TheoremBase

The proof computes the coordinates of p(x) and j(y) from the Riesz-Fischer criterion and derives linearity, the left-inverse identity and the norm and noise-norm relations from Bessel's and Parseval's identities, using the orthonormal subsequence of the noise basis picked out by the injective index map. The remaining clauses then follow: push-forward of noise couplings by p x p, gluing for the noise-connected measures, change of variables for pulled-back fields, a direct reindexing for cylindrical functions, and the sequential closure for tangent fields.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Preliminaries. For x∈X1x\in X_{1} and y∈X2y\in X_{2} the coordinates xk=⟨x,ek(1)⟩1x_{k}=\langle x,e^{(1)}_{k}\rangle_{1} and ym=⟨y,em(2)⟩2y_{m}=\langle y,e^{(2)}_{m}\rangle_{2} are those of Two Noise Levels over Hilbert Spaces: a Fine and a Coarse Reading of the Noise Framework and Level-Indexed Notation §coordinates; for i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\} and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} put fk(i)=(ak(i))1/2ek(i)f^{(i)}_{k}=(a^{(i)}_{k})^{1/2}e^{(i)}_{k}. We record four facts.

(P1) Let x∈X1x\in X_{1}. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §riesz-fischer, applied in X2X_{2} to (em(2))m∈N(e^{(2)}_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} with cm=xκ(m)c_{m}=x_{\kappa(m)}, the series ∑m=1∞xκ(m)2\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}x_{\kappa(m)}^{2} being convergent as shown in Mode-Restriction Links between a Fine and a Coarse Noise Level §restriction,

p(x)m=xκ(m)(m∈N),∣p(x)∣22=∑m=1∞xκ(m)2.p(x)_{m}=x_{\kappa(m)}\quad(m\in\mathbb{N}),\qquad|p(x)|_{2}^{2}=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}x_{\kappa(m)}^{2}.

(P2) Let y∈X2y\in X_{2}. By the same claim, applied in X1X_{1} to the orthonormal sequence (eκ(m)(1))m∈N(e^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} of Mode-Restriction Links between a Fine and a Coarse Noise Level §orthonormal with cm=ymc_{m}=y_{m}, the series ∑m=1∞ym2\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}y_{m}^{2} being convergent as shown in Mode-Restriction Links between a Fine and a Coarse Noise Level §embedding, one has ⟨j(y),eκ(m)(1)⟩1=ym\langle j(y),e^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)}\rangle_{1}=y_{m} for every mm and ∣j(y)∣12=∑m=1∞ym2|j(y)|_{1}^{2}=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}y_{m}^{2}. Let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} not be a value of κ\kappa. By Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space §inner-product, applied in X1X_{1} with w=ek(1)w=e^{(1)}_{k}, the number ⟨j(y),ek(1)⟩1\langle j(y),e^{(1)}_{k}\rangle_{1} is the sum of the series of real numbers with terms ⟨ymeκ(m)(1),ek(1)⟩1\langle y_{m}e^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)},e^{(1)}_{k}\rangle_{1}, each of which is 00 because κ(m)≠k\kappa(m)\neq k and (ek(1))k∈N(e^{(1)}_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is orthonormal; its partial sums are 00 by claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums, applied in the field of real numbers with i=1i=1 (every summand, the first included, being 00), so the sum is 00. Since κ\kappa is injective, each kk equals κ(m)\kappa(m) for at most one mm; thus j(y)k=ymj(y)_{k}=y_{m} if k=κ(m)k=\kappa(m), and j(y)k=0j(y)_{k}=0 if kk is not a value of κ\kappa.

(P3) For i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}, two vectors of XiX_{i} with the same coordinates are equal: by the additivity and homogeneity of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product) their difference has every coordinate 00, so it is the zero vector by Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space §basis.

(P4) For i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}, XiaX^{a}_{i} is a linear subspace of XiX_{i} which, with the operations of XiX_{i} and the inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩a,i\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{a,i}, is a real Hilbert space by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert, and (fk(i))k∈N(f^{(i)}_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is an orthonormal basis of it with ⟨x,fk(i)⟩a,i=(ak(i))−1/2xk\langle x,f^{(i)}_{k}\rangle_{a,i}=(a^{(i)}_{k})^{-1/2}x_{k} for x∈Xiax\in X^{a}_{i} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §basis, both taken at level ii. Analogously to Mode-Restriction Links between a Fine and a Coarse Noise Level §orthonormal, the injectivity of κ\kappa and the orthonormality of (fk(1))k∈N(f^{(1)}_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in X1aX^{a}_{1} (The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §basis at level 1) make (fκ(m)(1))m∈N(f^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} an orthonormal sequence in X1aX^{a}_{1}. Finally aκ(m)(1)=am(2)a^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)}=a^{(2)}_{m} for every mm by Mode-Restriction Links between a Fine and a Coarse Noise Level §link.

Claim (linear). Let x,x′∈X1x,x'\in X_{1}, y,y′∈X2y,y'\in X_{2} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By (P1) and the linearity of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product), p(x+tx′)p(x+tx') and p(x)+t p(x′)p(x)+t\,p(x') both have mm-th coordinate xκ(m)+t xκ(m)′x_{\kappa(m)}+t\,x'_{\kappa(m)}, so they are equal by (P3). By (P2) and the same linearity, j(y+ty′)j(y+ty') and j(y)+t j(y′)j(y)+t\,j(y') both have kk-th coordinate ym+t ym′y_{m}+t\,y'_{m} if k=κ(m)k=\kappa(m) and 00 if kk is not a value of κ\kappa, so they are equal by (P3).

Claim (inverse). Let y∈X2y\in X_{2}. By (P1) applied to j(y)j(y) and then (P2), p(j(y))m=j(y)κ(m)=ymp(j(y))_{m}=j(y)_{\kappa(m)}=y_{m} for every mm, so p(j(y))=yp(j(y))=y by (P3).

Claim (norms). Let x∈X1x\in X_{1}. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §bessel, applied in X1X_{1} to the orthonormal sequence (eκ(m)(1))m∈N(e^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}, ∑mxκ(m)2≤∣x∣12\sum_{m}x_{\kappa(m)}^{2}\le|x|_{1}^{2}; so ∣p(x)∣22≤∣x∣12|p(x)|_{2}^{2}\le|x|_{1}^{2} by (P1), and ∣p(x)∣2≤∣x∣1|p(x)|_{2}\le|x|_{1} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, both norms being nonnegative. Let y∈X2y\in X_{2}. By (P2) and Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §parseval in X2X_{2}, ∣j(y)∣12=∑mym2=∣y∣22|j(y)|_{1}^{2}=\sum_{m}y_{m}^{2}=|y|_{2}^{2}, so ∣j(y)∣1=∣y∣2|j(y)|_{1}=|y|_{2} by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Claim (noise). Let x∈X1ax\in X^{a}_{1}. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §bessel, applied in the Hilbert space X1aX^{a}_{1} to the orthonormal sequence (fκ(m)(1))m∈N(f^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} of (P4), the series ∑m⟨x,fκ(m)(1)⟩a,12\sum_{m}\langle x,f^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)}\rangle_{a,1}^{2} converges with sum at most ∣x∣a,12|x|_{a,1}^{2}. By (P4) and (P1) its mm-th term is (aκ(m)(1))−1xκ(m)2=(am(2))−1p(x)m2(a^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})^{-1}x_{\kappa(m)}^{2}=(a^{(2)}_{m})^{-1}p(x)_{m}^{2}. Hence p(x)∈X2ap(x)\in X^{a}_{2} by The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §space, and ∣p(x)∣a,22≤∣x∣a,12|p(x)|_{a,2}^{2}\le|x|_{a,1}^{2} by The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §inner-product, both taken at level 2; claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣p(x)∣a,2≤∣x∣a,1|p(x)|_{a,2}\le|x|_{a,1}.

Let y∈X2ay\in X^{a}_{2} and cm=(am(2))−1/2ymc_{m}=(a^{(2)}_{m})^{-1/2}y_{m}. The series ∑mcm2=∑m(am(2))−1ym2\sum_{m}c_{m}^{2}=\sum_{m}(a^{(2)}_{m})^{-1}y_{m}^{2} converges with sum ∣y∣a,22|y|_{a,2}^{2} by The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §space and The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §inner-product at level 2. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §riesz-fischer, applied in X1aX^{a}_{1} to (fκ(m)(1))m∈N(f^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}, the series ∑mcmfκ(m)(1)\sum_{m}c_{m}f^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)} converges in X1aX^{a}_{1} to some zz with ∣z∣a,12=∣y∣a,22|z|_{a,1}^{2}=|y|_{a,2}^{2}. By (P4) its mm-th term is (am(2))−1/2(aκ(m)(1))1/2ymeκ(m)(1)=ymeκ(m)(1)(a^{(2)}_{m})^{-1/2}(a^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})^{1/2}y_{m}e^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)}=y_{m}e^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)}, the mm-th term of the series defining j(y)j(y). The inclusion ι:X1a→X1\iota:X^{a}_{1}\to X_{1} is linear, the operations of X1aX^{a}_{1} being those of X1X_{1} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert, and, aˉ(1)\bar{a}^{(1)} being positive by Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §weights at level 1 (Two Noise Levels over Hilbert Spaces: a Fine and a Coarse Reading of the Noise Framework and Level-Indexed Notation §levels), so that its square root is defined, ∣ι(v)∣1≤(aˉ(1))1/2∣v∣a,1|\iota(v)|_{1}\le(\bar{a}^{(1)})^{1/2}|v|_{a,1} for v∈X1av\in X^{a}_{1} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §embedding at level 1 and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; so ι\iota is a bounded linear map in the sense of Bounded Linear Maps and Bounded Linear Functionals on Real Inner Product Spaces, and the Operator Norm §bounded. By Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space §linear-maps, the series ∑mymeκ(m)(1)\sum_{m}y_{m}e^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)} converges in X1X_{1} with sum ι(z)=z\iota(z)=z. Its sum is j(y)j(y), and the sum of a convergent series is unique by Series in a Real Inner Product Space §convergent. Hence j(y)=z∈X1aj(y)=z\in X^{a}_{1}, and we record the representation

j(y)=∑m=1∞cmfκ(m)(1)(convergence in X1a),j(y)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}c_{m}f^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)}\qquad\text{(convergence in }X^{a}_{1}),

called (R) below. Moreover ∣j(y)∣a,12=∣y∣a,22|j(y)|_{a,1}^{2}=|y|_{a,2}^{2}, whence ∣j(y)∣a,1=∣y∣a,2|j(y)|_{a,1}=|y|_{a,2} by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Claim (adjoint). Let y∈X2ay\in X^{a}_{2} and x∈X1ax\in X^{a}_{1}, and let cmc_{m} be as in the previous claim. By (R) and Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space §inner-product, applied in X1aX^{a}_{1} with w=xw=x, together with the homogeneity and symmetry of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product),

⟨j(y),x⟩a,1=∑m=1∞cm ⟨x,fκ(m)(1)⟩a,1.\langle j(y),x\rangle_{a,1}=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}c_{m}\,\langle x,f^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)}\rangle_{a,1}.

By (P4) and (P1) the mm-th term equals (am(2))−1/2ym (aκ(m)(1))−1/2xκ(m)=(am(2))−1ym p(x)m(a^{(2)}_{m})^{-1/2}y_{m}\,(a^{(1)}_{\kappa(m)})^{-1/2}x_{\kappa(m)}=(a^{(2)}_{m})^{-1}y_{m}\,p(x)_{m}. Since p(x)∈X2ap(x)\in X^{a}_{2} by claim 4, the sum of this series is ⟨y,p(x)⟩a,2\langle y,p(x)\rangle_{a,2} by The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §inner-product at level 2.

Claim (borel). For x,x′∈X1x,x'\in X_{1}, claims 1 and 3 give d2(p(x),p(x′))=∣p(x−x′)∣2≤∣x−x′∣1=d1(x,x′)d_{2}(p(x),p(x'))=|p(x-x')|_{2}\le|x-x'|_{1}=d_{1}(x,x'), so pp is Lipschitz with constant 11 in the sense of Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces, continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous, and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For z=(x,y)z=(x,y) and z′=(x′,y′)z'=(x',y') in X1×X1X_{1}\times X_{1}, Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric, applied to both products, gives

d((p×p)(z),(p×p)(z′))2=d2(p(x),p(x′))2+d2(p(y),p(y′))2≤d1(x,x′)2+d1(y,y′)2=d(z,z′)2,d\bigl((p\times p)(z),(p\times p)(z')\bigr)^{2}=d_{2}(p(x),p(x'))^{2}+d_{2}(p(y),p(y'))^{2}\le d_{1}(x,x')^{2}+d_{1}(y,y')^{2}=d(z,z')^{2},

so p×pp\times p is Lipschitz with constant 11 by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, hence continuous and Borel by the same two results.

Claim (pushforward-measure). Let μ∈P(X1)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X_{1}). By claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, as in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward, p#μp_{\#}\mu is a Borel measure on X2X_{2} with total mass μ(X1)=1\mu(X_{1})=1, so p#μ∈P(X2)p_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X_{2}).

Claim (pushforward-moment). Suppose μ∈P2(X1)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X_{1}). The functions w↦∣w∣22w\mapsto|w|_{2}^{2} on X2X_{2} and x↦∣x∣12x\mapsto|x|_{1}^{2} on X1X_{1} are Borel and nonnegative, as recorded in The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment at the levels concerned, and x↦∣p(x)∣22x\mapsto|p(x)|_{2}^{2} is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. By claim 3 and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, both norms being nonnegative, ∣p(x)∣22≤∣x∣12|p(x)|_{2}^{2}\le|x|_{1}^{2} for every x∈X1x\in X_{1}. By claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, this inequality, and the monotonicity in Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative,

M2(p#μ)=∫X2∣w∣22 (p#μ)(dw)=∫X1∣p(x)∣22 μ(dx)≤∫X1∣x∣12 μ(dx)=M2(μ)<∞,M_{2}(p_{\#}\mu)=\int_{X_{2}}|w|_{2}^{2}\,(p_{\#}\mu)(dw)=\int_{X_{1}}|p(x)|_{2}^{2}\,\mu(dx)\le\int_{X_{1}}|x|_{1}^{2}\,\mu(dx)=M_{2}(\mu)<\infty,

with M2M_{2} the second moment of The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment; so p#μ∈P2(X2)p_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X_{2}) by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space.

Claim (couplings). Let π∈Πa,1(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi^{a,1}(\mu,\nu) and π′=(p×p)#π\pi'=(p\times p)_{\#}\pi, a Borel probability measure on X2×X2X_{2}\times X_{2} by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. Write π1,π2\pi_{1},\pi_{2} for the coordinate maps of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pairs at either level; then π1∘(p×p)=p∘π1\pi_{1}\circ(p\times p)=p\circ\pi_{1}, so for B∈B(X2)B\in\mathcal{B}(X_{2}) the defining formula of claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives ((π1)#π′)(B)=π′(π1−1(B))=π((p×p)−1(π1−1(B)))=π(π1−1(p−1(B)))=μ(p−1(B))=(p#μ)(B)((\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi')(B)=\pi'(\pi_{1}^{-1}(B))=\pi((p\times p)^{-1}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(B)))=\pi(\pi_{1}^{-1}(p^{-1}(B)))=\mu(p^{-1}(B))=(p_{\#}\mu)(B), using (π1)#π=μ(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu from Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling; likewise (π2)#π′=p#ν(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi'=p_{\#}\nu. Thus π′∈Π(p#μ,p#ν)\pi'\in\Pi(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\nu) by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling. Let Da,iD_{a,i}, ca,ic_{a,i} and na,in_{a,i} be the set and functions of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §pairs and The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel at level ii. If z=(x,y)∈Da,1z=(x,y)\in D_{a,1}, then y−x∈X1ay-x\in X^{a}_{1}, so p(y)−p(x)=p(y−x)∈X2ap(y)-p(x)=p(y-x)\in X^{a}_{2} by claims 1 and 4; that is, (p×p)(z)∈Da,2(p\times p)(z)\in D_{a,2}, and

ca,2((p×p)(z))=∣p(y−x)∣a,22≤∣y−x∣a,12=ca,1(z)c_{a,2}\bigl((p\times p)(z)\bigr)=|p(y-x)|_{a,2}^{2}\le|y-x|_{a,1}^{2}=c_{a,1}(z)

by claim 4 and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Since Da,1⊆(p×p)−1(Da,2)D_{a,1}\subseteq(p\times p)^{-1}(D_{a,2}) and π(Da,1)=1\pi(D_{a,1})=1 by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite, the monotonicity of the measure π\pi, a consequence of the countable additivity in Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure, gives 1≤π((p×p)−1(Da,2))=π′(Da,2)≤11\le\pi((p\times p)^{-1}(D_{a,2}))=\pi'(D_{a,2})\le1. By the same additivity the complement of Da,1D_{a,1} is π\pi-null, so the inequality of costs holds for π\pi-almost every zz; the function ca,2∘(p×p)c_{a,2}\circ(p\times p) is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. By claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, applied to the nonnegative Borel function ca,2c_{a,2}, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison,

∫X2×X2ca,2 dπ′=∫X1×X1ca,2∘(p×p) dπ≤∫X1×X1ca,1 dπ=Ia,1(π)<∞.\int_{X_{2}\times X_{2}}c_{a,2}\,d\pi'=\int_{X_{1}\times X_{1}}c_{a,2}\circ(p\times p)\,d\pi\le\int_{X_{1}\times X_{1}}c_{a,1}\,d\pi=I^{a,1}(\pi)<\infty .

Hence π′∈Πa,2(p#μ,p#ν)\pi'\in\Pi^{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\nu) by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite and Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings, and Ia,2(π′)≤Ia,1(π)I^{a,2}(\pi')\le I^{a,1}(\pi) by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §cost.

Claim (lipschitz). Suppose (μ,ν)(\mu,\nu) is noise-connected at level 1. Then Πa,1(μ,ν)\Pi^{a,1}(\mu,\nu) has a member π\pi by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §connected, and (p×p)#π∈Πa,2(p#μ,p#ν)(p\times p)_{\#}\pi\in\Pi^{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\nu) by the previous claim, so (p#μ,p#ν)(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\nu) is noise-connected at level 2 by the same definition. For every π∈Πa,1(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi^{a,1}(\mu,\nu), The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance at level 2 and the previous claim give

Wa,2(p#μ,p#ν)2≤Ia,2((p×p)#π)≤Ia,1(π).W_{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\nu)^{2}\le I^{a,2}\bigl((p\times p)_{\#}\pi\bigr)\le I^{a,1}(\pi).

So Wa,2(p#μ,p#ν)2W_{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\nu)^{2} is a lower bound of the set {Ia,1(π):π∈Πa,1(μ,ν)}\{I^{a,1}(\pi):\pi\in\Pi^{a,1}(\mu,\nu)\}, whose greatest lower bound is Wa,1(μ,ν)2W_{a,1}(\mu,\nu)^{2} by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance at level 1; hence Wa,2(p#μ,p#ν)2≤Wa,1(μ,ν)2W_{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\nu)^{2}\le W_{a,1}(\mu,\nu)^{2}, and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives the asserted inequality, both distances being nonnegative. Any μ,ν∈Pρ1a\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho_{1}} are noise-connected at level 1 by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected, so this applies to them.

Claim (space). Let μ∈Pρ1a\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho_{1}}. Since ρ1∈Pρ1a\rho_{1}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho_{1}} by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §reference at level 1, the previous claim shows that (p#μ,p#ρ1)(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\rho_{1}) is noise-connected at level 2, and (p#ρ1,ρ2)(p_{\#}\rho_{1},\rho_{2}) is noise-connected at level 2 by the hypothesis p#ρ1∈Pρ2ap_{\#}\rho_{1}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho_{2}} and The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space. Choose π12∈Πa,2(p#μ,p#ρ1)\pi_{12}\in\Pi^{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\rho_{1}) and π23∈Πa,2(p#ρ1,ρ2)\pi_{23}\in\Pi^{a,2}(p_{\#}\rho_{1},\rho_{2}). The three measures lie in P2(X2)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X_{2}): μ,ρ1∈P2(X1)\mu,\rho_{1}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X_{1}) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments at level 1, so p#μ,p#ρ1∈P2(X2)p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\rho_{1}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X_{2}) by claim 6, and ρ2∈P2(X2)\rho_{2}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X_{2}) by Two Noise Levels over Hilbert Spaces: a Fine and a Coarse Reading of the Noise Framework and Level-Indexed Notation §levels. Hence Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §glued, at level 2, provides a gluing σ\sigma of π12\pi_{12} and π23\pi_{23}, and Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §noise-triangle gives (q1,q3)#σ∈Πa,2(p#μ,ρ2)(q_{1},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma\in\Pi^{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,\rho_{2}). Therefore (p#μ,ρ2)(p_{\#}\mu,\rho_{2}) is noise-connected at level 2 and p#μ∈Pρ2ap_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho_{2}} by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space. Now p#μp_{\#}\mu, p#ρ1p_{\#}\rho_{1} and ρ2\rho_{2} belong to Pρ2a\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho_{2}}, the last by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §reference at level 2, so the triangle inequality The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §triangle at level 2 and the previous claim, applied to μ\mu and ρ1\rho_{1}, give

Wa,2(p#μ,ρ2)≤Wa,2(p#μ,p#ρ1)+Wa,2(p#ρ1,ρ2)≤Wa,1(μ,ρ1)+Wa,2(p#ρ1,ρ2).W_{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,\rho_{2})\le W_{a,2}(p_{\#}\mu,p_{\#}\rho_{1})+W_{a,2}(p_{\#}\rho_{1},\rho_{2})\le W_{a,1}(\mu,\rho_{1})+W_{a,2}(p_{\#}\rho_{1},\rho_{2}).

Claim (fields). Let gg be as stated. For x∈X1x\in X_{1}, g(p(x))∈X2ag(p(x))\in X^{a}_{2}, so j(g(p(x)))∈X1aj(g(p(x)))\in X^{a}_{1} and ∣j(g(p(x)))∣a,1=∣g(p(x))∣a,2|j(g(p(x)))|_{a,1}=|g(p(x))|_{a,2} by claim 4. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, by (P2) the function x↦⟨j(g(p(x))),ek(1)⟩1x\mapsto\langle j(g(p(x))),e^{(1)}_{k}\rangle_{1} is x↦⟨g(p(x)),em(2)⟩2x\mapsto\langle g(p(x)),e^{(2)}_{m}\rangle_{2} if k=κ(m)k=\kappa(m), and the constant 00 if kk is not a value of κ\kappa. The function w↦⟨g(w),em(2)⟩2w\mapsto\langle g(w),e^{(2)}_{m}\rangle_{2} on X2X_{2} is measurable by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §measurable at level 2, gg being measurable into X2aX^{a}_{2}, and its composite with the Borel map pp of claim 6 is measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; constant functions are measurable. Hence j∘g∘pj\circ g\circ p is measurable as a map into X1aX^{a}_{1} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §measurable at level 1. The function ∣g∣a,22|g|_{a,2}^{2} is nonnegative and measurable by Measurable Maps into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Norms, Inner Products and Linear Combinations, Synthesis from Coordinates, Square-Integrability, and Almost-Everywhere Equality §operations, so claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives

∫X1∣j(g(p(x)))∣a,12 μ(dx)=∫X1∣g(p(x))∣a,22 μ(dx)=∫X2∣g(y)∣a,22 (p#μ)(dy)<∞,\int_{X_{1}}\bigl|j(g(p(x)))\bigr|_{a,1}^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\int_{X_{1}}|g(p(x))|_{a,2}^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\int_{X_{2}}|g(y)|_{a,2}^{2}\,(p_{\#}\mu)(dy)<\infty,

the finiteness by The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §space; so j∘g∘pj\circ g\circ p is square-integrable with respect to μ\mu, and the asserted identity holds. The map jj is injective by claim 2, since j(w)=j(w′)j(w)=j(w') implies w=p(j(w))=p(j(w′))=w′w=p(j(w))=p(j(w'))=w'. Let g′g' be measurable with g′∼p#μgg'\sim_{p_{\#}\mu}g. Then {x:j(g(p(x)))≠j(g′(p(x)))}=p−1({y:g(y)≠g′(y)})\{x:j(g(p(x)))\neq j(g'(p(x)))\}=p^{-1}(\{y:g(y)\neq g'(y)\}), and its μ\mu-measure is the p#μp_{\#}\mu-measure of {y:g(y)≠g′(y)}\{y:g(y)\neq g'(y)\}, which is 00 (Measurable Maps into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Norms, Inner Products and Linear Combinations, Synthesis from Coordinates, Square-Integrability, and Almost-Everywhere Equality §almost-everywhere); so j∘g′∘p∼μj∘g∘pj\circ g'\circ p\sim_{\mu}j\circ g\circ p, and the two classes coincide by The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §classes.

Claim (fields-isometry). By The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations, ∥j∘g∘p∥μ,1\lVert j\circ g\circ p\rVert_{\mu,1} and ∥g∥p#μ,2\lVert g\rVert_{p_{\#}\mu,2} are the nonnegative square roots of the first and last integrals of the display, which are equal; so the norms are equal. Claim (fields-linear). For representatives g,g′g,g' and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, claim 1 gives j(g(p(x))+t g′(p(x)))=j(g(p(x)))+t j(g′(p(x)))j(g(p(x))+t\,g'(p(x)))=j(g(p(x)))+t\,j(g'(p(x))) for every x∈X1x\in X_{1}, so by The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations the class of j∘(g+tg′)∘pj\circ(g+tg')\circ p is the class of j∘g∘pj\circ g\circ p plus tt times the class of j∘g′∘pj\circ g'\circ p.

Claim (cylindrical). Let (n,χ)(n,\chi) be a representation of ψ\psi (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §representation, at level 2), so χ∈Cb1(Rn)\chi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and ψ=χ∘ϖn(2)\psi=\chi\circ \varpi^{(2)}_{n}. Let NN be the largest of κ(1),…,κ(n)\kappa(1),\dots,\kappa(n), and let L:RN→RnL:\mathbb{R}^{N}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be L(t)=(tκ(1),…,tκ(n))L(t)=(t_{\kappa(1)},\dots,t_{\kappa(n)}). By (P1), ϖn(2)(p(x))=(xκ(1),…,xκ(n))=L(ϖN(1)(x))\varpi^{(2)}_{n}(p(x))=(x_{\kappa(1)},\dots,x_{\kappa(n)})=L(\varpi^{(1)}_{N}(x)) for x∈X1x\in X_{1}, so ψ∘p=(χ∘L)∘ϖN(1)\psi\circ p=(\chi\circ L)\circ \varpi^{(1)}_{N}.

We show χ∘L∈Cb1(RN)\chi\circ L\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}). Let t∈RNt\in\mathbb{R}^{N}, k∈[N]k\in[N] and h∈Rh\in\mathbb{R}, and let tht^{h} be tt with its kk-th entry replaced by tk+ht_{k}+h. If k=κ(i)k=\kappa(i) with i∈[n]i\in[n] (ii unique by injectivity), then L(th)L(t^{h}) is L(t)L(t) with its ii-th entry replaced by L(t)i+hL(t)_{i}+h; if kk is not among κ(1),…,κ(n)\kappa(1),\dots,\kappa(n), then L(th)=L(t)L(t^{h})=L(t). Hence the difference quotients of χ∘L\chi\circ L at tt in the kk-th variable are those of χ\chi at L(t)L(t) in the ii-th variable, respectively 00, and Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set gives that ∂k(χ∘L)(t)\partial_{k}(\chi\circ L)(t) exists and equals ∂iχ(L(t))\partial_{i}\chi(L(t)), respectively 00. For t,t′∈RNt,t'\in\mathbb{R}^{N}, ∑i=1n(tκ(i)′−tκ(i))2≤∑k=1N(tk′−tk)2\sum_{i=1}^{n}(t'_{\kappa(i)}-t_{\kappa(i)})^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{N}(t'_{k}-t_{k})^{2}, the left side being the sum of some of the nonnegative terms on the right since κ(1),…,κ(n)\kappa(1),\dots,\kappa(n) are distinct elements of [N][N]; so LL is continuous at every point in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces, with δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon. The function χ\chi and its partial derivatives ∂iχ\partial_{i}\chi are continuous at every point of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by clauses 1 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, so χ∘L\chi\circ L and ∂iχ∘L\partial_{i}\chi\circ L are continuous at every point by Composition of Continuous Euclidean Maps, and constant functions are continuous. Thus χ∘L\chi\circ L is of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} by the same clauses, and it and its partial derivatives are bounded because χ\chi and the ∂iχ\partial_{i}\chi are (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded). So χ∘L∈Cb1(RN)\chi\circ L\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}), and ψ∘p∈FCb1(X1)\psi\circ p\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X_{1}) with representation (N,χ∘L)(N,\chi\circ L) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical at level 1.

Fix x∈X1x\in X_{1}; we compare coordinates. By Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial at level 1, ∂k(ψ∘p)(x)=∂k(χ∘L)(ϖN(1)(x))\partial_{k}(\psi\circ p)(x)=\partial_{k}(\chi\circ L)(\varpi^{(1)}_{N}(x)) for k≤Nk\le N, which by the above is ∂iχ(ϖn(2)(p(x)))=∂iψ(p(x))\partial_{i}\chi(\varpi^{(2)}_{n}(p(x)))=\partial_{i}\psi(p(x)) if k=κ(i)k=\kappa(i) with i≤ni\le n, the last equality by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial at level 2, and 00 otherwise. By The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient, which identifies the coordinates of a noise gradient, at level 1, the kk-th coordinate of ∇a,1(ψ∘p)(x)\nabla_{a,1}(\psi\circ p)(x) is therefore aκ(i)(1)∂iψ(p(x))=ai(2)∂iψ(p(x))a^{(1)}_{\kappa(i)}\partial_{i}\psi(p(x))=a^{(2)}_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(p(x)) if k=κ(i)k=\kappa(i) with i≤ni\le n, and 00 for every other kk (for k>Nk>N by that clause, and k>Nk>N is not among κ(1),…,κ(n)\kappa(1),\dots,\kappa(n)). By the same clause at level 2, the mm-th coordinate of ∇a,2ψ(p(x))\nabla_{a,2}\psi(p(x)) is am(2)∂mψ(p(x))a^{(2)}_{m}\partial_{m}\psi(p(x)) for m≤nm\le n and 00 for m>nm>n; so by (P2) the kk-th coordinate of j(∇a,2ψ(p(x)))j(\nabla_{a,2}\psi(p(x))) is ai(2)∂iψ(p(x))a^{(2)}_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(p(x)) if k=κ(i)k=\kappa(i) with i≤ni\le n, and 00 otherwise (if k=κ(m)k=\kappa(m) with m>nm>n, or kk is not a value of κ\kappa). The two vectors have the same coordinates, so they are equal by (P3).

Claim (tangent). For h∈L2(p#μ;X2a)h\in L^{2}(p_{\#}\mu;X^{a}_{2}) write Φ(h)=j∘h∘p∈L2(μ;X1a)\Phi(h)=j\circ h\circ p\in L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}_{1}). By claim 9, Φ\Phi is linear and norm-preserving, so ∥Φ(h)−Φ(h′)∥μ,1=∥Φ(h−h′)∥μ,1=∥h−h′∥p#μ,2\lVert\Phi(h)-\Phi(h')\rVert_{\mu,1}=\lVert\Phi(h-h')\rVert_{\mu,1}=\lVert h-h'\rVert_{p_{\#}\mu,2}. If h∈Gp#μa,2h\in G^{a,2}_{p_{\#}\mu}, that is, hh is the class of ∇a,2ψ\nabla_{a,2}\psi for some ψ∈FCb1(X2)\psi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X_{2}) (The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradients at level 2), then by claim 10 Φ(h)\Phi(h) is the class of j∘∇a,2ψ∘p=∇a,1(ψ∘p)j\circ\nabla_{a,2}\psi\circ p=\nabla_{a,1}(\psi\circ p) with ψ∘p∈FCb1(X1)\psi\circ p\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X_{1}), so Φ(h)∈Gμa,1\Phi(h)\in G^{a,1}_{\mu}. Now g∈Tp#μa,2g\in T^{a,2}_{p_{\#}\mu}, the closure of Gp#μa,2G^{a,2}_{p_{\#}\mu} in L2(p#μ;X2a)L^{2}(p_{\#}\mu;X^{a}_{2}) (The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §tangent, with closure as in Real Hilbert Space §topology). By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space there is a sequence (gn)n∈N(g_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} in Gp#μa,2G^{a,2}_{p_{\#}\mu} converging to gg. Then Φ(gn)∈Gμa,1\Phi(g_{n})\in G^{a,1}_{\mu} and the distance from Φ(gn)\Phi(g_{n}) to Φ(g)\Phi(g) equals the distance from gng_{n} to gg for every nn (in both spaces the distance is the norm of the difference, by Real Inner Product Space §distance), so (Φ(gn))n∈N(\Phi(g_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to Φ(g)\Phi(g) in the sense of Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space; by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space again, Φ(g)=j∘g∘p\Phi(g)=j\circ g\circ p lies in the closure of Gμa,1G^{a,1}_{\mu}, which is Tμa,1T^{a,1}_{\mu}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…