Reason: Reference migration of the cost-convergence proof to the standing versions of the tracking proposition, the N-agent cost definition and the generalized mean-field cost.
whose expectation is the N-agent costJN[hA], satisfies ∣V∣≤(T+1)C at every point of Ω∗. At every point of Ω it satisfies V≥−(TCL+CG), where CL and CG are the lower bounds belonging to the population cost data. Since P(Ω∗)=1, the one-sided version of the passage of almost sure inequalities to expectations, applied with the constant random variable U=(T+1)C, shows that JN[hA] is a real number with ∣JN[hA]∣≤(T+1)C.
By the tracking proposition, ∣Σt(ω)−St∣≤Ψ(ω) for every t∈[0,T]. If Ψ(ω)≤δ then the uniform continuity clause gives
for every t; and in all cases these differences are at most 2C. Writing 1{Ψ>δ} for the function equal to 1 where Ψ>δ and 0 elsewhere, we therefore have, at every ω∈Ω∗,
Adding the two displays and using the triangle inequality, the random variable V satisfies V−JMF[(S),(A)]≤(T+1)(ε+2C1{Ψ>δ}) at every ω∈Ω∗, the number JMF[(S),(A)] being exactly the sum of the two mean-field terms by the definition of the generalized mean-field cost. Since P(Ω∗)=1 and JN[hA]=E[V], the one-sided version of the passage of almost sure inequalities to expectations, applied to the random variable V−JMF[(S),(A)], which is bounded below at every point of Ω, and to the bounded random variable U=(T+1)(ε+2C1{Ψ>δ}), gives
the last equality by linearity of the integral, the expectation of the indicator of an event being its probability.
Finally, Ψ2 is a nonnegative random variable, so Markov's inequality gives
P(Ψ>δ)≤P(Ψ2≥δ2)≤δ2E[Ψ2],
which yields the stated bound.
Claim 2. Let η>0. Choose ε=η/(2(T+1)) and let δ>0 be as in the boundedness and uniform continuity lemma for this ε; note that C and δ do not depend on N. By the tracking proposition,
E[ΨN2]≤2e2ΛbT(E[∣Σ0N−S0∣2]+N8l(l−1)BT),
where ΨN is the random variable of that proposition for the N-th system. Both terms in the bracket converge to 0 as N increases, the first by hypothesis, so E[ΨN2] converges to 0. Choose N0 such that (T+1)2CE[ΨN2]/δ2<η/2 for every N≥N0. Then Claim 1 gives
JN[hA]−JMF[(S),(A)]<2η+2η=ηfor every N≥N0.
As η>0 was arbitrary, JN[hA]converges to JMF[(S),(A)]. ■