TheoremBase

Minus the free entropy has the lower bound and closed-sublevel clauses by an earlier corollary and the tangent clause by hypothesis, so it is a free entropy penalty; the linear-quadratic comparison and uniqueness corollary, which holds for every free entropy penalty, then applies.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Claim 1. By Voiculescu's Non-Microstates Free Entropy of a Noncommutative Law §domain, Dχ\mathcal{D}_{\chi} is a subset of Σd\Sigma_{d}, and by Voiculescu's Non-Microstates Free Entropy of a Noncommutative Law §entropy, χ∗(λ)\chi^{*}(\lambda) is a real number for every λ∈Dχ\lambda\in\mathcal{D}_{\chi}; hence −χ∗-\chi^{*} is a function Dχ→R\mathcal{D}_{\chi}\to\mathbb{R}. The pair (Dχ,−χ∗)(\mathcal{D}_{\chi},-\chi^{*}) satisfies the lower bound clause by Minus the Free Entropy Is Bounded Below on Bounded Laws and Has Weak-Star Closed Sublevel Sets §lower, the closed sublevel set clause by Minus the Free Entropy Is Bounded Below on Bounded Laws and Has Weak-Star Closed Sublevel Sets §closed, and the tangent inequality clause by the hypothesis of the statement. These are the three properties required in Free Entropy Penalties: Displacement Convexity with Minus the Conjugate Variables as Gradient, so (Dχ,−χ∗)(\mathcal{D}_{\chi},-\chi^{*}) is a free entropy penalty.

Claims 2 and 3. By claim 1, the pair (D0,E0)=(Dχ,−χ∗)(\mathcal{D}_{0},\mathcal{E}_{0})=(\mathcal{D}_{\chi},-\chi^{*}) is a free entropy penalty, as The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §free-energy requires, so the setting of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation may be adopted with it. Comparison and Uniqueness for the Linear-Quadratic HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws is stated in that setting for an arbitrary free entropy penalty; with this penalty its domain D\mathcal{D}, its data ff, (bμ)(b_{\mu}), HLQ\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{LQ}}, its equation (ELQ)(\mathrm{E}^{\mathrm{LQ}}) and its hypotheses on AA, cc and ff are exactly those of claims 2 and 3. Hence claim 2 is Comparison and Uniqueness for the Linear-Quadratic HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws §comparison and claim 3 is Comparison and Uniqueness for the Linear-Quadratic HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws §uniqueness, both applied to the free entropy penalty (Dχ,−χ∗)(\mathcal{D}_{\chi},-\chi^{*}).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…