Proof of One Modulus and a Sum Bound for a Finite Family
lemmalem:finite-family-uniform-control-2026aClaims 2 and 3 follow from homogeneity, comparison and the 'each summand is at most the sum' property of finite sums. Claim 1 is an induction on the number of members of the family, the inductive step taking the lesser of two moduli.
Conventions. Of the setting adopted by the statement only the real numbers with their order, the natural numbers and the initial segments are used; no Euclidean or matrix notation enters. Elementary order facts are those of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, whose claim 1 is the compatibility of the strict order with addition, the non-strict law being an axiom of the ordered field ; order facts about are those of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers. Recall that .
Proof of claim 2. Every real satisfies , by the multiplicative identity axiom of the ordered field . Hence, applying claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums to the -tuple all of whose components are and to the scalar ,
the last equality by commutativity of multiplication. For the first assertion, by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so and the -tuple of ones has nonnegative components; claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums then gives , applied with the index , which lies in because by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers.
Proof of claim 3. Let be the -tuple all of whose components equal . Then for every , so claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers gives
the last equality by claim 2.
Proof of claim 1. Let be the set of those with the following property: for all metric spaces and , every , every , every assignment to each of a function that is continuous at relative to , and every positive , there is a positive such that every with satisfies for every . Claim 1 asserts that .
The number lies in . Let data as above be given with . Continuity of at relative to provides a positive such that every with satisfies . If then , while by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, so by claim 2 of that lemma; the displayed bound therefore holds for every .
The step. Let and let data as above be given for in place of . Every satisfies and , hence by claim 1 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, so ; the given assignment therefore restricts to an assignment on of functions continuous at relative to , and since there is a positive such that every with satisfies for every . Continuity of at relative to provides a positive such that every with satisfies . By claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field there is with , and or ; in either case is positive.
Let satisfy and let . By the mixed transitivity of claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and . If , the required bound holds by the choice of . Otherwise and , so by claim 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, that is , and the required bound holds by the choice of . Hence .
By Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, , which is claim 1.
Loadingβ¦
Prerequisites
bc06b49a-a666-4343-8a4a-02c6cf212a8b