TheoremBase

The integrand is the pointwise dot product of two square-integrable fields against the coupling, so the pairing is an inner product in that space; the bound is Cauchy-Schwarz, and the displacement and constant cases are computed by change of variables.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement above. Throughout, pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} and pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} are Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v), and (pr1)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu, (pr2)#π=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\nu by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i).

Claim 1. Fix a representative of η\eta, again written η\eta: a Borel map Rd→Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∫Rd∥η∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, as Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii) describes the elements of L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}).

The composite η∘pr1:Rd+d→Rd\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} is Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii). Its squared norm is Borel and nonnegative by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv) and Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, and by the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv) applied to pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1},

∫Rd+d∥η∘pr1∥2 dπ=∫Rd∥η∥2 dμ=∥η∥μ2<∞.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}\rVert^{2}\,d\pi=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}<\infty .

Hence the class of η∘pr1\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} belongs to L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and has norm ∥η∥μ\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu} there, by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii). By The Coordinate Fields of a Coupling, and the Second Moment as a Lipschitz Function of the Wasserstein Distance (i), read with dd in place of the dimension mm there, the classes of pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} and pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} belong to L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with

∥pr1−pr2∥π2=I(π),\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert_{\pi}^{2}=I(\pi),

so ∥pr1−pr2∥π=I(π)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert_{\pi}=\sqrt{I(\pi)} by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, the norm being nonnegative.

Both η∘pr1\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} and pr1−pr2\mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2} are thus elements of L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}), so by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii), which fixes the inner product of that space as the integral of the pointwise dot product of representatives, the function z↦η(x)⋅(x−y)z\mapsto\eta(x)\cdot(x-y) is integrable with respect to π\pi and

∫Rd+dη(x)⋅(x−y) π(dz)=⟨η∘pr1, pr1−pr2⟩π.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\eta(x)\cdot(x-y)\,\pi(dz)=\bigl\langle\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\ \mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\bigr\rangle_{\pi}.

The function z↦η(x)⋅(y−x)z\mapsto\eta(x)\cdot(y-x) is (−1)(-1) times this integrand, by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field together with the bilinearity of the dot product, The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite; it is therefore Borel and integrable with respect to π\pi, with

J(η,π)=−⟨η∘pr1, pr1−pr2⟩π,\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi)=-\bigl\langle\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\ \mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\bigr\rangle_{\pi},

by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion applied with the scalars −1-1 and 00.

It remains to see that this number does not depend on the representative. Let η′\eta' be another representative of the same class, so that μ({η=η′})=1\mu(\{\eta=\eta'\})=1 by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii). The map η−η′\eta-\eta' is Borel, its components being differences of Borel real functions by claim 2 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps and a map into Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with Borel components being Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii); the set {η=η′}\{\eta=\eta'\} is its preimage of the one-point set {0Rd}\{0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\}, which is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (v), and is therefore Borel. Hence N=Rd∖{η=η′}N=\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus\{\eta=\eta'\} is Borel, being the complement of a Borel set, and μ(N)=0\mu(N)=0 by claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure, μ\mu being finite with μ(Rd)=1\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1. Since (pr1)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu, the Borel set pr1−1(N)\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(N) satisfies π(pr1−1(N))=μ(N)=0\pi(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(N))=\mu(N)=0 by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv). Off pr1−1(N)\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(N) the two integrands z↦η(x)⋅(y−x)z\mapsto\eta(x)\cdot(y-x) and z↦η′(x)⋅(y−x)z\mapsto\eta'(x)\cdot(y-x) agree, so they agree π\pi-almost everywhere and their integrals coincide by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii).

Claim 2. By claim 1 and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in the real inner product space L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}),

∣J(η,π)∣=∣⟨η∘pr1, pr1−pr2⟩π∣≤∥η∘pr1∥π ∥pr1−pr2∥π=∥η∥μ I(π),\bigl|\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi)\bigr|=\bigl|\bigl\langle\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\ \mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\bigr\rangle_{\pi}\bigr|\le\lVert\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}\rVert_{\pi}\,\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}-\mathrm{pr}_{2}\rVert_{\pi}=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}\,\sqrt{I(\pi)},

the first equality using the symmetry of the absolute value, claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and the last the two norm computations of claim 1.

Claim 3. If η\eta and ξ\xi are represented by Borel maps and a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}, then aη+bξa\eta+b\xi is represented by the pointwise combination x↦a η(x)+b ξ(x)x\mapsto a\,\eta(x)+b\,\xi(x), by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii), and the value (a η(x)+b ξ(x))⋅(y−x)(a\,\eta(x)+b\,\xi(x))\cdot(y-x) equals a (η(x)⋅(y−x))+b (ξ(x)⋅(y−x))a\,(\eta(x)\cdot(y-x))+b\,(\xi(x)\cdot(y-x)) for every zz, by the bilinearity of the dot product, The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite. Both z↦η(x)⋅(y−x)z\mapsto\eta(x)\cdot(y-x) and z↦ξ(x)⋅(y−x)z\mapsto\xi(x)\cdot(y-x) are π\pi-integrable by claim 1, so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion gives the asserted identity.

Claim 4. By hypothesis S−idS-\mathrm{id} is a Borel map with ∫Rd∥S−id∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S-\mathrm{id}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, so its class belongs to L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii), with ∥S−id∥μ2=∫Rd∥S−id∥2 dμ\lVert S-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S-\mathrm{id}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu. Since id\mathrm{id} belongs to L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (ii) and that space is a real vector space by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii), the class of S=(S−id)+idS=(S-\mathrm{id})+\mathrm{id} belongs to it too, so ∫Rd∥S∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty and S#μ∈P2(Rd)S_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class (i).

By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound (iv), applied with id\mathrm{id} and SS in the roles of the two Borel maps, πS=(id,S)#μ\pi_{S}=(\mathrm{id},S)_{\#}\mu belongs to Π(id#μ,S#μ)=Π(μ,S#μ)\Pi(\mathrm{id}_{\#}\mu,S_{\#}\mu)=\Pi(\mu,S_{\#}\mu), the push-forward of μ\mu by the identity being μ\mu by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv), and

I(πS)=∫Rd∥x−S(x)∥2 μ(dx)=∥S−id∥μ2,I(\pi_{S})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x-S(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\lVert S-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\mu}^{2},

the second equality because ∥x−S(x)∥=∥S(x)−x∥\lVert x-S(x)\rVert=\lVert S(x)-x\rVert for every xx, by the absolute homogeneity of the Euclidean norm, claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, applied with the scalar −1-1.

For the pairing, the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv) applied to the Borel map (id,S)(\mathrm{id},S) and to the πS\pi_{S}-integrable function z↦η(x)⋅(y−x)z\mapsto\eta(x)\cdot(y-x) of claim 1 gives, using pr1((id,S)(x))=x\mathrm{pr}_{1}((\mathrm{id},S)(x))=x and pr2((id,S)(x))=S(x)\mathrm{pr}_{2}((\mathrm{id},S)(x))=S(x) from Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i),

J(η,πS)=∫Rdη(x)⋅(S(x)−x) μ(dx)=⟨η, S−id⟩μ,\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi_{S})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\eta(x)\cdot\bigl(S(x)-x\bigr)\,\mu(dx)=\langle\eta,\,S-\mathrm{id}\rangle_{\mu},

the last equality by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii), both classes lying in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Claim 5. The constant map with value cc is Borel, being continuous. For any probability measure λ\lambda on a Euclidean space, the constant function with value ∥c∥2\lVert c\rVert^{2} is ∥c∥2 1\lVert c\rVert^{2}\,\mathbf{1} on that space, so its integral against λ\lambda is ∥c∥2\lVert c\rVert^{2} by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion for the nonnegative scalar ∥c∥2\lVert c\rVert^{2}, by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set and by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii). Applying this with λ=μ\lambda=\mu shows that the class η\eta of the constant map lies in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), and applying it with λ=π\lambda=\pi shows that the class of the constant map on Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} with value cc lies in L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}).

By claim 1 the function z↦c⋅(y−x)z\mapsto c\cdot(y-x) is π\pi-integrable, and by the bilinearity of the dot product, The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite, it equals c⋅y−c⋅xc\cdot y-c\cdot x pointwise. The functions z↦c⋅pr2(z)z\mapsto c\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z) and z↦c⋅pr1(z)z\mapsto c\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z) are π\pi-integrable, being the pointwise dot products of that constant class of L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) with the classes of pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} and of pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1}, which lie in L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by The Coordinate Fields of a Coupling, and the Second Moment as a Lipschitz Function of the Wasserstein Distance (i), the integrability of a pointwise dot product of two elements of that space being recorded in Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii); so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion gives

J(η,π)=∫Rd+dc⋅pr2 dπ−∫Rd+dc⋅pr1 dπ.\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}c\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{2}\,d\pi-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}c\cdot\mathrm{pr}_{1}\,d\pi .

By the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv) applied to pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} and to pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1}, these two integrals are ∫Rdc⋅y ν(dy)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}c\cdot y\,\nu(dy) and ∫Rdc⋅x μ(dx)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}c\cdot x\,\mu(dx). Writing c⋅x=∑i=1dcixic\cdot x=\sum_{i=1}^{d}c_{i}x_{i} by Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n and using claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion together with claim 1 of The Mean of a Square-Integrable Probability Measure, Its Lift, Its Centring, and Functions of the Mean and Centred Integrals as Test Functions, which supplies the integrability of each coordinate map and the identity m(μ)i=∫Rdxi μ(dx)m(\mu)_{i}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}x_{i}\,\mu(dx), the second integral equals ∑i=1dci m(μ)i=c⋅m(μ)\sum_{i=1}^{d}c_{i}\,m(\mu)_{i}=c\cdot m(\mu), and likewise the first equals c⋅m(ν)c\cdot m(\nu). Subtracting and using The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite once more gives J(η,π)=c⋅(m(ν)−m(μ))\mathcal{J}(\eta,\pi)=c\cdot(m(\nu)-m(\mu)).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…