TheoremBase

Change of measure via the measure with density w/Z, the entropy identity via phi(st)=t phi(s)+st log t, and the score splitting by adding the potential term; the hard direction tests the Gibbs integration by parts against cut-off derivatives of the profile, absorbs via the curvature condition, and passes to the limit by monotone convergence, which also yields the Fisher information bound.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary real order and arithmetic are carried by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background and are not cited again; this covers in particular manipulations of inequalities, squares and finite sums, the limit laws for sums and real multiples of convergent sequences, the Archimedean property, the fact that for a nonnegative real rr and a positive real δ\delta one has r<δr<\delta if and only if r2<δ2r^{2}<\delta^{2}, and the two inequalities

pq≤2βp2+q28β,2pq≤p28β+8βq2(p,q∈R),pq\le2\beta p^{2}+\frac{q^{2}}{8\beta},\qquad 2pq\le\frac{p^{2}}{8\beta}+8\beta q^{2}\qquad(p,q\in\mathbb{R}),

which hold because 2β(p−q/(4β))2≥02\beta\bigl(p-q/(4\beta)\bigr)^{2}\ge0 and (8β)−1(p−8βq)2≥0(8\beta)^{-1}(p-8\beta q)^{2}\ge0, β\beta being positive.

Notation. Write w=wV,βw=w_{V,\beta}, Z=ZV,βZ=Z_{V,\beta}, γV=γβV\gamma^{V}=\gamma^{V}_{\beta}, and fix once and for all a constant bb as in Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §below, so that ww is Borel with 0<w(x)≤exp⁡(b/β)0<w(x)\le\exp(b/\beta) for every x∈Xx\in X by The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §weight, and ZZ is a positive real number by The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §normaliser. Put h=Z−1w:X→Rh=Z^{-1}w:X\to\mathbb{R}; it is Borel by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and h(x)>0h(x)>0 for every xx. By Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §continuity, VV and every ∂kV\partial_{k}V are continuous on XX, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, −b≤V(x)-b\le V(x) for every x∈Xx\in X, and ∣∇aV(x)∣a2=∑k=1dak ∂kV(x)2|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}, so that ∣∇aV∣a2|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2} is Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. ϕ:[0,∞)→R\phi:[0,\infty)\to\mathbb{R} is the function ϕ(0)=0\phi(0)=0, ϕ(s)=slog⁡s\phi(s)=s\log s (s>0s>0) of The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm, the function used in Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy; test functions in FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) are written φ\varphi. Integrals and integrability are those of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §integral: a measurable real function is integrable exactly when the integral of its absolute value is finite, and for a nonnegative integrable function the two integrals agree by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. Linearity and monotonicity of integrals, for nonnegative measurable and for integrable functions, are Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, cited below as linearity and monotonicity; constants are integrable against the Borel probability measures used here by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

Step 1 (Claim 1, change of measure). The function hh is measurable with values in [0,∞)[0,\infty), so claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables provides the measure νh\nu_{h} with density hh with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. For A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X), linearity (with the constant Z−1Z^{-1}) and The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §gibbs give

νh(A)=∫X1A h dγc=1Z∫X1A w dγc=γV(A),\nu_{h}(A)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}\,h\,d\gamma_{c}=\frac{1}{Z}\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}\,w\,d\gamma_{c}=\gamma^{V}(A),

so γV=νh\gamma^{V}=\nu_{h}. Hence, by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables and linearity, for every Borel f:X→[0,∞)f:X\to[0,\infty)

∫Xf dγV=∫Xf h dγc=1Z∫Xf w dγc;(1.1)\int_{X}f\,d\gamma^{V}=\int_{X}f\,h\,d\gamma_{c}=\frac{1}{Z}\int_{X}f\,w\,d\gamma_{c}; \tag{1.1}

and a Borel f:X→Rf:X\to\mathbb{R} is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V} if and only if fhfh is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, which by linearity (the two functions fhfh and fw=Z fhfw=Z\,fh being real multiples of one another) holds if and only if fwfw is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}; in that case (1.1) holds in R\mathbb{R}, again by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables and linearity. This is the displayed formula of Claim 1 and the integrability criterion.

Null sets. Let A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X). If γc(A)=0\gamma_{c}(A)=0, the nonnegative Borel function 1Aw\mathbf{1}_{A}w vanishes off the null set AA, so ∫X1Aw dγc=0\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}w\,d\gamma_{c}=0 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral and γV(A)=0\gamma^{V}(A)=0. Conversely, if γV(A)=0\gamma^{V}(A)=0 then ∫X1Aw dγc=0\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}w\,d\gamma_{c}=0, so 1Aw=0\mathbf{1}_{A}w=0 γc\gamma_{c}-almost everywhere by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing; since w>0w>0 everywhere, the set where this fails is AA itself, which is therefore γc\gamma_{c}-null in the sense of A Property Holding Almost Everywhere, that is, contained in some B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X) with γc(B)=0\gamma_{c}(B)=0 by Null Set of a Measure; so γc(A)≤γc(B)=0\gamma_{c}(A)\le\gamma_{c}(B)=0 by monotonicity of measures. Thus γV\gamma^{V} and γc\gamma_{c} have the same null sets.

Step 2 (Two identities). (a) For s∈[0,∞)s\in[0,\infty) and positive t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R},

ϕ(st)=t ϕ(s)+stlog⁡t.\phi(st)=t\,\phi(s)+st\log t .

If s=0s=0 both sides are 00, since ϕ(0)=0\phi(0)=0. If s>0s>0 then st>0st>0 and log⁡(st)=log⁡s+log⁡t\log(st)=\log s+\log t by The Natural Logarithm, so ϕ(st)=stlog⁡s+stlog⁡t=t ϕ(s)+stlog⁡t\phi(st)=st\log s+st\log t=t\,\phi(s)+st\log t.

(b) For every x∈Xx\in X, log⁡h(x)=−V(x)/β−log⁡Z\log h(x)=-V(x)/\beta-\log Z. Indeed h(x)=exp⁡(−V(x)/β) Z−1h(x)=\exp(-V(x)/\beta)\,Z^{-1}, and by The Natural Logarithm log⁡exp⁡(−V(x)/β)=−V(x)/β\log\exp(-V(x)/\beta)=-V(x)/\beta and log⁡(Z−1)=−log⁡Z\log(Z^{-1})=-\log Z, the latter because log⁡Z+log⁡(Z−1)=log⁡1=log⁡exp⁡(0)=0\log Z+\log(Z^{-1})=\log1=\log\exp(0)=0, using exp⁡(0)=1\exp(0)=1 from claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function.

Consequently, if g:X→[0,∞)g:X\to[0,\infty) and f=ghf=gh, then for every x∈Xx\in X

ϕ(f(x))=h(x) ϕ(g(x))−1β f(x)V(x)−f(x)log⁡Z.(2.1)\phi(f(x))=h(x)\,\phi(g(x))-\frac{1}{\beta}\,f(x)V(x)-f(x)\log Z . \tag{2.1}

Step 3 (Claim 2, finite entropy relative to γV\gamma^{V} implies the right-hand conditions, and the formula). Let μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) have finite relative entropy with respect to γV\gamma^{V}: by Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy there is a density gg of μ\mu with respect to γV\gamma^{V} in the sense of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities (a measurable g:X→[0,∞)g:X\to[0,\infty) with μ(A)=∫X1Ag dγV\mu(A)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}g\,d\gamma^{V} for A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X)) such that ϕ∘g\phi\circ g is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, and H(μ ∣ γV)=∫Xϕ∘g dγVH(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V})=\int_{X}\phi\circ g\,d\gamma^{V}. Put f=ghf=gh, a Borel function with values in [0,∞)[0,\infty) by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. By (1.1) applied to 1Ag\mathbf{1}_{A}g,

∫X1Af dγc=∫X1Ag dγV=μ(A)(A∈B(X)),\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}f\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}g\,d\gamma^{V}=\mu(A)\qquad(A\in\mathcal{B}(X)),

so ff is a density of μ\mu with respect to γc\gamma_{c}; it is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} with integral μ(X)=1\mu(X)=1 by The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities §uniqueness, and μ\mu is the measure νf\nu_{f} with density ff with respect to γc\gamma_{c} of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. The function ϕ∘g\phi\circ g is Borel by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous and integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, so by Claim 1 (Step 1) (ϕ∘g) w(\phi\circ g)\,w, and hence h (ϕ∘g)=Z−1(ϕ∘g) wh\,(\phi\circ g)=Z^{-1}(\phi\circ g)\,w, is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, with ∫Xh (ϕ∘g) dγc=∫Xϕ∘g dγV\int_{X}h\,(\phi\circ g)\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{X}\phi\circ g\,d\gamma^{V}.

Integrability of ϕ∘f\phi\circ f. The function ϕ∘f\phi\circ f is Borel by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous, and −exp⁡(−1)≤ϕ∘f-\exp(-1)\le\phi\circ f by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §lower. Since f≥0f\ge0, β>0\beta>0 and −V≤b-V\le b, (2.1) gives

ϕ∘f≤F,F=h (ϕ∘g)+(bβ−log⁡Z)f,\phi\circ f\le F,\qquad F=h\,(\phi\circ g)+\Bigl(\frac{b}{\beta}-\log Z\Bigr)f,

and FF is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} by linearity. Hence ∣ϕ∘f∣≤∣F∣+exp⁡(−1)|\phi\circ f|\le|F|+\exp(-1), whose integral is finite, so ϕ∘f\phi\circ f is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} by monotonicity. Thus μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, with H(μ ∣ γc)=∫Xϕ∘f dγcH(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})=\int_{X}\phi\circ f\,d\gamma_{c}.

Integrability of VV. By (2.1), β−1fV=h (ϕ∘g)−ϕ∘f−(log⁡Z) f\beta^{-1}fV=h\,(\phi\circ g)-\phi\circ f-(\log Z)\,f, which is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} by linearity; so fVfV is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, and since μ=νf\mu=\nu_{f}, claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables shows that VV is integrable with respect to μ\mu with ∫XV dμ=∫XfV dγc\int_{X}V\,d\mu=\int_{X}fV\,d\gamma_{c}.

Formula. Integrating (2.1) with linearity,

H(μ ∣ γV)=∫Xh (ϕ∘g) dγc=∫Xϕ∘f dγc+1β∫XfV dγc+log⁡Z∫Xf dγc=H(μ ∣ γc)+1β∫XV dμ+log⁡Z.H(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V})=\int_{X}h\,(\phi\circ g)\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{X}\phi\circ f\,d\gamma_{c}+\frac{1}{\beta}\int_{X}fV\,d\gamma_{c}+\log Z\int_{X}f\,d\gamma_{c}=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})+\frac{1}{\beta}\int_{X}V\,d\mu+\log Z .

Step 4 (Claim 2, the converse). Let μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) have finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, with a density ff with respect to γc\gamma_{c} for which ϕ∘f\phi\circ f is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, and let VV be integrable with respect to μ\mu. As in Step 3, ff is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and μ=νf\mu=\nu_{f}, so fVfV is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. The function x↦exp⁡(V(x)/β)x\mapsto\exp(V(x)/\beta) is continuous, hence Borel, by the argument of The Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §weight with −V-V replaced by VV; put g=Z f exp⁡(V/β)g=Z\,f\,\exp(V/\beta), a Borel function with values in [0,∞)[0,\infty) by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Since exp⁡(V/β)exp⁡(−V/β)=exp⁡(0)=1\exp(V/\beta)\exp(-V/\beta)=\exp(0)=1 by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, gh=fgh=f. By (1.1), ∫X1Ag dγV=∫X1Af dγc=μ(A)\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}g\,d\gamma^{V}=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}f\,d\gamma_{c}=\mu(A) for A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X), so gg is a density of μ\mu with respect to γV\gamma^{V}. By (2.1), h (ϕ∘g)=ϕ∘f+β−1fV+(log⁡Z) fh\,(\phi\circ g)=\phi\circ f+\beta^{-1}fV+(\log Z)\,f, which is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} by linearity; hence so is (ϕ∘g) w=Z h (ϕ∘g)(\phi\circ g)\,w=Z\,h\,(\phi\circ g), and ϕ∘g\phi\circ g (Borel by The Function slog⁡ss\log s: Continuity, Young's Inequality and Lower Bounds, with the Elementary Bounds for the Exponential and the Logarithm §continuous) is integrable with respect to γV\gamma^{V} by Claim 1. So μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γV\gamma^{V}, and the formula of Claim 2 holds by Step 3. This proves Claim 2.

Step 5 (Claim 3). Let μ\mu have finite relative entropy with respect to γV\gamma^{V}. By Step 3, μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and VV is integrable with respect to μ\mu. The first gives μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by Relative Entropy with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: the Moment Bound, the Cutoff Projections, and Bounded, Tight, Weakly Closed, Wasserstein-Closed and Weakly Sequentially Compact Sublevel Sets §moment; the second gives that ∣∇aV∣a|\nabla_{a}V|_{a} and every ∂kV\partial_{k}V are integrable with respect to μ\mu by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §integrable. In particular μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and ∂kV\partial_{k}V is integrable with respect to μ\mu for every k∈[d]k\in[d], which are the standing requirements of The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential.

Step 6 (Square-integrable slope). (a) Let μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) satisfy G=∫X∣∇aV∣a2 dμ<∞G=\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty. Let k∈[d]k\in[d]. Since every term of ∑j=1daj ∂jV(x)2=∣∇aV(x)∣a2\sum_{j=1}^{d}a_{j}\,\partial_{j}V(x)^{2}=|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2} is nonnegative, ∂kV(x)2≤ak−1∣∇aV(x)∣a2\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}\le a_{k}^{-1}|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2} for every xx, so ∫X(∂kV)2 dμ≤ak−1G<∞\int_{X}(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\,d\mu\le a_{k}^{-1}G<\infty by monotonicity and linearity. The power ∣∂kV∣2|\partial_{k}V|^{2} of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power is the natural square (∂kV)2(\partial_{k}V)^{2} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement, so the Borel function ∂kV\partial_{k}V is 22-integrable in the sense of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space, its class lies in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu), and by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product and Real Inner Product Space §norm

∥∂kV∥L2(μ)2=∫X(∂kV)2 dμ.\lVert\partial_{k}V\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}=\int_{X}(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\,d\mu .

For k>dk>d, ∂kV=0\partial_{k}V=0, whose class is the zero vector, of norm 00. Hence the partial sums of the series ∑k=1∞ak∥∂kV∥L2(μ)2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}\lVert\partial_{k}V\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2} are, from the dd-th on, all equal to ∑k=1dak∫X(∂kV)2 dμ=∫X∣∇aV∣a2 dμ=G\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\int_{X}(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\,d\mu=\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu=G, by linearity; so by Series of Real Numbers §convergent the series converges, with sum GG.

(b) In every real inner product space EE, for u,v∈Eu,v\in E and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, ∣u+tv∣2≤∣u+tv∣2+∣u−tv∣2=2∣u∣2+2t2∣v∣2|u+tv|^{2}\le|u+tv|^{2}+|u-tv|^{2}=2|u|^{2}+2t^{2}|v|^{2} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §parallelogram and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity.

Step 7 (Claim 4, the implication from the Gaussian side). Let μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) with VV integrable with respect to μ\mu (so ∂kV\partial_{k}V is integrable for k∈[d]k\in[d] by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §integrable), let μ\mu have a relative score (ζk)k∈N(\zeta_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} with respect to γc\gamma_{c} in the sense of The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score, with finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa in the sense of Weight Sequences and the Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §information, and let G=∫X∣∇aV∣a2 dμ<∞G=\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty. By Step 6, ∂kV∈L2(μ)\partial_{k}V\in L^{2}(\mu) for every kk; put ζkV=ζk+β−1∂kV∈L2(μ)\zeta^{V}_{k}=\zeta_{k}+\beta^{-1}\partial_{k}V\in L^{2}(\mu). Let φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X). The functions xkφ/ck−∂kφx_{k}\varphi/c_{k}-\partial_{k}\varphi and ∂kVφ\partial_{k}V\varphi are integrable with respect to μ\mu, as recorded in the preamble of The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential; so by linearity of the inner product (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product), The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product, The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score and linearity of the integral,

⟨ζkV,φ⟩L2(μ)=⟨ζk,φ⟩L2(μ)+1β∫X∂kV φ dμ=∫X((xkck+∂kV(x)β)φ(x)−∂kφ(x)) μ(dx).\langle\zeta^{V}_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}+\frac{1}{\beta}\int_{X}\partial_{k}V\,\varphi\,d\mu=\int_{X}\Bigl(\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}+\frac{\partial_{k}V(x)}{\beta}\Bigr)\varphi(x)-\partial_{k}\varphi(x)\Bigr)\,\mu(dx).

So (ζkV)k∈N(\zeta^{V}_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is a relative score of μ\mu with respect to γV\gamma^{V} by The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §score, and by the uniqueness recorded there it is the relative score; this proves the formula for its components. By Step 6(b) with t=β−1t=\beta^{-1}, 0≤ak∥ζkV∥2≤2ak∥ζk∥2+2β−2ak∥∂kV∥20\le a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert^{2}\le2a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}+2\beta^{-2}a_{k}\lVert\partial_{k}V\rVert^{2} (norms in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu)); the series of the right-hand sides converges, its partial sums being 22 times those of the convergent series ∑kak∥ζk∥2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2} plus 2β−22\beta^{-2} times those of the series of Step 6(a). By Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §comparison, ∑kak∥ζkV∥2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert^{2} converges, that is, μ\mu has finite Fisher information relative to γV\gamma^{V} with weights aa in the sense of The Weighted Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §information.

Step 8 (Constants for the converse). The following choices are made in this order, before any measure μ\mu is considered. By Existence of a Smooth Plateau Function on Euclidean Space (with q=dq=d, x0=0Rdx_{0}=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}, r=1r=1, s=2s=2) fix a smooth χ:Rd→R\chi:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} as in Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball with q=dq=d, with the functions χR(u)=χ(R−1u)\chi_{R}(u)=\chi(R^{-1}u), and fix the constant M1≥0M_{1}\ge0 of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff; thus for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} (a positive real number), χn\chi_{n} is smooth and compactly supported, 0≤χn≤10\le\chi_{n}\le1, χn(u)=1\chi_{n}(u)=1 when ∥u∥≤n\lVert u\rVert\le n, χn(u)=0\chi_{n}(u)=0 when ∥u∥≥2n\lVert u\rVert\ge2n, and ∣∂iχn(u)∣≤M1n−1≤M1|\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(u)|\le M_{1}n^{-1}\le M_{1} for all u∈Rdu\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and i∈[d]i\in[d]. Put ε=1/(8β)\varepsilon=1/(8\beta), let CεC_{\varepsilon} be a constant given for this ε\varepsilon by Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §curvature, and put C+=max⁡(Cε,0)C^{+}=\max(C_{\varepsilon},0); since 1+∑k=1duk2>01+\sum_{k=1}^{d}u_{k}^{2}>0, the inequality of that clause also holds with C+C^{+} in place of CεC_{\varepsilon}. Put

Λ=∑k=1dakck2,α=∑k=1dak,C1=4+4β2Λ+2βC++16β2M12α,C∗=2+3C1,\Lambda=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\frac{a_{k}}{c_{k}^{2}},\qquad\alpha=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k},\qquad C_{1}=4+4\beta^{2}\Lambda+2\beta C^{+}+16\beta^{2}M_{1}^{2}\alpha,\qquad C_{*}=2+3C_{1},

with ck>0c_{k}>0 by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances. These depend only on vv (hence on VV), β\beta, aa, cc and the choice of χ\chi, which is made once from dd alone; in particular C∗C_{*} does not depend on μ\mu.

Step 9 (Test functions). Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and k∈[d]k\in[d], and write ψk,n=∂kv⋅χn⋅χn:Rd→R\psi_{k,n}=\partial_{k}v\cdot\chi_{n}\cdot\chi_{n}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} (pointwise product). The profile vv is of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry), so ∂kv\partial_{k}v is of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set; χn\chi_{n} is smooth, hence of class C1C^{1} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set. By clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set (read through its clause 3), ∂kv\partial_{k}v, χn\chi_{n} and their partial derivatives ∂i∂kv\partial_{i}\partial_{k}v and ∂iχn\partial_{i}\chi_{n} (i∈[d]i\in[d]) exist at every point and are continuous at every point in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces. For a real-valued function on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} that notion of continuity at a point coincides with continuity at that point relative to Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} from (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}): by Euclidean Distance on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, dE(u,u′)d_{E}(u,u') is the nonnegative square root of ∑i=1d(ui−ui′)2\sum_{i=1}^{d}(u_{i}-u'_{i})^{2}, and for nonnegative rr and positive δ\delta, r<δr<\delta exactly when r2<δ2r^{2}<\delta^{2}, while ∣t∣2=t2|t|^{2}=t^{2}; so the two ε\varepsilon-δ\delta conditions are the same.

Partial derivatives. Fix u∈Rdu\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and i∈[d]i\in[d], and take ρ\rho and the interval II of claims 1 and 2 of Slice Function and the Partial Derivative for U=RdU=\mathbb{R}^{d}. The slice function of ψk,n\psi_{k,n} at uu in the ii-th variable is the pointwise product of the slice functions of ∂kv\partial_{k}v, χn\chi_{n} and χn\chi_{n}, which by claim 2 of that lemma are differentiable at uiu_{i} with derivatives ∂i∂kv(u)\partial_{i}\partial_{k}v(u), ∂iχn(u)\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(u) and ∂iχn(u)\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(u). Applying the product rule, claim 3 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, twice, the slice of ψk,n\psi_{k,n} is differentiable at uiu_{i}, and by claim 2 of Slice Function and the Partial Derivative again

∂iψk,n(u)=∂i∂kv(u) χn(u)2+2 ∂kv(u) χn(u) ∂iχn(u).(9.1)\partial_{i}\psi_{k,n}(u)=\partial_{i}\partial_{k}v(u)\,\chi_{n}(u)^{2}+2\,\partial_{k}v(u)\,\chi_{n}(u)\,\partial_{i}\chi_{n}(u). \tag{9.1}

By Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set, ψk,n\psi_{k,n} and the right-hand side of (9.1) are continuous on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, hence continuous at every point in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces by the coincidence above; so ψk,n\psi_{k,n} is of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set. Since χn(u)=0\chi_{n}(u)=0 when ∥u∥≥2n\lVert u\rVert\ge2n, ψk,n\psi_{k,n} and every ∂iψk,n\partial_{i}\psi_{k,n} vanish when ∥u∥>2n\lVert u\rVert>2n, so they are compactly supported by claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set and bounded by claim 1 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Bounded and Integrable. Hence ψk,n∈Cb1(Rd)\psi_{k,n}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded, and φk,n=ψk,n∘pd∈FCb1(X)\varphi_{k,n}=\psi_{k,n}\circ p_{d}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical, with ∂kφk,n=(∂kψk,n)∘pd\partial_{k}\varphi_{k,n}=(\partial_{k}\psi_{k,n})\circ p_{d} by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial.

Write κn=χn∘pd:X→R\kappa_{n}=\chi_{n}\circ p_{d}:X\to\mathbb{R}. It is Borel: χn\chi_{n} is continuous relative to Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} as a map into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous (smooth case), hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, pdp_{d} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, and the composite is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Moreover 0≤κn≤10\le\kappa_{n}\le1, and κn(x)=1\kappa_{n}(x)=1 whenever ∥pd(x)∥≤n\lVert p_{d}(x)\rVert\le n. Since ∂kV=(∂kv)∘pd\partial_{k}V=(\partial_{k}v)\circ p_{d} by Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §gradient, (9.1) with i=ki=k gives, for every x∈Xx\in X,

φk,n(x)=∂kV(x) κn(x)2,∂kφk,n(x)=∂k∂kv(pd(x)) κn(x)2+2 ∂kV(x) κn(x) ∂kχn(pd(x)).(9.2)\varphi_{k,n}(x)=\partial_{k}V(x)\,\kappa_{n}(x)^{2},\qquad\partial_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x)=\partial_{k}\partial_{k}v(p_{d}(x))\,\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}+2\,\partial_{k}V(x)\,\kappa_{n}(x)\,\partial_{k}\chi_{n}(p_{d}(x)). \tag{9.2}

Step 10 (Claim 4, the converse: an integral identity). Let μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) with VV integrable with respect to μ\mu, so that ∂kV\partial_{k}V is integrable for k∈[d]k\in[d] by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §integrable, and let μ\mu have a relative score (ζkV)k∈N(\zeta^{V}_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} with respect to γV\gamma^{V} and finite Fisher information relative to γV\gamma^{V} with weights aa; write IV=Ia(μ ∣ γV)I^{V}=\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}) and norms and inner products in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu) as ∥⋅∥\lVert\cdot\rVert and ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle. Let s(x)=∑k=1dxk2s(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}x_{k}^{2} for x∈Xx\in X; ss is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity and claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Since pd(x)=(x1,…,xd)p_{d}(x)=(x_{1},\dots,x_{d}) by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n gives s(x)=∥pd(x)∥2s(x)=\lVert p_{d}(x)\rVert^{2}, and Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity gives ∥pd(x)∥2=∣Pdx∣2≤∣Pdx∣2+∣Qdx∣2=∣x∣2\lVert p_{d}(x)\rVert^{2}=|P_{d}x|^{2}\le|P_{d}x|^{2}+|Q_{d}x|^{2}=|x|^{2}. As ∫X∣x∣2 μ(dx)<∞\int_{X}|x|^{2}\,\mu(dx)<\infty by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space, monotonicity shows that ss is integrable with respect to μ\mu; put m=∫Xs dμ=∫X∑k=1dxk2 μ(dx)≥0m=\int_{X}s\,d\mu=\int_{X}\sum_{k=1}^{d}x_{k}^{2}\,\mu(dx)\ge0. Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}.

(a) For k∈[d]k\in[d], φk,n\varphi_{k,n} is Borel and bounded by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel, say ∣φk,n∣≤B|\varphi_{k,n}|\le B; so ∂kV φk,n=(∂kV)2κn2\partial_{k}V\,\varphi_{k,n}=(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\kappa_{n}^{2} is Borel (claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions) with ∣∂kV φk,n∣≤B∣∂kV∣|\partial_{k}V\,\varphi_{k,n}|\le B|\partial_{k}V|, hence integrable with respect to μ\mu by monotonicity. Therefore ∣∇aV∣a2κn2=∑k=1dak ∂kV φk,n|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\kappa_{n}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}V\,\varphi_{k,n} is integrable, and

An=∫X∣∇aV∣a2 κn2 dμ=∑k=1dak∫X(∂kV)2κn2 dμA_{n}=\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,\kappa_{n}^{2}\,d\mu=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\int_{X}(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\kappa_{n}^{2}\,d\mu

is a nonnegative real number.

(b) For k∈[d]k\in[d], the functions x↦xkφk,n(x)x\mapsto x_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x), ∂kV φk,n\partial_{k}V\,\varphi_{k,n} and ∂kφk,n\partial_{k}\varphi_{k,n} are integrable with respect to μ\mu by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §coordinate-integrable, (a) and Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §square-integrable. So The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §score with φ=φk,n\varphi=\varphi_{k,n} and linearity give

⟨ζkV,φk,n⟩=1ck∫Xxkφk,n(x) μ(dx)+1β∫X∂kV φk,n dμ−∫X∂kφk,n dμ.\langle\zeta^{V}_{k},\varphi_{k,n}\rangle=\frac{1}{c_{k}}\int_{X}x_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x)\,\mu(dx)+\frac{1}{\beta}\int_{X}\partial_{k}V\,\varphi_{k,n}\,d\mu-\int_{X}\partial_{k}\varphi_{k,n}\,d\mu .

Multiplying by aka_{k}, summing over k∈[d]k\in[d] and using (a) and linearity,

1βAn=S1+S2+S3,(10.1)\frac{1}{\beta}A_{n}=S_{1}+S_{2}+S_{3}, \tag{10.1} S1=∑k=1dak⟨ζkV,φk,n⟩,S2=−∫X∑k=1dakckxkφk,n(x) μ(dx),S3=∫X∑k=1dak ∂kφk,n dμ.S_{1}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\langle\zeta^{V}_{k},\varphi_{k,n}\rangle,\qquad S_{2}=-\int_{X}\sum_{k=1}^{d}\frac{a_{k}}{c_{k}}x_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x)\,\mu(dx),\qquad S_{3}=\int_{X}\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}\varphi_{k,n}\,d\mu .

Step 11 (The estimate). With the data of Step 10:

S1S_{1}. For k∈[d]k\in[d], ⟨ζkV,φk,n⟩≤∥ζkV∥ ∥φk,n∥\langle\zeta^{V}_{k},\varphi_{k,n}\rangle\le\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert\,\lVert\varphi_{k,n}\rVert by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in the inner product space L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu), and by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product, (9.2), κn4≤κn2\kappa_{n}^{4}\le\kappa_{n}^{2} and monotonicity, ∥φk,n∥2=∫X(∂kV)2κn4 dμ≤∫X(∂kV)2κn2 dμ\lVert\varphi_{k,n}\rVert^{2}=\int_{X}(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\kappa_{n}^{4}\,d\mu\le\int_{X}(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\kappa_{n}^{2}\,d\mu. With pq≤2βp2+q2/(8β)pq\le2\beta p^{2}+q^{2}/(8\beta),

ak⟨ζkV,φk,n⟩≤2βak∥ζkV∥2+ak8β∫X(∂kV)2κn2 dμ.a_{k}\langle\zeta^{V}_{k},\varphi_{k,n}\rangle\le2\beta a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert^{2}+\frac{a_{k}}{8\beta}\int_{X}(\partial_{k}V)^{2}\kappa_{n}^{2}\,d\mu .

Summing over k∈[d]k\in[d], and using that ∑k=1dak∥ζkV∥2\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert^{2} is a partial sum of the series of nonnegative terms defining IVI^{V} in The Weighted Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §information, hence at most IVI^{V} by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates, and (a): S1≤2βIV+An/(8β)S_{1}\le2\beta I^{V}+A_{n}/(8\beta).

S2S_{2}. Fix x∈Xx\in X and k∈[d]k\in[d], and apply pq≤2βp2+q2/(8β)pq\le2\beta p^{2}+q^{2}/(8\beta) with p=∣xk∣κn(x)/ckp=|x_{k}|\kappa_{n}(x)/c_{k} and q=∣∂kV(x)∣κn(x)q=|\partial_{k}V(x)|\kappa_{n}(x): by (9.2), ak/ck2≤Λa_{k}/c_{k}^{2}\le\Lambda and κn2≤1\kappa_{n}^{2}\le1,

∣akckxkφk,n(x)∣=akpq≤2βakck2xk2+ak8β∂kV(x)2κn(x)2≤2βΛxk2+ak8β∂kV(x)2κn(x)2.\Bigl|\frac{a_{k}}{c_{k}}x_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x)\Bigr|=a_{k}pq\le2\beta\frac{a_{k}}{c_{k}^{2}}x_{k}^{2}+\frac{a_{k}}{8\beta}\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}\le2\beta\Lambda x_{k}^{2}+\frac{a_{k}}{8\beta}\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}.

Summing over kk, −∑k=1dakckxkφk,n(x)≤2βΛs(x)+(8β)−1∣∇aV(x)∣a2κn(x)2-\sum_{k=1}^{d}\frac{a_{k}}{c_{k}}x_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x)\le2\beta\Lambda s(x)+(8\beta)^{-1}|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}; both sides are integrable, so monotonicity gives S2≤2βΛm+An/(8β)S_{2}\le2\beta\Lambda m+A_{n}/(8\beta).

S3S_{3}. Fix x∈Xx\in X and put u=pd(x)u=p_{d}(x), so uk=xku_{k}=x_{k} and ∂kv(u)=∂kV(x)\partial_{k}v(u)=\partial_{k}V(x). By Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §curvature with ε=1/(8β)\varepsilon=1/(8\beta) and C+C^{+} (Step 8),

∑k=1dak ∂k∂kv(u)≤18β∑k=1dak ∂kV(x)2+C+(1+s(x));\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}\partial_{k}v(u)\le\frac{1}{8\beta}\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}+C^{+}\bigl(1+s(x)\bigr);

multiplying by κn(x)2∈[0,1]\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}\in[0,1] and using C+(1+s(x))≥0C^{+}(1+s(x))\ge0, the first part of ∑kak∂kφk,n(x)\sum_{k}a_{k}\partial_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x) in (9.2) is at most (8β)−1∣∇aV(x)∣a2κn(x)2+C+(1+s(x))(8\beta)^{-1}|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}+C^{+}(1+s(x)). For the second part, ∣∂kχn(u)∣≤M1|\partial_{k}\chi_{n}(u)|\le M_{1} (Step 8) and 2pq≤p2/(8β)+8βq22pq\le p^{2}/(8\beta)+8\beta q^{2} with p=∣∂kV(x)∣κn(x)p=|\partial_{k}V(x)|\kappa_{n}(x), q=M1q=M_{1} give

2ak ∂kV(x) κn(x) ∂kχn(u)≤2akpq≤ak8β∂kV(x)2κn(x)2+8βM12ak,2a_{k}\,\partial_{k}V(x)\,\kappa_{n}(x)\,\partial_{k}\chi_{n}(u)\le2a_{k}pq\le\frac{a_{k}}{8\beta}\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}+8\beta M_{1}^{2}a_{k},

whose sum over k∈[d]k\in[d] is (8β)−1∣∇aV(x)∣a2κn(x)2+8βM12α(8\beta)^{-1}|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}+8\beta M_{1}^{2}\alpha. Hence

∑k=1dak ∂kφk,n(x)≤14β∣∇aV(x)∣a2κn(x)2+C+(1+s(x))+8βM12α;\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}\varphi_{k,n}(x)\le\frac{1}{4\beta}|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}\kappa_{n}(x)^{2}+C^{+}\bigl(1+s(x)\bigr)+8\beta M_{1}^{2}\alpha ;

both sides are integrable, so monotonicity gives S3≤An/(4β)+C+(1+m)+8βM12αS_{3}\le A_{n}/(4\beta)+C^{+}(1+m)+8\beta M_{1}^{2}\alpha.

Combining with (10.1), β−1An≤(2β)−1An+2βIV+2βΛm+C+(1+m)+8βM12α\beta^{-1}A_{n}\le(2\beta)^{-1}A_{n}+2\beta I^{V}+2\beta\Lambda m+C^{+}(1+m)+8\beta M_{1}^{2}\alpha. Subtracting the real number (2β)−1An(2\beta)^{-1}A_{n} and multiplying by 2β2\beta,

An≤4β2IV+(4β2Λ+2βC+)m+2βC++16β2M12α≤C1(1+β2IV+m),(11.1)A_{n}\le4\beta^{2}I^{V}+\bigl(4\beta^{2}\Lambda+2\beta C^{+}\bigr)m+2\beta C^{+}+16\beta^{2}M_{1}^{2}\alpha\le C_{1}\bigl(1+\beta^{2}I^{V}+m\bigr), \tag{11.1}

the last step because each of the three coefficients is at most C1C_{1} and 11, β2IV\beta^{2}I^{V}, mm are nonnegative.

Step 12 (Removing the cutoff). With the data of Step 10, for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let Bn={x∈X:s(x)≤n2}B_{n}=\{x\in X:s(x)\le n^{2}\}, which lies in B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) since its complement {s>n2}\{s>n^{2}\} does, by the criterion of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §measurable; let fn=∣∇aV∣a2 1Bnf_{n}=|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,\mathbf{1}_{B_{n}}, nonnegative and Borel by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Since n2≤(n+1)2n^{2}\le(n+1)^{2}, fn≤fn+1f_{n}\le f_{n+1}; and for each xx there is n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with s(x)≤n≤n2s(x)\le n\le n^{2}, so x∈BNx\in B_{N} for all N≥nN\ge n and sup⁡nfn(x)=∣∇aV(x)∣a2\sup_{n}f_{n}(x)=|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}. For x∈Bnx\in B_{n}, ∥pd(x)∥2=s(x)≤n2\lVert p_{d}(x)\rVert^{2}=s(x)\le n^{2}, so ∥pd(x)∥≤n\lVert p_{d}(x)\rVert\le n and κn(x)=1\kappa_{n}(x)=1 (Step 9); hence fn≤∣∇aV∣a2κn2f_{n}\le|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\kappa_{n}^{2} everywhere, and ∫Xfn dμ≤An≤C1(1+β2IV+m)\int_{X}f_{n}\,d\mu\le A_{n}\le C_{1}(1+\beta^{2}I^{V}+m) by monotonicity and (11.1). By Monotone Convergence Theorem,

G=∫X∣∇aV∣a2 dμ=sup⁡n∫Xfn dμ≤C1(1+β2IV+m)<∞.(12.1)G=\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu=\sup_{n}\int_{X}f_{n}\,d\mu\le C_{1}\bigl(1+\beta^{2}I^{V}+m\bigr)<\infty . \tag{12.1}

Step 13 (Claim 4, the converse concluded). With the data of Step 10, (12.1) and Step 6(a) give ∂kV∈L2(μ)\partial_{k}V\in L^{2}(\mu) for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and the convergence of ∑kak∥∂kV∥2\sum_{k}a_{k}\lVert\partial_{k}V\rVert^{2} with sum GG. Put ζk=ζkV−β−1∂kV∈L2(μ)\zeta_{k}=\zeta^{V}_{k}-\beta^{-1}\partial_{k}V\in L^{2}(\mu). For φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), ∂kVφ\partial_{k}V\varphi and xkφ/ck−∂kφx_{k}\varphi/c_{k}-\partial_{k}\varphi are integrable (preamble of The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential), so by linearity of the inner product, The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product, The Relative Score with Respect to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §score and linearity of the integral,

⟨ζk,φ⟩=⟨ζkV,φ⟩−1β∫X∂kV φ dμ=∫X(xkckφ(x)−∂kφ(x)) μ(dx).\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle=\langle\zeta^{V}_{k},\varphi\rangle-\frac{1}{\beta}\int_{X}\partial_{k}V\,\varphi\,d\mu=\int_{X}\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}\varphi(x)-\partial_{k}\varphi(x)\Bigr)\,\mu(dx).

So (ζk)k∈N(\zeta_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is a relative score of μ\mu with respect to γc\gamma_{c} by The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score, the relative score by the uniqueness recorded there, and ζkV=ζk+β−1∂kV\zeta^{V}_{k}=\zeta_{k}+\beta^{-1}\partial_{k}V. By Step 6(b) with t=−β−1t=-\beta^{-1}, 0≤ak∥ζk∥2≤2ak∥ζkV∥2+2β−2ak∥∂kV∥20\le a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}\le2a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert^{2}+2\beta^{-2}a_{k}\lVert\partial_{k}V\rVert^{2}, and the series of the right-hand sides converges with sum 2IV+2β−2G2I^{V}+2\beta^{-2}G (its partial sums being the corresponding combination of partial sums). By Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §comparison, μ\mu has finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa (Weight Sequences and the Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §information) and

Ia(μ ∣ γc)≤2IV+2β−2G.(13.1)\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})\le2I^{V}+2\beta^{-2}G . \tag{13.1}

Together with G<∞G<\infty from (12.1) and Step 7, this proves the equivalence of Claim 4; in either case both scores exist, so the component formula proved in Step 7 holds, and the class of ∂kV\partial_{k}V lies in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu) by Step 6(a).

Step 14 (Claim 5). Let μ\mu be as in Claim 5; by Claim 4, ζkV=ζk+β−1∂kV\zeta^{V}_{k}=\zeta_{k}+\beta^{-1}\partial_{k}V for every kk, and ∫X∣∇aV∣a2 dμ<∞\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, so the class of ∇aV\nabla_{a}V lies in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §tangent, and Zμa∈L2(μ;Xa)Z^{a}_{\mu}\in L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) has coordinate ak1/2ζka_{k}^{1/2}\zeta_{k} along fkf_{k} by The Noise Score Field of a Measure of Finite Weighted Fisher Information: Existence, Norm, Pairing with Noise Gradients, Head Approximation and Tangency §field. Coordinates of ∇aV\nabla_{a}V: fix x∈Xx\in X and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, and let y=∇aV(x)=∑j=1daj∂jV(x)ej∈Xay=\nabla_{a}V(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{d}a_{j}\partial_{j}V(x)e_{j}\in X^{a} (Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §gradient). Its coordinate along fkf_{k} is ⟨y,fk⟩a=ak−1/2⟨y,ek⟩\langle y,f_{k}\rangle_{a}=a_{k}^{-1/2}\langle y,e_{k}\rangle by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §basis. Since (e1,…,ed)(e_{1},\dots,e_{d}) is orthonormal, ⟨y,ek⟩=ak∂kV(x)\langle y,e_{k}\rangle=a_{k}\partial_{k}V(x) for k≤dk\le d by Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space §coefficients, and for k>dk>d, ⟨y,ek⟩=∑j=1daj∂jV(x)⟨ej,ek⟩=0=ak∂kV(x)\langle y,e_{k}\rangle=\sum_{j=1}^{d}a_{j}\partial_{j}V(x)\langle e_{j},e_{k}\rangle=0=a_{k}\partial_{k}V(x) by Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space §combinations and orthonormality of (ej)j∈N(e_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}}. As ak−1/2ak=ak1/2a_{k}^{-1/2}a_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}, the coordinate is ak1/2∂kV(x)a_{k}^{1/2}\partial_{k}V(x) in all cases, so by The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §coordinates the coordinate of the class of ∇aV\nabla_{a}V along fkf_{k} is ak1/2∂kV∈L2(μ)a_{k}^{1/2}\partial_{k}V\in L^{2}(\mu) (Step 6(a)). By the linearity of coordinates in The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §coordinates, the coordinate of βZμa+∇aV\beta Z^{a}_{\mu}+\nabla_{a}V along fkf_{k} is

βak1/2ζk+ak1/2∂kV=βak1/2(ζk+β−1∂kV)=βak1/2ζkV.\beta a_{k}^{1/2}\zeta_{k}+a_{k}^{1/2}\partial_{k}V=\beta a_{k}^{1/2}\bigl(\zeta_{k}+\beta^{-1}\partial_{k}V\bigr)=\beta a_{k}^{1/2}\zeta^{V}_{k}.

By the norm identity of The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §coordinates and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity, ∥βZμa+∇aV∥μ2=∑k=1∞β2ak∥ζkV∥2\lVert\beta Z^{a}_{\mu}+\nabla_{a}V\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\beta^{2}a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{V}_{k}\rVert^{2}; the partial sums of this series are β2\beta^{2} times those of the series defining Ia(μ ∣ γV)\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}) in The Weighted Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential §information, so its sum is β2Ia(μ ∣ γV)\beta^{2}\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}). This proves Claim 5.

Step 15 (Claim 6). Let C∗C_{*} be the constant of Step 8, and let μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) be as in Claim 6; these are the data of Step 10. With GG and mm as there, (13.1) gives β2Ia(μ ∣ γc)≤2β2IV+2G\beta^{2}\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})\le2\beta^{2}I^{V}+2G, and (12.1) gives G≤C1(1+β2IV+m)G\le C_{1}(1+\beta^{2}I^{V}+m). Hence

β2Ia(μ ∣ γc)+G≤2β2IV+3G≤2β2IV+3C1(1+β2IV+m)≤(2+3C1)(1+β2IV+m)=C∗(1+β2Ia(μ ∣ γβV)+∫X∑k=1dxk2 μ(dx)),\beta^{2}\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})+G\le2\beta^{2}I^{V}+3G\le2\beta^{2}I^{V}+3C_{1}\bigl(1+\beta^{2}I^{V}+m\bigr)\le(2+3C_{1})\bigl(1+\beta^{2}I^{V}+m\bigr)=C_{*}\Bigl(1+\beta^{2}\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma^{V}_{\beta})+\int_{X}\sum_{k=1}^{d}x_{k}^{2}\,\mu(dx)\Bigr),

using that 11, β2IV\beta^{2}I^{V} and mm are nonnegative. Since C∗C_{*} was fixed in Step 8 from VV, β\beta, aa and cc alone, this proves Claim 6. ■\qquad\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…