TheoremBase

Proof of The Laplacian of the Trigonometric System, and the Fourier Coefficients of a Laplacian on the Torus

lemmalem:laplacian-trigonometric-system-torus-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 10,293 chars · 20 deps · depth 30 Reason: Initial publication of the proof.

Differentiating the known first partial derivative of a member of the trigonometric system a second time returns a multiple of the member itself, because reflecting one frequency coordinate twice restores the frequency. The coefficient identity follows by moving both derivatives onto the trigonometric factor through the weak-derivative test identity, applied once with the member and once with its partial derivative as test function.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named. For kZnk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} and i[n]i\in[n] let k(i)k^{(i)} be the point of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} whose ii-th component is ki-k_{i} and whose jj-th component is kjk_{j} for j[n]j\in[n] with jij\ne i, as introduced in The Trigonometric System is Continuously Differentiable and Orthogonal in the Sobolev Space of the Torus, which records that k(i)Znk^{(i)}\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} and that

ekCper1,iek(x)=2πkiek(i)(x)for every xRn,e_{k}\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}},\qquad \partial_{i}e_{k}(x)=-2\pi k_{i}\,e_{k^{(i)}}(x)\quad\text{for every }x\in\mathbb{R}^{n},

by The Trigonometric System is Continuously Differentiable and Orthogonal in the Sobolev Space of the Torus §classical. Pointwise sums, scalar multiples and products of maps on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} are those of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set.

Claim 1 (Reflecting one component twice). Let kZnk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} and i[n]i\in[n]. Then (k(i))i=ki(k^{(i)})_{i}=-k_{i} and (k(i))(i)=k(k^{(i)})^{(i)}=k.

The first is the definition of k(i)k^{(i)}. For the second, the ii-th component of (k(i))(i)(k^{(i)})^{(i)} is (k(i))i=(ki)-(k^{(i)})_{i}=-(-k_{i}), which is kik_{i} because in a field the additive inverse of ki-k_{i} is unique and kik_{i} is one such; and for jij\ne i the jj-th component of (k(i))(i)(k^{(i)})^{(i)} is (k(i))j=kj(k^{(i)})_{j}=k_{j}. The two points of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} therefore have the same components, so they are equal by claim 1 of Euclidean Points as Tuples of Real Numbers.

Claim 2 (Clause 1). Let kZnk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} and i[n]i\in[n]. Applying the displayed identity of the preamble to k(i)k^{(i)} in place of kk, and then claim 1,

iek(i)(x)=2π(k(i))ie(k(i))(i)(x)=2π(ki)ek(x)=2πkiek(x)\partial_{i}e_{k^{(i)}}(x)=-2\pi\,(k^{(i)})_{i}\,e_{(k^{(i)})^{(i)}}(x)=-2\pi(-k_{i})\,e_{k}(x)=2\pi k_{i}\,e_{k}(x)

for every xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, using claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field for 2π(ki)=2πki-2\pi(-k_{i})=2\pi k_{i}.

Now iek\partial_{i}e_{k} is the scalar multiple (2πki)ek(i)(-2\pi k_{i})e_{k^{(i)}} of ek(i)e_{k^{(i)}}, by the preamble. Since the partial derivative of ek(i)e_{k^{(i)}} with respect to the ii-th variable exists at every point, claim 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set gives, for every xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n},

iiek(x)=(2πki)iek(i)(x)=(2πki)(2πki)ek(x)=4π2ki2ek(x),\partial_{i}\partial_{i}e_{k}(x)=(-2\pi k_{i})\,\partial_{i}e_{k^{(i)}}(x)=(-2\pi k_{i})(2\pi k_{i})\,e_{k}(x)=-4\pi^{2}k_{i}^{2}\,e_{k}(x),

the last equality being field arithmetic together with claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field.

It remains to see that eke_{k} is of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and lies in Cper2C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}. It is of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, being a member of Cper1C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} by the preamble and Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes; and for each i[n]i\in[n] the function iek=(2πki)ek(i)\partial_{i}e_{k}=(-2\pi k_{i})e_{k^{(i)}} is of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, since ek(i)e_{k^{(i)}} is. By clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, read with the scalar convention of clause 3 there, eke_{k} is of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; and it is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic, being in Cper1C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, so it lies in Cper2C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}} by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes.

Claim 3 (Clause 2). Let kZnk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} and xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian, applicable since eke_{k} is of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by claim 2, and then by claim 2 again,

Δek(x)=i=1niiek(x)=i=1n(4π2ek(x))ki2=(4π2ek(x))i=1nki2,\Delta e_{k}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}e_{k}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl(-4\pi^{2}e_{k}(x)\bigr)k_{i}^{2}=\bigl(-4\pi^{2}e_{k}(x)\bigr)\sum_{i=1}^{n}k_{i}^{2},

the last step by the homogeneity of claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the remaining sum is k2\lVert k\rVert^{2}, which gives clause 2.

Claim 4 (Regularity in clause 3). Let uCper2u\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}} and i[n]i\in[n]. Then uu is of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, hence uCper1u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, and uCperu\in C_{\mathrm{per}} by claim 3 of that lemma with Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes. By Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative one has iuCper1\partial_{i}u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, and then iiuCper\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u\in C_{\mathrm{per}} by that clause again.

Next, ΔuCper\Delta u\in C_{\mathrm{per}}. For m[n]m\in[n] let Pm:RnRP_{m}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be the map with Pm(x)=i=1miiu(x)P_{m}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u(x). Throughout this paragraph m+1m+1 denotes the successor S(m)S(m) of mm, the two being equal by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers, so that the clauses cited below, which are phrased with the successor map, apply as written.

Let TT be the union of the set of mNm\in\mathbb{N} with n<mn<m and the set of m[n]m\in[n] with PmCperP_{m}\in C_{\mathrm{per}}. Then 1T1\in T: if n<1n<1 this is immediate, and otherwise P1=11uP_{1}=\partial_{1}\partial_{1}u by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, which lies in CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by the previous paragraph. Let mTm\in T; we show m+1Tm+1\in T. If n<m+1n<m+1 this is immediate, so assume m+1[n]m+1\in[n]; then m[n]m\in[n], since m<m+1m<m+1 by claim 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, hence mm+1m\le m+1 by claim 1 of that lemma, and m+1nm+1\le n, so mnm\le n by the transitivity of \le in claim 1. Therefore PmCperP_{m}\in C_{\mathrm{per}}, and by the recursion in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums the map Pm+1P_{m+1} is the pointwise sum Pm+m+1m+1uP_{m}+\partial_{m+1}\partial_{m+1}u, which lies in CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §algebra. By Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers with the inductive set TT we get T=NT=\mathbb{N}, and since n[n]n\in[n] this gives PnCperP_{n}\in C_{\mathrm{per}}. By The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian the map Δu\Delta u is PnP_{n}.

Consequently uQu|_{Q} and (Δu)Q(\Delta u)|_{Q} are measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} and belong to L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), by Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus §member; the same applies to (iu)Q(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}, (iiu)Q(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q} and ekQe_{k}|_{Q} for every kZnk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}, the last by The Trigonometric System on the Torus is Orthonormal §classes.

Claim 5 (Moving one derivative at a time). Let uCper2u\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}, kZnk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} and i[n]i\in[n]. Then

Tn(iiu)Q(ekQ)dx=4π2ki2TnuQ(ekQ)dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}\,\bigl(e_{k}|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx=-4\pi^{2}k_{i}^{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u|_{Q}\,\bigl(e_{k}|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx .

By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus, applied to uCper1u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} and to iuCper1\partial_{i}u\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} from claim 4, the class [(iu)Q][(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}] is the ii-th weak partial derivative of [uQ][u|_{Q}] in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), and [(iiu)Q][(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}] is the ii-th weak partial derivative of [(iu)Q][(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}] in L2(Tn)L^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}).

The map iek\partial_{i}e_{k} lies in Cper1C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}: it is the scalar multiple (2πki)ek(i)(-2\pi k_{i})e_{k^{(i)}} of ek(i)Cper1e_{k^{(i)}}\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, so Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §algebra applies. Now apply claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Weak Partial Derivative on the Torus twice: first with the class [(iu)Q][(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}], its weak derivative [(iiu)Q][(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}], the representatives (iu)Q(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q} and (iiu)Q(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}, and the test function ekCper1e_{k}\in C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}; then with the class [uQ][u|_{Q}], its weak derivative [(iu)Q][(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}], the representatives uQu|_{Q} and (iu)Q(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}, and the test function iek\partial_{i}e_{k}. This gives

Tn(iu)Q((iek)Q)dx=Tn(iiu)Q(ekQ)dx\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}\,\bigl((\partial_{i}e_{k})|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx=-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}\,\bigl(e_{k}|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx

and

TnuQ((iiek)Q)dx=Tn(iu)Q((iek)Q)dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u|_{Q}\,\bigl((\partial_{i}\partial_{i}e_{k})|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx=-\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}\,\bigl((\partial_{i}e_{k})|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx .

Combining the two, the left-hand side of the first display equals the negative of the left-hand side of the second, so

Tn(iiu)Q(ekQ)dx=TnuQ((iiek)Q)dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}\,\bigl(e_{k}|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u|_{Q}\,\bigl((\partial_{i}\partial_{i}e_{k})|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx .

By claim 2 the map iiek\partial_{i}\partial_{i}e_{k} is the scalar multiple (4π2ki2)ek(-4\pi^{2}k_{i}^{2})e_{k}, so the integrand on the right is (4π2ki2)uQ(ekQ)(-4\pi^{2}k_{i}^{2})\,u|_{Q}\,(e_{k}|_{Q}) at every point of QQ. The product uQ(ekQ)u|_{Q}\,(e_{k}|_{Q}) is integrable, being a product of two members of L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by claim 4 and The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product; so Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §linear, used with the single summand uQ(ekQ)u|_{Q}\,(e_{k}|_{Q}) and the constant 4π2ki2-4\pi^{2}k_{i}^{2}, moves that constant out of the integral and yields the assertion.

Claim 6 (Clause 3). Let uCper2u\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}} and kZnk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}; the membership assertions of clause 3 are claim 4. By The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product, applied to the measure space (Q,BQ,λQ)(Q,\mathcal{B}_{Q},\lambda_{Q}) of The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §measure, both inner products in clause 3 are the integrals over Tn\mathbb{T}^{n} of the corresponding pointwise products.

At every point of QQ one has (Δu)Q(ekQ)=i=1n(iiu)Q(ekQ)(\Delta u)|_{Q}\,(e_{k}|_{Q})=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}\,(e_{k}|_{Q}), by The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian and the homogeneity of claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums. Each summand is integrable, being a product of two members of L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by claim 4 and The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product; so Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §linear gives

Tn(Δu)Q(ekQ)dx=i=1nTn(iiu)Q(ekQ)dx.\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(\Delta u)|_{Q}\,\bigl(e_{k}|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}(\partial_{i}\partial_{i}u)|_{Q}\,\bigl(e_{k}|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx .

By claim 5 each term equals 4π2ki2TnuQ(ekQ)dx-4\pi^{2}k_{i}^{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u|_{Q}\,(e_{k}|_{Q})\,dx, so by the homogeneity of claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums the right-hand side is

(4π2TnuQ(ekQ)dx)i=1nki2,\Bigl(-4\pi^{2}\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}u|_{Q}\,\bigl(e_{k}|_{Q}\bigr)\,dx\Bigr)\sum_{i=1}^{n}k_{i}^{2},

and i=1nki2=k2\sum_{i=1}^{n}k_{i}^{2}=\lVert k\rVert^{2} by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. This is clause 3.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…