TheoremBase

For each n, transport the Gaussian head by the Euclidean Talagrand map of the projected measure and keep the independent Gaussian tail. This pushes gammacgamma_c to the tail-replaced approximation mu(n)mu^(n) with noise cost at most 2 kappa H(mu|gamma_c), because ckc_k <= kappa aka_k. Since mu(n)mu^(n) converges weakly to mu, lower semicontinuity of the noise Wasserstein distance then gives noise-connectedness and the bound.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, cc, ρ=γc\rho=\gamma_{c}, κ\kappa, aa and μ\mu are as in the statement, and XX, its inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle, the orthonormal basis (ek)k∈N(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the coordinates xk=⟨x,ek⟩x_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle, and, for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, the maps pnp_{n}, pn∗p_{n}^{*}, Pn=pn∗∘pnP_{n}=p_{n}^{*}\circ p_{n} and Qn=idX−PnQ_{n}=\mathrm{id}_{X}-P_{n} are those of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, in force through Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §background. The noise space XaX^{a}, its norm ∣⋅∣a|\cdot|_{a}, the Borel function nan_{a} of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel, the sets Πa(⋅,⋅)\Pi^{a}(\cdot,\cdot) and the noise cost IaI^{a} are those of Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §noise-space and Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost. By Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §gibbs, H(μ ∣ γc)H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}) is a nonnegative real number.

Step 1 (The approximating measures). By Relative Entropy with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: the Moment Bound, the Cutoff Projections, and Bounded, Tight, Weakly Closed, Wasserstein-Closed and Weakly Sequentially Compact Sublevel Sets §moment, μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X). So for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} the measure

μ(n)=(Φn)#((pn)#μ⊗(Qn)#γc)∈P(X)\mu^{(n)}=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\bigl((p_{n})_{\#}\mu\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)\in\mathcal{P}(X)

of Replacing the Tail of a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space by an Independent Diagonal Gaussian Tail: Same Head and Convergence in the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is defined, with Φn:Rn×X→X\Phi_{n}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X\to X, Φn(u,w)=pn∗(u)+w\Phi_{n}(u,w)=p_{n}^{*}(u)+w, the Borel map of Head and Tail of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space are Independent §synthesis; here Rn×X\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X carries the product metric, whose Borel σ\sigma-algebra is B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Product of Two Separable Metric Spaces is the Product Sigma-Algebra §product, both factors being separable (Euclidean Space is a Separable Metric Space §separable and Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space). Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} until the end of Step 6, and write μn=(pn)#μ\mu_{n}=(p_{n})_{\#}\mu and ν0=(Qn)#γc\nu^{0}=(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}, Borel probability measures on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and on XX.

Step 2 (A Euclidean transport map for the head). By Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, (pn)#γc=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}, where c(n)c^{(n)} is the truncation of cc, a variance vector in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, and γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} is the diagonal Gaussian measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with variances c(n)c^{(n)}. By Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §projections, applied with γc\gamma_{c} in place of γ\gamma, the probability measure μn\mu_{n} on (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})) has finite relative entropy with respect to γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} and H(μn ∣ γc(n))≤H(μ ∣ γc)H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})\le H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}). Now Talagrand's Inequality for a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space in the Cameron-Martin Cost §talagrand, read with nn in place of dd, c(n)c^{(n)} in place of cc and μn\mu_{n} in place of μ\mu, gives a Borel map T(n):Rn→RnT^{(n)}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}, with coordinate functions Tk(n)T^{(n)}_{k}, such that (T(n))#γc(n)=μn(T^{(n)})_{\#}\gamma_{c^{(n)}}=\mu_{n} and the nonnegative Borel function

gn:Rn→R,gn(u)=∑k=1n(Tk(n)(u)−uk)2ck,g_{n}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R},\qquad g_{n}(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\bigl(T^{(n)}_{k}(u)-u_{k}\bigr)^{2}}{c_{k}},

is integrable with respect to γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} with

∫Rngn dγc(n)≤2 H(μn ∣ γc(n))≤2 H(μ ∣ γc).(1)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g_{n}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\le2\,H(\mu_{n}\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(n)}})\le2\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}).\tag{1}

Step 3 (The transport map on XX). Let Fn:Rn×X→Rn×XF_{n}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X be the map Fn(u,w)=(T(n)(u),w)F_{n}(u,w)=(T^{(n)}(u),w). For A∈B(Rn)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X) one has Fn−1(A×B)=(T(n))−1(A)×BF_{n}^{-1}(A\times B)=(T^{(n)})^{-1}(A)\times B, a measurable rectangle, T(n)T^{(n)} being Borel. Since the measurable rectangles generate B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) (Product Sigma-Algebra), FnF_{n} is measurable by claim 2 of Generator Criterion for Measurability. Let hn:X→Rn×Xh_{n}:X\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X, hn(x)=(pn(x),Qnx)h_{n}(x)=(p_{n}(x),Q_{n}x), be the Borel map of Head and Tail of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space are Independent §head-tail, and define

Un=Φn∘Fn∘hn:X→X,Un(x)=pn∗(T(n)(pn(x)))+Qnx.U_{n}=\Phi_{n}\circ F_{n}\circ h_{n}:X\to X,\qquad U_{n}(x)=p_{n}^{*}\bigl(T^{(n)}(p_{n}(x))\bigr)+Q_{n}x .

It is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, applied twice (recall from Step 1 that B(Rn×X)=B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X)=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X)).

Step 4 (The image of γc\gamma_{c}). For measurable maps GG and FF whose composition F∘GF\circ G is defined and a measure λ\lambda on the domain of GG, the definition of image measures in claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives (F∘G)#λ(B)=λ(G−1(F−1(B)))=F#(G#λ)(B)(F\circ G)_{\#}\lambda(B)=\lambda(G^{-1}(F^{-1}(B)))=F_{\#}(G_{\#}\lambda)(B) for every measurable BB, that is, (F∘G)#λ=F#(G#λ)(F\circ G)_{\#}\lambda=F_{\#}(G_{\#}\lambda). By Head and Tail of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space are Independent §head-tail, (hn)#γc=γc(n)⊗ν0(h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\nu^{0}. For A∈B(Rn)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X), by Step 3, the defining property of the product measure (Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure) and Step 2,

(Fn)#(γc(n)⊗ν0)(A×B)=γc(n)((T(n))−1(A)) ν0(B)=μn(A) ν0(B).(F_{n})_{\#}\bigl(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\nu^{0}\bigr)(A\times B)=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\bigl((T^{(n)})^{-1}(A)\bigr)\,\nu^{0}(B)=\mu_{n}(A)\,\nu^{0}(B).

The image measure (Fn)#(γc(n)⊗ν0)(F_{n})_{\#}(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\nu^{0}) is a measure on B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, and μn\mu_{n} and ν0\nu^{0} are finite, hence σ\sigma-finite; so the uniqueness in Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure gives (Fn)#(γc(n)⊗ν0)=μn⊗ν0(F_{n})_{\#}(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\nu^{0})=\mu_{n}\otimes\nu^{0}. Consequently

(Un)#γc=(Φn)#((Fn)#((hn)#γc))=(Φn)#(μn⊗ν0)=μ(n).(U_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\Bigl((F_{n})_{\#}\bigl((h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)\Bigr)=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\bigl(\mu_{n}\otimes\nu^{0}\bigr)=\mu^{(n)} .

Step 5 (The displacement lies in the noise space). Let x∈Xx\in X and put v=T(n)(pn(x))−pn(x)∈Rnv=T^{(n)}(p_{n}(x))-p_{n}(x)\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Since Qnx=x−pn∗(pn(x))Q_{n}x=x-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x)) and pn∗p_{n}^{*}, being given by the finite sum pn∗(y)=∑k=1nykekp_{n}^{*}(y)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}y_{k}e_{k}, is linear,

Un(x)−x=pn∗(T(n)(pn(x)))−pn∗(pn(x))=pn∗(v).U_{n}(x)-x=p_{n}^{*}\bigl(T^{(n)}(p_{n}(x))\bigr)-p_{n}^{*}\bigl(p_{n}(x)\bigr)=p_{n}^{*}(v).

The coordinates of y=pn∗(v)y=p_{n}^{*}(v) are yk=vky_{k}=v_{k} for k≤nk\le n, because pn(pn∗(v))=vp_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(v))=v by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, and yk=∑j=1nvj⟨ej,ek⟩=0y_{k}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}v_{j}\langle e_{j},e_{k}\rangle=0 for k>nk>n, by the orthonormality of the basis (Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space §basis). Hence, for N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, the partial sum ∑k=1Nak−1yk2\sum_{k=1}^{N}a_{k}^{-1}y_{k}^{2} of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums equals ∑k=1min⁡(N,n)ak−1vk2\sum_{k=1}^{\min(N,n)}a_{k}^{-1}v_{k}^{2}, which is at most ∑k=1nak−1vk2\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{-1}v_{k}^{2} and equals it for N=nN=n. By The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums, y∈Xay\in X^{a} and ∣y∣a2|y|_{a}^{2}, the supremum of these partial sums, is ∑k=1nak−1vk2\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{-1}v_{k}^{2}. Since ck≤κ akc_{k}\le\kappa\,a_{k} and ak,ck>0a_{k},c_{k}>0, one has ak−1≤κ ck−1a_{k}^{-1}\le\kappa\,c_{k}^{-1} for every kk; and vk=Tk(n)(pn(x))−(pn(x))kv_{k}=T^{(n)}_{k}(p_{n}(x))-(p_{n}(x))_{k}. So, by the definition of nan_{a} in The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel,

Un(x)−x∈Xaandna(Un(x)−x)=∑k=1nvk2ak≤κ gn(pn(x))for every x∈X.(2)U_{n}(x)-x\in X^{a}\qquad\text{and}\qquad n_{a}\bigl(U_{n}(x)-x\bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{v_{k}^{2}}{a_{k}}\le\kappa\,g_{n}\bigl(p_{n}(x)\bigr)\qquad\text{for every }x\in X.\tag{2}

Step 6 (A coupling of finite noise cost). The function gn∘png_{n}\circ p_{n} is Borel and nonnegative, pnp_{n} being Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. By the change-of-variables formula of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward and (pn)#γc=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}, one has ∫Xgn(pn(x)) γc(dx)=∫Rngn dγc(n)\int_{X}g_{n}(p_{n}(x))\,\gamma_{c}(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g_{n}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}. By (2), monotonicity and homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative functions (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative) and (1),

∫Xna(Un(x)−x) γc(dx)≤κ∫Rngn dγc(n)≤2κ H(μ ∣ γc)<∞.\int_{X}n_{a}\bigl(U_{n}(x)-x\bigr)\,\gamma_{c}(dx)\le\kappa\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g_{n}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\le2\kappa\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})<\infty .

Since UnU_{n} is Borel with Un(x)−x∈XaU_{n}(x)-x\in X^{a} for every xx (Steps 3 and 5), Couplings of Finite Noise Cost: the Support Bound, Swap, Displacement Couplings and Lower Semicontinuity of the Noise Cost §displacement, applied with γc\gamma_{c} in place of μ\mu and UnU_{n} in place of SS, together with Step 4, gives Γn=(idX,Un)#γc∈Πa(γc,μ(n))\Gamma_{n}=(\mathrm{id}_{X},U_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\in\Pi^{a}(\gamma_{c},\mu^{(n)}) with Ia(Γn)≤2κ H(μ ∣ γc)I^{a}(\Gamma_{n})\le2\kappa\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}). By Couplings of Finite Noise Cost: the Support Bound, Swap, Displacement Couplings and Lower Semicontinuity of the Noise Cost §swap, with σ\sigma the swap map there, σ#Γn∈Πa(μ(n),ρ)\sigma_{\#}\Gamma_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\mu^{(n)},\rho) and Ia(σ#Γn)=Ia(Γn)I^{a}(\sigma_{\#}\Gamma_{n})=I^{a}(\Gamma_{n}). Hence the ordered pair (μ(n),ρ)(\mu^{(n)},\rho) is noise-connected (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §connected), that is, μ(n)∈Pρa\mu^{(n)}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space, and by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance

Wa(μ(n),ρ)2≤Ia(σ#Γn)≤2κ H(μ ∣ γc),so0≤Wa(μ(n),ρ)≤2κ H(μ ∣ γc).(3)W_{a}(\mu^{(n)},\rho)^{2}\le I^{a}(\sigma_{\#}\Gamma_{n})\le2\kappa\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}),\qquad\text{so}\qquad0\le W_{a}(\mu^{(n)},\rho)\le\sqrt{2\kappa\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})}.\tag{3}

Step 7 (Passage to the limit). Now let nn vary. By Replacing the Tail of a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space by an Independent Diagonal Gaussian Tail: Same Head and Convergence in the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance §convergence, which applies since μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) (Step 1), μ(n)⇒μ\mu^{(n)}\Rightarrow\mu. The constant sequence with every term ρ\rho converges weakly to ρ\rho, its integrals against each bounded continuous function being constant (Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space), and ρ∈Pρa\rho\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §reference. By Step 6 every μ(n)\mu^{(n)} belongs to Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, and by (3) the sequence (Wa(μ(n),ρ))n∈N(W_{a}(\mu^{(n)},\rho))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is bounded. So The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §lsc, applied with μj=μ(j)\mu_{j}=\mu^{(j)}, νj=ρ\nu_{j}=\rho and ν=ρ\nu=\rho, shows that (μ,ρ)(\mu,\rho) is noise-connected and that

Wa(μ,ρ)≤lim inf⁡nWa(μ(n),ρ)≤2κ H(μ ∣ γc);W_{a}(\mu,\rho)\le\liminf_{n}W_{a}(\mu^{(n)},\rho)\le\sqrt{2\kappa\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})};

the last inequality holds because, in Limit Inferior of a Bounded Sequence of Real Numbers, each infimum of a tail of the sequence is at most the first term of that tail, hence at most 2κ H(μ ∣ γc)\sqrt{2\kappa\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})} by (3), and so is their supremum. Since (μ,ρ)(\mu,\rho) is noise-connected, μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space, which is claim 1. Squaring the last display, both sides being nonnegative, and recalling ρ=γc\rho=\gamma_{c} gives Wa(μ,γc)2≤2κ H(μ ∣ γc)W_{a}(\mu,\gamma_{c})^{2}\le2\kappa\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}), which is claim 2.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…