TheoremBase

Proof of The Bump Construction on the Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Intrinsic Test Function

lemmalem:perron-bump-wasserstein-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 14,509 chars · 33 deps · depth 40 Reason: P2b: proof carried onto lem:perron-bump-wasserstein-2026b; growth of the bump from the new upper bound, case-2 matrix step with translation-Hessian shifts.

Growth of the bump follows from the upper bound on the test function and the lower bound on the penalty; its envelope is computed on two open pieces. At a test maximum either the subsolution's envelope is active and its witnesses serve, or the penalised test function is active; then regular penalised maxima and the penalised-extremum conditions give the gradient identity and the matrix inequality, and degenerate ellipticity turns the test condition into the required inequality.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The symmetry and the triangle inequality of W2W_{2} (The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §symmetry, The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §triangle) and the rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding and scaling inequalities are used without further mention. By Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §lsc the penalty E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D}, and by Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §bounded-below there is e0Re_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with e0E(ν)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu) for νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}. The function ψ\psi is continuous on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §continuity. For ν,νP2(Rd)\nu',\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and πΠ(ν,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\nu',\nu) we have W2(ν,ν)I(π)W_{2}(\nu',\nu)\le\sqrt{I(\pi)} by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. For a,b,eRa,b,e\in\mathbb{R} one has max{a,b}e=max{ae,be}\max\{a,b\}-e=\max\{a-e,b-e\}: by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, aba\le b if and only if aebea-e\le b-e, so the two applications of Maximum of Two Elements of a Totally Ordered Set select corresponding entries.

Put O1={ν:W2(ν,μ^)<γ}O_{1}=\{\nu:W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma\} and O2={ν:γ2<W2(ν,μ^)}O_{2}=\{\nu:\tfrac{\gamma}{2}<W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})\}. The set O1O_{1} is open in (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}) by Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open; O2O_{2} is the complement of the closed ball of radius γ2\tfrac{\gamma}{2} about μ^\hat{\mu}, which is closed by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Closed Ball in a Metric Space, so O2O_{2} is open by Closed Subset of a Topological Space. Every νP2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) lies in O1O_{1} or in O2O_{2}, since W2(ν,μ^)γW_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})\ge\gamma implies W2(ν,μ^)>γ2W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})>\tfrac{\gamma}{2} by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Put S1=DO1S_{1}=\mathcal{D}\cap O_{1} and S2=DO2S_{2}=\mathcal{D}\cap O_{2}.

Claim 1. If νS1\nu\in S_{1} then v(ν)max{ψ(ν)λE(ν),v(ν)}=w(ν)v(\nu)\le\max\{\psi(\nu)-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),v(\nu)\}=w(\nu) by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements; if νDS1\nu\in\mathcal{D}\setminus S_{1} then w(ν)=v(ν)w(\nu)=v(\nu) by definition. If νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and γ2<W2(ν,μ^)<γ\tfrac{\gamma}{2}<W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma, then the annulus condition gives ψ(ν)λE(ν)v(ν)\psi(\nu)-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le v(\nu), so w(ν)=v(ν)w(\nu)=v(\nu) by Maximum of Two Elements of a Totally Ordered Set; if νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and γW2(ν,μ^)\gamma\le W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu}), then νS1\nu\notin S_{1} and w(ν)=v(ν)w(\nu)=v(\nu). So w(ν)=v(ν)w(\nu)=v(\nu) for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with γ2<W2(ν,μ^)\tfrac{\gamma}{2}<W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu}), that is, w=vw=v on S2S_{2}.

For the growth, let δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive. The subsolution vv has penalty-subordinate growth from above (Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution); let CC be as in Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Penalty Domain §above for vv and δ\delta, let bb be as in the upper-bound hypothesis, and put C=max{C,b(λ+δ)e0}C'=\max\{C,\,b-(\lambda+\delta)e_{0}\}. Let νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}. Then v(ν)C+δE(ν)C+δE(ν)v(\nu)\le C+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le C'+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements. If νS1\nu\in S_{1}, then ψ(ν)b\psi(\nu)\le b, and (λ+δ)e0(λ+δ)E(ν)(\lambda+\delta)e_{0}\le(\lambda+\delta)\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, λ+δ\lambda+\delta being positive; hence

ψ(ν)λE(ν)b(λ+δ)E(ν)+δE(ν)b(λ+δ)e0+δE(ν)C+δE(ν),\psi(\nu)-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le b-(\lambda+\delta)\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le b-(\lambda+\delta)e_{0}+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le C'+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),

and w(ν)C+δE(ν)w(\nu)\le C'+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements. Otherwise w(ν)=v(ν)C+δE(ν)w(\nu)=v(\nu)\le C'+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu). As δ\delta was arbitrary, ww has penalty-subordinate growth from above by Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Penalty Domain §above.

Claim 2. Let δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive. By claim 1 and The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Penalty Domain Relative to a Penalty Pair §minus, W=wδEW=w-\delta\mathcal{E} and vδEv-\delta\mathcal{E} are bounded above near each point of D\mathcal{D}, with wδ=Ww^{-}_{\delta}=W^{*} and vδ=(vδE)v^{-}_{\delta}=(v-\delta\mathcal{E})^{*}.

Suppose S1S_{1} is nonempty. Let P,Q:S1RP,Q:S_{1}\to\mathbb{R} be P(ν)=ψ(ν)(λ+δ)E(ν)P(\nu)=\psi(\nu)-(\lambda+\delta)\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) and Q(ν)=v(ν)δE(ν)Q(\nu)=v(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu). For νS1\nu\in S_{1} the identity above gives W(ν)=max{P(ν),Q(ν)}W(\nu)=\max\{P(\nu),Q(\nu)\}, since (ψ(ν)λE(ν))δE(ν)=P(ν)(\psi(\nu)-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\nu))-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)=P(\nu); so WS1=PQW|_{S_{1}}=P\vee Q in the notation of The Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Pointwise Maximum and of a Pointwise Minimum. The function PP is upper semicontinuous on S1S_{1}, λ+δ\lambda+\delta being positive: for ν0S1\nu_{0}\in S_{1} and positive ε0\varepsilon_{0}, lower semicontinuity of E\mathcal{E} at ν0\nu_{0} with ε02(λ+δ)1\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2}(\lambda+\delta)^{-1} and continuity of ψ\psi at ν0\nu_{0} with ε02\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2} give a radius within which (λ+δ)E(ν)<(λ+δ)E(ν0)+ε02-(\lambda+\delta)\mathcal{E}(\nu)<-(\lambda+\delta)\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})+\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2} and ψ(ν)<ψ(ν0)+ε02\psi(\nu)<\psi(\nu_{0})+\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2}, and the sum is P(ν)<P(ν0)+ε0P(\nu)<P(\nu_{0})+\varepsilon_{0}. Taking ε0=1\varepsilon_{0}=1 and half the radius so obtained shows that PP is bounded above near each point of S1S_{1}, and then P=PP^{*}=P by Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §fixed. By Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set §near-bounds and Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set §upper, applied to vδEv-\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D} with the open set O1O_{1}, QQ is bounded above near each point of S1S_{1} and Q=vδQ^{*}=v^{-}_{\delta} on S1S_{1}. By The Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Pointwise Maximum and of a Pointwise Minimum §upper, (PQ)=max{P,vδ}(P\vee Q)^{*}=\max\{P,v^{-}_{\delta}\} on S1S_{1}, and by Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set §upper applied to WW with O1O_{1}, W=(WS1)W^{*}=(W|_{S_{1}})^{*} on S1S_{1}. Hence wδ(ν)=max{ψ(ν)(λ+δ)E(ν),vδ(ν)}w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)=\max\{\psi(\nu)-(\lambda+\delta)\mathcal{E}(\nu),v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\} for νS1\nu\in S_{1}. (If S1S_{1} is empty there is nothing to prove.)

Suppose S2S_{2} is nonempty. By claim 1, WS2=(vδE)S2W|_{S_{2}}=(v-\delta\mathcal{E})|_{S_{2}}, so two applications of Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set §upper with the open set O2O_{2} give wδ(ν)=(WS2)(ν)=((vδE)S2)(ν)=vδ(ν)w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)=(W|_{S_{2}})^{*}(\nu)=((v-\delta\mathcal{E})|_{S_{2}})^{*}(\nu)=v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu) for νS2\nu\in S_{2}.

Claim 3. By claim 1, ww has penalty-subordinate growth from above, so its δ\delta-envelopes wδw^{-}_{\delta} are defined. Let δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let φ\varphi be an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, let ν^D\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D} be a point at which the function with value wδ(ν)φ(ν)w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu) at νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} has a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D}, with witnessing radius τ\tau (Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space), and let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. By claim 1 and Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §monotone, vδ(ν)wδ(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\le w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu) for νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}. Exactly one of the following cases occurs.

Case 1: wδ(ν^)=vδ(ν^)w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})=v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}). For νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(ν^,ν)<τW_{2}(\hat{\nu},\nu)<\tau,

vδ(ν)φ(ν)wδ(ν)φ(ν)wδ(ν^)φ(ν^)=vδ(ν^)φ(ν^),v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)\le w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)\le w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\varphi(\hat{\nu})=v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\varphi(\hat{\nu}),

so vδφv^{-}_{\delta}-\varphi has a local maximum at ν^\hat{\nu} relative to D\mathcal{D}. By continuity of φ\varphi (Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §continuity) there is a positive σ0\sigma_{0} with φ(ν)φ(ν^)<ε2|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\nu})|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} whenever W2(ν^,ν)<σ0W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\nu)<\sigma_{0}. Put ε=min{ε,σ0,τ}\varepsilon''=\min\{\varepsilon,\sigma_{0},\tau\}. Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution to vv with δ\delta, φ\varphi, ν^\hat{\nu} and the tolerance ε\varepsilon'' yields νDΣ\nu'\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, πΠ(ν,ν^)\pi\in\Pi(\nu',\hat{\nu}), ss, qq and YY satisfying the six conditions there with vv and ε\varepsilon''. Since εε\varepsilon''\le\varepsilon and vδ(ν^)=wδ(ν^)v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})=w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}), five of the six conditions required for ww with tolerance ε\varepsilon follow at once (for the cost and the discrepancy by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field). For the remaining one: νD\nu'\in\mathcal{D} and W2(ν^,ν)I(π)<εW_{2}(\hat{\nu},\nu')\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}<\varepsilon'', so the local maximum and the choice of σ0\sigma_{0} give wδ(ν)wδ(ν^)φ(ν)φ(ν^)<ε2w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')-w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})\le\varphi(\nu')-\varphi(\hat{\nu})<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, while wδ(ν)vδ(ν)>vδ(ν^)εwδ(ν^)εw^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')\ge v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')>v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\varepsilon''\ge w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\varepsilon. So wδ(ν)wδ(ν^)<ε|w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')-w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|<\varepsilon by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Case 2: vδ(ν^)<wδ(ν^)v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})<w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}). By claim 2, ν^S2\hat{\nu}\notin S_{2}, so ν^S1\hat{\nu}\in S_{1}, and wδ(ν^)=max{P(ν^),vδ(ν^)}w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})=\max\{P(\hat{\nu}),v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})\} equals P(ν^)P(\hat{\nu}) by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, the other value being excluded. Let τ=min{τ,γW2(ν^,μ^)}\tau'=\min\{\tau,\gamma-W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})\}, positive. For νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(ν^,ν)<τW_{2}(\hat{\nu},\nu)<\tau' we have νS1\nu\in S_{1}, so by claim 2 and claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements

P(ν)φ(ν)wδ(ν)φ(ν)wδ(ν^)φ(ν^)=P(ν^)φ(ν^).P(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)\le w^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)\le w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\varphi(\hat{\nu})=P(\hat{\nu})-\varphi(\hat{\nu}).

Let χ=ψφ\chi=\psi-\varphi, an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with χ(ν)=ψ(ν)φ(ν)\nabla\chi(\nu)=\nabla\psi(\nu)-\nabla\varphi(\nu) for νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and Hχ=HψHφH_{\chi}=H_{\psi}-H_{\varphi}, by Restrictions, Sums, Real Multiples and Differences of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §difference. The display says that χ(λ+δ)E\chi-(\lambda+\delta)\mathcal{E} has a local maximum at ν^\hat{\nu} relative to D\mathcal{D}. Since λ+δ\lambda+\delta is positive, Penalty Pairs with Regular Penalised Maxima §regular gives ν^DΣ\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, and then First- and Second-Order Conditions at a Penalised Extremum of an Intrinsic Test Function on the Wasserstein Space §maximum, applied with Q=DQ=\mathcal{D}, gives

ψ(ν^)φ(ν^)=(λ+δ)Σ(ν^),Hψ(ν^)Hφ(ν^)(λ+δ)HE(ν^).\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu})=(\lambda+\delta)\,\Sigma(\hat{\nu}),\qquad H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})-H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})\preceq(\lambda+\delta)H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu}).

The first identity, rearranged in the vector space L2(ν^;Rd)L^{2}(\hat{\nu};\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields), reads φ(ν^)+δΣ(ν^)=ψ(ν^)λΣ(ν^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu})+\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\nu})=\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\Sigma(\hat{\nu}). The second says, by The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices, that (λ+δ)HE(ν^)(Hψ(ν^)Hφ(ν^))(\lambda+\delta)H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})-(H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})-H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})) is positive semidefinite. This matrix equals (Hφ(ν^)+δHE(ν^))(Hψ(ν^)λHE(ν^))\bigl(H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})+\delta H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})\bigr)-\bigl(H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})-\lambda H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})\bigr), the two being equal entrywise by Difference of Real Matrices and the field axioms, and both matrices in parentheses lie in S(d)\mathcal{S}(d) by claim 1 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure; so, by The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices again,

Hψ(ν^)λHE(ν^)Hφ(ν^)+δHE(ν^).H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})-\lambda H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})\preceq H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})+\delta H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu}).

We check the test condition at ν^\hat{\nu}. By Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity, v(ν^)δE(ν^)vδ(ν^)<P(ν^)=ψ(ν^)(λ+δ)E(ν^)v(\hat{\nu})-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})\le v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})<P(\hat{\nu})=\psi(\hat{\nu})-(\lambda+\delta)\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu}), so v(ν^)<ψ(ν^)λE(ν^)v(\hat{\nu})<\psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu}). As ν^DΣ\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and W2(ν^,μ^)<γW_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})<\gamma, the test condition and The Bundle of Vector Fields over a Set of Measures, Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §shifted give

F(ν^, ψ(ν^)λE(ν^), ψ(ν^)λΣ(ν^), Hψ(ν^)λHE(ν^))=Fλ+(ν^,ψ(ν^),ψ(ν^),Hψ(ν^))0.F\bigl(\hat{\nu},\ \psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu}),\ \nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\Sigma(\hat{\nu}),\ H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})-\lambda H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})\bigr)=F^{+}_{\lambda}\bigl(\hat{\nu},\psi(\hat{\nu}),\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu}),H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})\bigr)\le0 .

We take as witnesses ν=ν^DΣ\nu=\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, π=(id,id)#ν^\pi=(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})_{\#}\hat{\nu}, s=wδ(ν^)s=w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}), q=φ(ν^)q=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu}) and Y=Hφ(ν^)Y=H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}). By The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §displacement with S=idS=\mathrm{id}, πΠ(ν^,ν^)\pi\in\Pi(\hat{\nu},\hat{\nu}) and I(π)=ididν^2=0<ε2I(\pi)=\lVert\mathrm{id}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\hat{\nu}}^{2}=0<\varepsilon^{2}. By The Bundle of Vector Fields over a Set of Measures, Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §shifted, and since wδ(ν^)+δE(ν^)=P(ν^)+δE(ν^)=ψ(ν^)λE(ν^)w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})=P(\hat{\nu})+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu})=\psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu}),

Fδ(ν^,s,q,Y)=F(ν^, ψ(ν^)λE(ν^), ψ(ν^)λΣ(ν^), Hφ(ν^)+δHE(ν^))F(ν^, ψ(ν^)λE(ν^), ψ(ν^)λΣ(ν^), Hψ(ν^)λHE(ν^))0ε,F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(\hat{\nu},s,q,Y\bigr)=F\bigl(\hat{\nu},\ \psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu}),\ \nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\Sigma(\hat{\nu}),\ H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})+\delta H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})\bigr)\le F\bigl(\hat{\nu},\ \psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\nu}),\ \nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\,\Sigma(\hat{\nu}),\ H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})-\lambda H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})\bigr)\le0\le\varepsilon,

the first inequality by Degenerate Elliptic Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space §elliptic applied with Hψ(ν^)λHE(ν^)Hφ(ν^)+δHE(ν^)H_{\psi}(\hat{\nu})-\lambda H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu})\preceq H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})+\delta H_{\mathcal{E}}(\hat{\nu}) (the pair (ν^,ψ(ν^)λΣ(ν^))(\hat{\nu},\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})-\lambda\Sigma(\hat{\nu})) lying in V(DΣ)\mathcal{V}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}), both fields belonging to L2(ν^;Rd)L^{2}(\hat{\nu};\mathbb{R}^{d})). The remaining conditions hold with vanishing left-hand sides: wδ(ν^)wδ(ν^)=0|w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|=0, swδ(ν^)=0|s-w^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|=0, the discrepancy of qq and φ(ν^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu}) along π\pi equals qφ(ν^)ν^2=0\lVert q-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu})\rVert_{\hat{\nu}}^{2}=0 by The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §diagonal, and YHφ(ν^)=0d=0\lVert Y-H_{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})\rVert=\lVert0_{d}\rVert=0 by claim 4 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix; each is less than the corresponding positive bound.

In both cases witnesses exist. As δ\delta, φ\varphi, ν^\hat{\nu} and ε\varepsilon were arbitrary, ww is a viscosity subsolution of FF relative to the penalty pair.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…