We use the notation and claims of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space , the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space , and for real numbers the claims of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . Vector identities such as β ( x β y ) = y β x -(x-y)=y-x β ( x β y ) = y β x , ( x + z ) β ( y + z ) = x β y (x+z)-(y+z)=x-y ( x + z ) β ( y + z ) = x β y and Ξ» x β Ξ» y = Ξ» ( x β y ) \lambda x-\lambda y=\lambda(x-y) Ξ» x β Ξ» y = Ξ» ( x β y ) follow from the axioms of Vector Space over a Field and Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and are used without further comment.
Claim 1. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§expansion , claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space ,
β£ x + y β£ 2 = β£ x β£ 2 + 2 β¨ x , y β© + β£ y β£ 2 β€ β£ x β£ 2 + 2 β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ + β£ y β£ 2 = ( β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ ) 2 , |x+y|^{2}=|x|^{2}+2\langle x,y\rangle+|y|^{2}\le|x|^{2}+2|x|\,|y|+|y|^{2}=(|x|+|y|)^{2}, β£ x + y β£ 2 = β£ x β£ 2 + 2 β¨ x , y β© + β£ y β£ 2 β€ β£ x β£ 2 + 2β£ x β£ β£ y β£ + β£ y β£ 2 = ( β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ ) 2 ,
the inequality by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field (multiplier 2 β₯ 0 2\ge 0 2 β₯ 0 ) and the compatibility of the order with addition (an axiom of Ordered Field ). Both β£ x + y β£ |x+y| β£ x + y β£ and β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ |x|+|y| β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ are nonnegative (the latter by claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ), so β£ x + y β£ β€ β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ |x+y|\le|x|+|y| β£ x + y β£ β€ β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field . Applying this to x x x and β y -y β y and using β£ β y β£ = β£ y β£ |-y|=|y| β£ β y β£ = β£ y β£ (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity ) gives β£ x β y β£ β€ β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ |x-y|\le|x|+|y| β£ x β y β£ β€ β£ x β£ + β£ y β£ .
Claim 2. By claim 1, β£ x β£ = β£ ( x β y ) + y β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ + β£ y β£ |x|=|(x-y)+y|\le|x-y|+|y| β£ x β£ = β£ ( x β y ) + y β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ + β£ y β£ , so β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ |x|-|y|\le|x-y| β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ ; exchanging x x x and y y y and using β£ y β x β£ = β£ β ( x β y ) β£ = β£ x β y β£ |y-x|=|-(x-y)|=|x-y| β£ y β x β£ = β£ β ( x β y ) β£ = β£ x β y β£ gives β£ y β£ β β£ x β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ |y|-|x|\le|x-y| β£ y β£ β β£ x β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ , that is, β β£ x β y β£ β€ β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ -|x-y|\le|x|-|y| β β£ x β y β£ β€ β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ . By claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , β£ β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ \bigl||x|-|y|\bigr|\le|x-y| β β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ β β€ β£ x β y β£ .
Claim 3. We verify the four conditions of Metric Space . (1) d ( x , y ) = β£ x β y β£ β₯ 0 d(x,y)=|x-y|\ge 0 d ( x , y ) = β£ x β y β£ β₯ 0 by Real Inner Product Space Β§norm . (2) d ( x , y ) = 0 d(x,y)=0 d ( x , y ) = 0 if and only if x β y = 0 E x-y=0_{E} x β y = 0 E β (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§vanishing ), if and only if x = y x=y x = y (add y y y to both sides). (3) d ( y , x ) = β£ y β x β£ = β£ β ( x β y ) β£ = β£ x β y β£ = d ( x , y ) d(y,x)=|y-x|=|-(x-y)|=|x-y|=d(x,y) d ( y , x ) = β£ y β x β£ = β£ β ( x β y ) β£ = β£ x β y β£ = d ( x , y ) by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity . (4) d ( x , z ) = β£ ( x β y ) + ( y β z ) β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ + β£ y β z β£ = d ( x , y ) + d ( y , z ) d(x,z)=|(x-y)+(y-z)|\le|x-y|+|y-z|=d(x,y)+d(y,z) d ( x , z ) = β£ ( x β y ) + ( y β z ) β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ + β£ y β z β£ = d ( x , y ) + d ( y , z ) by claim 1. Finally d ( x + z , y + z ) = β£ ( x + z ) β ( y + z ) β£ = β£ x β y β£ = d ( x , y ) d(x+z,y+z)=|(x+z)-(y+z)|=|x-y|=d(x,y) d ( x + z , y + z ) = β£ ( x + z ) β ( y + z ) β£ = β£ x β y β£ = d ( x , y ) , and d ( Ξ» x , Ξ» y ) = β£ Ξ» ( x β y ) β£ = β£ Ξ» β£ β β£ x β y β£ d(\lambda x,\lambda y)=|\lambda(x-y)|=|\lambda|\,|x-y| d ( Ξ» x , Ξ» y ) = β£ Ξ» ( x β y ) β£ = β£ Ξ» β£ β£ x β y β£ by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity .
In the remaining claims, convergence of ( x m ) (x_{m}) ( x m β ) to x x x means, by Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space and claim 3, that for every real Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 there is N β N N\in\mathbb{N} N β N with β£ x m β x β£ < Ξ΅ |x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon β£ x m β β x β£ < Ξ΅ for all m β₯ N m\ge N m β₯ N ; and convergence of a real sequence ( a m ) (a_{m}) ( a m β ) to a a a means, by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers , the same with β£ a m β a β£ |a_{m}-a| β£ a m β β a β£ in place of β£ x m β x β£ |x_{m}-x| β£ x m β β x β£ . Given two indices N 1 , N 2 N_{1},N_{2} N 1 β , N 2 β we may always pass to N = max β‘ ( N 1 , N 2 ) N=\max(N_{1},N_{2}) N = max ( N 1 β , N 2 β ) , using claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements , and for a given Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 the numbers Ξ΅ / 2 \varepsilon/2 Ξ΅ /2 and, for c > 0 c>0 c > 0 , Ξ΅ / c \varepsilon/c Ξ΅ / c are positive by claims 7, 8 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field .
Claim 4. Let Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 and choose N N N such that β£ x m β x β£ < Ξ΅ / 2 |x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/2 β£ x m β β x β£ < Ξ΅ /2 and β£ y m β y β£ < Ξ΅ / 2 |y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon/2 β£ y m β β y β£ < Ξ΅ /2 for m β₯ N m\ge N m β₯ N . For such m m m , by claim 1, β£ ( x m + y m ) β ( x + y ) β£ = β£ ( x m β x ) + ( y m β y ) β£ β€ β£ x m β x β£ + β£ y m β y β£ < Ξ΅ |(x_{m}+y_{m})-(x+y)|=|(x_{m}-x)+(y_{m}-y)|\le|x_{m}-x|+|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon β£ ( x m β + y m β ) β ( x + y ) β£ = β£ ( x m β β x ) + ( y m β β y ) β£ β€ β£ x m β β x β£ + β£ y m β β y β£ < Ξ΅ , and β£ ( x m β y m ) β ( x β y ) β£ = β£ ( x m β x ) β ( y m β y ) β£ β€ β£ x m β x β£ + β£ y m β y β£ < Ξ΅ |(x_{m}-y_{m})-(x-y)|=|(x_{m}-x)-(y_{m}-y)|\le|x_{m}-x|+|y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon β£ ( x m β β y m β ) β ( x β y ) β£ = β£ ( x m β β x ) β ( y m β β y ) β£ β€ β£ x m β β x β£ + β£ y m β β y β£ < Ξ΅ . For the multiple: if Ξ» = 0 \lambda=0 Ξ» = 0 then Ξ» x m = 0 E = Ξ» x \lambda x_{m}=0_{E}=\lambda x Ξ» x m β = 0 E β = Ξ» x for all m m m and there is nothing to prove; otherwise β£ Ξ» β£ > 0 |\lambda|>0 β£ Ξ» β£ > 0 , and choosing N N N with β£ x m β x β£ < Ξ΅ / β£ Ξ» β£ |x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/|\lambda| β£ x m β β x β£ < Ξ΅ /β£ Ξ» β£ for m β₯ N m\ge N m β₯ N gives β£ Ξ» x m β Ξ» x β£ = β£ Ξ» β£ β β£ x m β x β£ < Ξ΅ |\lambda x_{m}-\lambda x|=|\lambda|\,|x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon β£ Ξ» x m β β Ξ» x β£ = β£ Ξ» β£ β£ x m β β x β£ < Ξ΅ . For the last assertion, the convergent real sequence ( Ξ» m ) (\lambda_{m}) ( Ξ» m β ) is bounded by claim 2 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences : there is a real B 0 B_{0} B 0 β with β£ Ξ» m β£ β€ B 0 |\lambda_{m}|\le B_{0} β£ Ξ» m β β£ β€ B 0 β for all m m m ; put B = max β‘ ( B 0 , 1 ) B=\max(B_{0},1) B = max ( B 0 β , 1 ) , so that 0 < 1 β€ B 0<1\le B 0 < 1 β€ B (claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) and β£ Ξ» m β£ β€ B |\lambda_{m}|\le B β£ Ξ» m β β£ β€ B for all m m m by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements . Then
β£ Ξ» m x m β Ξ» x β£ = β£ Ξ» m ( x m β x ) + ( Ξ» m β Ξ» ) x β£ β€ β£ Ξ» m β£ β β£ x m β x β£ + β£ Ξ» m β Ξ» β£ β β£ x β£ β€ B β β£ x m β x β£ + β£ Ξ» m β Ξ» β£ β β£ x β£ , |\lambda_{m}x_{m}-\lambda x|=|\lambda_{m}(x_{m}-x)+(\lambda_{m}-\lambda)x|\le|\lambda_{m}|\,|x_{m}-x|+|\lambda_{m}-\lambda|\,|x|\le B\,|x_{m}-x|+|\lambda_{m}-\lambda|\,|x|, β£ Ξ» m β x m β β Ξ» x β£ = β£ Ξ» m β ( x m β β x ) + ( Ξ» m β β Ξ» ) x β£ β€ β£ Ξ» m β β£ β£ x m β β x β£ + β£ Ξ» m β β Ξ» β£ β£ x β£ β€ B β£ x m β β x β£ + β£ Ξ» m β β Ξ» β£ β£ x β£ ,
by claim 1 and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§homogeneity . Choose N N N such that β£ x m β x β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 B ) |x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/(2B) β£ x m β β x β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 B ) and β£ Ξ» m β Ξ» β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 ( β£ x β£ + 1 ) ) |\lambda_{m}-\lambda|<\varepsilon/(2(|x|+1)) β£ Ξ» m β β Ξ» β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 ( β£ x β£ + 1 )) for m β₯ N m\ge N m β₯ N ; then the right side is less than Ξ΅ / 2 + Ξ΅ / 2 = Ξ΅ \varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon Ξ΅ /2 + Ξ΅ /2 = Ξ΅ for such m m m , using β£ x β£ β€ β£ x β£ + 1 |x|\le|x|+1 β£ x β£ β€ β£ x β£ + 1 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field .
Claim 5. Choose N 0 N_{0} N 0 β with β£ y m β y β£ < 1 |y_{m}-y|<1 β£ y m β β y β£ < 1 for m β₯ N 0 m\ge N_{0} m β₯ N 0 β ; then β£ y m β£ β€ β£ y m β y β£ + β£ y β£ β€ β£ y β£ + 1 |y_{m}|\le|y_{m}-y|+|y|\le|y|+1 β£ y m β β£ β€ β£ y m β β y β£ + β£ y β£ β€ β£ y β£ + 1 for such m m m by claim 1. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§bilinear , claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space ,
β£ β¨ x m , y m β© β β¨ x , y β© β£ = β£ β¨ x m β x , y m β© + β¨ x , y m β y β© β£ β€ β£ x m β x β£ β β£ y m β£ + β£ x β£ β β£ y m β y β£ β€ β£ x m β x β£ β ( β£ y β£ + 1 ) + β£ x β£ β β£ y m β y β£ |\langle x_{m},y_{m}\rangle-\langle x,y\rangle|=|\langle x_{m}-x,y_{m}\rangle+\langle x,y_{m}-y\rangle|\le|x_{m}-x|\,|y_{m}|+|x|\,|y_{m}-y|\le|x_{m}-x|\,(|y|+1)+|x|\,|y_{m}-y| β£ β¨ x m β , y m β β© β β¨ x , y β© β£ = β£ β¨ x m β β x , y m β β© + β¨ x , y m β β y β© β£ β€ β£ x m β β x β£ β£ y m β β£ + β£ x β£ β£ y m β β y β£ β€ β£ x m β β x β£ ( β£ y β£ + 1 ) + β£ x β£ β£ y m β β y β£
for m β₯ N 0 m\ge N_{0} m β₯ N 0 β . Given Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 , choose N β₯ N 0 N\ge N_{0} N β₯ N 0 β such that β£ x m β x β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 ( β£ y β£ + 1 ) ) |x_{m}-x|<\varepsilon/(2(|y|+1)) β£ x m β β x β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 ( β£ y β£ + 1 )) and β£ y m β y β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 ( β£ x β£ + 1 ) ) |y_{m}-y|<\varepsilon/(2(|x|+1)) β£ y m β β y β£ < Ξ΅ / ( 2 ( β£ x β£ + 1 )) for m β₯ N m\ge N m β₯ N ; then β£ β¨ x m , y m β© β β¨ x , y β© β£ < Ξ΅ |\langle x_{m},y_{m}\rangle-\langle x,y\rangle|<\varepsilon β£ β¨ x m β , y m β β© β β¨ x , y β© β£ < Ξ΅ for such m m m . Taking the constant sequence y m = z y_{m}=z y m β = z , which converges to z z z since d ( z , z ) = 0 < Ξ΅ d(z,z)=0<\varepsilon d ( z , z ) = 0 < Ξ΅ for every Ξ΅ > 0 \varepsilon>0 Ξ΅ > 0 (Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space ), gives the particular case. Finally β£ β£ x m β£ β β£ x β£ β£ β€ β£ x m β x β£ \bigl||x_{m}|-|x|\bigr|\le|x_{m}-x| β β£ x m β β£ β β£ x β£ β β€ β£ x m β β x β£ by claim 2, so β£ x m β£ β β£ x β£ |x_{m}|\to|x| β£ x m β β£ β β£ x β£ with the same N N N as for x m β x x_{m}\to x x m β β x .
Claim 6. Suppose A A A is bounded in ( E , d ) (E,d) ( E , d ) : by Bounded Subset of a Metric Space there are x 0 β E x_{0}\in E x 0 β β E and a real R 0 > 0 R_{0}>0 R 0 β > 0 with β£ x 0 β a β£ β€ R 0 |x_{0}-a|\le R_{0} β£ x 0 β β a β£ β€ R 0 β for every a β A a\in A a β A . Then β£ a β£ = β£ x 0 β ( x 0 β a ) β£ β€ β£ x 0 β£ + β£ x 0 β a β£ β€ β£ x 0 β£ + R 0 |a|=|x_{0}-(x_{0}-a)|\le|x_{0}|+|x_{0}-a|\le|x_{0}|+R_{0} β£ a β£ = β£ x 0 β β ( x 0 β β a ) β£ β€ β£ x 0 β β£ + β£ x 0 β β a β£ β€ β£ x 0 β β£ + R 0 β for every a β A a\in A a β A by claim 1, so R = β£ x 0 β£ + R 0 R=|x_{0}|+R_{0} R = β£ x 0 β β£ + R 0 β serves. Conversely suppose β£ a β£ β€ R |a|\le R β£ a β£ β€ R for every a β A a\in A a β A . Put R β² = β£ R β£ + 1 > 0 R'=|R|+1>0 R β² = β£ R β£ + 1 > 0 ; then d ( 0 E , a ) = β£ 0 E β a β£ = β£ β a β£ = β£ a β£ β€ R β€ β£ R β£ β€ R β² d(0_{E},a)=|0_{E}-a|=|-a|=|a|\le R\le|R|\le R' d ( 0 E β , a ) = β£ 0 E β β a β£ = β£ β a β£ = β£ a β£ β€ R β€ β£ R β£ β€ R β² for every a β A a\in A a β A , by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , so A A A is bounded with the point 0 E 0_{E} 0 E β and the radius R β² R' R β² .
Claim 7. By claim 2, d R ( β£ x β£ , β£ y β£ ) = β£ β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ = 1 β
d ( x , y ) d_{\mathbb{R}}(|x|,|y|)=\bigl||x|-|y|\bigr|\le|x-y|=1\cdot d(x,y) d R β ( β£ x β£ , β£ y β£ ) = β β£ x β£ β β£ y β£ β β€ β£ x β y β£ = 1 β
d ( x , y ) , and 1 β₯ 0 1\ge 0 1 β₯ 0 ; so the norm is Lipschitz with constant 1 1 1 in the sense of Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces . By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space Β§bilinear and The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space , d R ( β¨ x , z β© , β¨ y , z β© ) = β£ β¨ x , z β© β β¨ y , z β© β£ = β£ β¨ x β y , z β© β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ β β£ z β£ = β£ z β£ β d ( x , y ) d_{\mathbb{R}}(\langle x,z\rangle,\langle y,z\rangle)=|\langle x,z\rangle-\langle y,z\rangle|=|\langle x-y,z\rangle|\le|x-y|\,|z|=|z|\,d(x,y) d R β (β¨ x , z β© , β¨ y , z β©) = β£ β¨ x , z β© β β¨ y , z β© β£ = β£ β¨ x β y , z β© β£ β€ β£ x β y β£ β£ z β£ = β£ z β£ d ( x , y ) , and β£ z β£ β₯ 0 |z|\ge 0 β£ z β£ β₯ 0 ; so x β¦ β¨ x , z β© x\mapsto\langle x,z\rangle x β¦ β¨ x , z β© is Lipschitz with constant β£ z β£ |z| β£ z β£ .