TheoremBase

Proof of The Langevin Free-Energy Pair is a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair: Growth Bounds, Continuity of the Translation Hessian, and the First Variation of the Penalty

lemmalem:langevin-free-energy-penalty-pair-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 14,812 chars · 38 deps · depth 33 Reason: E2 Stage 2: proof that the Langevin free-energy pair is a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair.

Energy bounds combine a quadratic minorant of V with the Gaussian lower bound for the entropy. Gaussian smoothing of retracted measures lands in the score domain, which gives nonemptiness and density. The first variation adds the entropy variation to the potential variation, and translations act only on V. Coercivity comes from superquadratic compactness and closed entropy sublevel sets; the Hessian bounds from the curvature condition.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding, multiplying and comparing inequalities between real numbers (among them the positivity of σ22\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}, σ24\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{4} and their inverses), and the properties of the absolute value in Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, are used without further mention. Integrals of nonnegative Borel functions are taken in [0,][0,\infty]; linearity and monotonicity of integrals are claim 1 (nonnegative functions) and claim 2 (integrable functions, used only after integrability has been established) of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. Change of variables under a push-forward, including the transfer of integrability, is that of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward. By The Langevin Free-Energy Pair of a Confining Potential on the Wasserstein Space §pair, DΣDP2Ent(Rd)P2(Rd)\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), E\mathcal{E} is real-valued on D\mathcal{D}, VV is μ\mu-integrable for μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}, and Σ(μ)Tμ\Sigma(\mu)\in T_{\mu} for μDΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}.

Constants. By Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability §growth fix v0v_{0} and Cg0C_{g}\ge0 with v0Vv_{0}\le V and V(x+a)v0+1exp(Cga)(V(x)v0+1)V(x+a)-v_{0}+1\le\exp(C_{g}\lVert a\rVert)(V(x)-v_{0}+1); put u=Vv0+11u=V-v_{0}+1\ge1 and A0=1+v01A_{0}=1+|v_{0}-1|, so that VA0u|V|\le A_{0}u and 1+V(1+A0)u1+|V|\le(1+A_{0})u. Taking x=0Rdx=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} and a=ya=y, and using DVCs(1+V)\lVert DV\rVert\le C_{s}(1+|V|) with Cs0C_{s}\ge0 from Confining Potentials on Euclidean Space §slope (nonnegative since 0DV(0Rd)0\le\lVert DV(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})\rVert), we get for every yRdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d}

V(y)A0u(0Rd)exp(Cgy),V(y)2(Cs(1+A0)u(0Rd))2exp(2Cgy),(X)|V(y)|\le A_{0}u(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})\exp(C_{g}\lVert y\rVert),\qquad\lVert\nabla V(y)\rVert^{2}\le\bigl(C_{s}(1+A_{0})u(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})\bigr)^{2}\exp(2C_{g}\lVert y\rVert),\tag{X}

using exp(s)exp(s)=exp(2s)\exp(s)\exp(s)=\exp(2s) (Basic Properties of the Exponential Function). By Confining Potentials on Euclidean Space §curvature with ε=1\varepsilon=1 fix C1C_{1} with ΔVV+C1\Delta V\le|V|+C_{1}. Let c1c_{1} be the constant of Basic Properties of the Entropy on the Wasserstein Space: Comparison with the Gaussian Relative Entropy, Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Absolute Continuity, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity and γ=σ22logc1\gamma=\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\log c_{1}. By Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability §minorant with M=σ24+1>0M=\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{4}+1>0 fix CMC_{M} with Mx2CMV(x)M\lVert x\rVert^{2}-C_{M}\le V(x) for all xx.

Step E (energy bounds). Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}. Integrating the minorant, MM2(μ)CMVdμM\,M_{2}(\mu)-C_{M}\le\int V\,d\mu; and logc112M2(μ)Ent(μ)\log c_{1}-\tfrac12M_{2}(\mu)\le\mathrm{Ent}(\mu) by Basic Properties of the Entropy on the Wasserstein Space: Comparison with the Gaussian Relative Entropy, Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Absolute Continuity, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §lower. Hence E(μ)γσ24M2(μ)+MM2(μ)CM=γ+M2(μ)CM\mathcal{E}(\mu)\ge\gamma-\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{4}M_{2}(\mu)+M\,M_{2}(\mu)-C_{M}=\gamma+M_{2}(\mu)-C_{M}, that is

M2(μ)E(μ)γ+CM.(E1)M_{2}(\mu)\le\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\gamma+C_{M}.\tag{E1}

Next Vdμ=E(μ)σ22Ent(μ)E(μ)γ+σ24M2(μ)\int V\,d\mu=\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)\le\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\gamma+\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{4}M_{2}(\mu), so by (E1)

Vdμβ0E(μ)+b0,β0=1+σ24,b0=σ24CMβ0γ.(E2)\int V\,d\mu\le\beta_{0}\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)+b_{0},\qquad\beta_{0}=1+\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{4},\quad b_{0}=\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{4}C_{M}-\beta_{0}\gamma.\tag{E2}

Finally Vdμv0\int V\,d\mu\ge v_{0} gives

Ent(μ)=2σ2(E(μ)Vdμ)2σ2(E(μ)v0).(E3)\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)=\tfrac{2}{\sigma^{2}}\Bigl(\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\int V\,d\mu\Bigr)\le\tfrac{2}{\sigma^{2}}\bigl(\mathcal{E}(\mu)-v_{0}\bigr).\tag{E3}

Step S (smoothing). Let ρP(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) satisfy ρ(Bˉ(0Rd,R))=1\rho(\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},R))=1 for some real R0R\ge0, with Bˉ\bar{B} as in Euclidean Space and Lebesgue Measure: Standing Notation §space. Then y2R2\lVert y\rVert^{2}\le R^{2} for ρ\rho-almost every yy, so M2(ρ)R2M_{2}(\rho)\le R^{2} (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison) and ρP2(Rd)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). For real ss with 0<s120<s\le\tfrac12 let ρs\rho_{s} be the measure μs\mu_{s} of Gaussian Smoothing of a Measure with Finite Second Moment: Positive Density, Finite Entropy, a Tangent Score, Non-Increasing Fisher Information and Exponential Integrability built from ρ\rho. We show ρsDΣ\rho_{s}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and W2(ρs,ρ)2dsW_{2}(\rho_{s},\rho)^{2}\le d\,s. By Gaussian Smoothing of a Measure with Finite Second Moment: Positive Density, Finite Entropy, a Tangent Score, Non-Increasing Fisher Information and Exponential Integrability §density, Gaussian Smoothing of a Measure with Finite Second Moment: Positive Density, Finite Entropy, a Tangent Score, Non-Increasing Fisher Information and Exponential Integrability §entropy and Gaussian Smoothing of a Measure with Finite Second Moment: Positive Density, Finite Entropy, a Tangent Score, Non-Increasing Fisher Information and Exponential Integrability §score, ρsP2Ent(Rd)P2I(Rd)\rho_{s}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\cap\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and W2(ρs,ρ)2dsW_{2}(\rho_{s},\rho)^{2}\le d\,s. The functions VV (continuous, hence Borel) and V2\lVert\nabla V\rVert^{2} (Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, V\nabla V being Borel by Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability §regularity) satisfy the exponential bounds (X), so both are ρs\rho_{s}-integrable by Gaussian Smoothing of a Measure with Finite Second Moment: Positive Density, Finite Entropy, a Tangent Score, Non-Increasing Fisher Information and Exponential Integrability §exponential. Hence ρsD\rho_{s}\in\mathcal{D} and then ρsDΣ\rho_{s}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}.

Claim 5 (first variation on D\mathcal{D}). Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} and ψCc(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). By The First Variation of the Entropy Along a Gradient Perturbation of the Identity §variation there is t1>0t_{1}>0 with (id+tψ)#μP2Ent(Rd)(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi)_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) for t(t1,t1)t\in(-t_{1},t_{1}) and tEnt((id+tψ)#μ)t\mapsto\mathrm{Ent}((\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi)_{\#}\mu) differentiable at 00 with derivative Δψdμ-\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu. By The Potential Energy of a Confining Potential: Smoothness in Translations, First Variation, Closed Sublevel Sets and Convergence at Bounded Energy §variation, Vψ\nabla V\cdot\nabla\psi is μ\mu-integrable, and for every tt the function V(id+tψ)V\circ(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi) is μ\mu-integrable, so VV is (id+tψ)#μ(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi)_{\#}\mu-integrable with Vd(id+tψ)#μ=FV(t):=V(x+tψ(x))μ(dx)\int V\,d(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi)_{\#}\mu=F_{V}(t):=\int V(x+t\nabla\psi(x))\,\mu(dx), and FVF_{V} is differentiable at 00 with derivative Vψdμ\int\nabla V\cdot\nabla\psi\,d\mu. Put t0=t1t_{0}=t_{1}. For t(t0,t0)t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}), (id+tψ)#μD(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi)_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D} and E((id+tψ)#μ)=σ22Ent((id+tψ)#μ)+FV(t)\mathcal{E}((\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi)_{\#}\mu)=\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\mathrm{Ent}((\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi)_{\#}\mu)+F_{V}(t). Restricting FVF_{V} to (t0,t0)(-t_{0},t_{0}) (claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative) and using claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, this function is differentiable at 00 with derivative Vψdμσ22Δψdμ\int\nabla V\cdot\nabla\psi\,d\mu-\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu.

Claim 1 (penalty pair). We verify the five conditions of Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §nonempty. Let γdP(Rd)\gamma_{d}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) be the measure of Basic Properties of the Entropy on the Wasserstein Space: Comparison with the Gaussian Relative Entropy, Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Absolute Continuity, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity and ρ=(P1)#γd\rho=(P_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{d}, with P1P_{1} the radial retraction of Radial Retraction onto a Closed Ball: Compactly Supported Approximation in the Wasserstein Distance (dimension dd, R=1R=1). By Radial Retraction onto a Closed Ball: Compactly Supported Approximation in the Wasserstein Distance §retraction, ρ(Bˉ(0Rd,1))=1\rho(\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},1))=1, and Step S gives ρ1/2DΣ\rho_{1/2}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §bound. Put C=γ+CM0C=|\gamma|+|C_{M}|\ge0. For μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}, by (E1), E(μ)γCM+M2(μ)CC(1+M2(μ))\mathcal{E}(\mu)\ge\gamma-C_{M}+M_{2}(\mu)\ge-C\ge-C(1+M_{2}(\mu)).

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §translation, and the translation Hessian. Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} and aRda\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, with τa(x)=x+a\tau_{a}(x)=x+a (The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation §constants). By Basic Properties of the Entropy on the Wasserstein Space: Comparison with the Gaussian Relative Entropy, Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Absolute Continuity, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §translation, (τa)#μP2Ent(Rd)(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and Ent((τa)#μ)=Ent(μ)\mathrm{Ent}((\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu)=\mathrm{Ent}(\mu). By Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability §integrable, xV(x+a)x\mapsto V(x+a) is μ\mu-integrable, so VV is (τa)#μ(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu-integrable with integral Φμ(a)\Phi_{\mu}(a), the function of The Potential Energy of a Confining Potential: Smoothness in Translations, First Variation, Closed Sublevel Sets and Convergence at Bounded Energy §translation. Hence (τa)#μD(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D} and eμ(a)=σ22Ent(μ)+Φμ(a)e_{\mu}(a)=\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)+\Phi_{\mu}(a). The constant function is smooth (claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set) and Φμ\Phi_{\mu} is of class C2C^{2} (The Potential Energy of a Confining Potential: Smoothness in Translations, First Variation, Closed Sublevel Sets and Convergence at Bounded Energy §translation), so eμe_{\mu} is of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set), with jieμ=jiΦμ\partial_{j}\partial_{i}e_{\mu}=\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\Phi_{\mu} by claim 1 there, the partial derivatives of a constant being 00. By Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function, each entry of HE(μ)=D2eμ(0Rd)H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)=D^{2}e_{\mu}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}) is a second partial derivative jieμ(0Rd)=jiΦμ(0Rd)=jiVdμ\partial_{j}\partial_{i}e_{\mu}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\Phi_{\mu}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=\int\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V\,d\mu, and the corresponding entry of D2V(x)D^{2}V(x) is jiV(x)\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V(x); each such function, and ΔV\Delta V, is μ\mu-integrable by Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability §integrable. By the definition of the trace, trHE(μ)=i=1diiVdμ=i=1diiVdμ=ΔVdμ\mathrm{tr}\,H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\int\partial_{i}\partial_{i}V\,d\mu=\int\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}V\,d\mu=\int\Delta V\,d\mu, by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral applied d1d-1 times and The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian. This proves the second sentence of Claim 1.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §variation. Let μDΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and ψCc(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). Claim 5 gives t0t_{0} and the derivative Vψdμσ22Δψdμ\int\nabla V\cdot\nabla\psi\,d\mu-\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu. By Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, V,ψμ=Vψdμ\langle\nabla V,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\int\nabla V\cdot\nabla\psi\,d\mu, and by Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure §score, ξμ,ψμ=Δψdμ\langle\xi_{\mu},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=-\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu; by bilinearity of the inner product the derivative equals V+σ22ξμ,ψμ=Σ(μ),ψμ\langle\nabla V+\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}\xi_{\mu},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\Sigma(\mu),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §dense. Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} and ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Radial Retraction onto a Closed Ball: Compactly Supported Approximation in the Wasserstein Distance §approximation choose R>0R>0 with W2(ρ,μ)<ε/2W_{2}(\rho,\mu)<\varepsilon/2, where ρ=(PR)#μ\rho=(P_{R})_{\#}\mu, and ρ(Bˉ(0Rd,R))=1\rho(\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},R))=1 by Radial Retraction onto a Closed Ball: Compactly Supported Approximation in the Wasserstein Distance §retraction. Let ss be the lesser of 12\tfrac12 and ε2(8d)1\varepsilon^{2}(8d)^{-1}, with dd read in R\mathbb{R}; by Step S, ρsDΣ\rho_{s}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and W2(ρs,ρ)2dsε2/8<(ε/2)2W_{2}(\rho_{s},\rho)^{2}\le ds\le\varepsilon^{2}/8<(\varepsilon/2)^{2}, so W2(ρs,ρ)<ε/2W_{2}(\rho_{s},\rho)<\varepsilon/2 (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field). By The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §triangle, W2(ρs,μ)<εW_{2}(\rho_{s},\mu)<\varepsilon.

So (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) is a penalty pair, and Claim 1 is proved.

Claim 2 (coercivity and the map property). Let cRc\in\mathbb{R} and let (μn)n(\mu_{n})_{n} be a sequence in Sc={μD:E(μ)c}S_{c}=\{\mu\in\mathcal{D}:\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le c\}. By (E2), Vdμnβ0c+b0\int V\,d\mu_{n}\le\beta_{0}c+b_{0} for every nn. The function VV is Borel, bounded below by v0v_{0}, and superquadratic in the sense of Wasserstein Convergence from Weak Convergence with Uniformly Integrable Second Moments, and Wasserstein Compactness under a Superquadratic Moment Bound §compactness by Confining Potentials on Euclidean Space §superquadratic; that clause (with m=dm=d) gives μP2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and a strictly increasing (nk)k(n_{k})_{k} with W2(μnk,μ)0W_{2}(\mu_{n_{k}},\mu)\to0. By (E3), Ent(μnk)2σ2(cv0)\mathrm{Ent}(\mu_{n_{k}})\le\tfrac{2}{\sigma^{2}}(c-v_{0}), so Basic Properties of the Entropy on the Wasserstein Space: Comparison with the Gaussian Relative Entropy, Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Absolute Continuity, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §closed gives μP2Ent(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}); and The Potential Energy of a Confining Potential: Smoothness in Translations, First Variation, Closed Sublevel Sets and Convergence at Bounded Energy §closed gives that VV is μ\mu-integrable, so μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Basic Properties of the Entropy on the Wasserstein Space: Comparison with the Gaussian Relative Entropy, Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Absolute Continuity, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §lsc and claim 1 of Sequential Characterization of Lower Semicontinuity on a Subset of a Metric Space (the sequence (μnk)k(\mu_{n_{k}})_{k} lies in P2Ent(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and converges there to μ\mu) there is N1N_{1} with Ent(μ)ε<Ent(μnk)\mathrm{Ent}(\mu)-\varepsilon<\mathrm{Ent}(\mu_{n_{k}}) for kN1k\ge N_{1}, and by The Potential Energy of a Confining Potential: Smoothness in Translations, First Variation, Closed Sublevel Sets and Convergence at Bounded Energy §closed there is N2N_{2} with Vdμε<Vdμnk\int V\,d\mu-\varepsilon<\int V\,d\mu_{n_{k}} for kN2k\ge N_{2} (the indices nkkn_{k}\ge k being large with kk). For kk at least the larger of N1,N2N_{1},N_{2}, E(μ)(σ22+1)ε<E(μnk)c\mathcal{E}(\mu)-(\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{2}+1)\varepsilon<\mathcal{E}(\mu_{n_{k}})\le c. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, E(μ)c\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le c (Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack), so μSc\mu\in S_{c}. Thus ScS_{c} is sequentially compact in (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}), and the pair is Wasserstein-coercive (Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pairs §coercive). Every μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} has finite entropy and is therefore absolutely continuous by Basic Properties of the Entropy on the Wasserstein Space: Comparison with the Gaussian Relative Entropy, Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Absolute Continuity, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §absolutely-continuous; so D\mathcal{D} has the map property by Two Sufficient Conditions for the Map Property: Absolute Continuity, and Atomlessness on the Line §absolutely-continuous.

Claim 3 (semicontinuity and growth). By Claims 1 and 2 the pair is a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair, so E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} by Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §lsc. Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}. By (E1), M2(μ)E(μ)+γ+CMc1(1+E(μ))M_{2}(\mu)\le|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|+|\gamma|+|C_{M}|\le c_{1}'(1+|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|) with c1=1+γ+CMc_{1}'=1+|\gamma|+|C_{M}|. By Claim 1, Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability §hessian (0ΔV0\le\Delta V), the choice of C1C_{1}, V(Vv0)+v0|V|\le(V-v_{0})+|v_{0}| and (E2),

0trHE(μ)=ΔVdμVdμv0+v0+C1β0E(μ)+b0+2v0+C1,0\le\mathrm{tr}\,H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)=\int\Delta V\,d\mu\le\int V\,d\mu-v_{0}+|v_{0}|+|C_{1}|\le\beta_{0}|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|+|b_{0}|+2|v_{0}|+|C_{1}|,

so trHE(μ)c2(1+E(μ))|\mathrm{tr}\,H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)|\le c_{2}'(1+|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|) with c2=β0+b0+2v0+C1c_{2}'=\beta_{0}+|b_{0}|+2|v_{0}|+|C_{1}|. Take C=c1+c2C=c_{1}'+c_{2}'.

Claim 4 (continuity of the trace of the translation Hessian). Let R>0R>0 and SR={μD:E(μ)R}S_{R}=\{\mu\in\mathcal{D}:|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|\le R\}. By Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §on-subset it suffices to show: if μk,μSR\mu_{k},\mu\in S_{R} and W2(μk,μ)0W_{2}(\mu_{k},\mu)\to0, then trHE(μk)trHE(μ)\mathrm{tr}\,H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu_{k})\to\mathrm{tr}\,H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu). By (E2), Vdμkβ0R+b0\int V\,d\mu_{k}\le\beta_{0}R+b_{0} for every kk. The function ΔV\Delta V is continuous (Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability §regularity) and, being nonnegative, satisfies ΔV=ΔVεV+Cε|\Delta V|=\Delta V\le\varepsilon|V|+C_{\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 with CεC_{\varepsilon} from Confining Potentials on Euclidean Space §curvature. So The Potential Energy of a Confining Potential: Smoothness in Translations, First Variation, Closed Sublevel Sets and Convergence at Bounded Energy §convergence with h=ΔVh=\Delta V and c=β0R+b0c=\beta_{0}R+b_{0} gives ΔVdμkΔVdμ\int\Delta V\,d\mu_{k}\to\int\Delta V\,d\mu, which by Claim 1 is the assertion. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…