TheoremBase

Proof of The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair is a Displacement Convex, Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair with Closed Score and Regular Penalised Maxima

lemmalem:confined-log-energy-pair-properties-line-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 42,984 chars · 85 deps · depth 41 Reason: E1: proof of the properties of the confined logarithmic-energy pair.

Preliminaries on V (lower bound, quadratic minorant, tangent inequality, V''>=0, growth u(x+h)<=e^{B|h|}u(x)); weak convergence from W2; lsc of the potential term; energy bounds; first variation on D. Density by truncation then Gaussian smoothing. Coercivity by the superquadratic compactness lemma; map property from atomlessness. Closed score and regular maxima via the splitting lemma. Displacement convexity via the log-energy lemma and the tangent inequality. Bounds and continuity of HEH_E = int V'' by truncation.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The rules for adding, multiplying and comparing inequalities between real numbers in Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and the properties of the absolute value in Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, are used without further mention.

Conventions. As in One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars, s=s\lVert s\rVert=|s| and s2=s2\lVert s\rVert^{2}=s^{2} for sR=R1s\in\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{R}^{1}, so M2(ν)=x2ν(dx)M_{2}(\nu)=\int x^{2}\,\nu(dx) for νP(R)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment), and ξ,ην=ξηdν\langle\xi,\eta\rangle_{\nu}=\int\xi\eta\,d\nu on L2(ν;R)L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}); for ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), ψ=ψ\psi'=\nabla\psi, (ψ)=Δψ(\psi')'=\Delta\psi, ψ\psi' and Δψ\Delta\psi are continuous and bounded, and ξ,ψν=ξψdν\langle\xi,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu}=\int\xi\psi'\,d\nu (One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives). Every real number is an interior point of the interval R\mathbb{R} (claim 1 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line), so a function RR\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} differentiable at every point is continuous (Differentiability at an Interior Point Implies Continuity There); a continuous function on R\mathbb{R} or on R2\mathbb{R}^{2} is Borel (claims 3(a) and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets). In particular VV, VV' and VV'' are continuous and Borel. Integrals of nonnegative Borel functions are taken in [0,][0,\infty]; linearity and monotonicity of integrals are claim 1 (nonnegative functions) and claim 2 (integrable functions, used only after integrability has been established) of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. Change of variables under a push-forward, including the transfer of integrability in both directions, is that of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward and claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. For zR2z\in\mathbb{R}^{2} we write x=pr1(z)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z) and y=pr2(z)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z); if πΠ(ν,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\nu') and ff is Borel, then f(x)π(dz)=fdν\int f(x)\,\pi(dz)=\int f\,d\nu and f(y)π(dz)=fdν\int f(y)\,\pi(dz)=\int f\,d\nu', whenever either side is defined, by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling and this change of variables. By The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair, DDlogP2(R)\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{D}_{\log}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and every μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} has VV μ\mu-integrable.

Constants. By Confining Potentials on the Real Line §slope fix CsRC_{s}\in\mathbb{R} with V(x)Cs(1+V(x))|V'(x)|\le C_{s}(1+|V(x)|) for every xx; then Cs0C_{s}\ge0, since 0V(0)Cs(1+V(0))0\le|V'(0)|\le C_{s}(1+|V(0)|) and 1+V(0)>01+|V(0)|>0. By Confining Potentials on the Real Line §curvature with ε=1\varepsilon=1 fix C1RC_{1}\in\mathbb{R} with V(x)V(x)+C1V''(x)\le|V(x)|+C_{1} for every xx. By Confining Potentials on the Real Line §superquadratic with M=β/2>0M=\beta/2>0 fix a positive KK with β2x2V(x)\tfrac{\beta}{2}x^{2}\le V(x) whenever KxK\le|x|.

Step P1 (A lower bound for VV and a quadratic minorant). The restriction of VV to [K,K][-K,K] is continuous (claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative), so Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval gives xmin[K,K]x_{\min}\in[-K,K] with V(xmin)V(x)V(x_{\min})\le V(x) for xK|x|\le K. Put m=min{V(xmin),0}m=\min\{V(x_{\min}),0\}, so m0m\le0 and m=m-m=|m|. For xK|x|\ge K, V(x)β2x20mV(x)\ge\tfrac{\beta}{2}x^{2}\ge0\ge m; hence V(x)mV(x)\ge m for every xRx\in\mathbb{R}. Put b=β2K2m0b=\tfrac{\beta}{2}K^{2}-m\ge0. If xK|x|\ge K then β2x2V(x)V(x)+b\tfrac{\beta}{2}x^{2}\le V(x)\le V(x)+b; if x<K|x|<K then β2x2β2K2=b+mb+V(x)\tfrac{\beta}{2}x^{2}\le\tfrac{\beta}{2}K^{2}=b+m\le b+V(x). Thus

β2x2V(x)+b(xR).(Q)\tfrac{\beta}{2}\,x^{2}\le V(x)+b\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}).\tag{Q}

Define u=1+Vm:RRu=1+V-m:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}. Then u1u\ge1, uu is continuous and Borel, and uu is differentiable at every point with u=Vu'=V' (claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives). Since Vm0V-m\ge0,

V(Vm)+mu+m,1+Vu+1+m(2+m)u.(U)|V|\le(V-m)+|m|\le u+|m|,\qquad 1+|V|\le u+1+|m|\le(2+|m|)\,u .\tag{U}

In particular, for νP(R)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), VV is ν\nu-integrable if and only if uu is, and then udν=1m+Vdν\int u\,d\nu=1-m+\int V\,d\nu.

Step P2 (Convexity). (i) Tangent inequality: V(x)(yx)V(y)V(x)V'(x)(y-x)\le V(y)-V(x) for all x,yRx,y\in\mathbb{R}. This is trivial for y=xy=x. Let xyx\ne y and w=yxw=y-x. For real tt with 0<t10<t\le1, convexity of VV (Convex Real-Valued Function on a Convex Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n with n=1n=1, the points y,xy,x and the weight tt) gives V(x+tw)=V(ty+(1t)x)tV(y)+(1t)V(x)V(x+tw)=V(ty+(1-t)x)\le tV(y)+(1-t)V(x), so, with h=tw0h=tw\ne0, dividing by t>0t>0,

wV(x+h)V(x)hV(y)V(x).w\cdot\frac{V(x+h)-V(x)}{h}\le V(y)-V(x).

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and let δ>0\delta>0 be as in Derivative at an Interior Point for VV at xx with ε/w\varepsilon/|w| in place of ε\varepsilon. Choosing t=min{1,δ/(2w)}t=\min\{1,\delta/(2|w|)\} we get 0<h<δ0<|h|<\delta, so the difference quotient is within ε/w\varepsilon/|w| of V(x)V'(x), whence wV(x)V(y)V(x)+εwV'(x)\le V(y)-V(x)+\varepsilon. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, (i) follows.

(ii) V0V''\ge0. Adding (i) to (i) with xx and yy exchanged gives 0(V(y)V(x))(yx)0\le(V'(y)-V'(x))(y-x), so V(x)V(y)V'(x)\le V'(y) whenever x<yx<y. Hence every difference quotient (V(x+h)V(x))/h(V'(x+h)-V'(x))/h with h0h\ne0 is nonnegative. If V(x)<0V''(x)<0 for some xx, Derivative at an Interior Point for VV' at xx with ε=V(x)\varepsilon=-V''(x) yields h0h\ne0 with a difference quotient below V(x)+ε=0V''(x)+\varepsilon=0, a contradiction. So V0V''\ge0.

(iii) Curvature bound. Put A=1+m+C1A=1+|m|+|C_{1}|. By (ii), the choice of C1C_{1} and (U), 0VV+C1u+m+C1Au0\le V''\le|V|+C_{1}\le u+|m|+|C_{1}|\le A\,u.

Step P3 (Slope and growth). Put B=Cs(2+m)+1>0B=C_{s}(2+|m|)+1>0. By the choice of CsC_{s} and (U), u=VCs(1+V)Bu|u'|=|V'|\le C_{s}(1+|V|)\le B\,u. We claim

u(x+h)exp(Bh)u(x)(x,hR).(G)u(x+h)\le\exp(B|h|)\,u(x)\qquad(x,h\in\mathbb{R}).\tag{G}

Fix xx. The map tx+tt\mapsto x+t has every difference quotient equal to 11, so it is differentiable with derivative 11 (Derivative at an Interior Point), and by Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives tu(x+t)t\mapsto u(x+t) is differentiable at every tt with derivative V(x+t)V'(x+t). By claim 1 of Derivative and Continuity of the Scaled Exponential Function and the product rule (claim 3 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives), w(t)=u(x+t)exp(Bt)w_{-}(t)=u(x+t)\exp(-Bt) and w+(t)=u(x+t)exp(Bt)w_{+}(t)=u(x+t)\exp(Bt) are differentiable at every tt with

w(t)=(V(x+t)Bu(x+t))exp(Bt)0,w+(t)=(V(x+t)+Bu(x+t))exp(Bt)0,w_{-}'(t)=\bigl(V'(x+t)-Bu(x+t)\bigr)\exp(-Bt)\le0,\qquad w_{+}'(t)=\bigl(V'(x+t)+Bu(x+t)\bigr)\exp(Bt)\ge0,

because VBu|V'|\le Bu and exp>0\exp>0 (claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function). Both are continuous on R\mathbb{R}, so by The Sign of the Derivative and Monotonicity §nonincreasing and The Sign of the Derivative and Monotonicity §nondecreasing ww_{-} is nonincreasing and w+w_{+} nondecreasing. For h0h\ge0, u(x+h)exp(Bh)=w(h)w(0)=u(x)u(x+h)\exp(-Bh)=w_{-}(h)\le w_{-}(0)=u(x); for h0h\le0, u(x+h)exp(Bh)=w+(h)w+(0)=u(x)u(x+h)\exp(Bh)=w_{+}(h)\le w_{+}(0)=u(x). Multiplying by exp(Bh)\exp(Bh), respectively exp(Bh)\exp(-Bh), and using exp(v)exp(v)=exp(0)=1\exp(v)\exp(-v)=\exp(0)=1 (claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function) gives (G). Since exp\exp is increasing (claim 4 there), u(x+h)exp(Br)u(x)u(x+h)\le\exp(Br)\,u(x) whenever hr|h|\le r, and by (U)

V(x+h)exp(Br)u(x)+m,V(x+h)Bexp(Br)u(x),0V(x+h)Aexp(Br)u(x)(hr).(G)|V(x+h)|\le\exp(Br)\,u(x)+|m|,\qquad|V'(x+h)|\le B\exp(Br)\,u(x),\qquad0\le V''(x+h)\le A\exp(Br)\,u(x)\qquad(|h|\le r).\tag{G$'$}

Step P4 (Weak convergence from Wasserstein convergence). Let νk,νP2(R)\nu_{k},\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) (kNk\in\mathbb{N}) with (W2(νk,ν))k(W_{2}(\nu_{k},\nu))_{k} of limit 00. Then (i) νkν\nu_{k}\Rightarrow\nu on (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) and (ii) νkνkνν\nu_{k}\boxtimes\nu_{k}\Rightarrow\nu\boxtimes\nu on (R2,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{2},d_{E}), in the sense of Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space.

For each kk let πkΠ(νk,ν)\pi_{k}\in\Pi(\nu_{k},\nu) be optimal, I(πk)=W2(νk,ν)2I(\pi_{k})=W_{2}(\nu_{k},\nu)^{2} (Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment). (i) For bounded f:RRf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, Lipschitz with constant LL, Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz gives fdνkfdνLW2(νk,ν)|\int f\,d\nu_{k}-\int f\,d\nu|\le L\,W_{2}(\nu_{k},\nu), so fdνkfdν\int f\,d\nu_{k}\to\int f\,d\nu by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, and claim 1 of Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space gives νkν\nu_{k}\Rightarrow\nu. (ii) Let F:R2RF:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded, FBF|F|\le B_{F}, and Lipschitz with constant Λ\Lambda for dEd_{E}. By claim 4 of Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space and claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, dE((x,y),(x,y))=yyd_{E}((x,y),(x,y'))=|y-y'| and dE((x,y),(x,y))=xxd_{E}((x,y),(x',y))=|x-x'|, so each section yF(x,y)y\mapsto F(x,y) is bounded and Lipschitz with constant Λ\Lambda. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product and the Tonelli part of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems, applied to the nonnegative Borel function F+BFF+B_{F} and then subtracting BFB_{F}, the functions Ψk(x)=F(x,y)νk(dy)\Psi_{k}(x)=\int F(x,y)\,\nu_{k}(dy) and Ψ(x)=F(x,y)ν(dy)\Psi(x)=\int F(x,y)\,\nu(dy) are Borel with values in [BF,BF][-B_{F},B_{F}], and Fd(νν)=(F(x,y)ν(dy))ν(dx)\int F\,d(\nu'\boxtimes\nu'')=\int(\int F(x,y)\,\nu''(dy))\,\nu'(dx) for ν,ν{νk,ν}\nu',\nu''\in\{\nu_{k},\nu\}. By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz, Ψk(x)Ψ(x)ΛW2(νk,ν)|\Psi_{k}(x)-\Psi(x)|\le\Lambda\,W_{2}(\nu_{k},\nu) for every xx, and Ψ(x)Ψ(x)F(x,y)F(x,y)ν(dy)Λxx|\Psi(x)-\Psi(x')|\le\int|F(x,y)-F(x',y)|\,\nu(dy)\le\Lambda|x-x'|, so Ψ\Psi is bounded and Lipschitz. Hence

Fd(νkνk)Fd(νν)ΨkΨdνk+ΨdνkΨdν2ΛW2(νk,ν),\Bigl|\int F\,d(\nu_{k}\boxtimes\nu_{k})-\int F\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\Bigr|\le\int|\Psi_{k}-\Psi|\,d\nu_{k}+\Bigl|\int\Psi\,d\nu_{k}-\int\Psi\,d\nu\Bigr|\le2\Lambda\,W_{2}(\nu_{k},\nu),

the last term again by Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz; claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences and claim 1 of Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space give (ii).

Step P5 (Semicontinuity of the potential term). Let νk,ν\nu_{k},\nu be as in Step P4, suppose that VV is νk\nu_{k}-integrable for every kk and that Vdνka0\int V\,d\nu_{k}\le a_{0} for every kk, for some a0Ra_{0}\in\mathbb{R}. Then VV is ν\nu-integrable, Vdνa0\int V\,d\nu\le a_{0}, and for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is NN with Vdνε<Vdνk\int V\,d\nu-\varepsilon<\int V\,d\nu_{k} for all kNk\ge N.

For jNj\in\mathbb{N} let Vj=min{V,j}V_{j}=\min\{V,j\}; it is continuous (claim 4 of Continuity of the Absolute Value, Maximum and Minimum of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space) with mVjjm\le V_{j}\le j, hence bounded and Borel. By Step P4(i), VjdνkVjdν\int V_{j}\,d\nu_{k}\to\int V_{j}\,d\nu, and VjdνkVdνka0\int V_{j}\,d\nu_{k}\le\int V\,d\nu_{k}\le a_{0}, so Vjdνa0\int V_{j}\,d\nu\le a_{0} (claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences). The functions Vjm0V_{j}-m\ge0 are nondecreasing in jj with supremum VmV-m (claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers), so Monotone Convergence Theorem gives (Vm)dν=supj(Vjm)dνa0m<\int(V-m)\,d\nu=\sup_{j}\int(V_{j}-m)\,d\nu\le a_{0}-m<\infty. Hence VmV-m, and so VV, is ν\nu-integrable, and Vdν=supjVjdνa0\int V\,d\nu=\sup_{j}\int V_{j}\,d\nu\le a_{0}. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose first jj with Vjdν>Vdνε/2\int V_{j}\,d\nu>\int V\,d\nu-\varepsilon/2 (supremum property), then NN with VjdνkVjdν<ε/2|\int V_{j}\,d\nu_{k}-\int V_{j}\,d\nu|<\varepsilon/2 for kNk\ge N; for such kk, VdνkVjdνk>Vdνε\int V\,d\nu_{k}\ge\int V_{j}\,d\nu_{k}>\int V\,d\nu-\varepsilon.

Step P6 (Energy bounds). Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}. Since VmV\ge m, Vdμm\int V\,d\mu\ge m, and Elog(μ)(1+M2(μ))\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)\ge-(1+M_{2}(\mu)) by Basic Properties of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line: Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §lower-bound; so

E(μ)β4(1+M2(μ))+m.(E0)\mathcal{E}(\mu)\ge-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\bigl(1+M_{2}(\mu)\bigr)+m .\tag{E0}

Integrating (Q) against μ\mu gives β2M2(μ)Vdμ+b\tfrac{\beta}{2}M_{2}(\mu)\le\int V\,d\mu+b, so β4M2(μ)12Vdμ+b2\tfrac{\beta}{4}M_{2}(\mu)\le\tfrac12\int V\,d\mu+\tfrac{b}{2}, and therefore, writing E(μ)=β4Elog(μ)+Vdμ\mathcal{E}(\mu)=\tfrac{\beta}{4}\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)+\int V\,d\mu and using Elog(μ)(1+M2(μ))\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)\ge-(1+M_{2}(\mu)) directly rather than (E0), E(μ)β412Vdμb2+Vdμ\mathcal{E}(\mu)\ge-\tfrac{\beta}{4}-\tfrac12\int V\,d\mu-\tfrac b2+\int V\,d\mu. Hence

Vdμ2E(μ)+β2+b,M2(μ)2β(Vdμ+b)4βE(μ)+1+4bβ.(E1)\int V\,d\mu\le2\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\tfrac{\beta}{2}+b,\qquad M_{2}(\mu)\le\tfrac{2}{\beta}\Bigl(\int V\,d\mu+b\Bigr)\le\tfrac{4}{\beta}\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)+1+\tfrac{4b}{\beta}.\tag{E1}

Step P7 (First variation on D\mathcal{D}). Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} and ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}); let P0P\ge0 with ψ(x)P|\psi'(x)|\le P for all xx (The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §gradient), and Gt=id+tψG_{t}=\mathrm{id}+t\psi', which is Borel with (Gt)#μP2(R)(G_{t})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and G0=idG_{0}=\mathrm{id} (The Push-Forward of a Probability Measure with Finite Second Moment by the Identity Perturbed along the Gradient of a Test Function: Borel, Finite Second Moment, the Diagonal Coupling and the Wasserstein Bound §borel). We show: there is t0t_{0} with 0<t010<t_{0}\le1 such that (Gt)#μD(G_{t})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D} for every t(t0,t0)t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}), and tE((Gt)#μ)t\mapsto\mathcal{E}((G_{t})_{\#}\mu) on (t0,t0)(-t_{0},t_{0}) is differentiable at 00 with derivative

RVψdμβ4R2Fψd(μμ).(FV)\int_{\mathbb{R}}V'\psi'\,d\mu-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}F_{\psi}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu).\tag{FV}

Let U=(1,1)U=(-1,1) and f(t,x)=V(x+tψ(x))f(t,x)=V(x+t\psi'(x)) for tUt\in U, xRx\in\mathbb{R}. (i) For tUt\in U, xf(t,x)=VGt(x)x\mapsto f(t,x)=V\circ G_{t}(x) is Borel, and by (G') with r=Pr=P, f(t,x)exp(BP)u(x)+m|f(t,x)|\le\exp(BP)u(x)+|m|, which is μ\mu-integrable because uu is (Step P1); so f(t,)f(t,\cdot) is μ\mu-integrable. (ii) For fixed xx, the map sx+sψ(x)s\mapsto x+s\psi'(x) has all difference quotients equal to ψ(x)\psi'(x), so it is differentiable with derivative ψ(x)\psi'(x); by Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives and claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, sf(s,x)s\mapsto f(s,x) is differentiable at every sUs\in U with D1f(s,x)=V(x+sψ(x))ψ(x)D_{1}f(s,x)=V'(x+s\psi'(x))\psi'(x). (iii) By (G'), D1f(t,x)PBexp(BP)u(x)|D_{1}f(t,x)|\le PB\exp(BP)u(x), a μ\mu-integrable function of xx. By Differentiation under the Integral Sign, FV(t)=f(t,x)μ(dx)F_{V}(t)=\int f(t,x)\,\mu(dx) is differentiable at every point of UU, with FV(0)=VψdμF_{V}'(0)=\int V'\psi'\,d\mu. By the change of variables, VV is (Gt)#μ(G_{t})_{\#}\mu-integrable with Vd(Gt)#μ=FV(t)\int V\,d(G_{t})_{\#}\mu=F_{V}(t) for tUt\in U. Let t1t_{1} be as in The First Variation of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line along Gradient Perturbations of the Identity §variation for μ\mu and ψ\psi, and t0=min{t1,1}t_{0}=\min\{t_{1},1\}. For t(t0,t0)t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}), (Gt)#μDlog(G_{t})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log} and VV is integrable against it, so (Gt)#μD(G_{t})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D} and E((Gt)#μ)=β4Elog((Gt)#μ)+FV(t)\mathcal{E}((G_{t})_{\#}\mu)=\tfrac{\beta}{4}\mathcal{E}_{\log}((G_{t})_{\#}\mu)+F_{V}(t). Restricting both summands to (t0,t0)(-t_{0},t_{0}) (claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative) and using claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives with the derivative Fψd(μμ)-\int F_{\psi}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu) of The First Variation of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line along Gradient Perturbations of the Identity §variation gives (FV). If moreover μP2Φ(R)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\Phi^{*}}(\mathbb{R}), then by The First Variation of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line along Gradient Perturbations of the Identity §score the derivative (FV) equals Vψdμβ4Ξμ,ψμ\int V'\psi'\,d\mu-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\langle\Xi_{\mu},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}.

Step P8 (Gaussian smoothing and truncation). Let λ\lambda be Lebesgue measure on B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and, for 0<s10<s\le1, gsg_{s} the Gaussian kernel of The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails in dimension q=1q=1, which is the weight φs\varphi_{s} of claim 1 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder with m=1m=1, η=s\eta=s, and is even (The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §derivatives). For ρP(R)\rho\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) let pρ,s=gsρp_{\rho,s}=g_{s}*\rho be the Gaussian smoothing of Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity; by Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §duality it is nonnegative, Borel and λ\lambda-integrable with pρ,sdλ=1\int p_{\rho,s}\,d\lambda=1. Let νρ,s\nu_{\rho,s} be the measure with density pρ,sp_{\rho,s} with respect to λ\lambda (claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables), νρ,s(E)=1Epρ,sdλ\nu_{\rho,s}(E)=\int\mathbf{1}_{E}\,p_{\rho,s}\,d\lambda; since νρ,s(R)=1\nu_{\rho,s}(\mathbb{R})=1, νρ,sP(R)\nu_{\rho,s}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}). For Borel f:R[0,)f:\mathbb{R}\to[0,\infty) and xRx\in\mathbb{R} write (gsf)(x)=gs(xy)f(y)dy[0,](g_{s}*f)(x)=\int g_{s}(x-y)f(y)\,dy\in[0,\infty], consistently with the notation of Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity for bounded ff.

(a) Integrals against νρ,s\nu_{\rho,s}. For bounded Borel ff, fpρ,sf\,p_{\rho,s} is λ\lambda-integrable and fdνρ,s=fpρ,sdλ=gsfdρ\int f\,d\nu_{\rho,s}=\int f\,p_{\rho,s}\,d\lambda=\int g_{s}*f\,d\rho, by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables and Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §duality. For Borel f0f\ge0, put fk=min{f,k}f_{k}=\min\{f,k\} (kNk\in\mathbb{N}), bounded and Borel; fkf_{k} increases to ff (claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers). Three applications of Monotone Convergence Theorem (in yy for each fixed xx, then against λ\lambda, then against ρ\rho, the functions gsfkg_{s}*f_{k} being Borel by the duality clause) together with claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables give that gsfg_{s}*f is Borel and

fdνρ,s=fpρ,sdλ=supkfkpρ,sdλ=supkgsfkdρ=gsfdρ.\int f\,d\nu_{\rho,s}=\int f\,p_{\rho,s}\,d\lambda=\sup_{k}\int f_{k}\,p_{\rho,s}\,d\lambda=\sup_{k}\int g_{s}*f_{k}\,d\rho=\int g_{s}*f\,d\rho .

(b) Exponential moments. For real c0c\ge0 and xRx\in\mathbb{R}, gs(xy)exp(cyx)dy2exp(c2/2)\int g_{s}(x-y)\exp(c|y-x|)\,dy\le2\exp(c^{2}/2). Indeed exp(cv)exp(cv)+exp(cv)\exp(c|v|)\le\exp(cv)+\exp(-cv), one summand being the left side and the other positive. For σ{1,1}\sigma\in\{1,-1\}, claim 3 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder with a=σcsa=\sigma cs (so Za(v)=σcvZ_{a}(v)=\sigma cv and κa=c2s\kappa_{a}=c^{2}s) and the evenness of gsg_{s} give gs(xy)exp(σc(yx))=exp(c2s/2)gs(y(x+σcs))g_{s}(x-y)\exp(\sigma c(y-x))=\exp(c^{2}s/2)\,g_{s}(y-(x+\sigma cs)), whose integral in yy is exp(c2s/2)exp(c2/2)\exp(c^{2}s/2)\le\exp(c^{2}/2) by claim 1 there (with x+σcsx+\sigma cs in place of its aa), s1s\le1 and the monotonicity of exp\exp. Add the two bounds.

(c) Moments of uu. Put Γ=2exp(2B2)\Gamma=2\exp(2B^{2}). For j{1,2}j\in\{1,2\} and x,yRx,y\in\mathbb{R}, (G) with h=yxh=y-x and claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function give u(y)jexp(jByx)u(x)ju(y)^{j}\le\exp(jB|y-x|)u(x)^{j}, so by (b) with c=jBc=jB, (gsuj)(x)2exp(j2B2/2)u(x)jΓu(x)j(g_{s}*u^{j})(x)\le2\exp(j^{2}B^{2}/2)u(x)^{j}\le\Gamma u(x)^{j}. By (a),

ujdνρ,sΓujdρ(j=1,2).\int u^{j}\,d\nu_{\rho,s}\le\Gamma\int u^{j}\,d\rho\qquad(j=1,2).

(d) Membership in DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}. Suppose ρ(R[r,r])=0\rho(\mathbb{R}\setminus[-r,r])=0 for some real r0r\ge0. By Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval applied to the restriction of uu to [r,r][-r,r] there is UrU_{r} with uUru\le U_{r} on [r,r][-r,r]; so u2Ur2u^{2}\le U_{r}^{2} ρ\rho-almost everywhere and u2dρUr2\int u^{2}\,d\rho\le U_{r}^{2} (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison). Let ν=νρ,s\nu=\nu_{\rho,s}. By (c), u2dν<\int u^{2}\,d\nu<\infty, and udνu2dν\int u\,d\nu\le\int u^{2}\,d\nu since 1u1\le u. By (Q) and (U), x22β(u(x)+m+b)x^{2}\le\tfrac{2}{\beta}(u(x)+|m|+b), so M2(ν)<M_{2}(\nu)<\infty and νP2(R)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}); by (U), VV is ν\nu-integrable; and (V)2B2u2(V')^{2}\le B^{2}u^{2} (Step P3), so (V)2dν<\int(V')^{2}\,d\nu<\infty. By Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §regularity, p=pρ,sp=p_{\rho,s} is of class C3C^{3}, hence of class C1C^{1}, on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} (C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), and 1p\partial_{1}p is bounded; by claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line, pp is differentiable at every point with p=1pp'=\partial_{1}p continuous and bounded. As ν(E)=Epdλ\nu(E)=\int_{E}p\,d\lambda for every Borel EE, A Probability Measure on the Real Line with a Continuously Differentiable Density of Bounded Derivative Has Finite Free Fisher Information and Finite Logarithmic Energy §smooth gives νP2Φ(R)Dlog\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\Phi^{*}}(\mathbb{R})\cap\mathcal{D}_{\log}. By The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair, νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and then νDΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}.

(e) Weak convergence as s0s\to0. Let ρP(R)\rho\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), sk=1/(k+1)s_{k}=1/(k+1) and νk=νρ,sk\nu_{k}=\nu_{\rho,s_{k}}. Then νkρ\nu_{k}\Rightarrow\rho. Let ff be bounded, fMf|f|\le M_{f} with Mf>0M_{f}>0, and Lipschitz with constant L0L\ge0; it is Borel. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0 put r=ε/(L+1)r=\varepsilon/(L+1), so f(x)f(x)Lrε|f(x)-f(x')|\le Lr\le\varepsilon when xxr|x-x'|\le r. By Gaussian Smoothing of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Mass, Duality, Approximation of a Bounded Function with a Modulus of Continuity, and the Pairing Identity §approximation (with q=1q=1), (gsf)(x)f(x)ε+2Mfs/r2|(g_{s}*f)(x)-f(x)|\le\varepsilon+2M_{f}s/r^{2} for every xx, so by (a) fdνkfdρ=(gskff)dρε+2Mfsk/r2|\int f\,d\nu_{k}-\int f\,d\rho|=|\int(g_{s_{k}}*f-f)\,d\rho|\le\varepsilon+2M_{f}s_{k}/r^{2}. By claim 2 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is NN with 2Mf<(N+1)r2ε2M_{f}<(N+1)r^{2}\varepsilon, and then the difference is below 2ε2\varepsilon for kNk\ge N. Thus fdνkfdρ\int f\,d\nu_{k}\to\int f\,d\rho, and claim 1 of Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space gives νkρ\nu_{k}\Rightarrow\rho.

(f) Wasserstein convergence. Let ρ\rho and rr be as in (d) and νk\nu_{k} as in (e). Then ρP2(R)\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) (its second moment is at most r2r^{2} by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison), νkP2(R)\nu_{k}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) by (d), and (W2(νk,ρ))k(W_{2}(\nu_{k},\rho))_{k} has limit 00. Indeed, let ε>0\varepsilon>0, put cρ=Γudρ+mc_{\rho}=\Gamma\int u\,d\rho+|m| and M=(cρ+1)/ε>0M=(c_{\rho}+1)/\varepsilon>0, and let KM>0K_{M}>0 be given by Confining Potentials on the Real Line §superquadratic. For yKM|y|\ge K_{M}, My2V(y)u(y)+mMy^{2}\le V(y)\le u(y)+|m| by (U); so, by (c), for every kk

{KM<y}y2νk(dy)1M(u+m)dνkcρM<ε.\int_{\{K_{M}<|y|\}}y^{2}\,\nu_{k}(dy)\le\frac1M\int(u+|m|)\,d\nu_{k}\le\frac{c_{\rho}}{M}<\varepsilon .

With (e), Wasserstein Convergence from Weak Convergence with Uniformly Integrable Second Moments, and Wasserstein Compactness under a Superquadratic Moment Bound §convergence (dimension 11) gives the claim.

(g) Truncation. For nNn\in\mathbb{N} let Tn(x)=min{max{x,n},n}T_{n}(x)=\min\{\max\{x,-n\},n\}. A case check shows Tn(x)Tn(x)xx|T_{n}(x)-T_{n}(x')|\le|x-x'|, Tn(x)n|T_{n}(x)|\le n, Tn(x)=xT_{n}(x)=x for xn|x|\le n and Tn(x)xx|T_{n}(x)-x|\le|x| for all xx; so TnT_{n} is continuous (A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous) and Borel. For νP(R)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), ρ=(Tn)#νP(R)\rho=(T_{n})_{\#}\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) and ρ(R[n,n])=ν()=0\rho(\mathbb{R}\setminus[-n,n])=\nu(\emptyset)=0. If μP2(R)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and ρn=(Tn)#μ\rho_{n}=(T_{n})_{\#}\mu, then ρnP2(R)\rho_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and (W2(μ,ρn))n(W_{2}(\mu,\rho_{n}))_{n} has limit 00: by Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §pushforward, (id,Tn)#μΠ(μ,ρn)(\mathrm{id},T_{n})_{\#}\mu\in\Pi(\mu,\rho_{n}) has cost In=(xTn(x))2μ(dx)I_{n}=\int(x-T_{n}(x))^{2}\,\mu(dx); the integrands are dominated by the μ\mu-integrable function xx2x\mapsto x^{2} and vanish at xx once nxn\ge|x| (claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers), so In0I_{n}\to0 by Dominated Convergence Theorem; and W2(μ,ρn)2InW_{2}(\mu,\rho_{n})^{2}\le I_{n} (The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance), so W2(μ,ρn)<εW_{2}(\mu,\rho_{n})<\varepsilon as soon as In<ε2I_{n}<\varepsilon^{2} (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field).

Claim 1 (Penalty pair). By The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair, DΣDP2(R)\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}), E\mathcal{E} is real-valued on D\mathcal{D}, and Σ(μ)L2(μ;R)=Tμ\Sigma(\mu)\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R})=T_{\mu} for μDΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} (On the Real Line the Tangent Space is the Whole Space of Square-Integrable Vector Fields §everything). We verify the five conditions of Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §nonempty. The function g1g_{1} is nonnegative and Borel with g1dλ=1\int g_{1}\,d\lambda=1 (claim 1 of The Gaussian Smoothing Weight: Normalization, Derivatives, Exponential Tilting, Moments, and First-Order Remainder), so the measure γ\gamma with density g1g_{1} with respect to λ\lambda (claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables) belongs to P(R)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}). By Step P8(g), ρ=(T0)#γ\rho=(T_{0})_{\#}\gamma satisfies ρ(R[0,0])=0\rho(\mathbb{R}\setminus[0,0])=0, and by Step P8(d) with r=0r=0, νρ,1DΣ\nu_{\rho,1}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §bound. Put C=β4+m0C=\tfrac{\beta}{4}+|m|\ge0. Since mmm(1+M2(μ))m\ge-|m|\ge-|m|(1+M_{2}(\mu)), (E0) gives C(1+M2(μ))E(μ)-C(1+M_{2}(\mu))\le\mathcal{E}(\mu) for every μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §translation, and the formula for HEH_{\mathcal{E}}. Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} and aRa\in\mathbb{R}, and let τa(x)=x+a\tau_{a}(x)=x+a (The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation §constants). By Basic Properties of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line: Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §translation, (τa)#μDlog(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log} with Elog((τa)#μ)=Elog(μ)\mathcal{E}_{\log}((\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu)=\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu). By (G') with r=ar=|a|, xV(x+a)x\mapsto V(x+a) is μ\mu-integrable, so by the change of variables VV is (τa)#μ(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu-integrable with integral Φ0(a)=V(x+a)μ(dx)\Phi_{0}(a)=\int V(x+a)\,\mu(dx). Hence (τa)#μD(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D} and eμ(a)=β4Elog(μ)+Φ0(a)e_{\mu}(a)=\tfrac{\beta}{4}\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)+\Phi_{0}(a). Put Φ1(a)=V(x+a)μ(dx)\Phi_{1}(a)=\int V'(x+a)\,\mu(dx) and Φ2(a)=V(x+a)μ(dx)\Phi_{2}(a)=\int V''(x+a)\,\mu(dx), well defined by (G'). Fix a0Ra_{0}\in\mathbb{R}, let U0U_{0} be the open interval (a01,a0+1)(a_{0}-1,a_{0}+1) and r0=a0+1r_{0}=|a_{0}|+1, so tr0|t|\le r_{0} for tU0t\in U_{0}. Apply Differentiation under the Integral Sign on U0U_{0} to f(t,x)=V(x+t)f(t,x)=V(x+t): condition (i) holds by (G') with r=r0r=r_{0}; (ii) holds with D1f(t,x)=V(x+t)D_{1}f(t,x)=V'(x+t), by Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives for tx+tt\mapsto x+t (derivative 11) and claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative; (iii) holds with g=Bexp(Br0)ug=B\exp(Br_{0})u by (G'). So the restriction of Φ0\Phi_{0} to U0U_{0} is differentiable at a0a_{0} with derivative Φ1(a0)\Phi_{1}(a_{0}). The same argument with VV', VV'' and the bound Aexp(Br0)uA\exp(Br_{0})u of (G') in place of VV, VV' and Bexp(Br0)uB\exp(Br_{0})u shows that the restriction of Φ1\Phi_{1} to U0U_{0} is differentiable at a0a_{0} with derivative Φ2(a0)\Phi_{2}(a_{0}). The condition of Derivative at an Interior Point at a0a_{0} involves only points a0+ha_{0}+h with 0<h<δ0<|h|<\delta, and δ\delta may be decreased to at most 11; so Φ0\Phi_{0} and Φ1\Phi_{1}, as functions on R\mathbb{R}, are differentiable at a0a_{0} with derivatives Φ1(a0)\Phi_{1}(a_{0}) and Φ2(a0)\Phi_{2}(a_{0}). Moreover Φ2\Phi_{2} is continuous at a0a_{0}: if (aj)j(a_{j})_{j} converges to a0a_{0}, there is JJ with aja0<1|a_{j}-a_{0}|<1 for jJj\ge J; for such jj, V(x+aj)V(x+a0)V''(x+a_{j})\to V''(x+a_{0}) for every xx (continuity of VV'' and Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential) with the μ\mu-integrable bound Aexp(Br0)u(x)A\exp(Br_{0})u(x), so Dominated Convergence Theorem applied to (aJ+i)i(a_{J+i})_{i} gives Φ2(aj)Φ2(a0)\Phi_{2}(a_{j})\to\Phi_{2}(a_{0}), and Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §criterion applies. By claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, eμe_{\mu} is differentiable at every point with eμ=Φ1e_{\mu}'=\Phi_{1}, and by claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line, 1eμ=Φ1\partial_{1}e_{\mu}=\Phi_{1} and 11eμ=1Φ1=Φ2\partial_{1}\partial_{1}e_{\mu}=\partial_{1}\Phi_{1}=\Phi_{2} at every point. The functions eμe_{\mu} and Φ1\Phi_{1} are continuous (being differentiable) and so is Φ2\Phi_{2}, continuity on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} for the Euclidean distance being continuity for dRd_{\mathbb{R}} (preamble of One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative). By clauses 1 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, eμe_{\mu} and Φ1\Phi_{1} are of class C1C^{1}, and by clause 2 with k=1k=1, eμe_{\mu} is of class C2C^{2} on R\mathbb{R}. Finally, by Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function, HE(μ)=D2eμ(0)H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)=D^{2}e_{\mu}(0) is the 1×11\times1 matrix with entry 11eμ(0)=Φ2(0)=Vdμ\partial_{1}\partial_{1}e_{\mu}(0)=\Phi_{2}(0)=\int V''\,d\mu, where VV'' is μ\mu-integrable by (G') with r=0r=0. This proves the second sentence of the claim.

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §variation. Let μDΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}). Then μDP2Φ(R)\mu\in\mathcal{D}\cap\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\Phi^{*}}(\mathbb{R}), and id+tψ=Gt\mathrm{id}+t\nabla\psi=G_{t}. Step P7 gives t0>0t_{0}>0 with (Gt)#μD(G_{t})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D} for t(t0,t0)t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}) and derivative at 00 equal to Vψdμβ4Ξμ,ψμ=V,ψμβ4Ξμ,ψμ=Σ(μ),ψμ\int V'\psi'\,d\mu-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\langle\Xi_{\mu},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\langle V',\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\langle\Xi_{\mu},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\langle\Sigma(\mu),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}, by bilinearity of the inner product of L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}) and the definition of Σ(μ)\Sigma(\mu).

Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §dense. Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} and ε>0\varepsilon>0. First choose nNn\in\mathbb{N} with W2(μ,ρn)<ε/2W_{2}(\mu,\rho_{n})<\varepsilon/2, where ρn=(Tn)#μ\rho_{n}=(T_{n})_{\#}\mu (Step P8(g)); then, ρn\rho_{n} being carried by [n,n][-n,n], choose kk with W2(νρn,sk,ρn)<ε/2W_{2}(\nu_{\rho_{n},s_{k}},\rho_{n})<\varepsilon/2 (Step P8(f) with r=nr=n). Then ν=νρn,skDΣ\nu=\nu_{\rho_{n},s_{k}}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} by Step P8(d), and W2(ν,μ)W2(ν,ρn)+W2(ρn,μ)<εW_{2}(\nu,\mu)\le W_{2}(\nu,\rho_{n})+W_{2}(\rho_{n},\mu)<\varepsilon by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §triangle and The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §symmetry.

Hence (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) is a penalty pair, and HE(μ)=VdμH_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)=\int V''\,d\mu for μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

Claim 2 (Coercivity and the map property). Let cRc\in\mathbb{R}, Sc={μD:E(μ)c}S_{c}=\{\mu\in\mathcal{D}:\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le c\}, and let (μn)n(\mu_{n})_{n} be a sequence in ScS_{c}. By (E1), Vdμn2c+β2+b\int V\,d\mu_{n}\le2c+\tfrac{\beta}{2}+b for every nn. The function VV is Borel, bounded below by mm, and superquadratic in the sense of Wasserstein Convergence from Weak Convergence with Uniformly Integrable Second Moments, and Wasserstein Compactness under a Superquadratic Moment Bound §compactness by Confining Potentials on the Real Line §superquadratic; that clause gives μP2(R)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and a strictly increasing (nk)k(n_{k})_{k} with W2(μnk,μ)0W_{2}(\mu_{n_{k}},\mu)\to0. Since β4Elog(μnk)=E(μnk)Vdμnkcm\tfrac{\beta}{4}\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu_{n_{k}})=\mathcal{E}(\mu_{n_{k}})-\int V\,d\mu_{n_{k}}\le c-m, Basic Properties of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line: Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §closed with the bound 4β(cm)\tfrac{4}{\beta}(c-m) gives μDlog\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log}. Step P5 gives that VV is μ\mu-integrable, so μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Basic Properties of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line: Lower Bound, Translation Invariance, Closed Sublevel Sets and Lower Semicontinuity §lsc and claim 1 of Sequential Characterization of Lower Semicontinuity on a Subset of a Metric Space (the sequence (μnk)k(\mu_{n_{k}})_{k} lies in Dlog\mathcal{D}_{\log} and converges to μ\mu there) there is N1N_{1} with Elog(μ)ε<Elog(μnk)\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)-\varepsilon<\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu_{n_{k}}) for kN1k\ge N_{1}, and by Step P5 there is N2N_{2} with Vdμε<Vdμnk\int V\,d\mu-\varepsilon<\int V\,d\mu_{n_{k}} for kN2k\ge N_{2}. For kmax{N1,N2}k\ge\max\{N_{1},N_{2}\}, E(μ)(β4+1)ε<E(μnk)c\mathcal{E}(\mu)-(\tfrac{\beta}{4}+1)\varepsilon<\mathcal{E}(\mu_{n_{k}})\le c. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, E(μ)c\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le c, i.e. μSc\mu\in S_{c}. So ScS_{c} is sequentially compact in (P2(R),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}),W_{2}), and the pair is Wasserstein-coercive (Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pairs §coercive). Every μDDlog\mu\in\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{D}_{\log} satisfies μ({x})=0\mu(\{x\})=0 for every xx (The Logarithmic Energy of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §energy), i.e. is atomless; so D\mathcal{D} has the map property by Two Sufficient Conditions for the Map Property: Absolute Continuity, and Atomlessness on the Line §line.

Claim 3 (Closed score). Let R0R\ge0, let (νn)n(\nu_{n})_{n} be a sequence in DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} with Σ(νn)νnR\lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le R, let νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}, and let (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n} be a sequence of couplings of vanishing cost from (νn)n(\nu_{n})_{n} to ν\nu, so πnΠ(νn,ν)\pi_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\nu) and I(πn)0I(\pi_{n})\to0. Since W2(νn,ν)2I(πn)W_{2}(\nu_{n},\nu)^{2}\le I(\pi_{n}) (The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance), claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives W2(νn,ν)<εW_{2}(\nu_{n},\nu)<\varepsilon whenever I(πn)<ε2I(\pi_{n})<\varepsilon^{2}; so W2(νn,ν)0W_{2}(\nu_{n},\nu)\to0, and likewise I(πn)0\sqrt{I(\pi_{n})}\to0. Step P4 applies.

Test functions. Fix ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), with PP as in Step P7 and Lψ0L_{\psi}\ge0 a bound for Δψ|\Delta\psi|. The support of ψ\psi' is compact (The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §gradient), hence bounded (Heine-Borel Theorem in Rn\mathbb{R}^n), and contains every xx with ψ(x)0\psi'(x)\ne0 (Support of a Real-Valued Function on a Topological Space); so there is rψ0r_{\psi}\ge0 with ψ(x)=0\psi'(x)=0 for x>rψ|x|>r_{\psi}. By Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, applied to the restrictions of VV' and V-V' to [rψ,rψ][-r_{\psi},r_{\psi}], there is WψW_{\psi} with VWψ|V'|\le W_{\psi} there; so VψPWψ|V'\psi'|\le PW_{\psi} everywhere, and VψV'\psi' and (ψ)2(\psi')^{2} are bounded and continuous (Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space); FψF_{\psi} is bounded and continuous by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §quotient. For x<yx<y, Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval applied to ψ\psi' on [x,y][x,y] gives ψ(y)ψ(x)Lψyx|\psi'(y)-\psi'(x)|\le L_{\psi}|y-x|. By the definition of Σ\Sigma and Finite Free Fisher Information, the Free Score and the Free Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §score,

n(ψ):=Σ(νn),ψνn=Vψdνnβ4Fψd(νnνn).\ell_{n}(\psi):=\langle\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu_{n}}=\int V'\psi'\,d\nu_{n}-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\int F_{\psi}\,d(\nu_{n}\boxtimes\nu_{n}).

Put (ψ)=Vψdνβ4Fψd(νν)\ell(\psi)=\int V'\psi'\,d\nu-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\int F_{\psi}\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu). By Step P4, Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space and claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, n(ψ)(ψ)\ell_{n}(\psi)\to\ell(\psi) and (ψ)2dνn(ψ)2dν\int(\psi')^{2}\,d\nu_{n}\to\int(\psi')^{2}\,d\nu. By The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in L2(νn;R)L^{2}(\nu_{n};\mathbb{R}), n(ψ)2R2(ψ)2dνn\ell_{n}(\psi)^{2}\le R^{2}\int(\psi')^{2}\,d\nu_{n}; passing to the limit (claim 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences) gives (ψ)2(Rψν)2\ell(\psi)^{2}\le(R\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\nu})^{2}, so (ψ)Rψν|\ell(\psi)|\le R\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\nu} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

νDΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}. As νDlog\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log} and VV is ν\nu-integrable, Splitting a Bounded First Variation into a Square-Integrable Potential Force and a Finite Free Fisher Information §splitting with a=β4a=\tfrac{\beta}{4} and C=RC=R gives (V)2dν<\int(V')^{2}\,d\nu<\infty and νP2Φ(R)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\Phi^{*}}(\mathbb{R}); so νDΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, and the computation above at ν\nu gives Σ(ν),ψν=(ψ)\langle\Sigma(\nu),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu}=\ell(\psi). Hence

Σ(νn),ψνnΣ(ν),ψν(ψCc(R)).(S)\langle\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu_{n}}\to\langle\Sigma(\nu),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu}\qquad(\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})).\tag{S}

Weak convergence along (πn)(\pi_{n}). (a) Let ψ\psi be as above and qnq_{n} a Borel representative of Σ(νn)\Sigma(\nu_{n}). By The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §pairing, K(Σ(νn),ψ,πn)=qn(x)ψ(y)πn(dz)\mathcal{K}(\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi,\pi_{n})=\int q_{n}(x)\psi'(y)\,\pi_{n}(dz), and by the change of variables Σ(νn),ψνn=qn(x)ψ(x)πn(dz)\langle\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu_{n}}=\int q_{n}(x)\psi'(x)\,\pi_{n}(dz). The Borel functions zqn(x)z\mapsto q_{n}(x) and h(z)=ψ(y)ψ(x)h(z)=\psi'(y)-\psi'(x) satisfy qn(x)2πn(dz)=Σ(νn)νn2R2\int q_{n}(x)^{2}\,\pi_{n}(dz)=\lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}^{2}\le R^{2} and h(z)2Lψ2(xy)2h(z)^{2}\le L_{\psi}^{2}(x-y)^{2}, so h2dπnLψ2I(πn)\int h^{2}\,d\pi_{n}\le L_{\psi}^{2}I(\pi_{n}) (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost). By Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder with exponents 22 and 22,

K(Σ(νn),ψ,πn)Σ(νn),ψνnqn(x)h(z)πn(dz)RLψI(πn)0,\bigl|\mathcal{K}(\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi,\pi_{n})-\langle\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu_{n}}\bigr|\le\int|q_{n}(x)h(z)|\,\pi_{n}(dz)\le RL_{\psi}\sqrt{I(\pi_{n})}\to0,

and with (S) and claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, K(Σ(νn),ψ,πn)Σ(ν),ψν\mathcal{K}(\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi,\pi_{n})\to\langle\Sigma(\nu),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu}.

(b) Let ηL2(ν;R)\eta\in L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0; put Sν=Σ(ν)νS_{\nu}=\lVert\Sigma(\nu)\rVert_{\nu} and ε=ε/(3(R+Sν+1))\varepsilon'=\varepsilon/(3(R+S_{\nu}+1)). Since L2(ν;R)=TνL^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R})=T_{\nu} is the closure of GνG_{\nu} (On the Real Line the Tangent Space is the Whole Space of Square-Integrable Vector Fields §everything, The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §tangent), Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space gives ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) with ηψν<ε\lVert\eta-\nabla\psi\rVert_{\nu}<\varepsilon'. By The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §linear and The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §bound, K(Σ(νn),η,πn)K(Σ(νn),ψ,πn)Rε|\mathcal{K}(\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\eta,\pi_{n})-\mathcal{K}(\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi,\pi_{n})|\le R\varepsilon' for every nn, and by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space, Σ(ν),ηνΣ(ν),ψνSνε|\langle\Sigma(\nu),\eta\rangle_{\nu}-\langle\Sigma(\nu),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu}|\le S_{\nu}\varepsilon'. By (a) choose NN with K(Σ(νn),ψ,πn)Σ(ν),ψν<ε/3|\mathcal{K}(\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\nabla\psi,\pi_{n})-\langle\Sigma(\nu),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\nu}|<\varepsilon/3 for nNn\ge N. For nNn\ge N, K(Σ(νn),η,πn)Σ(ν),ην<(R+Sν)ε+ε/3<ε|\mathcal{K}(\Sigma(\nu_{n}),\eta,\pi_{n})-\langle\Sigma(\nu),\eta\rangle_{\nu}|<(R+S_{\nu})\varepsilon'+\varepsilon/3<\varepsilon. So (Σ(νn))n(\Sigma(\nu_{n}))_{n} converges weakly to Σ(ν)\Sigma(\nu) along (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n} (Strong and Weak Convergence of Vector Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Cost §weak), and the pair has closed score along couplings (Penalty Pairs with Closed Score Along Couplings §closed).

Claim 4 (Regular penalised maxima). Let χ\chi be an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, let λ0>0\lambda_{0}>0 be the positive number written λ\lambda in Penalty Pairs with Regular Penalised Maxima §regular (the letter λ\lambda denotes Lebesgue measure here), and let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} be a point at which χλ0E\chi-\lambda_{0}\mathcal{E} has a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D}, with radius δ>0\delta>0. By property (b) of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §test, χ\chi is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with gradient ζ=χ(μ)L2(μ;R)\zeta=\nabla\chi(\mu)\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}). Let ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), GtG_{t} and t0t_{0} as in Step P7, pψ=ψμp_{\psi}=\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu}, and t2=min{t0,δ/(pψ+1)}>0t_{2}=\min\{t_{0},\delta/(p_{\psi}+1)\}>0. For t(t2,t2)t\in(-t_{2},t_{2}): (Gt)#μD(G_{t})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{D} (Step P7) and W2(μ,(Gt)#μ)tpψ<δW_{2}(\mu,(G_{t})_{\#}\mu)\le|t|p_{\psi}<\delta (The Push-Forward of a Probability Measure with Finite Second Moment by the Identity Perturbed along the Gradient of a Test Function: Borel, Finite Second Moment, the Diagonal Coupling and the Wasserstein Bound §distance); so ϕ(t)=χ((Gt)#μ)λ0E((Gt)#μ)ϕ(0)\phi(t)=\chi((G_{t})_{\#}\mu)-\lambda_{0}\mathcal{E}((G_{t})_{\#}\mu)\le\phi(0), as (G0)#μ=μ(G_{0})_{\#}\mu=\mu. Thus ϕ:(t2,t2)R\phi:(-t_{2},t_{2})\to\mathbb{R} has a local maximum at 00 relative to (t2,t2)(-t_{2},t_{2}).

Differentiability of the first term. Put g0=ζ,ψμg_{0}=\langle\zeta,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and let θ>0\theta>0 be given by Differentiability of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Along Couplings, and Its Gradient §differentiable for ε/(pψ+1)\varepsilon/(p_{\psi}+1). For 0<t<θ/(pψ+1)0<|t|<\theta/(p_{\psi}+1), the coupling πt=(id,Gt)#μΠ(μ,(Gt)#μ)\pi_{t}=(\mathrm{id},G_{t})_{\#}\mu\in\Pi(\mu,(G_{t})_{\#}\mu) has I(πt)=t2pψ2<θ2I(\pi_{t})=t^{2}p_{\psi}^{2}<\theta^{2} (The Push-Forward of a Probability Measure with Finite Second Moment by the Identity Perturbed along the Gradient of a Test Function: Borel, Finite Second Moment, the Diagonal Coupling and the Wasserstein Bound §coupling), and by The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §displacement with S=GtS=G_{t}, whose displacement Gtid=tψG_{t}-\mathrm{id}=t\psi' is bounded, J(ζ,πt)=ζ,tψμ=tg0\mathcal{J}(\zeta,\pi_{t})=\langle\zeta,t\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=tg_{0}. Hence χ((Gt)#μ)χ(μ)tg0εpψ+1tpψ<εt|\chi((G_{t})_{\#}\mu)-\chi(\mu)-tg_{0}|\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{p_{\psi}+1}|t|p_{\psi}<\varepsilon|t|, so, the restriction to (t2,t2)(-t_{2},t_{2}) being harmless, tχ((Gt)#μ)t\mapsto\chi((G_{t})_{\#}\mu) is differentiable at 00 with derivative g0g_{0} (Derivative at an Interior Point).

By Step P7 and claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative and claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, ϕ\phi is differentiable at 00 with ϕ(0)=g0λ0(Vψdμβ4Fψd(μμ))\phi'(0)=g_{0}-\lambda_{0}\bigl(\int V'\psi'\,d\mu-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\int F_{\psi}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\bigr), and ϕ(0)=0\phi'(0)=0 by Vanishing of the Derivative at an Interior Local Extremum. With The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}),

Vψdμβ4Fψd(μμ)=λ01g0λ01ζμψμ.\Bigl|\int V'\psi'\,d\mu-\tfrac{\beta}{4}\int F_{\psi}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\Bigr|=\lambda_{0}^{-1}|g_{0}|\le\lambda_{0}^{-1}\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}\,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu}.

This holds for every ψ\psi, and μDlog\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log} with VV μ\mu-integrable; Splitting a Bounded First Variation into a Square-Integrable Potential Force and a Finite Free Fisher Information §splitting with a=β4a=\tfrac{\beta}{4} and C=λ01ζμC=\lambda_{0}^{-1}\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu} gives (V)2dμ<\int(V')^{2}\,d\mu<\infty and μP2Φ(R)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\Phi^{*}}(\mathbb{R}), i.e. μDΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}. So the pair has regular penalised maxima (Penalty Pairs with Regular Penalised Maxima §regular).

Claim 5 (Displacement convexity). Let μDΣ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and let πΠ(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) be optimal. In L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}), Σ(μ)=V+β4(Ξμ)\Sigma(\mu)=V'+\tfrac{\beta}{4}(-\Xi_{\mu}), so by The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §linear, J(Σ(μ),π)=J(V,π)+β4J(Ξμ,π)\mathcal{J}(\Sigma(\mu),\pi)=\mathcal{J}(V',\pi)+\tfrac{\beta}{4}\mathcal{J}(-\Xi_{\mu},\pi). By Displacement Convexity of the Logarithmic Energy on the Real Line §convex (μDlogP2Φ(R)\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log}\cap\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\Phi^{*}}(\mathbb{R}), νDlog\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log}), Elog(μ)+J(Ξμ,π)Elog(ν)\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)+\mathcal{J}(-\Xi_{\mu},\pi)\le\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\nu). By The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §pairing with the representative VV', J(V,π)=V(x)(yx)π(dz)\mathcal{J}(V',\pi)=\int V'(x)(y-x)\,\pi(dz); the functions zV(y)z\mapsto V(y) and zV(x)z\mapsto V(x) are π\pi-integrable with integrals Vdν\int V\,d\nu and Vdμ\int V\,d\mu (change of variables), and V(x)(yx)V(y)V(x)V'(x)(y-x)\le V(y)-V(x) for every zz by Step P2(i); so J(V,π)VdνVdμ\mathcal{J}(V',\pi)\le\int V\,d\nu-\int V\,d\mu. Multiplying the logarithmic inequality by β4>0\tfrac{\beta}{4}>0 and adding,

E(μ)+J(Σ(μ),π)+02I(π)=β4(Elog(μ)+J(Ξμ,π))+Vdμ+J(V,π)β4Elog(ν)+Vdν=E(ν).\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\mathcal{J}(\Sigma(\mu),\pi)+\tfrac{0}{2}I(\pi)=\tfrac{\beta}{4}\bigl(\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu)+\mathcal{J}(-\Xi_{\mu},\pi)\bigr)+\int V\,d\mu+\mathcal{J}(V',\pi)\le\tfrac{\beta}{4}\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\nu)+\int V\,d\nu=\mathcal{E}(\nu).

So the pair is 00-displacement convex, i.e. displacement convex (λ\lambda-Displacement Convexity of a Penalty Pair on the Wasserstein Space §convex).

Claim 6 (Semicontinuity and growth). By Claims 1 and 2 the pair is a Wasserstein-coercive penalty pair, so E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} by Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §lsc. Let μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}. By (E1), M2(μ)4βE(μ)+1+4bβc1(1+E(μ))M_{2}(\mu)\le\tfrac{4}{\beta}\mathcal{E}(\mu)+1+\tfrac{4b}{\beta}\le c_{1}(1+|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|) with c1=4β+1+4bβc_{1}=\tfrac{4}{\beta}+1+\tfrac{4b}{\beta}. By Claim 1, Step P2(iii) and V(Vm)+m|V|\le(V-m)+|m|, 0HE(μ)=VdμVdμm+m+C10\le H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)=\int V''\,d\mu\le\int V\,d\mu-m+|m|+|C_{1}|, so by (E1) and m=m-m=|m|, HE(μ)2E(μ)+β2+b+2m+C1c2(1+E(μ))|H_{\mathcal{E}}(\mu)|\le2\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\tfrac{\beta}{2}+b+2|m|+|C_{1}|\le c_{2}(1+|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|) with c2=2+β2+b+2m+C1c_{2}=2+\tfrac{\beta}{2}+b+2|m|+|C_{1}|. Take C=c1+c2C=c_{1}+c_{2}.

Claim 7 (Continuity of the translation Hessian at bounded energy). Let R>0R>0 and SR={μD:E(μ)R}S_{R}=\{\mu\in\mathcal{D}:|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|\le R\}. By (E1), every νSR\nu\in S_{R} satisfies (Vm)dνaR\int(V-m)\,d\nu\le a_{R}, where aR=2R+β2+bm0a_{R}=2R+\tfrac{\beta}{2}+b-m\ge0. By Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §on-subset it suffices to show: if μk,μSR\mu_{k},\mu\in S_{R} and W2(μk,μ)0W_{2}(\mu_{k},\mu)\to0, then VdμkVdμ\int V''\,d\mu_{k}\to\int V''\,d\mu. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. First put η0=ε/(4(aR+1))\eta_{0}=\varepsilon/(4(a_{R}+1)) and let Cη0C_{\eta_{0}} be given by Confining Potentials on the Real Line §curvature for η0\eta_{0}; then put L=η0m+Cη0L=\eta_{0}|m|+|C_{\eta_{0}}| and VL=min{V,L}V''_{L}=\min\{V'',L\}, a continuous function with 0VLL0\le V''_{L}\le L (Step P2(ii)). Where V>LV''>L, VVL=VLη0V+Cη0Lη0(Vm)V''-V''_{L}=V''-L\le\eta_{0}|V|+C_{\eta_{0}}-L\le\eta_{0}(V-m); elsewhere VVL=0η0(Vm)V''-V''_{L}=0\le\eta_{0}(V-m). Hence for νSR\nu\in S_{R}, 0VdνVLdνη0aR<ε/40\le\int V''\,d\nu-\int V''_{L}\,d\nu\le\eta_{0}a_{R}<\varepsilon/4. Finally, by Step P4(i) choose NN with VLdμkVLdμ<ε/2|\int V''_{L}\,d\mu_{k}-\int V''_{L}\,d\mu|<\varepsilon/2 for kNk\ge N. For kNk\ge N,

VdμkVdμ<ε4+ε2+ε4=ε.\Bigl|\int V''\,d\mu_{k}-\int V''\,d\mu\Bigr|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}=\varepsilon .

By Claim 1, HE(ν)=VdνH_{\mathcal{E}}(\nu)=\int V''\,d\nu on D\mathcal{D}, so the restriction of HEH_{\mathcal{E}} to SRS_{R} is continuous.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…