TheoremBase

Proof of Viscosity Inequalities Pass to Limits of Test-Function Data

lemmalem:viscosity-inequality-limit-test-data-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 3,129 chars · 7 deps · depth 22 Reason: Proof carried onto the 2026b statement: the body of the published proof of 2026a, with only the reference changes required by the revised statement (continuity and approximability now cited from their definition items, viscosity sub- and supersolution moved to 2026c). Provenance recorded in the attached citation.

Both claims are proved by contradiction: if the inequality fails, continuity at the quadruple with a suitable tolerance transfers the sign to a nearby genuine test-function quadruple, contradicting the viscosity inequality there.

Proof

Write c=F(x0,u(x0),p,X)c=F\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr).

Claim 1. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that c0c\le 0 fails. Since the order on R\mathbb{R} is a total order, this means 0<c0<c.

Apply Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator §at-point, the continuity of FF at (x0,u(x0),p,X)\bigl(x_{0},u(x_{0}),p,X\bigr), with ε=c\varepsilon=c: there is δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ0<\delta such that every yUy\in U, sRs\in\mathbb{R}, qRnq\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and YS(n)Y\in\mathcal{S}(n) with

dE(y,x0)<δ,su(x0)<δ,qp<δ,dS(n)(Y,X)<δd_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta,\quad |s-u(x_{0})|<\delta,\quad \lVert q-p\rVert<\delta,\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X)<\delta

satisfies F(y,s,q,Y)c<c\bigl|F(y,s,q,Y)-c\bigr|<c.

Apply Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data §above with ε=δ\varepsilon=\delta: there are yUy\in U and φ:UR\varphi:U\to\mathbb{R} of class C2C^{2} on UU such that uφu-\varphi has a local maximum at yy relative to UU and

dE(y,x0)<δ,u(y)u(x0)<δ,Dφ(y)p<δ,dS(n)(D2φ(y),X)<δ.d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta,\quad |u(y)-u(x_{0})|<\delta,\quad \lVert D\varphi(y)-p\rVert<\delta,\quad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(y),X\bigr)<\delta .

Thus the quadruple (y,u(y),Dφ(y),D2φ(y))\bigl(y,u(y),D\varphi(y),D^{2}\varphi(y)\bigr) satisfies the four conditions above, with s=u(y)s=u(y), q=Dφ(y)q=D\varphi(y) and Y=D2φ(y)Y=D^{2}\varphi(y); recall that YY lies in S(n)\mathcal{S}(n) by Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets §test-functions. Writing

a=F(y,u(y),Dφ(y),D2φ(y)),a=F\bigl(y,u(y),D\varphi(y),D^{2}\varphi(y)\bigr),

we therefore have ac<c|a-c|<c, and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives c<ac-c<a-c, whence 0<a0<a by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

On the other hand uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF on UU, and φ\varphi is of class C2C^{2} on UU with uφu-\varphi having a local maximum at yUy\in U relative to UU, so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives a0a\le 0. Together with 0<a0<a this yields 0<00<0 by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, which is false. Hence c0c\le 0, which is claim 1.

Claim 2. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that 0c0\le c fails; by totality of the order, c<0c<0, and by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field the element c-c satisfies 0<c0<-c.

Apply Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator §at-point with ε=c\varepsilon=-c, obtaining δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ0<\delta as above, and then Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data §below with ε=δ\varepsilon=\delta, obtaining yUy\in U and φ:UR\varphi:U\to\mathbb{R} of class C2C^{2} on UU such that uφu-\varphi has a local minimum at yy relative to UU and the four displayed conditions hold. With

a=F(y,u(y),Dφ(y),D2φ(y))a=F\bigl(y,u(y),D\varphi(y),D^{2}\varphi(y)\bigr)

we get ac<c|a-c|<-c, and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives ac<ca-c<-c, whence a<0a<0 by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

On the other hand uu is a viscosity supersolution of FF on UU and uφu-\varphi has a local minimum at yy relative to UU, so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives 0a0\le a. Together with a<0a<0 this yields 0<00<0 by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, which is false. Hence 0c0\le c, which is claim 2.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…