TheoremBase

Proof of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product

lemmalem:matrix-vector-product-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial proof: coordinatewise computation for linearity in the vector and for (BA)v = B(Av) (the latter by interchange of the finite double sum), and the norm bound by the coordinate estimate |(Av)_k| <= c_k ||v||, squaring, and summing.

Proof

Two points of a Euclidean space are equal exactly when they agree at every coordinate, so the identities of claims 1 and 2 are proved by computing coordinates. Throughout, (Av)k=i=1nAkivi(Av)_k=\sum_{i=1}^{n}A_{ki}v_i by Matrix-Vector Product; coordinates of sums, differences and scalar multiples of points are computed coordinatewise by Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n; claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Sums are used as additivity and homogeneity of finite sums; and the field axioms of the field R\mathbb{R} are used freely in coordinatewise computations.

Claim 1. Fix a natural number kk with 1km1\le k\le m. Distributivity gives Aki(vi+wi)=Akivi+AkiwiA_{ki}(v_i+w_i)=A_{ki}v_i+A_{ki}w_i for every ii, so additivity of finite sums gives

(A(v+w))k=i=1n(Akivi+Akiwi)=(Av)k+(Aw)k=(Av+Aw)k,\bigl(A(v+w)\bigr)_k=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl(A_{ki}v_i+A_{ki}w_i\bigr)=(Av)_k+(Aw)_k=(Av+Aw)_k ,

which proves the first identity. Commutativity and associativity of multiplication give Aki(μvi)=μ(Akivi)A_{ki}(\mu v_i)=\mu\,(A_{ki}v_i) for every ii, so homogeneity of finite sums gives

(A(μv))k=i=1nμ(Akivi)=μ(Av)k=(μ(Av))k,\bigl(A(\mu v)\bigr)_k=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\mu\,(A_{ki}v_i)=\mu\,(Av)_k=\bigl(\mu\,(Av)\bigr)_k ,

which proves the third identity. For the second, claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space give (vw)+w=v(v-w)+w=v, so the first identity, applied to the points vwv-w and ww, gives A(vw)+Aw=AvA(v-w)+Aw=Av; adding the additive inverse of AwAw to both sides and using claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space again gives A(vw)=AvAwA(v-w)=Av-Aw.

For the fourth identity, note first that 0t=00\,t=0 for every tRt\in\mathbb{R}: indeed 0t+0t=(0+0)t=0t=0t+00\,t+0\,t=(0+0)\,t=0\,t=0\,t+0 by distributivity and the additive-identity axiom, so 0t=00\,t=0 by claim 2 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. Consequently every coordinate of the scalar multiple 0v0\,v is 00, so 0v=0Rn0\,v=0_{\mathbb{R}^n} by The Origin of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and likewise 0(Av)=0Rm0\,(Av)=0_{\mathbb{R}^m}. The third identity with μ=0\mu=0 therefore gives

A0Rn=A(0v)=0(Av)=0Rm.A\,0_{\mathbb{R}^n}=A(0\,v)=0\,(Av)=0_{\mathbb{R}^m}.

Claim 2. Fix a natural number α\alpha with 1αp1\le\alpha\le p. The matrix BABA has pp rows and nn columns, and (BA)αi=j=1mBαjAji(BA)_{\alpha i}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}B_{\alpha j}A_{ji} by Product of Real Matrices, so

((BA)v)α=i=1n(BA)αivi=i=1n(j=1mBαjAji)vi.\bigl((BA)v\bigr)_{\alpha}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(BA)_{\alpha i}\,v_i=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\Bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{m}B_{\alpha j}A_{ji}\Bigr)v_i .

For each fixed ii, homogeneity of finite sums applied to the inner sum with the factor viv_i, together with commutativity and associativity of multiplication, gives

(j=1mBαjAji)vi=j=1mBαjAjivi,\Bigl(\sum_{j=1}^{m}B_{\alpha j}A_{ji}\Bigr)v_i=\sum_{j=1}^{m}B_{\alpha j}A_{ji}v_i ,

so that ((BA)v)α=i=1nj=1mBαjAjivi\bigl((BA)v\bigr)_{\alpha}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{m}B_{\alpha j}A_{ji}v_i. In the same way, for each fixed jj homogeneity applied to the inner sum with the factor BαjB_{\alpha j} gives Bαji=1nAjivi=i=1nBαjAjiviB_{\alpha j}\sum_{i=1}^{n}A_{ji}v_i=\sum_{i=1}^{n}B_{\alpha j}A_{ji}v_i, so that

(B(Av))α=j=1mBαj(Av)j=j=1mi=1nBαjAjivi.\bigl(B(Av)\bigr)_{\alpha}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}B_{\alpha j}(Av)_j=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\sum_{i=1}^{n}B_{\alpha j}A_{ji}v_i .

The two resulting expressions are the two iterated sums of the doubly indexed family whose value at (i,j)(i,j) is BαjAjiviB_{\alpha j}A_{ji}v_i, so they are equal by Interchange of a Finite Double Sum. Hence ((BA)v)α=(B(Av))α\bigl((BA)v\bigr)_{\alpha}=\bigl(B(Av)\bigr)_{\alpha} for every α\alpha, which proves the claim.

Claim 3. Write c=(c1,,cm)c=(c_1,\dots,c_m), a point of Rm\mathbb{R}^m, so that C=cC=\lVert c\rVert.

Nonnegativity. By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have 0Aki0\le|A_{ki}| for all admissible kk and ii, so 0ck0\le c_k for every kk by claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n,

0C,C2=k=1mck2,0\le C,\qquad C^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_k^{2},

and also 0v0\le\lVert v\rVert and 0Av0\le\lVert Av\rVert. Since 0ck0\le c_k and 0v0\le\lVert v\rVert, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to the inequality 0v0\le\lVert v\rVert with the nonnegative factor ckc_k gives ck0ckvc_k\cdot 0\le c_k\lVert v\rVert, and ck0=0c_k\cdot 0=0 as shown in claim 1; hence 0ckv0\le c_k\lVert v\rVert. The same argument gives 0Cv0\le C\lVert v\rVert.

Step 1: a coordinate bound. Fix kk with 1km1\le k\le m. By Matrix-Vector Product and claim 2 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers,

(Av)k=i=1nAkivii=1nAkivi.|(Av)_k|=\Bigl|\sum_{i=1}^{n}A_{ki}v_i\Bigr|\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}|A_{ki}v_i| .

For each ii, claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives Akivi=Akivi|A_{ki}v_i|=|A_{ki}|\,|v_i|, while claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n gives viv|v_i|\le\lVert v\rVert; multiplying the latter inequality by the nonnegative factor Aki|A_{ki}| using claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field yields

Akivi=AkiviAkiv.|A_{ki}v_i|=|A_{ki}|\,|v_i|\le|A_{ki}|\,\lVert v\rVert .

Hence, by claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers and then homogeneity of finite sums with the factor v\lVert v\rVert (using commutativity of multiplication),

i=1nAkivii=1nAkiv=(i=1nAki)v=ckv.\sum_{i=1}^{n}|A_{ki}v_i|\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}|A_{ki}|\,\lVert v\rVert=\Bigl(\sum_{i=1}^{n}|A_{ki}|\Bigr)\lVert v\rVert=c_k\,\lVert v\rVert .

Combining the two displays by transitivity of the order,

(Av)kckv.|(Av)_k|\le c_k\,\lVert v\rVert .

Step 2: squaring the coordinate bound. By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have 0(Av)k0\le|(Av)_k|, and 0ckv0\le c_k\lVert v\rVert was shown above, so claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field applied to the inequality of step 1 gives

(Av)k2(ckv)2=ck2v2,|(Av)_k|^{2}\le\bigl(c_k\lVert v\rVert\bigr)^{2}=c_k^{2}\,\lVert v\rVert^{2},

the equality by commutativity and associativity of multiplication. Moreover (Av)k2=((Av)k)2|(Av)_k|^{2}=\bigl((Av)_k\bigr)^{2}, because by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field the number (Av)k|(Av)_k| is either (Av)k(Av)_k or its additive inverse, and in either case its square is ((Av)k)2\bigl((Av)_k\bigr)^{2}. Therefore

((Av)k)2ck2v2for every k with 1km.\bigl((Av)_k\bigr)^{2}\le c_k^{2}\,\lVert v\rVert^{2}\qquad\text{for every }k\text{ with }1\le k\le m .

Step 3: summing over the coordinates. By claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, then homogeneity of finite sums with the factor v2\lVert v\rVert^{2}, and then the identity C2=k=1mck2C^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_k^{2},

k=1m((Av)k)2k=1mck2v2=(k=1mck2)v2=C2v2=(Cv)2,\sum_{k=1}^{m}\bigl((Av)_k\bigr)^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_k^{2}\,\lVert v\rVert^{2}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_k^{2}\Bigr)\lVert v\rVert^{2}=C^{2}\,\lVert v\rVert^{2}=\bigl(C\,\lVert v\rVert\bigr)^{2},

the last equality again by commutativity and associativity of multiplication. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n applied to the point AvAv of Rm\mathbb{R}^m, the left-hand side equals Av2\lVert Av\rVert^{2}. Thus

Av2(Cv)2.\lVert Av\rVert^{2}\le\bigl(C\,\lVert v\rVert\bigr)^{2}.

Step 4: conclusion. Both Av\lVert Av\rVert and CvC\lVert v\rVert are nonnegative, so claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, read from right to left, gives AvCv\lVert Av\rVert\le C\,\lVert v\rVert. The final assertion of the claim holds with this CC, which does not depend on vv.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…