TheoremBase

The torus data satisfy the hypotheses of the Hilbert-space well-posedness theorem with temperature and constant 1, which gives comparison, existence and uniqueness; rewriting the cutoff Wick sums through the Fourier coefficients, the counterterm and divergence clauses are those of the renormalisation proposition with the divergent Wick constant.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary ordered-field arithmetic and order, and the properties of finite sums, are used without further comment, as provided by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background.

The data. By The Free Field on the Torus as the Gaussian Reference Measure, with Square-Integrable White Noise: Standing Notation §gaussian, the notation of A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation is in force with the reference measure ρ=γc\rho=\gamma_{c}. By White Noise in the Square-Integrable Space and the Free Field on the Torus as Noise Weights and a Variance Sequence on a Negative Sobolev Space §ratio, cj≤1⋅ajc_{j}\le1\cdot a_{j} for every j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}, so the temperature β=1\beta=1 and the constant κ=1\kappa=1 satisfy the standing hypotheses of Well-Posedness of the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift and a Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space, by Gaussian Dressing, Gaussian Dressing of the Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space: Riccati Coefficients, Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Constant, the Dressed Pair and the Shifted Operator and The Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost is the Wick-Ordered Series, and Cutoff Counterterms Are Forced up to a Convergent Constant, with the Gaussian entropy pair (D,DΣ,E,Σ)(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma},\mathcal{E},\Sigma) of the corollary. Since n≤3n\le3, ww is a sequence of Wick couplings with bound ∣w0∣|w_{0}| by The Wick Square of the Free Field on the Torus as Diagonal Couplings: Summability in Dimension at Most Three, the Riccati Condition, and the Divergent Wick Constant §summability. By hypothesis 0<λ00<\lambda_{0}, 0<θ≤10<\theta\le1 and ε0=1+λ0+2θmin⁡{w0,0}>0\varepsilon_{0}=1+\lambda_{0}+2\theta\min\{w_{0},0\}>0, and The Wick Square of the Free Field on the Torus as Diagonal Couplings: Summability in Dimension at Most Three, the Riccati Condition, and the Divergent Wick Constant §riccati gives aj/cj+λ0+2θwjcj≥ε0a_{j}/c_{j}+\lambda_{0}+2\theta w_{j}c_{j}\ge\varepsilon_{0} for every jj; as β=1\beta=1, this is the inequality βaj/cj+λ0+2θwjcj/β≥ε0\beta a_{j}/c_{j}+\lambda_{0}+2\theta w_{j}c_{j}/\beta\ge\varepsilon_{0} required in Well-Posedness of the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift and a Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space, by Gaussian Dressing and Gaussian Dressing of the Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space: Riccati Coefficients, Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Constant, the Dressed Pair and the Shifted Operator. The running cost gg is bounded and uniformly continuous on D\mathcal{D}, relative to the metric space (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}), with 0≤C0\le C and ∣g∣≤C|g|\le C on D\mathcal{D}. So Well-Posedness of the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift and a Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space, by Gaussian Dressing applies to the data β=1\beta=1, κ=1\kappa=1, ww, λ0\lambda_{0}, θ\theta, ε0\varepsilon_{0}, gg and CC; its profile Φ0\Phi_{0} and constant ee are those of Gaussian Dressing of the Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space: Riccati Coefficients, Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Constant, the Dressed Pair and the Shifted Operator §profile and Gaussian Dressing of the Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space: Riccati Coefficients, Dressed Variances, the Quadratic Profile, the Constant, the Dressed Pair and the Shifted Operator §constant for these data, that is, the Φ0\Phi_{0} and ee of the corollary; and its viscosity subsolutions, supersolutions and solutions relative to the profile Φ0\Phi_{0} are those of The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift and a Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space §equation relative to γc\gamma_{c} with temperature 11, discount λ0\lambda_{0}, control cost θ\theta, Wick couplings ww and running cost gg, which are those of the corollary.

The Wick-ordered terms. Let ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}. Since ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (The Gaussian Entropy Pair on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Relative Entropy and the Noise Score Field §pair), the function x↦xj2x\mapsto x_{j}^{2} is ν\nu-integrable, by the preamble of Diagonal Quadratic Profiles on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Moment Bounds, a Lipschitz Estimate, the Gradient Field, and Noise Intrinsic Test Functions. For x∈Xx\in X, xj=⟨x,ej⟩H−mx_{j}=\langle x,e_{j}\rangle_{H^{-m}} (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates) equals ρκ(j)m x(κ(j))\rho^{m}_{\kappa(j)}\,x(\kappa(j)) by White Noise in the Square-Integrable Space and the Free Field on the Torus as Noise Weights and a Variance Sequence on a Negative Sobolev Space §basis, so xj2=aj x(κ(j))2x_{j}^{2}=a_{j}\,x(\kappa(j))^{2} and x(κ(j))2=aj−1xj2x(\kappa(j))^{2}=a_{j}^{-1}x_{j}^{2}, with aj>0a_{j}>0 by White Noise in the Square-Integrable Space and the Free Field on the Torus as Noise Weights and a Variance Sequence on a Negative Sobolev Space §weights. Hence x↦x(κ(j))2x\mapsto x(\kappa(j))^{2} is ν\nu-integrable by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable. By The Wick Square of the Free Field on the Torus as Diagonal Couplings: Summability in Dimension at Most Three, the Riccati Condition, and the Divergent Wick Constant §wick, wjxj2=w0 x(κ(j))2w_{j}x_{j}^{2}=w_{0}\,x(\kappa(j))^{2} for every x∈Xx\in X, so Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable gives

wj∫Xxj2 ν(dx)=∫Xwjxj2 ν(dx)=∫Xw0 x(κ(j))2 ν(dx)=w0∫Xx(κ(j))2 ν(dx),(1)w_{j}\int_{X}x_{j}^{2}\,\nu(dx)=\int_{X}w_{j}x_{j}^{2}\,\nu(dx)=\int_{X}w_{0}\,x(\kappa(j))^{2}\,\nu(dx)=w_{0}\int_{X}x(\kappa(j))^{2}\,\nu(dx),\tag{1}

and the same clause gives wjcj=w0 μκ(j)−1w_{j}c_{j}=w_{0}\,\mu_{\kappa(j)}^{-1}. In particular the jj-th term wj(∫Xxj2 dν−cj)w_{j}\bigl(\int_{X}x_{j}^{2}\,d\nu-c_{j}\bigr) of the series of The Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost is the Wick-Ordered Series, and Cutoff Counterterms Are Forced up to a Convergent Constant §series is w0(∫Xx(κ(j))2 ν(dx)−μκ(j)−1)w_{0}\bigl(\int_{X}x(\kappa(j))^{2}\,\nu(dx)-\mu_{\kappa(j)}^{-1}\bigr). Summing (1) and the last identity over j≤Nj\le N, for every N∈NN\in\mathbb{N},

∑j=1Nwj∫Xxj2 ν(dx)=w0∑j=1N∫Xx(κ(j))2 ν(dx),∑j=1Nwjcj=w0∑j=1Nμκ(j)−1.(2)\sum_{j=1}^{N}w_{j}\int_{X}x_{j}^{2}\,\nu(dx)=w_{0}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\int_{X}x(\kappa(j))^{2}\,\nu(dx),\qquad\sum_{j=1}^{N}w_{j}c_{j}=w_{0}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\mu_{\kappa(j)}^{-1}.\tag{2}

Clauses 1, 2 and 3. These are Well-Posedness of the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift and a Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space, by Gaussian Dressing §comparison, Well-Posedness of the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift and a Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space, by Gaussian Dressing §existence and Well-Posedness of the Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Gaussian Score Drift and a Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost on a Hilbert Space, by Gaussian Dressing §uniqueness for the data above.

Clause 4. Apply The Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost is the Wick-Ordered Series, and Cutoff Counterterms Are Forced up to a Convergent Constant §counterterms with β=1\beta=1, κ=1\kappa=1, the couplings ww and the sequence (CN)N∈N(C_{N})_{N\in\mathbb{N}}; its score-paired Wick-square cost is the GwG_{w} of the corollary. By (2), its functions ∑j=1Nwj∫Xxj2 ν(dx)−CN\sum_{j=1}^{N}w_{j}\int_{X}x_{j}^{2}\,\nu(dx)-C_{N} are the functions GN(ν)G_{N}(\nu) of clause 4, and its numbers eN=∑j=1Nwjcj−CNe_{N}=\sum_{j=1}^{N}w_{j}c_{j}-C_{N} are w0∑j=1Nμκ(j)−1−CNw_{0}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\mu_{\kappa(j)}^{-1}-C_{N}. By the equivalence of (ii) and (iii) there, (GN(ν))N∈N(G_{N}(\nu))_{N\in\mathbb{N}} converges for every ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} if and only if (eN)N∈N(e_{N})_{N\in\mathbb{N}} converges, and in that case lim⁡N→∞GN(ν)=Gw(ν)+e∞\lim_{N\to\infty}G_{N}(\nu)=G_{w}(\nu)+e_{\infty} for every ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, with e∞e_{\infty} the limit of (eN)N∈N(e_{N})_{N\in\mathbb{N}}. This is clause 4.

Clause 5. Suppose 2≤n2\le n and 0<w00<w_{0}. For every jj, μκ(j)−1>0\mu_{\kappa(j)}^{-1}>0 (as 1≤μκ(j)1\le\mu_{\kappa(j)}, see the preamble of The Wick Square of the Free Field on the Torus as Diagonal Couplings: Summability in Dimension at Most Three, the Riccati Condition, and the Divergent Wick Constant) and cj>0c_{j}>0 (White Noise in the Square-Integrable Space and the Free Field on the Torus as Noise Weights and a Variance Sequence on a Negative Sobolev Space §variances), so wj=w0 μκ(j)−1/cj>0w_{j}=w_{0}\,\mu_{\kappa(j)}^{-1}/c_{j}>0 by The Wick Square of the Free Field on the Torus as Diagonal Couplings: Summability in Dimension at Most Three, the Riccati Condition, and the Divergent Wick Constant §wick; in particular wj≥0w_{j}\ge0. By The Wick Square of the Free Field on the Torus as Diagonal Couplings: Summability in Dimension at Most Three, the Riccati Condition, and the Divergent Wick Constant §divergent, the series ∑j=1∞wjcj\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}w_{j}c_{j} does not converge. So The Score-Paired Wick-Square Cost is the Wick-Ordered Series, and Cutoff Counterterms Are Forced up to a Convergent Constant §bare, applied with β=1\beta=1, κ=1\kappa=1 and ww, gives for every ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and M∈RM\in\mathbb{R} an N0∈NN_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with ∑j=1Nwj∫Xxj2 ν(dx)>M\sum_{j=1}^{N}w_{j}\int_{X}x_{j}^{2}\,\nu(dx)>M for every N≥N0N\ge N_{0}; by (2) the left-hand side is w0∑j=1N∫Xx(κ(j))2 ν(dx)w_{0}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\int_{X}x(\kappa(j))^{2}\,\nu(dx).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…