TheoremBase

Order reversal follows by multiplying the inequality by the product of the two inverses. The bound on the partial sums is an induction resting on the comparison of the square of a successor with the product of consecutive numbers, and the series then converges by the criterion for nonnegative terms. The quadratic sum is split about its middle index, the two halves matched by the reversing permutation and each bounded through the reciprocal squares.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named. Natural numbers are read in R\mathbb{R} through the canonical map, as fixed in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i); by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field every natural number is positive as a real number, and by claim 1 of that lemma the real number attached to j+1j+1 is the real number attached to jj increased by 11. We use throughout that ≤\le on R\mathbb{R} is a total order, so reflexive (axiom 1) and transitive (axiom 3), and that x≤yx\le y holds if and only if 0≤y−x0\le y-x, by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; adding two inequalities x≤yx\le y and u≤vu\le v to get x+u≤y+vx+u\le y+v uses that claim together with claim 2 of the same lemma, applied to (y−x)+(v−u)=(y+v)−(x+u)(y-x)+(v-u)=(y+v)-(x+u).

Claim 1 (Clause 1). Let 0<a0<a and a≤ba\le b. By claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field the inverse a−1a^{-1} exists and 0<a−10<a^{-1}. By the mixed transitivity of claim 2 of that lemma, 0<a0<a and a≤ba\le b give 0<b0<b, so by claim 7 again b−1b^{-1} exists and 0<b−10<b^{-1}. The product a−1b−1a^{-1}b^{-1} is positive by claim 5 of that lemma, so in particular 0≤a−1b−10\le a^{-1}b^{-1}. Applying claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to a≤ba\le b with the nonnegative multiplier a−1b−1a^{-1}b^{-1} gives

a−1b−1a≤a−1b−1b.a^{-1}b^{-1}a\le a^{-1}b^{-1}b .

By the commutativity and associativity of multiplication and a−1a=1a^{-1}a=1, b−1b=1b^{-1}b=1, the left side is b−1b^{-1} and the right side is a−1a^{-1}. Hence b−1≤a−1b^{-1}\le a^{-1}.

Claim 2 (Clause 2). Let PP be the set of those M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} for which ∑m=1M1m2≤2−1M\sum_{m=1}^{M}\tfrac{1}{m^{2}}\le2-\tfrac{1}{M}; we show P=NP=\mathbb{N} by Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers with the inductive set PP.

First, 1∈P1\in P: by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums the sum over [1][1] is its single term, which is 112=1\tfrac{1}{1^{2}}=1 because 12=11^{2}=1 by claim 2 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field; and 2−11=12-\tfrac{1}{1}=1, so the required inequality is 1≤11\le1.

Next, let M∈PM\in P. By claim 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers the successor of MM is M+1M+1, so by the recursion in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums,

∑m=1M+11m2=∑m=1M1m2+1(M+1)2.\sum_{m=1}^{M+1}\frac{1}{m^{2}}=\sum_{m=1}^{M}\frac{1}{m^{2}}+\frac{1}{(M+1)^{2}} .

The real numbers MM and M+1M+1 are positive, so M(M+1)M(M+1) and (M+1)2(M+1)^{2} are positive by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. From M≤M+1M\le M+1 and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, with the nonnegative multiplier M+1M+1, we get M(M+1)≤(M+1)2M(M+1)\le(M+1)^{2}, whence by claim 1 above

1(M+1)2≤1M(M+1).\frac{1}{(M+1)^{2}}\le\frac{1}{M(M+1)} .

Since MM and M+1M+1 are nonzero, field arithmetic gives 1M−1M+1=1M(M+1)\tfrac{1}{M}-\tfrac{1}{M+1}=\tfrac{1}{M(M+1)}. Adding ∑m=1M1m2≤2−1M\sum_{m=1}^{M}\tfrac{1}{m^{2}}\le2-\tfrac{1}{M} to the displayed inequality and using the identity just recorded,

∑m=1M+11m2≤2−1M+1M(M+1)=2−1M+1,\sum_{m=1}^{M+1}\frac{1}{m^{2}}\le 2-\frac{1}{M}+\frac{1}{M(M+1)}=2-\frac{1}{M+1},

so M+1∈PM+1\in P. Hence P=NP=\mathbb{N}, which is clause 2.

Claim 3 (Clause 3). For every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} the real number m2m^{2} is positive by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so 1m2\tfrac{1}{m^{2}} exists and is positive by claim 7 of that lemma; in particular 0≤1m20\le\tfrac{1}{m^{2}}. Let sM=∑m=1M1m2s_{M}=\sum_{m=1}^{M}\tfrac{1}{m^{2}} denote the partial sums. Also 0≤1M0\le\tfrac{1}{M} for every M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}, so 2−1M≤22-\tfrac{1}{M}\le2; with clause 2 and transitivity, sM≤2s_{M}\le2 for every M∈NM\in\mathbb{N}. Thus {sM:M∈N}\{s_{M}:M\in\mathbb{N}\} is bounded above by 22, so by claim 1 of Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series the series converges with sum sup⁡{sM:M∈N}\sup\{s_{M}:M\in\mathbb{N}\}; and that least upper bound is at most 22, since 22 is an upper bound of the set.

Claim 4 (Denominators in clause 4). Write N=M+M+1N=M+M+1 and let c:[N]→Rc:[N]\to\mathbb{R} be the map with

cm=11+α (m−M−1)2.c_{m}=\frac{1}{1+\alpha\,(m-M-1)^{2}} .

This is defined: (m−M−1)2(m-M-1)^{2} is nonnegative by claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, so α(m−M−1)2\alpha(m-M-1)^{2} is nonnegative by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to 0≤(m−M−1)20\le(m-M-1)^{2} with the nonnegative multiplier α\alpha, together with α⋅0=0\alpha\cdot0=0 from claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field; hence 1≤1+α(m−M−1)21\le1+\alpha(m-M-1)^{2}, and 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so the denominator is positive by the mixed transitivity of claim 2 of that lemma and its inverse exists by claim 7.

Claim 5 (Splitting the sum of clause 4). By the associativity and commutativity of addition on N\mathbb{N}, claims 3 and 4 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers, one has N=M+(M+1)N=M+(M+1) and M+1=1+MM+1=1+M. Applying Splitting a Finite Sum at an Index to cc with the decomposition N=M+(M+1)N=M+(M+1) gives

∑m=1Ncm=∑m=1Mcm+∑j=1M+1cM+j,\sum_{m=1}^{N}c_{m}=\sum_{m=1}^{M}c_{m}+\sum_{j=1}^{M+1}c_{M+j},

and applying it again to the map j↦cM+jj\mapsto c_{M+j} on [1+M][1+M] with the decomposition M+1=1+MM+1=1+M gives

∑j=1M+1cM+j=cM+1+∑r=1McM+1+r,\sum_{j=1}^{M+1}c_{M+j}=c_{M+1}+\sum_{r=1}^{M}c_{M+1+r},

the first summand being a sum with a single term, evaluated by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums.

Claim 6 (The three pieces). For r∈[M]r\in[M] one has (M+1+r)−M−1=r(M+1+r)-M-1=r, so

cM+1+r=11+αr2;c_{M+1+r}=\frac{1}{1+\alpha r^{2}} ;

and (M+1)−M−1=0(M+1)-M-1=0, so cM+1=11+α⋅0=1c_{M+1}=\tfrac{1}{1+\alpha\cdot0}=1, using claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field.

For the first piece, define ρ:[M]→[M]\rho:[M]\to[M] as follows. Let r∈[M]r\in[M], so that r≤Mr\le M, and let M<M+1M<M+1 be as given by claim 6 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers. Then r<M+1r<M+1. Indeed, by the trichotomy of claim 3 of that lemma exactly one of r<Mr<M, r=Mr=M, M<rM<r holds, and the last is impossible, since M<rM<r would give M≤rM\le r by claim 1 and hence r=Mr=M by the antisymmetry of claim 2, contradicting that exclusivity; in the case r=Mr=M one has r<M+1r<M+1 at once, and in the case r<Mr<M the strict transitivity of claim 1 gives r<M+1r<M+1. By claim 7 of that lemma there is exactly one k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with M+1=r+kM+1=r+k, and we set ρ(r)=k\rho(r)=k. This kk lies in [M][M]: by claim 4 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers one has r+k=k+rr+k=k+r, and k<k+rk<k+r by claim 6 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, so k<M+1k<M+1, and then claim 5 of that lemma, applied with M+1M+1 the successor of MM, gives k≤Mk\le M. The map ρ\rho is injective, since ρ(r)=ρ(r′)\rho(r)=\rho(r') gives r+ρ(r)=M+1=r′+ρ(r)r+\rho(r)=M+1=r'+\rho(r) and hence r=r′r=r' by the cancellation of claim 5 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers together with claim 4 of that lemma; so ρ\rho is a bijection of [M][M] onto itself by claim 1 of An Injective Self-Map of a Finite Set is a Bijection.

Read in R\mathbb{R}, the identity M+1=r+ρ(r)M+1=r+\rho(r) gives ρ(r)−M−1=−r\rho(r)-M-1=-r, by the additivity of claim 4 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field; hence (ρ(r)−M−1)2=r2(\rho(r)-M-1)^{2}=r^{2} by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, and so cρ(r)=11+αr2c_{\rho(r)}=\tfrac{1}{1+\alpha r^{2}}. By claim 1 of Invariance of Finite Sums and Products under Reindexing by a Permutation, applied to the restriction of cc to [M][M] and to ρ\rho,

∑r=1Mcr=∑r=1Mcρ(r)=∑r=1M11+αr2.\sum_{r=1}^{M}c_{r}=\sum_{r=1}^{M}c_{\rho(r)}=\sum_{r=1}^{M}\frac{1}{1+\alpha r^{2}} .

Claim 7 (Clause 4). Let r∈[M]r\in[M]. The real number αr2\alpha r^{2} is positive by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and αr2≤1+αr2\alpha r^{2}\le1+\alpha r^{2} because 0≤10\le1 by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; so claim 1 above gives

11+αr2≤1αr2=1α⋅1r2,\frac{1}{1+\alpha r^{2}}\le\frac{1}{\alpha r^{2}}=\frac{1}{\alpha}\cdot\frac{1}{r^{2}} ,

the last equality being field arithmetic with the nonzero factors α\alpha and r2r^{2}. Summing these inequalities over r∈[M]r\in[M] by claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, and using the homogeneity of claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums,

∑r=1M11+αr2≤1α∑r=1M1r2.\sum_{r=1}^{M}\frac{1}{1+\alpha r^{2}}\le\frac{1}{\alpha}\sum_{r=1}^{M}\frac{1}{r^{2}} .

By claim 3 the sum on the right is at most 22 — indeed ∑r=1M1r2≤2\sum_{r=1}^{M}\tfrac{1}{r^{2}}\le2 was shown there — and 1α\tfrac{1}{\alpha} is nonnegative by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives

∑r=1M11+αr2≤2α.\sum_{r=1}^{M}\frac{1}{1+\alpha r^{2}}\le\frac{2}{\alpha} .

By claims 5 and 6 the sum of clause 4 equals ∑r=1Mcr+1+∑r=1McM+1+r\sum_{r=1}^{M}c_{r}+1+\sum_{r=1}^{M}c_{M+1+r}, and both of these sums equal ∑r=1M11+αr2\sum_{r=1}^{M}\tfrac{1}{1+\alpha r^{2}}. Adding the two bounds just obtained to 1≤11\le1 therefore gives

∑m=12M+111+α (m−M−1)2≤2α+1+2α=1+4α,\sum_{m=1}^{2M+1}\frac{1}{1+\alpha\,(m-M-1)^{2}}\le\frac{2}{\alpha}+1+\frac{2}{\alpha}=1+\frac{4}{\alpha},

which is clause 4.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…