Both claims are proved by contradiction: if the inequality fails, continuity at the quadruple with a suitable tolerance transfers the sign to a nearby genuine test-function quadruple, contradicting the viscosity inequality there.
Write .
Claim 1. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that fails. Since the order on is a total order, this means .
Apply Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator (i), the continuity of at , with : there is with such that every , , and with
satisfies .
Apply Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data (i) with : there are and of class on such that has a local maximum at relative to and
Thus the quadruple satisfies the four conditions above, with , and ; recall that lies in by Second-Order Equations on Euclidean Open Sets (iv). Writing
we therefore have , and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives , whence by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
On the other hand is a viscosity subsolution of on , and is of class on with having a local maximum at relative to , so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives . Together with this yields by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, which is false. Hence , which is claim 1.
Claim 2. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that fails; by totality of the order, , and by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field the element satisfies .
Apply Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator (i) with , obtaining with as above, and then Quadruple Approximable by Test-Function Data (ii) with , obtaining and of class on such that has a local minimum at relative to and the four displayed conditions hold. With
we get , and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives , whence by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
On the other hand is a viscosity supersolution of on and has a local minimum at relative to , so Viscosity Subsolution and Supersolution of a Second-Order Equation gives . Together with this yields by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, which is false. Hence , which is claim 2.
Loadingβ¦