All sums are the finite sums of that definition, whose two clauses we call the base clause and the recursion. Each claim is proved by applying the principle of induction to the set of natural numbers n for which the assertion holds for all admissible data, with S the successor map of Natural Numbers. We use the field axioms of K throughout.
Claim 1. For n=1 both sides equal a1β+b1β by the base clause. Assume the identity for n, and let akβ,bkβ be given for 1β€kβ€S(n). By the recursion, the inductive hypothesis, and commutativity and associativity of addition,
k=1βS(n)β(akβ+bkβ)=k=1βnβ(akβ+bkβ)+(aS(n)β+bS(n)β)=(k=1βnβakβ+k=1βnβbkβ)+(aS(n)β+bS(n)β),
which rearranges to (βk=1nβakβ+aS(n)β)+(βk=1nβbkβ+bS(n)β)=βk=1S(n)βakβ+βk=1S(n)βbkβ.
Claim 2. For n=1 both sides equal Ξ»a1β. Assume the identity for n. By the recursion, the inductive hypothesis and the distributive law,
k=1βS(n)β(Ξ»akβ)=k=1βnβ(Ξ»akβ)+Ξ»aS(n)β=Ξ»k=1βnβakβ+Ξ»aS(n)β=Ξ»(k=1βnβakβ+aS(n)β)=Ξ»k=1βS(n)βakβ.
Claim 3. For n=1 both sides equal a1ββ. Assume the identity for n. Since conjugation preserves sums by claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus,
k=1βS(n)βakββ=k=1βnβakβ+aS(n)ββ=k=1βnβakββ+aS(n)ββ=k=1βnβakββ+aS(n)ββ=k=1βS(n)βakββ.
Claim 4. We first record two facts about real numbers, which form an ordered field. If 0β€p and 0β€q, then adding p to 0β€q gives pβ€p+q, so 0β€p+q by transitivity. If moreover p+q=0, then pβ€p+q=0 and 0β€p, so p=0 by antisymmetry, and symmetrically q=0.
First assertion. For n=1 it is the hypothesis 0β€a1β. Assume it for n and let 0β€akβ for 1β€kβ€S(n). By the inductive hypothesis 0β€βk=1nβakβ, and 0β€aS(n)β, so the first recorded fact gives 0β€βk=1nβakβ+aS(n)β=βk=1S(n)βakβ.
Second assertion. For n=1 the hypothesis reads a1β=0. Assume it for n and suppose 0β€akβ for 1β€kβ€S(n) with βk=1S(n)βakβ=0. Writing p=βk=1nβakβ and q=aS(n)β, we have 0β€p by the first assertion, 0β€q, and p+q=0, so p=0 and q=0 by the second recorded fact. Applying the inductive hypothesis to a1β,β¦,anβ gives akβ=0 for 1β€kβ€n, and aS(n)β=q=0.