TheoremBase

Proof of Displacement Convexity of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line

lemmalem:logarithmic-energy-displacement-convex-line-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 26,378 chars · 48 deps · depth 38 Reason: E1: proof of displacement convexity of the logarithmic energy on the line.

The free-score identity is extended to Lipschitz functions; the optimal coupling is given by a nondecreasing map, whose difference-quotient integral is bounded by its pairing with the free score through monotone Lipschitz approximation and Fatou; the inequality -log r >= 1 - r then gives the tangent inequality.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field for adding, multiplying and scaling inequalities and for absolute values are used without further mention, as are the rules for limits of sums, products and quotients of convergent real sequences and the fact that a non-strict inequality between the terms of convergent real sequences passes to their limits (limits being those of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers).

Conventions. As in One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative, a point of R2\mathbb{R}^{2} is written (x,y)(x,y) with x,yRx,y\in\mathbb{R}, and the coordinate projections are pr1(x,y)=x\mathrm{pr}_{1}(x,y)=x and pr2(x,y)=y\mathrm{pr}_{2}(x,y)=y, which are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections. For A,BB(R)A,B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) we write A×BA\times B for the set {(x,y):xA, yB}=pr11(A)pr21(B)\{(x,y):x\in A,\ y\in B\}=\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A)\cap\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(B); by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product it is Borel and (ρρ)(A×B)=ρ(A)ρ(B)(\rho\boxtimes\rho')(A\times B)=\rho(A)\rho'(B) for ρ,ρP(R)\rho,\rho'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}). λ1\lambda_{1} is the Lebesgue measure on B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). Integrals against members of P(R)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) and P(R2)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{2}) are those of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures, where it is recorded that a bounded Borel function is integrable against each of them. Null means of measure 00 for the measure in question; by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-union finite and countable unions of null sets are null. Dominated convergence always refers to The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §dominated, and Fatou to Fatou's Lemma. A function f:RRf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} is Lipschitz with constant LL, for a real L0L\ge0, if f(x)f(y)Lxy|f(x)-f(y)|\le L|x-y| for all x,yRx,y\in\mathbb{R}, which is Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces for the absolute-value metric; such an ff is continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous, hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps. Borel maps are closed under composition by the same clause.

Fix μ\mu, ν\nu and π\pi as in the statement.

Step 0 (Standing facts).

(0-) Differentiability implies continuity. If f:RRf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} is differentiable at x0x_{0} in the sense of Derivative at an Interior Point, then, taking ε=1\varepsilon=1 there, there is δ>0\delta>0 with f(x0+h)f(x0)(f(x0)+1)h|f(x_{0}+h)-f(x_{0})|\le(|f'(x_{0})|+1)|h| whenever 0<h<δ0<|h|<\delta; hence ff is continuous at x0x_{0}. A function differentiable at every point is therefore continuous, and so is its restriction to any closed interval.

(0a) Atomless measures and the diagonal. Since μ,νDlog\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log}, by The Logarithmic Energy of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §energy both belong to P2(R)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and give measure 00 to every one-point set, that is, both are atomless. The diagonal Δ={(x,x):xR}\Delta=\{(x,x):x\in\mathbb{R}\} is Borel by The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure §borel, and (μμ)(Δ)=0=(νν)(Δ)(\mu\boxtimes\mu)(\Delta)=0=(\nu\boxtimes\nu)(\Delta) by The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure §diagonal. If AB(R)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and μ(A)=0\mu(A)=0, then A×RA\times\mathbb{R} and R×A\mathbb{R}\times A are μμ\mu\boxtimes\mu-null by the product formula recalled above.

(0b) The score. Fix a Borel map ξ:RR\xi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} representing ΞμL2(μ;R)\Xi_{\mu}\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}); by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars, Rξ2dμ<\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi^{2}\,d\mu<\infty and Ξμ,ημ=Rξηdμ\langle\Xi_{\mu},\eta\rangle_{\mu}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\,\eta\,d\mu for every ηL2(μ;R)\eta\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}). For every Borel η:RR\eta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} with Rη2dμ<\int_{\mathbb{R}}\eta^{2}\,d\mu<\infty the product ξη\xi\eta is integrable, since ξη12(ξ2+η2)|\xi\eta|\le\tfrac12(\xi^{2}+\eta^{2}) by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (with q=1q=1) and integrals of nonnegative functions are monotone and additive by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. Taking η=1\eta=1, ξ\xi is integrable; put Nξ=RξdμN_{\xi}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}|\xi|\,d\mu.

(0c) Difference quotients. For φ:RR\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} let Qφ:R2RQ_{\varphi}:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R} be Qφ(x,y)=φ(x)φ(y)xyQ_{\varphi}(x,y)=\frac{\varphi(x)-\varphi(y)}{x-y} if xyx\ne y and Qφ(x,x)=0Q_{\varphi}(x,x)=0. Clearly Qφ(x,y)=Qφ(y,x)Q_{\varphi}(x,y)=Q_{\varphi}(y,x), and Qaφ+bφ=aQφ+bQφQ_{a\varphi+b\varphi'}=aQ_{\varphi}+bQ_{\varphi'} for a,bRa,b\in\mathbb{R}. If φ\varphi is Borel, so is QφQ_{\varphi}. Indeed, let \ell be the logarithmic kernel of The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure, Borel by The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure §borel. The exponential function is differentiable at every point by claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, hence continuous by (0-), hence Borel, so exp\exp\circ\ell is Borel. Let w(x,y)=(xy)exp((x,y))2w(x,y)=(x-y)\exp(\ell(x,y))^{2}, Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. For xyx\ne y, exp((x,y))=exp(logxy)=1/exp(logxy)=1/xy\exp(\ell(x,y))=\exp(-\log|x-y|)=1/\exp(\log|x-y|)=1/|x-y| by claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function and The Natural Logarithm, so w(x,y)=(xy)/(xy)2=1/(xy)w(x,y)=(x-y)/(x-y)^{2}=1/(x-y); and w(x,x)=0w(x,x)=0. Hence Qφ=(φpr1φpr2)wQ_{\varphi}=(\varphi\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}-\varphi\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})\,w, which is Borel by the same claims.

(0d) Bounds on quotients. If φ\varphi is Lipschitz with constant LL, then QφL|Q_{\varphi}|\le L everywhere, so QφQ_{\varphi} is bounded and Borel, hence integrable against μμ\mu\boxtimes\mu. If φ\varphi is differentiable at every point with continuous derivative bounded in absolute value by LL, then off Δ\Delta the function QφQ_{\varphi} coincides with the function FF of The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane, so QφL|Q_{\varphi}|\le L by The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §bound, and φ\varphi is Lipschitz with constant LL. In particular this applies to every gCc(R)g\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), whose derivative gg' is continuous and bounded by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives; such gg is continuous (being differentiable, by (0-)) and compactly supported, hence bounded by claim 1 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Bounded and Integrable.

(0e) The score identity in terms of QQ. Let ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}). The function FψF_{\psi} of One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §quotient equals QψQ_{\psi'} off Δ\Delta, and Δ\Delta is μμ\mu\boxtimes\mu-null by (0a); both are integrable (by that clause and by (0d)), so Fψd(μμ)=Qψd(μμ)\int F_{\psi}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\int Q_{\psi'}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu) by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison. Hence the defining identity of Finite Free Fisher Information, the Free Score and the Free Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §score, read through One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives, becomes

Rξψdμ=R2Qψd(μμ)(ψCc(R)).(1)\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\,\psi'\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}Q_{\psi'}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\qquad(\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})).\tag{1}

(0f) Kernels. Fix a mollifier kernel ρ\rho of radius 11 on R=R1\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{R}^{1}, which exists by claim 2 of Existence of Mollifier Kernels of Every Radius. For a positive real ss let ρs(y)=s1ρ(s1y)\rho_{s}(y)=s^{-1}\rho(s^{-1}y); by Rescaling a Mollifier Kernel it is a mollifier kernel of radius ss, so it is smooth, nonnegative, vanishes at every yy with y>s|y|>s, and Rρsdλ1=1\int_{\mathbb{R}}\rho_{s}\,d\lambda_{1}=1. By claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set it is compactly supported, so ρsCc(R)\rho_{s}\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) by Test Functions on Euclidean Space, Their Gradient Maps and Laplacians §space. By (0d) there are reals Bρ,Lρ0B_{\rho},L_{\rho}\ge0 with ρBρ|\rho|\le B_{\rho} and QρLρ|Q_{\rho}|\le L_{\rho}. Hence ρsBρ/s|\rho_{s}|\le B_{\rho}/s, and, since for xyx\ne y

Qρs(x,y)=s1(ρ(x/s)ρ(y/s))xy=s2Qρ(x/s,y/s),Q_{\rho_{s}}(x,y)=\frac{s^{-1}\bigl(\rho(x/s)-\rho(y/s)\bigr)}{x-y}=s^{-2}\,Q_{\rho}(x/s,\,y/s),

also QρsLρ/s2|Q_{\rho_{s}}|\le L_{\rho}/s^{2} everywhere.

(0g) Mollifying a Lipschitz function. Let f:RRf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be Lipschitz with constant KK and let 0<ε10<\varepsilon\le1. Since ff is continuous and ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} is continuous and vanishes off [ε,ε][-\varepsilon,\varepsilon], the convolution fρεf*\rho_{\varepsilon} is defined on all of R\mathbb{R} (the open set being R\mathbb{R}), with (fρε)(x)=Rf(xy)ρε(y)λ1(dy)(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(x-y)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)\,\lambda_{1}(dy), the integrand being integrable by claim 1 of The Convolution Integrand is Continuous, Compactly Supported and Integrable. (g1) fρεf*\rho_{\varepsilon} is smooth by claim 2 of Convolution with a CkC^k Kernel is of Class CkC^k. (g2) (fρε)(x)f(x)Kε|(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)-f(x)|\le K\varepsilon for every xx: as ρεdλ1=1\int\rho_{\varepsilon}\,d\lambda_{1}=1, claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral gives (fρε)(x)f(x)=(f(xy)f(x))ρε(y)λ1(dy)(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)-f(x)=\int(f(x-y)-f(x))\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)\,\lambda_{1}(dy), and the absolute value of this integrand is at most Kyρε(y)Kερε(y)K|y|\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)\le K\varepsilon\,\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) for every yy, because ρε(y)=0\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=0 when y>ε|y|>\varepsilon; the bound follows from the same claim. (g3) fρεf*\rho_{\varepsilon} is Lipschitz with constant KK: (fρε)(x)(fρε)(x)=(f(xy)f(xy))ρε(y)λ1(dy)(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)-(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x')=\int(f(x-y)-f(x'-y))\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)\,\lambda_{1}(dy) and the integrand is at most Kxxρε(y)K|x-x'|\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) in absolute value. (g4) If A>0A>0 and f(t)=0f(t)=0 whenever t>A|t|>A, then (fρε)(x)=0(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)=0 whenever x>A+1|x|>A+1, since for every yy either y>ε|y|>\varepsilon and ρε(y)=0\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=0, or yε1|y|\le\varepsilon\le1 and xyxy>A|x-y|\ge|x|-|y|>A, so the integrand vanishes identically; then fρεf*\rho_{\varepsilon} is compactly supported by claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set and belongs to Cc(R)C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) by Test Functions on Euclidean Space, Their Gradient Maps and Laplacians §space.

Step 1 (The score identity for every test function). For gCc(R)g\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) put

κ(g)=RξgdμR2Qgd(μμ),\kappa(g)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\,g\,d\mu-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}Q_{g}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu),

both integrals existing by (0b) and (0d), gg being bounded and Borel. We show κ(g)=0\kappa(g)=0. Let s>0s>0 and c=Rgdλ1c=\int_{\mathbb{R}}g\,d\lambda_{1}, which exists by Test Functions on the Real Line: Unit Mass, Large Mass, Mean-Zero Correction, and the Primitive of a Mean-Zero Test Function §integrable. The function ρs\rho_{s} is a nonnegative test function of unit mass, as in claim 2 of Test Functions on the Real Line: Unit Mass, Large Mass, Mean-Zero Correction, and the Primitive of a Mean-Zero Test Function; so by Test Functions on the Real Line: Unit Mass, Large Mass, Mean-Zero Correction, and the Primitive of a Mean-Zero Test Function §correction the function gcρsg-c\rho_{s} is a test function with λ1\lambda_{1}-integral 00, and by Test Functions on the Real Line: Unit Mass, Large Mass, Mean-Zero Correction, and the Primitive of a Mean-Zero Test Function §primitive there is ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) with ψ=gcρs\psi'=g-c\rho_{s}. By (1), linearity of QQ and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,

κ(g)=cκ(ρs).(2)\kappa(g)=c\,\kappa(\rho_{s}).\tag{2}

Applying (2) with g=ρtg=\rho_{t} (for which c=1c=1) gives κ(ρt)=κ(ρs)\kappa(\rho_{t})=\kappa(\rho_{s}) for all positive s,ts,t. By (0f), for s1s\ge1,

κ(ρs)RξBρsdμ+Lρs2NξBρ+Lρs.|\kappa(\rho_{s})|\le\int_{\mathbb{R}}|\xi|\,\frac{B_{\rho}}{s}\,d\mu+\frac{L_{\rho}}{s^{2}}\le\frac{N_{\xi}B_{\rho}+L_{\rho}}{s}.

So κ(ρ1)(NξBρ+Lρ)/s|\kappa(\rho_{1})|\le(N_{\xi}B_{\rho}+L_{\rho})/s for every real s1s\ge1, whence κ(ρ1)=0\kappa(\rho_{1})=0, and (2) with s=1s=1 gives κ(g)=0\kappa(g)=0.

Step 2 (The score identity for Lipschitz functions). Let φ:RR\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be Lipschitz with constant LL. Then Rφ2dμ<\int_{\mathbb{R}}\varphi^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, ξφ\xi\varphi and QφQ_{\varphi} are integrable, and

Rξφdμ=R2Qφd(μμ).(3)\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\,\varphi\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}Q_{\varphi}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu).\tag{3}

Since φ(x)φ(0)+Lx|\varphi(x)|\le|\varphi(0)|+L|x|, we have φ(x)22φ(0)2+2L2x2\varphi(x)^{2}\le2\varphi(0)^{2}+2L^{2}x^{2}, and x2μ(dx)<\int x^{2}\,\mu(dx)<\infty because μP2(R)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment); so φ2dμ<\int\varphi^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, and ξφ\xi\varphi is integrable by (0b). QφQ_{\varphi} is integrable by (0d).

For a real R1R\ge1 let χR\chi_{R} be the cutoff of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff with q=1q=1, and M10M_{1}\ge0 the constant there (independent of RR): χR\chi_{R} is smooth and compactly supported, 0χR10\le\chi_{R}\le1, χR(x)=1\chi_{R}(x)=1 for xR|x|\le R, χR(x)=0\chi_{R}(x)=0 for x2R|x|\ge2R, and 1χRM1/R|\partial_{1}\chi_{R}|\le M_{1}/R. Thus χRCc(R)\chi_{R}\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), its derivative is χR=1χR\chi_{R}'=\partial_{1}\chi_{R} by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives, and by (0d) χR(x)χR(y)(M1/R)xy|\chi_{R}(x)-\chi_{R}(y)|\le(M_{1}/R)|x-y|. Put fR=χRφf_{R}=\chi_{R}\varphi and K=L+M1φ(0)+2M1LK=L+M_{1}|\varphi(0)|+2M_{1}L.

(2a) fRf_{R} is Lipschitz with constant KK. Let x,yRx,y\in\mathbb{R} with yx|y|\le|x| (the other case follows by exchanging xx and yy). If y2R|y|\ge2R then x2R|x|\ge2R and fR(x)=0=fR(y)f_{R}(x)=0=f_{R}(y). If y<2R|y|<2R, then fR(x)fR(y)=χR(x)(φ(x)φ(y))+φ(y)(χR(x)χR(y))f_{R}(x)-f_{R}(y)=\chi_{R}(x)(\varphi(x)-\varphi(y))+\varphi(y)(\chi_{R}(x)-\chi_{R}(y)) and φ(y)φ(0)+2RL|\varphi(y)|\le|\varphi(0)|+2RL, so, using R1R\ge1,

fR(x)fR(y)Lxy+(φ(0)+2RL)M1RxyKxy.|f_{R}(x)-f_{R}(y)|\le L|x-y|+(|\varphi(0)|+2RL)\tfrac{M_{1}}{R}|x-y|\le K|x-y|.

(2b) The identity for fRf_{R}. For kNk\in\mathbb{N} with k1k\ge1 let gR,k=fRρ1/kg_{R,k}=f_{R}*\rho_{1/k}. Since fRf_{R} vanishes off [2R,2R][-2R,2R], (0g) shows that gR,kCc(R)g_{R,k}\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), that gR,kg_{R,k} is Lipschitz with constant KK, and that gR,kfRK/k|g_{R,k}-f_{R}|\le K/k. By Step 1, ξgR,kdμ=QgR,kd(μμ)\int\xi g_{R,k}\,d\mu=\int Q_{g_{R,k}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu). As kk\to\infty: gR,k(x)fR(x)g_{R,k}(x)\to f_{R}(x) for every xx, and ξgR,kξ(φ+K)|\xi g_{R,k}|\le|\xi|(|\varphi|+K), which is integrable by (0b); so ξgR,kdμξfRdμ\int\xi g_{R,k}\,d\mu\to\int\xi f_{R}\,d\mu by dominated convergence. Also QgR,k(x,y)QfR(x,y)Q_{g_{R,k}}(x,y)\to Q_{f_{R}}(x,y) for xyx\ne y, both vanish on Δ\Delta, and QgR,kK|Q_{g_{R,k}}|\le K by (0d); so QgR,kd(μμ)QfRd(μμ)\int Q_{g_{R,k}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\to\int Q_{f_{R}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu) by dominated convergence. Hence ξfRdμ=QfRd(μμ)\int\xi f_{R}\,d\mu=\int Q_{f_{R}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu).

(2c) Removing the cutoff. Let R=jNR=j\in\mathbb{N}, j1j\ge1, and let jj\to\infty. For every xx, fj(x)=φ(x)f_{j}(x)=\varphi(x) once jxj\ge|x|, and ξfjξφ|\xi f_{j}|\le|\xi\varphi|; so ξfjdμξφdμ\int\xi f_{j}\,d\mu\to\int\xi\varphi\,d\mu by dominated convergence. For every (x,y)(x,y), Qfj(x,y)=Qφ(x,y)Q_{f_{j}}(x,y)=Q_{\varphi}(x,y) once jmax(x,y)j\ge\max(|x|,|y|), and QfjK|Q_{f_{j}}|\le K by (2a) and (0d); so Qfjd(μμ)Qφd(μμ)\int Q_{f_{j}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\to\int Q_{\varphi}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu). With (2b) this proves (3).

Step 3 (Ξμ,idμ=1\langle\Xi_{\mu},\mathrm{id}\rangle_{\mu}=1). The identity map is Lipschitz with constant 11, and Qid(x,y)=1Q_{\mathrm{id}}(x,y)=1 for xyx\ne y, Qid=0Q_{\mathrm{id}}=0 on Δ\Delta. By (3) and (0a), ξ(x)xμ(dx)=(μμ)(R2Δ)=1\int\xi(x)\,x\,\mu(dx)=(\mu\boxtimes\mu)(\mathbb{R}^{2}\setminus\Delta)=1. The class of id\mathrm{id} lies in L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}) by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §identity, so by (0b) Ξμ,idμ=1\langle\Xi_{\mu},\mathrm{id}\rangle_{\mu}=1.

Step 4 (The optimal coupling is induced by a monotone map). Since μ,νP2(R)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and μ\mu is atomless, On the Real Line an Atomless Source is Uniquely Mapped, by a Nondecreasing Optimal Map §monotone gives EB(R)E\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) with μ(E)=1\mu(E)=1 and a Borel map S:RRS:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} with S(x)S(x)S(x)\le S(x') for all x,xEx,x'\in E with xxx\le x' and S=0S=0 off EE, which is an optimal map from μ\mu to ν\nu: S#μ=νS_{\#}\mu=\nu and (id,S)#μ(\mathrm{id},S)_{\#}\mu is an optimal coupling. By On the Real Line an Atomless Source is Uniquely Mapped, by a Nondecreasing Optimal Map §uniquely-mapped and Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §uniquely-mapped there is an optimal map T0T_{0} such that every optimal coupling of μ\mu and ν\nu equals (id,T0)#μ(\mathrm{id},T_{0})_{\#}\mu; applied to (id,S)#μ(\mathrm{id},S)_{\#}\mu and to π\pi this gives π=(id,T0)#μ=(id,S)#μ\pi=(\mathrm{id},T_{0})_{\#}\mu=(\mathrm{id},S)_{\#}\mu. By The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable, S2dμ=M2(ν)<\int S^{2}\,d\mu=M_{2}(\nu)<\infty, the class of SS lies in L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}), and so does idS\mathrm{id}-S; in particular (S(x)x)2μ(dx)<\int(S(x)-x)^{2}\,\mu(dx)<\infty (One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars). The displacement pairing of the statement is that of The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §pairing (The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §couplings), so The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §displacement with d=1d=1 and η=Ξμ\eta=-\Xi_{\mu} yields, using (0b), claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and Step 3,

J(Ξμ,π)=Ξμ,Sidμ=Rξ(x)xμ(dx)RξSdμ=1RξSdμ.(4)\mathcal{J}(-\Xi_{\mu},\pi)=\langle-\Xi_{\mu},S-\mathrm{id}\rangle_{\mu}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi(x)\,x\,\mu(dx)-\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\,S\,d\mu=1-\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\,S\,d\mu.\tag{4}

Step 5 (Transporting the energy of ν\nu). Let S^:R2R2\hat S:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R}^{2}, S^(x,y)=(S(x),S(y))\hat S(x,y)=(S(x),S(y)), the pairing of Spr1S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} and Spr2S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}, Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §pairing. For every Borel F:R2[0,]F:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to[0,\infty],

R2Fd(νν)=R2FS^d(μμ).(5)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}F\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}F\circ\hat S\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu).\tag{5}

By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product, the left side is R×RFιd(νν)\int_{\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}}F\circ\iota\,d(\nu\otimes\nu), with FιF\circ\iota measurable for the product σ\sigma-algebra. By the Sections and Tonelli clauses of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems, each section yF(x,y)y'\mapsto F(x',y') is Borel, the map G(x)=F(x,y)ν(dy)G(x')=\int F(x',y')\,\nu(dy') is Borel with values in [0,][0,\infty], and the left side equals Gdν\int G\,d\nu. By the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward (with ν=S#μ\nu=S_{\#}\mu), G(x)=F(x,S(y))μ(dy)G(x')=\int F(x',S(y))\,\mu(dy) for every xx', and Gdν=G(S(x))μ(dx)\int G\,d\nu=\int G(S(x))\,\mu(dx). On the other hand FS^F\circ\hat S is Borel, (FS^)(x,y)=F(S(x),S(y))(F\circ\hat S)(x,y)=F(S(x),S(y)), and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product together with the same two clauses of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems, now for μμ\mu\otimes\mu, give FS^d(μμ)=(F(S(x),S(y))μ(dy))μ(dx)=G(S(x))μ(dx)\int F\circ\hat S\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\int\bigl(\int F(S(x),S(y))\,\mu(dy)\bigr)\mu(dx)=\int G(S(x))\,\mu(dx). This proves (5).

(5a) With F=1ΔF=\mathbf{1}_{\Delta} (Borel by claim 1 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions): the Borel set S^1(Δ)={(x,y):S(x)=S(y)}\hat S^{-1}(\Delta)=\{(x,y):S(x)=S(y)\} has (μμ)(S^1(Δ))=(νν)(Δ)=0(\mu\boxtimes\mu)(\hat S^{-1}(\Delta))=(\nu\boxtimes\nu)(\Delta)=0 by (0a).

(5b) Let +=max(,0)\ell^{+}=\max(\ell,0) and =max(,0)\ell^{-}=\max(-\ell,0), Borel by claim 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. As νDlog\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log}, \ell is νν\nu\boxtimes\nu-integrable, so ±d(νν)<\int\ell^{\pm}\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)<\infty, and by (5) ±S^d(μμ)=±d(νν)\int\ell^{\pm}\circ\hat S\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\int\ell^{\pm}\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu). Hence S^=+S^S^\ell\circ\hat S=\ell^{+}\circ\hat S-\ell^{-}\circ\hat S is μμ\mu\boxtimes\mu-integrable and, by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral and The Logarithmic Energy of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §energy,

R2S^d(μμ)=R2d(νν)=Elog(ν).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}\ell\circ\hat S\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}\ell\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)=\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\nu).

Step 6 (The monotone quotient of SS is controlled by the score). Let R=QS1E×ER=Q_{S}\,\mathbf{1}_{E\times E}, Borel by (0c) and claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. For x,yEx,y\in E with xyx\ne y, S(x)S(y)S(x)-S(y) and xyx-y are both 0\ge0 or both 0\le0 by monotonicity of SS on EE, so R0R\ge0 everywhere. We show Rd(μμ)ξSdμ\int R\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\le\int\xi S\,d\mu; in particular RR is integrable.

For nNn\in\mathbb{N} with n1n\ge1 let Tn(t)=max(n,min(t,n))T_{n}(t)=\max(-n,\min(t,n)). Checking the cases t<nt<-n, tn|t|\le n, t>nt>n: TnT_{n} is nondecreasing, Lipschitz with constant 11 (so Borel), Tn(t)min(t,n)|T_{n}(t)|\le\min(|t|,n), and Tn(t)=tT_{n}(t)=t when tn|t|\le n. Define hn:RRh_{n}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} by

hn(x)=sup({n}{Tn(S(e)):eE, ex}),h_{n}(x)=\sup\bigl(\{-n\}\cup\{T_{n}(S(e)):e\in E,\ e\le x\}\bigr),

the supremum of a nonempty set bounded above by nn. Then (h1) nhnn-n\le h_{n}\le n; (h2) hnh_{n} is nondecreasing on R\mathbb{R}, the set grows with xx; (h3) hn(x)=Tn(S(x))h_{n}(x)=T_{n}(S(x)) for xEx\in E, because TnST_{n}\circ S is nondecreasing on EE, so Tn(S(x))nT_{n}(S(x))\ge-n is the largest element of the set. For xRx\in\mathbb{R} put hn(x)=sup{hn(y):y<x}h_{n}(x^{-})=\sup\{h_{n}(y):y<x\}, so nhn(x)hn(x)-n\le h_{n}(x^{-})\le h_{n}(x), and let Dn={x:hn(x)<hn(x)}D_{n}=\{x:h_{n}(x^{-})<h_{n}(x)\}.

(6a) DnD_{n} is Borel and μ(Dn)=0\mu(D_{n})=0. For kNk\in\mathbb{N} let Dn,k={x:hn(x)hn(x)1/(k+1)}D_{n,k}=\{x:h_{n}(x)-h_{n}(x^{-})\ge1/(k+1)\}, so Dn=kDn,kD_{n}=\bigcup_{k}D_{n,k}. If x1<<xNx_{1}<\dots<x_{N} are points of Dn,kD_{n,k}, then hn(x1)n+1/(k+1)h_{n}(x_{1})\ge-n+1/(k+1), and for 2iN2\le i\le N we have hn(xi)hn(xi1)h_{n}(x_{i}^{-})\ge h_{n}(x_{i-1}), hence hn(xi)hn(xi1)+1/(k+1)h_{n}(x_{i})\ge h_{n}(x_{i-1})+1/(k+1); so nhn(xN)n+N/(k+1)n\ge h_{n}(x_{N})\ge-n+N/(k+1) and N2n(k+1)N\le2n(k+1). Thus Dn,kD_{n,k} has at most 2n(k+1)2n(k+1) elements; it is finite, hence countable by claim 2 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets, and DnD_{n} is countable by A Countable Union of Countable Sets is Countable. Since μ\mu is atomless, Countable Sets are Null for an Atomless Measure, One-Point Sets are Lebesgue Null, and an Absolutely Continuous Measure is Atomless §countable gives DnB(R)D_{n}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and μ(Dn)=0\mu(D_{n})=0.

(6b) Lipschitz approximants. For mNm\in\mathbb{N} with m1m\ge1 let

gn,m(x)=inf{hn(y)+mxy:yR},g_{n,m}(x)=\inf\{h_{n}(y)+m|x-y|:y\in\mathbb{R}\},

a real number since every element of the set is n\ge-n. Then ngn,mhnn-n\le g_{n,m}\le h_{n}\le n (take y=xy=x). gn,mg_{n,m} is Lipschitz with constant mm: for all x,x,yx,x',y, gn,m(x)hn(y)+mxy+mxxg_{n,m}(x)\le h_{n}(y)+m|x'-y|+m|x-x'|, and taking the infimum over yy gives gn,m(x)gn,m(x)+mxxg_{n,m}(x)\le g_{n,m}(x')+m|x-x'|; exchange x,xx,x'. gn,mg_{n,m} is nondecreasing: if xxx\le x' and a=xxa=x'-x, then for every yy, by (h2), gn,m(x)hn(ya)+mx(ya)hn(y)+mxyg_{n,m}(x)\le h_{n}(y-a)+m|x-(y-a)|\le h_{n}(y)+m|x'-y|, and taking the infimum over yy gives gn,m(x)gn,m(x)g_{n,m}(x)\le g_{n,m}(x'). Consequently Qgn,m0Q_{g_{n,m}}\ge0 everywhere.

(6c) Convergence off DnD_{n}. Let xDnx\notin D_{n} and η>0\eta>0. As hn(x)=hn(x)h_{n}(x^{-})=h_{n}(x) there is y0<xy_{0}<x with hn(y0)>hn(x)ηh_{n}(y_{0})>h_{n}(x)-\eta. Let m2n/(xy0)m\ge2n/(x-y_{0}). For yy0y\ge y_{0}, hn(y)+mxyhn(y0)>hn(x)ηh_{n}(y)+m|x-y|\ge h_{n}(y_{0})>h_{n}(x)-\eta by (h2); for y<y0y<y_{0}, hn(y)+mxyn+m(xy0)nhn(x)h_{n}(y)+m|x-y|\ge-n+m(x-y_{0})\ge n\ge h_{n}(x) by (h1). So hn(x)ηgn,m(x)hn(x)h_{n}(x)-\eta\le g_{n,m}(x)\le h_{n}(x). Hence gn,m(x)hn(x)g_{n,m}(x)\to h_{n}(x) as mm\to\infty.

(6d) Fatou in mm. Let Rn=QTnS1E×ER_{n}=Q_{T_{n}\circ S}\,\mathbf{1}_{E\times E}, Borel as RR is and 0\ge0 as TnST_{n}\circ S is nondecreasing on EE. Let Gn=((EDn)×(EDn))ΔG_{n}=((E\setminus D_{n})\times(E\setminus D_{n}))\setminus\Delta; its complement lies in ((R(EDn))×R)(R×(R(EDn)))Δ((\mathbb{R}\setminus(E\setminus D_{n}))\times\mathbb{R})\cup(\mathbb{R}\times(\mathbb{R}\setminus(E\setminus D_{n})))\cup\Delta, which is μμ\mu\boxtimes\mu-null by (0a) and (6a). For (x,y)Gn(x,y)\in G_{n}, (6c) and (h3) give Qgn,m(x,y)Qhn(x,y)=QTnS(x,y)=Rn(x,y)Q_{g_{n,m}}(x,y)\to Q_{h_{n}}(x,y)=Q_{T_{n}\circ S}(x,y)=R_{n}(x,y); at a point where a sequence of nonnegative reals converges, its lower limit in the sense of Fatou's Lemma is its limit. So lim infmQgn,m=Rn\liminf_{m}Q_{g_{n,m}}=R_{n} almost everywhere, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison, Fatou, and (3) applied to the Lipschitz functions gn,mg_{n,m},

Rnd(μμ)=lim infmQgn,md(μμ)lim infmQgn,md(μμ)=lim infmξgn,mdμ.\int R_{n}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\int\liminf_{m}Q_{g_{n,m}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\le\liminf_{m}\int Q_{g_{n,m}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\liminf_{m}\int\xi\,g_{n,m}\,d\mu.

By (6c), (h3) and (6a), gn,mTnSg_{n,m}\to T_{n}\circ S on the μ\mu-full set EDnE\setminus D_{n}, and ξgn,mnξ|\xi g_{n,m}|\le n|\xi|; by dominated convergence ξgn,mdμξ(TnS)dμ\int\xi g_{n,m}\,d\mu\to\int\xi\,(T_{n}\circ S)\,d\mu. Hence Rnd(μμ)ξ(TnS)dμ\int R_{n}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\le\int\xi\,(T_{n}\circ S)\,d\mu.

(6e) Fatou in nn. For every (x,y)(x,y), Rn(x,y)R(x,y)R_{n}(x,y)\to R(x,y): if x,yEx,y\in E and xyx\ne y then Rn(x,y)=R(x,y)R_{n}(x,y)=R(x,y) once nmax(S(x),S(y))n\ge\max(|S(x)|,|S(y)|), and otherwise both vanish. By Fatou and (6d),

Rd(μμ)lim infnRnd(μμ)lim infnξ(TnS)dμ=ξSdμ,\int R\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\le\liminf_{n}\int R_{n}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\le\liminf_{n}\int\xi\,(T_{n}\circ S)\,d\mu=\int\xi\,S\,d\mu,

the last by dominated convergence: Tn(S(x))S(x)T_{n}(S(x))\to S(x) for every xx, and ξ(TnS)ξS|\xi\,(T_{n}\circ S)|\le|\xi S|, integrable by (0b) since S2dμ<\int S^{2}\,d\mu<\infty.

Step 7 (Conclusion). First, logtt1\log t\le t-1 for every real t>0t>0. Indeed exp(u)1+u\exp(u)\ge1+u for all uRu\in\mathbb{R}: for u0u\ge0 by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function; for u<0u<0, the function f(v)=exp(v)1vf(v)=\exp(v)-1-v is differentiable at every point with f(v)=exp(v)1f'(v)=\exp(v)-1 (claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function and claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives), hence continuous by (0-), so Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, applied to the restriction of ff to [u,0][u,0], gives c(u,0)c\in(u,0) with f(0)f(u)=(exp(c)1)(u)<0f(0)-f(u)=(\exp(c)-1)(-u)<0, as exp(c)<exp(0)=1\exp(c)<\exp(0)=1 by claims 1 and 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function; thus f(u)>f(0)=0f(u)>f(0)=0. With u=logtu=\log t and exp(logt)=t\exp(\log t)=t (The Natural Logarithm) this is t1+logtt\ge1+\log t.

Let G={(x,y)E×E:xy, S(x)S(y)}=(E×E)(ΔS^1(Δ))G=\{(x,y)\in E\times E:x\ne y,\ S(x)\ne S(y)\}=(E\times E)\setminus(\Delta\cup\hat S^{-1}(\Delta)), Borel. Its complement lies in ((RE)×R)(R×(RE))ΔS^1(Δ)((\mathbb{R}\setminus E)\times\mathbb{R})\cup(\mathbb{R}\times(\mathbb{R}\setminus E))\cup\Delta\cup\hat S^{-1}(\Delta), which is μμ\mu\boxtimes\mu-null by (0a) and (5a). Let (x,y)G(x,y)\in G. Then R(x,y)=QS(x,y)R(x,y)=Q_{S}(x,y) is nonzero and 0\ge0, hence >0>0, and S(x)S(y)=R(x,y)xy|S(x)-S(y)|=R(x,y)\,|x-y|. By the definition of \ell in The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure and log(st)=logs+logt\log(st)=\log s+\log t (The Natural Logarithm),

(S^(x,y))(x,y)=logS(x)S(y)+logxy=logR(x,y)1R(x,y).\ell(\hat S(x,y))-\ell(x,y)=-\log|S(x)-S(y)|+\log|x-y|=-\log R(x,y)\ge1-R(x,y).

Let Φ=S^1+R\Phi=\ell\circ\hat S-\ell-1+R. It is integrable against μμ\mu\boxtimes\mu by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral: S^\ell\circ\hat S by (5b), \ell because μDlog\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log}, the constant 11 being bounded, and RR by Step 6. We have Φ0\Phi\ge0 on GG, so Φ1G0\Phi\mathbf{1}_{G}\ge0 everywhere and Φ1G=Φ\Phi\mathbf{1}_{G}=\Phi almost everywhere; by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, Φd(μμ)=Φ1Gd(μμ)0\int\Phi\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)=\int\Phi\mathbf{1}_{G}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\ge0. By linearity, (5b), The Logarithmic Energy of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §energy, Step 6 and (4),

Elog(ν)Elog(μ)1Rd(μμ)1RξSdμ=J(Ξμ,π),\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\nu)-\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)\ge1-\int R\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\ge1-\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\,S\,d\mu=\mathcal{J}(-\Xi_{\mu},\pi),

which is the assertion Elog(μ)+J(Ξμ,π)Elog(ν)\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)+\mathcal{J}(-\Xi_{\mu},\pi)\le\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\nu).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…