TheoremBase

A minimizer of the distance to x exists on the compact set of points of C within distance ‖x−c₀‖ of x; expanding the squared distance along segments gives the variational inequality, and the inequality forces uniqueness.

Proof

Throughout, closedness and compactness in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} refer to the metric topology TdE\mathcal{T}_{d_{E}}, which exists by The Open Sets of a Metric Space Form a Set, Given by a Predicative Formula (ii), and a point p∈Cp\in C is called nearest if ∥x−p∥≤∥x−y∥\lVert x-p\rVert\le\lVert x-y\rVert for every y∈Cy\in C.

We first record an expansion. For p,y∈Rnp,y\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} let zt=(1−t)p+ty=p+t(y−p)z_{t}=(1-t)p+ty=p+t(y-p). Since x−ztx-z_{t} is the sum of x−px-p and −t(y−p)-t(y-p), Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (viii), applied to these two vectors, together with bilinearity of the dot product gives

∥x−zt∥2=∥x−p∥2−2t (x−p)⋅(y−p)+t2∥y−p∥2.\lVert x-z_{t}\rVert^{2}=\lVert x-p\rVert^{2}-2t\,(x-p)\cdot(y-p)+t^{2}\lVert y-p\rVert^{2}.

We now prove (ii). Let p∈Cp\in C. Suppose first that (x−p)⋅(y−p)≤0(x-p)\cdot(y-p)\le0 for every y∈Cy\in C, and let y∈Cy\in C. The expansion with t=1t=1, for which z1=yz_{1}=y, gives

∥x−y∥2=∥x−p∥2−2 (x−p)⋅(y−p)+∥y−p∥2≥∥x−p∥2,\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}=\lVert x-p\rVert^{2}-2\,(x-p)\cdot(y-p)+\lVert y-p\rVert^{2}\ge\lVert x-p\rVert^{2},

and since both norms are nonnegative, ∥x−y∥≥∥x−p∥\lVert x-y\rVert\ge\lVert x-p\rVert. So pp is nearest. Conversely, let pp be nearest, let y∈Cy\in C, put s=(x−p)⋅(y−p)s=(x-p)\cdot(y-p), and suppose that s>0s>0. Then y≠py\neq p, so ∥y−p∥>0\lVert y-p\rVert>0 and we may put

t=min⁡{1, s/∥y−p∥2}∈(0,1].t=\min\bigl\{1,\,s/\lVert y-p\rVert^{2}\bigr\}\in(0,1].

The point ztz_{t} lies on the segment [p,y][p,y], which is contained in CC because CC is convex (Segments and Convex Subsets of Rn\mathbb{R}^n (i), Segments and Convex Subsets of Rn\mathbb{R}^n (ii)). As pp is nearest, ∥x−zt∥2≥∥x−p∥2\lVert x-z_{t}\rVert^{2}\ge\lVert x-p\rVert^{2}, and the expansion together with t∥y−p∥2≤st\lVert y-p\rVert^{2}\le s gives

0≤∥x−zt∥2−∥x−p∥2=t(t∥y−p∥2−2s)≤t(s−2s)=−ts<0,0\le\lVert x-z_{t}\rVert^{2}-\lVert x-p\rVert^{2}=t\bigl(t\lVert y-p\rVert^{2}-2s\bigr)\le t(s-2s)=-ts<0,

a contradiction. Hence s≤0s\le0, and (ii) is proved.

Next we show that a nearest point exists. As CC is nonempty, fix c0∈Cc_{0}\in C, let r=∥x−c0∥r=\lVert x-c_{0}\rVert, and let Bˉ=BˉdE(x,r)\bar{B}=\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(x,r). The closed ball Bˉ\bar{B} is compact by the standing setting, hence closed by Closed Subsets of Compact Sets Are Compact, and Compact Subsets of a Metric Space Are Closed and Bounded (ii). So K=C∩BˉK=C\cap\bar{B} is closed, as the intersection of two closed sets (its complement is the union of their open complements, which is open by Topological Space (iii)); since K⊆BˉK\subseteq\bar{B}, it is compact by Closed Subsets of Compact Sets Are Compact, and Compact Subsets of a Metric Space Are Closed and Bounded (i). It contains c0c_{0}, since dE(x,c0)=rd_{E}(x,c_{0})=r (Closed Ball in a Metric Space (ii)). Consider the function f:K→Rf:K\to\mathbb{R}, f(y)=∥x−y∥f(y)=\lVert x-y\rVert. By Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (vii),

∣f(y)−f(y′)∣≤∥y−y′∥=dE(y,y′)(y,y′∈K),|f(y)-f(y')|\le\lVert y-y'\rVert=d_{E}(y,y')\qquad(y,y'\in K),

so for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 the choice δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon meets Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (i) at each point of KK, and ff is continuous on KK. By Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space (i) there is p∈Kp\in K with f(p)≤f(y)f(p)\le f(y) for every y∈Ky\in K. If y∈C∖Ky\in C\setminus K, then y∉Bˉy\notin\bar{B}, so

f(y)=dE(x,y)>r=f(c0)≥f(p).f(y)=d_{E}(x,y)>r=f(c_{0})\ge f(p).

Hence f(p)≤f(y)f(p)\le f(y) for every y∈Cy\in C, that is, pp is nearest.

Finally, a nearest point is unique. Let p,q∈Cp,q\in C both be nearest. By (ii), applied to pp with y=qy=q and to qq with y=py=p, we have (x−p)⋅(q−p)≤0(x-p)\cdot(q-p)\le0 and (x−q)⋅(p−q)≤0(x-q)\cdot(p-q)\le0. Adding these and using bilinearity,

∥q−p∥2=((x−p)−(x−q))⋅(q−p)=(x−p)⋅(q−p)+(x−q)⋅(p−q)≤0,\lVert q-p\rVert^{2}=\bigl((x-p)-(x-q)\bigr)\cdot(q-p)=(x-p)\cdot(q-p)+(x-q)\cdot(p-q)\le0,

so ∥q−p∥=0\lVert q-p\rVert=0 and q=pq=p. Together with the existence shown above, this proves (i).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…