TheoremBase

Everything follows from the tiling of Euclidean space by the cell: periodicity and measurability from the wrapping map, the null-set statement from the countably many lattice translates of a null set, integrability on a bounded set from a finite cover by cells, and the comparison of seminorms from Hoelder's inequality against the constant function.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement of this lemma. Throughout we use that BQ={A∈B(Rn):AβŠ†Q}\mathcal{B}_{Q}=\{A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}):A\subseteq Q\} and that Ξ»Q\lambda_{Q} is the restriction of Ξ»n\lambda_{n} to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}, as fixed in The Flat Torus: Standing Notation (iii); in particular BQβŠ†B(Rn)\mathcal{B}_{Q}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and Ξ»Q(A)=Ξ»n(A)\lambda_{Q}(A)=\lambda_{n}(A) for A∈BQA\in\mathcal{B}_{Q}, and Ξ»Q(Q)=1\lambda_{Q}(Q)=1. We also use repeatedly the following domination criterion: if ff is measurable and ∣fβˆ£β‰€g|f|\le g pointwise with gg measurable, nonnegative and of finite integral, then ∫∣fβˆ£β‰€βˆ«g<∞\int|f|\le\int g<\infty by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, so ff is integrable by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral, a measurable map being integrable exactly when the integral of its absolute value is finite.

Step 1. Proof of claim 1.

Let x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and m∈Znm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}. By The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (iii) we have Ο€(x+m)=Ο€(x)\pi(x+m)=\pi(x), hence v~(x+m)=v(Ο€(x+m))=v(Ο€(x))=v~(x)\tilde{v}(x+m)=v(\pi(x+m))=v(\pi(x))=\tilde{v}(x); so v~\tilde{v} is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic. By the same clause Ο€(x)=x\pi(x)=x exactly when x∈Qx\in Q, so v~(x)=v(x)\tilde{v}(x)=v(x) for x∈Qx\in Q.

Suppose vv is measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}, and let EE be a Borel subset of R\mathbb{R}. The set A={y∈Q:v(y)∈E}A=\{y\in Q:v(y)\in E\} lies in BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}, hence in B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). Since Ο€(x)∈Q\pi(x)\in Q for every xx, we have {x∈Rn:v~(x)∈E}={x∈Rn:Ο€(x)∈A}\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\tilde{v}(x)\in E\}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\pi(x)\in A\}, which belongs to B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) because Ο€\pi is measurable with respect to B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (iii). So v~\tilde{v} is measurable.

Finally let u:Rnβ†’Ru:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic and let x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (ii) there is exactly one m∈Znm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} with xβˆ’m∈Qx-m\in Q, and Ο€(x)=xβˆ’m\pi(x)=x-m by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (iii). Hence the periodic extension of u∣Qu|_{Q} has value (u∣Q)(xβˆ’m)=u(xβˆ’m)=u(x)(u|_{Q})(x-m)=u(x-m)=u(x) at xx, the last equality by periodicity of uu applied with the lattice vector βˆ’m-m, which lies in Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}. So that extension is uu.

Step 2. Proof of claim 2.

For x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the value of the periodic extension of v+c vβ€²v+c\,v' at xx is (v+c vβ€²)(Ο€(x))=v(Ο€(x))+c vβ€²(Ο€(x))=v~(x)+c v~β€²(x)(v+c\,v')(\pi(x))=v(\pi(x))+c\,v'(\pi(x))=\tilde{v}(x)+c\,\tilde{v}'(x), the middle equality being the definition of the pointwise sum and scalar multiple.

Step 3. Proof of claim 3.

Put N={y∈Q:v(y)β‰ vβ€²(y)}N=\{y\in Q:v(y)\ne v'(y)\}. The map vβˆ’vβ€²v-v' is measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} by Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps, so N={y∈Q:0<∣v(y)βˆ’vβ€²(y)∣}N=\{y\in Q:0<|v(y)-v'(y)|\} lies in BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} by claim 4 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps and claim 3 of Intervals Are Borel, and Rays, Half-Open Intervals and Rational Intervals Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line; and Ξ»Q(N)=0\lambda_{Q}(N)=0 by hypothesis, hence Ξ»n(N)=0\lambda_{n}(N)=0.

Since v~(x)=v(Ο€(x))\tilde{v}(x)=v(\pi(x)) and v~β€²(x)=vβ€²(Ο€(x))\tilde{v}'(x)=v'(\pi(x)), we have v~(x)β‰ v~β€²(x)\tilde{v}(x)\ne\tilde{v}'(x) exactly when Ο€(x)∈N\pi(x)\in N. By The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (ii) and The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (iii), Ο€(x)∈N\pi(x)\in N holds exactly when x∈N+mx\in N+m for some m∈Znm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}; so

{x∈Rn:v~(x)β‰ v~β€²(x)}=⋃m∈Zn(N+m).\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\tilde{v}(x)\ne\tilde{v}'(x)\}=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}(N+m).

For each mm, the set N+mN+m lies in B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) with Ξ»n(N+m)=Ξ»n(N)=0\lambda_{n}(N+m)=\lambda_{n}(N)=0, by claim 1 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on ℝⁿ. The lattice Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} is the set of nn-tuples of integers by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes (i), hence is countable by claim 1 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable together with claim 2 of Products and Powers of Countable Sets. So the union above is a countable union of null sets, hence null by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (i); that is, v~=v~β€²\tilde{v}=\tilde{v}' almost everywhere.

Step 4. Proof of claim 4.

Let v∈Lp(Tn)v\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). If p=1p=1 there is nothing to prove: vv is measurable with ∫Q∣vβˆ£β€‰dΞ»Q<∞\int_{Q}|v|\,d\lambda_{Q}<\infty by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii), hence integrable by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral, and the asserted inequality reads βˆ₯vβˆ₯1≀βˆ₯vβˆ₯1\lVert v\rVert_{1}\le\lVert v\rVert_{1}.

Suppose 1<p1<p and let qq be the conjugate exponent of pp, which exists by that clause. We first record that 1a=11^{a}=1 for every real number aa with 0<a0<a. Indeed 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so 0<1a0<1^{a} by Properties of Real Powers (i); and 1a=(1β‹…1)a=1aβ‹…1a1^{a}=(1\cdot1)^{a}=1^{a}\cdot1^{a} by Properties of Real Powers (iii), which gives the power of a product as the product of the powers. Multiplying by the inverse of the nonzero number 1a1^{a} yields 1=1a1=1^{a}.

Let e:Qβ†’R\mathbf{e}:Q\to\mathbb{R} be the map with constant value 11, which is measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} and is the indicator of QQ read as a map on QQ. By the previous paragraph and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have ∣e∣q=e|\mathbf{e}|^{q}=\mathbf{e}, so

∫Q∣e∣q dΞ»Q=Ξ»Q(Q)=1\int_{Q}|\mathbf{e}|^{q}\,d\lambda_{Q}=\lambda_{Q}(Q)=1

by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set. Hence e∈Lq(Tn)\mathbf{e}\in\mathcal{L}^{q}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii), and βˆ₯eβˆ₯q=11/q=1\lVert\mathbf{e}\rVert_{q}=1^{1/q}=1 by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii) and the previous paragraph. The pointwise product v ev\,\mathbf{e} equals vv. By HΓΆlder's Inequality (i) applied to v∈Lpv\in\mathcal{L}^{p} and e∈Lq\mathbf{e}\in\mathcal{L}^{q}, that product lies in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) and

βˆ₯vβˆ₯1=βˆ₯v eβˆ₯1≀βˆ₯vβˆ₯p βˆ₯eβˆ₯q=βˆ₯vβˆ₯p.\lVert v\rVert_{1}=\lVert v\,\mathbf{e}\rVert_{1}\le\lVert v\rVert_{p}\,\lVert\mathbf{e}\rVert_{q}=\lVert v\rVert_{p}.

Membership in L1(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is exactly integrability with respect to Ξ»Q\lambda_{Q}, by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii) and Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral.

Step 5. Proof of claim 5.

Let vv be measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} and integrable with respect to Ξ»Q\lambda_{Q}. By claim 1 the extension v~\tilde{v} is measurable and Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic, and 1Qv~\mathbf{1}_{Q}\tilde{v}, the map on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} agreeing with vv on QQ and vanishing off QQ, is integrable with respect to Ξ»n\lambda_{n} with

∫Rn1Q v~ dΞ»n=∫Qv dΞ»Q=∫Tnv dx,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{Q}\,\tilde{v}\,d\lambda_{n}=\int_{Q}v\,d\lambda_{Q}=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}v\,dx,

by claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions, which identifies integration against the restricted measure with integration of the zero extension, and by The Flat Torus: Standing Notation (iii). Applying The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (v) to the measurable periodic map v~\tilde{v} and to hh gives that 1Q+hv~\mathbf{1}_{Q+h}\tilde{v} is integrable with the same integral, which is the displayed identity of claim 5.

Now let B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) be bounded. Choose a real Ξ›\Lambda with 0<Ξ›0<\Lambda such that βˆ₯xβˆ₯≀Λ\lVert x\rVert\le\Lambda for every x∈Bx\in B, and, by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers, a natural number NN with Ξ›+1≀N\Lambda+1\le N. Put

G={m∈Zn:βˆ’N≀mi≀NΒ forΒ everyΒ i∈[n]}.G=\{m\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}:-N\le m_{i}\le N\ \text{for every}\ i\in[n]\}.

GG is finite. Let J={j∈Z:βˆ’N≀j≀N}J=\{j\in\mathbb{Z}:-N\le j\le N\}. The initial segment [2N+1][2N+1] is finite by claim 1 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and the map sending k∈[2N+1]k\in[2N+1] to kβˆ’Nβˆ’1k-N-1 takes values in JJ and is onto JJ: it takes values in Z\mathbb{Z} by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers, and βˆ’N≀kβˆ’Nβˆ’1≀N-N\le k-N-1\le N because 1≀k≀2N+11\le k\le 2N+1; conversely a given j∈Jj\in J is the value at k=j+N+1k=j+N+1, which satisfies 1≀k≀2N+11\le k\le 2N+1 and is a natural number by claim 1 of Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers. Hence JJ is finite by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and GG, being the set of nn-tuples with all entries in JJ, is finite by claim 3 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets.

BB is covered by the cells indexed by GG. Let x∈Bx\in B and let m∈Znm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} be the unique lattice vector with xβˆ’m∈Qx-m\in Q, given by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (ii). For each i∈[n]i\in[n] we have 0≀xiβˆ’mi<10\le x_{i}-m_{i}<1, so xiβˆ’1<mi≀xix_{i}-1<m_{i}\le x_{i}; and ∣xiβˆ£β‰€βˆ₯xβˆ₯≀Λ|x_{i}|\le\lVert x\rVert\le\Lambda by claim 4 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square. Hence βˆ’Nβ‰€βˆ’Ξ›βˆ’1<mi≀Λ≀N-N\le-\Lambda-1<m_{i}\le\Lambda\le N, so m∈Gm\in G and x∈Q+mx\in Q+m.

Consequently, for every x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n},

1B(x)β€‰βˆ£v~(x)βˆ£β‰€βˆ‘m∈G1Q+m(x)β€‰βˆ£v~(x)∣,\mathbf{1}_{B}(x)\,|\tilde{v}(x)|\le\sum_{m\in G}\mathbf{1}_{Q+m}(x)\,|\tilde{v}(x)| ,

since for x∈Bx\in B the right-hand side contains the term with the mm just produced and all terms are nonnegative, while for xβˆ‰Bx\notin B the left-hand side is 00. The map ∣v~∣|\tilde{v}| is measurable by claim 4 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps and is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic, being the periodic extension of ∣v∣|v|; and 1Q∣v~∣\mathbf{1}_{Q}|\tilde{v}| is integrable, because ∣v∣|v| is integrable by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral and claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions applies as above. So The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (v) gives that each 1Q+m∣v~∣\mathbf{1}_{Q+m}|\tilde{v}| is integrable, and the finite sum over m∈Gm\in G is integrable by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, applied repeatedly over the finitely many summands. The map 1Bv~\mathbf{1}_{B}\tilde{v} is measurable by Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps, since B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), and ∣1Bv~∣=1B∣v~∣|\mathbf{1}_{B}\tilde{v}|=\mathbf{1}_{B}|\tilde{v}| by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; the domination criterion now shows that 1Bv~\mathbf{1}_{B}\tilde{v} is integrable.

Step 6. Proof of claim 6.

Let v∈Lp(Tn)v\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). The map ∣v∣p|v|^{p} is measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i), and ∫Q∣v∣p dΞ»Q<∞\int_{Q}|v|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}<\infty by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii); being nonnegative, it is therefore integrable with respect to Ξ»Q\lambda_{Q} by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral. For x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the periodic extension of ∣v∣p|v|^{p} has value (∣v(Ο€(x))∣)p=(∣v~(x)∣)p\bigl(|v(\pi(x))|\bigr)^{p}=\bigl(|\tilde{v}(x)|\bigr)^{p}, which is the value of ∣v~∣p|\tilde{v}|^{p} at xx; so that extension is ∣v~∣p|\tilde{v}|^{p}.

Claim 5 applied to ∣v∣p|v|^{p} in place of vv therefore gives that 1B∣v~∣p\mathbf{1}_{B}|\tilde{v}|^{p} is integrable for every bounded B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and that, for every h∈Rnh\in\mathbb{R}^{n},

∫Rn1Q+hβ€‰βˆ£v~∣p dΞ»n=∫Tn∣v∣p dx=∫Q∣v∣p dΞ»Q.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{Q+h}\,|\tilde{v}|^{p}\,d\lambda_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|v|^{p}\,dx=\int_{Q}|v|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}.

Finally, βˆ₯vβˆ₯p\lVert v\rVert_{p} is the power of ∫Q∣v∣p dΞ»Q\int_{Q}|v|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q} with exponent 1/p1/p by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii), so raising it to the power pp returns ∫Q∣v∣p dΞ»Q\int_{Q}|v|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q} by Properties of Real Powers (vi). This is the displayed identity of claim 6. β– \blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…