TheoremBase

Proof of The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity

lemmalem:real-inner-product-metric-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Β· 6,679 chars Β· 18 deps Β· depth 11 Reason: P10.1 Batch 1a proof.

Triangle inequality from the expansion of |x+y|^2 and Cauchy-Schwarz; the metric axioms and the limit and continuity statements follow by epsilon arguments from the triangle inequalities.

Proof

We use the notation and claims of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space, and for real numbers the claims of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Vector identities such as βˆ’(xβˆ’y)=yβˆ’x-(x-y)=y-x, (x+z)βˆ’(y+z)=xβˆ’y(x+z)-(y+z)=x-y and Ξ»xβˆ’Ξ»y=Ξ»(xβˆ’y)\lambda x-\lambda y=\lambda(x-y) follow from the axioms of Vector Space over a Field and Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and are used without further comment.

Claim 1. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§expansion, claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space,

∣x+y∣2=∣x∣2+2⟨x,y⟩+∣y∣2β‰€βˆ£x∣2+2∣xβˆ£β€‰βˆ£y∣+∣y∣2=(∣x∣+∣y∣)2,|x+y|^{2}=|x|^{2}+2\langle x,y\rangle+|y|^{2}\le|x|^{2}+2|x|\,|y|+|y|^{2}=(|x|+|y|)^{2},

the inequality by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field (multiplier 2β‰₯02\ge 0) and the compatibility of the order with addition (an axiom of Ordered Field). Both ∣x+y∣|x+y| and ∣x∣+∣y∣|x|+|y| are nonnegative (the latter by claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), so ∣x+yβˆ£β‰€βˆ£x∣+∣y∣|x+y|\le|x|+|y| by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Applying this to xx and βˆ’y-y and using βˆ£βˆ’y∣=∣y∣|-y|=|y| (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity) gives ∣xβˆ’yβˆ£β‰€βˆ£x∣+∣y∣|x-y|\le|x|+|y|.

Claim 2. By claim 1, ∣x∣=∣(xβˆ’y)+yβˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ’y∣+∣y∣|x|=|(x-y)+y|\le|x-y|+|y|, so ∣xβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£yβˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ’y∣|x|-|y|\le|x-y|; exchanging xx and yy and using ∣yβˆ’x∣=βˆ£βˆ’(xβˆ’y)∣=∣xβˆ’y∣|y-x|=|-(x-y)|=|x-y| gives ∣yβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£xβˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ’y∣|y|-|x|\le|x-y|, that is, βˆ’βˆ£xβˆ’yβˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£y∣-|x-y|\le|x|-|y|. By claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣∣xβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£yβˆ£βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ’y∣\bigl||x|-|y|\bigr|\le|x-y|.

Claim 3. We verify the four conditions of Metric Space. (1) d(x,y)=∣xβˆ’y∣β‰₯0d(x,y)=|x-y|\ge 0 by Real Inner Product Space Β§norm. (2) d(x,y)=0d(x,y)=0 if and only if xβˆ’y=0Ex-y=0_{E} (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§vanishing), if and only if x=yx=y (add yy to both sides). (3) d(y,x)=∣yβˆ’x∣=βˆ£βˆ’(xβˆ’y)∣=∣xβˆ’y∣=d(x,y)d(y,x)=|y-x|=|-(x-y)|=|x-y|=d(x,y) by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity. (4) d(x,z)=∣(xβˆ’y)+(yβˆ’z)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ’y∣+∣yβˆ’z∣=d(x,y)+d(y,z)d(x,z)=|(x-y)+(y-z)|\le|x-y|+|y-z|=d(x,y)+d(y,z) by claim 1. Finally d(x+z,y+z)=∣(x+z)βˆ’(y+z)∣=∣xβˆ’y∣=d(x,y)d(x+z,y+z)=|(x+z)-(y+z)|=|x-y|=d(x,y), and d(Ξ»x,Ξ»y)=∣λ(xβˆ’y)∣=βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ£xβˆ’y∣d(\lambda x,\lambda y)=|\lambda(x-y)|=|\lambda|\,|x-y| by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity.

In the remaining claims, convergence of (xm)(x_{m}) to xx means, by Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space and claim 3, that for every real Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∣xmβˆ’x∣<Ξ΅|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon for all mβ‰₯Nm\ge N; and convergence of a real sequence (am)(a_{m}) to aa means, by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, the same with ∣amβˆ’a∣|a_{m}-a| in place of ∣xmβˆ’x∣|x_{m}-x|. Given two indices N1,N2N_{1},N_{2} we may always pass to N=max⁑(N1,N2)N=\max(N_{1},N_{2}), using claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, and for a given Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 the numbers Ξ΅/2\varepsilon/2 and, for c>0c>0, Ξ΅/c\varepsilon/c are positive by claims 7, 8 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Claim 4. Let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 and choose NN such that ∣xmβˆ’x∣<Ξ΅/2|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/2 and ∣ymβˆ’y∣<Ξ΅/2|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon/2 for mβ‰₯Nm\ge N. For such mm, by claim 1, ∣(xm+ym)βˆ’(x+y)∣=∣(xmβˆ’x)+(ymβˆ’y)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xmβˆ’x∣+∣ymβˆ’y∣<Ξ΅|(x_{m}+y_{m})-(x+y)|=|(x_{m}-x)+(y_{m}-y)|\le|x_{m}-x|+|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon, and ∣(xmβˆ’ym)βˆ’(xβˆ’y)∣=∣(xmβˆ’x)βˆ’(ymβˆ’y)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xmβˆ’x∣+∣ymβˆ’y∣<Ξ΅|(x_{m}-y_{m})-(x-y)|=|(x_{m}-x)-(y_{m}-y)|\le|x_{m}-x|+|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon. For the multiple: if Ξ»=0\lambda=0 then Ξ»xm=0E=Ξ»x\lambda x_{m}=0_{E}=\lambda x for all mm and there is nothing to prove; otherwise ∣λ∣>0|\lambda|>0, and choosing NN with ∣xmβˆ’x∣<Ξ΅/∣λ∣|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/|\lambda| for mβ‰₯Nm\ge N gives ∣λxmβˆ’Ξ»x∣=βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ£xmβˆ’x∣<Ξ΅|\lambda x_{m}-\lambda x|=|\lambda|\,|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon. For the last assertion, the convergent real sequence (Ξ»m)(\lambda_{m}) is bounded by claim 2 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences: there is a real B0B_{0} with ∣λmβˆ£β‰€B0|\lambda_{m}|\le B_{0} for all mm; put B=max⁑(B0,1)B=\max(B_{0},1), so that 0<1≀B0<1\le B (claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and ∣λmβˆ£β‰€B|\lambda_{m}|\le B for all mm by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements. Then

∣λmxmβˆ’Ξ»x∣=∣λm(xmβˆ’x)+(Ξ»mβˆ’Ξ»)xβˆ£β‰€βˆ£Ξ»mβˆ£β€‰βˆ£xmβˆ’x∣+∣λmβˆ’Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ£xβˆ£β‰€Bβ€‰βˆ£xmβˆ’x∣+∣λmβˆ’Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ£x∣,|\lambda_{m}x_{m}-\lambda x|=|\lambda_{m}(x_{m}-x)+(\lambda_{m}-\lambda)x|\le|\lambda_{m}|\,|x_{m}-x|+|\lambda_{m}-\lambda|\,|x|\le B\,|x_{m}-x|+|\lambda_{m}-\lambda|\,|x|,

by claim 1 and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity. Choose NN such that ∣xmβˆ’x∣<Ξ΅/(2B)|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/(2B) and ∣λmβˆ’Ξ»βˆ£<Ξ΅/(2(∣x∣+1))|\lambda_{m}-\lambda|<\varepsilon/(2(|x|+1)) for mβ‰₯Nm\ge N; then the right side is less than Ξ΅/2+Ξ΅/2=Ξ΅\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon for such mm, using ∣xβˆ£β‰€βˆ£x∣+1|x|\le|x|+1 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Claim 5. Choose N0N_{0} with ∣ymβˆ’y∣<1|y_{m}-y|<1 for mβ‰₯N0m\ge N_{0}; then ∣ymβˆ£β‰€βˆ£ymβˆ’y∣+∣yβˆ£β‰€βˆ£y∣+1|y_{m}|\le|y_{m}-y|+|y|\le|y|+1 for such mm by claim 1. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§bilinear, claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space,

∣⟨xm,ymβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨x,y⟩∣=∣⟨xmβˆ’x,ym⟩+⟨x,ymβˆ’yβŸ©βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xmβˆ’xβˆ£β€‰βˆ£ym∣+∣xβˆ£β€‰βˆ£ymβˆ’yβˆ£β‰€βˆ£xmβˆ’xβˆ£β€‰(∣y∣+1)+∣xβˆ£β€‰βˆ£ymβˆ’y∣|\langle x_{m},y_{m}\rangle-\langle x,y\rangle|=|\langle x_{m}-x,y_{m}\rangle+\langle x,y_{m}-y\rangle|\le|x_{m}-x|\,|y_{m}|+|x|\,|y_{m}-y|\le|x_{m}-x|\,(|y|+1)+|x|\,|y_{m}-y|

for mβ‰₯N0m\ge N_{0}. Given Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0, choose Nβ‰₯N0N\ge N_{0} such that ∣xmβˆ’x∣<Ξ΅/(2(∣y∣+1))|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/(2(|y|+1)) and ∣ymβˆ’y∣<Ξ΅/(2(∣x∣+1))|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon/(2(|x|+1)) for mβ‰₯Nm\ge N; then ∣⟨xm,ymβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨x,y⟩∣<Ξ΅|\langle x_{m},y_{m}\rangle-\langle x,y\rangle|<\varepsilon for such mm. Taking the constant sequence ym=zy_{m}=z, which converges to zz since d(z,z)=0<Ξ΅d(z,z)=0<\varepsilon for every Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 (Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space), gives the particular case. Finally ∣∣xmβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£xβˆ£βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xmβˆ’x∣\bigl||x_{m}|-|x|\bigr|\le|x_{m}-x| by claim 2, so ∣xmβˆ£β†’βˆ£x∣|x_{m}|\to|x| with the same NN as for xmβ†’xx_{m}\to x.

Claim 6. Suppose AA is bounded in (E,d)(E,d): by Bounded Subset of a Metric Space there are x0∈Ex_{0}\in E and a real R0>0R_{0}>0 with ∣x0βˆ’aβˆ£β‰€R0|x_{0}-a|\le R_{0} for every a∈Aa\in A. Then ∣a∣=∣x0βˆ’(x0βˆ’a)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£x0∣+∣x0βˆ’aβˆ£β‰€βˆ£x0∣+R0|a|=|x_{0}-(x_{0}-a)|\le|x_{0}|+|x_{0}-a|\le|x_{0}|+R_{0} for every a∈Aa\in A by claim 1, so R=∣x0∣+R0R=|x_{0}|+R_{0} serves. Conversely suppose ∣aβˆ£β‰€R|a|\le R for every a∈Aa\in A. Put Rβ€²=∣R∣+1>0R'=|R|+1>0; then d(0E,a)=∣0Eβˆ’a∣=βˆ£βˆ’a∣=∣aβˆ£β‰€Rβ‰€βˆ£Rβˆ£β‰€Rβ€²d(0_{E},a)=|0_{E}-a|=|-a|=|a|\le R\le|R|\le R' for every a∈Aa\in A, by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so AA is bounded with the point 0E0_{E} and the radius Rβ€²R'.

Claim 7. By claim 2, dR(∣x∣,∣y∣)=∣∣xβˆ£βˆ’βˆ£yβˆ£βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ’y∣=1β‹…d(x,y)d_{\mathbb{R}}(|x|,|y|)=\bigl||x|-|y|\bigr|\le|x-y|=1\cdot d(x,y), and 1β‰₯01\ge 0; so the norm is Lipschitz with constant 11 in the sense of Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§bilinear and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space, dR(⟨x,z⟩,⟨y,z⟩)=∣⟨x,zβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨y,z⟩∣=∣⟨xβˆ’y,zβŸ©βˆ£β‰€βˆ£xβˆ’yβˆ£β€‰βˆ£z∣=∣zβˆ£β€‰d(x,y)d_{\mathbb{R}}(\langle x,z\rangle,\langle y,z\rangle)=|\langle x,z\rangle-\langle y,z\rangle|=|\langle x-y,z\rangle|\le|x-y|\,|z|=|z|\,d(x,y), and ∣z∣β‰₯0|z|\ge 0; so xβ†¦βŸ¨x,z⟩x\mapsto\langle x,z\rangle is Lipschitz with constant ∣z∣|z|.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…