=(p,q). By (N3), #I0=Nτ\#I_{0}=N_{\tau}. The sets I1I_{1} and I2I_{2}. Let L={p∈[n]:p<i}L=\{p\in[n]:p<i\} and G={q∈[n]:σ(q)<j}G=\{q\in[n]:\sigma(q)<j\}; then i∉Li\notin L, and i∉Gi\notin G as σ(i)=j\sigma(i)=j. The elements of I1I_{1} are the pairs (p,i)(p,i) with p∈Lp\in L and j=σ(i)<σ(p)j=\sigma(i)<\sigma(p). For p∈Lp\in L, p≠ip\neq i, so σ(p)≠j\sigma(p)\neq j, and j<σ(p)j<\sigma(p) if and only if p∉Gp\notin G. Hence I1=(L∖G)×{i}I_{1}=(L\setminus G)\times\{i\}. Likewise, the elements of I2I_{2} are the pairs (i,q)(i,q) with q∈Gq\in G and i<qi<q; for q∈Gq\in G, q≠iq\neq i, so i<qi<q if and only if q∉Lq\notin L. Hence I2={i}×(G∖L)I_{2}=\{i\}\times(G\setminus L). By (N2), #I1=#(L∖G)\#I_{1}=\#(L\setminus G) and #I2=#(G∖L)\#I_{2}=\#(G\setminus L). Counting LL and GG. As 1≤i1\le i, i−1∈N0i-1\in\mathbb{N}_{0} and (i−1)+1=i(i-1)+1=i, by The Difference of Two Natural Numbers with Zero §difference, and (i−1)+1(i-1)+1 is the successor of i−1i-1 by Natural Numbers Are the Successors in Omega: One Is Least and Not a Successor of a Natural Number, the Successor Is Injective, and N Is Closed under Addition and Multiplication §plus-one; so for p∈Np\in\mathbb{N}, p<ip<i if and only if p≤i−1p\le i-1, by The Order on Omega Is a Well-Order with Membership as Its Strict Order, and Nothing Lies between n and Its Successor §successor. As i≤ni\le n, L=[i−1]L=[i-1], and #L=i−1\#L=i-1 by (N4). Likewise, for r∈Nr\in\mathbb{N}, r<jr<j if and only if r≤j−1r\le j-1. The restriction σ∣G:G→[n]\sigma|_{G}:G\to[n] is injective, and its image is [j−1][j-1]: for q∈Gq\in G, σ(q)<j\sigma(q)<j, so σ(q)∈[j−1]\sigma(q)\in[j-1]; for r∈[j−1]r\in[j-1], r<j≤nr<j\le n, and as σ\sigma is surjective there is q∈[n]q\in[n] with σ(q)=r<j\sigma(q)=r<j, that is q∈Gq\in G. By (N3) and (N4), #G=j−1\#G=j-1. Parity. L=(L∖G)∪(L∩G)L=(L\setminus G)\cup(L\cap G) and G=(G∖L)∪(L∩G)G=(G\setminus L)\cup(L\cap G), both unions disjoint. With a=#(L∩G)a=\#(L\cap G), (N1) gives #(L∖G)+a=i−1\#(L\setminus G)+a=i-1 and #(G∖L)+a=j−1\#(G\setminus L)+a=j-1, so #I1+(a+1)=i\#I_{1}+(a+1)=i and #I2+(a+1)=j\#I_{2}+(a+1)=j. With (1) and #I0=Nτ\#I_{0}=N_{\tau}, in N0\mathbb{N}_{0},

Nσ+(a+1)+(a+1)=Nτ+(#I1+(a+1))+(#I2+(a+1))=Nτ+(i+j).N_{\sigma}+(a+1)+(a+1)=N_{\tau}+\bigl(\#I_{1}+(a+1)\bigr)+\bigl(\#I_{2}+(a+1)\bigr)=N_{\tau}+(i+j).

Write e=−1∈Re=-1\in\mathbb{R}. By Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §exponents, eNσea+1ea+1=eNτei+je^{N_{\sigma}}e^{a+1}e^{a+1}=e^{N_{\tau}}e^{i+j}. By Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality §product, ea+1ea+1=(e e)a+1=1a+1=1e^{a+1}e^{a+1}=(e\,e)^{a+1}=1^{a+1}=1, as e e=1e\,e=1. Hence eNσ=ei+jeNτe^{N_{\sigma}}=e^{i+j}e^{N_{\tau}}, that is, sgn⁡(Φi(j,τ))=(−1)i+jsgn⁡(τ)\operatorname{sgn}(\Phi_{i}(j,\tau))=(-1)^{i+j}\operatorname{sgn}(\tau) by Sign of a Permutation §sign, applied with nn and with mm.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…