TheoremBase

Composition with the coordinate map pnp_n is an isometry from L2L^2 of the projected measure onto a closed subspace VnV_n of L2(mu)L^2(mu); projecting the score components onto VnV_n and using the Euclidean componentwise characterisation identifies the projections with the projected scores. Monotonicity, convergence and the converse then follow from Pythagoras, density of cylindrical functions, and completeness of L2(mu)L^2(mu).

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Conventions. Each pnp_{n} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. For a measure space, L2L^{2} is the Lebesgue space of The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §space, whose elements are classes [f][f] of 22-integrable functions under almost-everywhere equality (The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §equivalence), with inner product ⟨[f],[g]⟩=∫fg\langle[f],[g]\rangle=\int fg and norm ∥[f]∥2=∫f2\lVert[f]\rVert^{2}=\int f^{2} by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product; it is a real Hilbert space by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §hilbert. For 1≤n≤m1\le n\le m let πm,n:Rm→Rn\pi_{m,n}:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}, πm,n(y)=(y1,…,yn)\pi_{m,n}(y)=(y_{1},\dots,y_{n}); it is Borel by claims 1, 2 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, and pn=πm,n∘pmp_{n}=\pi_{m,n}\circ p_{m}. For a closed linear subspace VV of L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu), PVP_{V} is the orthogonal projection of Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space; by Nearest-Point Projection onto a Nonempty Closed Convex Subset of a Real Hilbert Space §existence PVx∈VP_{V}x\in V and ∥x−PVx∥≤∥x−v∥\lVert x-P_{V}x\rVert\le\lVert x-v\rVert for every v∈Vv\in V, and by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §characterisation x−PVxx-P_{V}x is orthogonal to every element of VV. We write Πn=PVn\Pi_{n}=P_{V_{n}} once claim 3 is proved. For each nn, Cb1(Rn)C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) is the set of Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded with q=nq=n, both in Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical and in Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions, the latter being read, as the statement prescribes, with nn in place of dd and the variance vector c(n)=(c1,…,cn)c^{(n)}=(c_{1},\dots,c_{n}) (Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations). So read, and applied to μn\mu_{n} (which lies in P2(Rn)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by claim 1), the identity of Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §componentwise reads, for k∈[n]k\in[n] and ψ∈Cb1(Rn)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}),

⟨g,ψ⟩L2(μn)=∫Rn(ykckψ(y)−∂kψ(y))μn(dy).(Sn,k)\langle g,\psi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu_{n})}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Bigl(\frac{y_{k}}{c_{k}}\psi(y)-\partial_{k}\psi(y)\Bigr)\mu_{n}(dy).\qquad(\mathrm{S}_{n,k})

Claim 1. By claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, μn\mu_{n} is a Borel probability measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. The function y↦∥y∥2y\mapsto\lVert y\rVert^{2} is nonnegative and Borel (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment), so by claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, ∫∥y∥2 μn(dy)=∫∥pn(x)∥2 μ(dx)\int\lVert y\rVert^{2}\,\mu_{n}(dy)=\int\lVert p_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx). By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, ∥pn(x)∥2=∣Pnx∣2≤∣Pnx∣2+∣Qnx∣2=∣x∣2\lVert p_{n}(x)\rVert^{2}=|P_{n}x|^{2}\le|P_{n}x|^{2}+|Q_{n}x|^{2}=|x|^{2}, so by monotonicity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative) M2(μn)≤M2(μ)<∞M_{2}(\mu_{n})\le M_{2}(\mu)<\infty (The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space); hence μn∈P2(Rn)\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space).

Claim 2. Let g:Rn→Rg:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be Borel. Then g∘png\circ p_{n} is Borel, since (g∘pn)−1(B)=pn−1(g−1(B))(g\circ p_{n})^{-1}(B)=p_{n}^{-1}(g^{-1}(B)), and ∣g∣2|g|^{2} is Borel and nonnegative (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power) with ∣g∣2∘pn=∣g∘pn∣2|g|^{2}\circ p_{n}=|g\circ p_{n}|^{2}. Claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives ∫∣g∣2 dμn=∫∣g∘pn∣2 dμ\int|g|^{2}\,d\mu_{n}=\int|g\circ p_{n}|^{2}\,d\mu in [0,∞][0,\infty]; so one side is finite exactly when the other is, and then the two norms agree. If g′g' is another Borel representative of the class of gg in L2(μn)L^{2}(\mu_{n}), the Borel set N={g≠g′}N=\{g\neq g'\} (claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions) is contained in a μn\mu_{n}-null set, so μn(N)=0\mu_{n}(N)=0, and {g∘pn≠g′∘pn}=pn−1(N)\{g\circ p_{n}\neq g'\circ p_{n}\}=p_{n}^{-1}(N) has μ\mu-measure μn(N)=0\mu_{n}(N)=0; so the class of g∘png\circ p_{n} depends only on that of gg. Moreover, for 22-integrable Borel g,g′g,g' on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, gg′gg' is μn\mu_{n}-integrable (The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product), so by claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables (gg′)∘pn(gg')\circ p_{n} is μ\mu-integrable with the same integral; that is,

⟨g∘pn,g′∘pn⟩L2(μ)=⟨g,g′⟩L2(μn).(IP)\langle g\circ p_{n},g'\circ p_{n}\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\langle g,g'\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu_{n})}.\qquad(\mathrm{IP})

Claim 3. Define Jn:L2(μn)→L2(μ)J_{n}:L^{2}(\mu_{n})\to L^{2}(\mu), Jnh=h∘pnJ_{n}h=h\circ p_{n}, well defined by claim 2. Since (sg+tg′)∘pn=s(g∘pn)+t(g′∘pn)(sg+tg')\circ p_{n}=s(g\circ p_{n})+t(g'\circ p_{n}) pointwise and the operations of L2L^{2} are those of representatives (The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §space), JnJ_{n} is linear, and ∥Jnh∥=∥h∥\lVert J_{n}h\rVert=\lVert h\rVert by claim 2. By claim 2 again, VnV_{n} is exactly the image of JnJ_{n}, hence a linear subspace. Let vv lie in the closure of VnV_{n}; by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space there are hj∈L2(μn)h_{j}\in L^{2}(\mu_{n}) with Jnhj→vJ_{n}h_{j}\to v. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle, ∥hj−hl∥=∥Jnhj−Jnhl∥≤∥Jnhj−v∥+∥v−Jnhl∥\lVert h_{j}-h_{l}\rVert=\lVert J_{n}h_{j}-J_{n}h_{l}\rVert\le\lVert J_{n}h_{j}-v\rVert+\lVert v-J_{n}h_{l}\rVert, so (hj)(h_{j}) is Cauchy and converges to some h∈L2(μn)h\in L^{2}(\mu_{n}) by completeness (Real Hilbert Space §hilbert). Then ∥Jnh−v∥≤∥h−hj∥+∥Jnhj−v∥→0\lVert J_{n}h-v\rVert\le\lVert h-h_{j}\rVert+\lVert J_{n}h_{j}-v\rVert\to0, so v=Jnh∈Vnv=J_{n}h\in V_{n}. Thus VnV_{n} equals its closure and is closed (claims 1 and 4 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset). Finally, if v∈Vnv\in V_{n} is the class of g∘png\circ p_{n}, then g∘pn=(g∘πn+1,n)∘pn+1g\circ p_{n}=(g\circ\pi_{n+1,n})\circ p_{n+1} with g∘πn+1,ng\circ\pi_{n+1,n} Borel, so v∈Vn+1v\in V_{n+1}. By induction Vn⊆VmV_{n}\subseteq V_{m} whenever n≤mn\le m.

Claim 4. Let (ζk)(\zeta_{k}) be the relative score of μ\mu, n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and k∈[n]k\in[n]. As Πnζk∈Vn\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\in V_{n}, there is hk∈L2(μn)h_{k}\in L^{2}(\mu_{n}) with Πnζk=Jnhk\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}=J_{n}h_{k}. Let ψ∈Cb1(Rn)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and φ=ψ∘pn∈FCb1(X)\varphi=\psi\circ p_{n}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), with representation (n,ψ)(n,\psi) (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical). By claim 1 and Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §integrable, ψ\psi is Borel and 22-integrable for μn\mu_{n} and F(y)=ykψ(y)/ck−∂kψ(y)F(y)=y_{k}\psi(y)/c_{k}-\partial_{k}\psi(y) is μn\mu_{n}-integrable; so the class of φ\varphi is Jnψ∈VnJ_{n}\psi\in V_{n}. Since ζk−Πnζk\zeta_{k}-\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k} is orthogonal to VnV_{n}, by (IP)

⟨hk,ψ⟩L2(μn)=⟨Jnhk,Jnψ⟩L2(μ)=⟨ζk,φ⟩L2(μ)=∫X(xkckφ(x)−∂kφ(x))μ(dx)\langle h_{k},\psi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu_{n})}=\langle J_{n}h_{k},J_{n}\psi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\int_{X}\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}\varphi(x)-\partial_{k}\varphi(x)\Bigr)\mu(dx)

by The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score. Since xk=(pn(x))kx_{k}=(p_{n}(x))_{k} and the partial derivative ∂kφ\partial_{k}\varphi of Partial Derivatives along an Orthonormal Basis of a Function Differentiable on a Hilbert Space §partial equals (∂kψ)∘pn(\partial_{k}\psi)\circ p_{n} by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial, the last integrand is F∘pnF\circ p_{n}, and claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives ∫F∘pn dμ=∫F dμn\int F\circ p_{n}\,d\mu=\int F\,d\mu_{n}. So hkh_{k} satisfies (Sn,k)(\mathrm{S}_{n,k}) for every ψ∈Cb1(Rn)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), for each k∈[n]k\in[n]. By Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §componentwise, μn\mu_{n} has finite Fisher information relative to γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}}, and by Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §agreement hk=ζk(n)h_{k}=\zeta^{(n)}_{k}; hence Πnζk=ζk(n)∘pn\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}=\zeta^{(n)}_{k}\circ p_{n}.

Claim 5. First, whenever μn\mu_{n} has finite Fisher information relative to γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}},

Ia(n)(μn)=∑k=1nak∥ζk(n)∥L2(μn)2=∑k=1nak∥ζk(n)∘pn∥L2(μ)2.(E)\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{(n)}_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu_{n})}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{(n)}_{k}\circ p_{n}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}.\qquad(\mathrm{E})

Indeed, let ζ=(ζ1,…,ζn)\zeta=(\zeta_{1},\dots,\zeta_{n}) be a representative of the relative score of μn\mu_{n}. By the convention of Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions (read with nn in place of dd), the class in L2(μn)L^{2}(\mu_{n}) of the kk-th component ζk\zeta_{k} is ζk(n)\zeta^{(n)}_{k}; and ζk\zeta_{k} is Borel with ∫ζk2 dμn<∞\int\zeta_{k}^{2}\,d\mu_{n}<\infty (Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Coordinates, Operations, Almost Sure Equality and the Mean-Square Form §coordinates), so ∫ζk2 dμn=∥ζk(n)∥L2(μn)2\int\zeta_{k}^{2}\,d\mu_{n}=\lVert\zeta^{(n)}_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu_{n})}^{2} by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product. Each akζk2a_{k}\zeta_{k}^{2} is nonnegative and Borel (claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions), with ak>0a_{k}>0 (Weight Sequences and the Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §weights). Hence, by the shorthand of the statement, The Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space §information (with weights a(n)a^{(n)} and the representative ζ\zeta), and additivity and homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative measurable functions (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative) applied repeatedly to the finite sum,

Ia(n)(μn)=∫Rn∑k=1nak ζk(y)2 μn(dy)=∑k=1nak∫Rnζk2 dμn=∑k=1nak∥ζk(n)∥L2(μn)2,\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\,\zeta_{k}(y)^{2}\,\mu_{n}(dy)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\zeta_{k}^{2}\,d\mu_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\lVert\zeta^{(n)}_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu_{n})}^{2},

which is the first equality of (E); the second follows from claim 2. Now let μ\mu have a relative score (ζk)(\zeta_{k}) and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}; by claim 4 and (E), Ia(n)(μn)=∑k=1nak∥Πnζk∥2\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}. For k∈[n]k\in[n] put w=Πn+1ζkw=\Pi_{n+1}\zeta_{k}. Since Vn⊆Vn+1V_{n}\subseteq V_{n+1}, both ζk−w\zeta_{k}-w and ζk−Πnζk\zeta_{k}-\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k} are orthogonal to VnV_{n}, hence so is their difference w−Πnζkw-\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}; as Πnζk∈Vn\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\in V_{n}, Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §characterisation gives Πnw=Πnζk\Pi_{n}w=\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}, and Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §pythagoras gives ∥Πnζk∥=∥Πnw∥≤∥w∥\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert=\lVert\Pi_{n}w\rVert\le\lVert w\rVert. As every ak>0a_{k}>0 (Weight Sequences and the Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §weights),

Ia(n)(μn)≤∑k=1nak∥Πn+1ζk∥2≤∑k=1n+1ak∥Πn+1ζk∥2=Ia(n+1)(μn+1).\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})\le\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\lVert\Pi_{n+1}\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}a_{k}\lVert\Pi_{n+1}\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}=\mathcal{I}^{(n+1)}_{a}(\mu_{n+1}).

Claim 6. Write Ia=Ia(μ ∣ γc)\mathcal{I}_{a}=\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}). By Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §pythagoras, ∥Πnζk∥≤∥ζk∥\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert\le\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert, so, since Ia(n)(μn)=∑k=1nak∥Πnζk∥2\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2} by claim 4 and (E), and by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates, Ia(n)(μn)≤∑k=1nak∥ζk∥2≤Ia\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})\le\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}\le\mathcal{I}_{a}. Next fix kk; we show Πnζk→ζk\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\to\zeta_{k}. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. The classes of FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) are dense in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu) (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §density), so by Dense Subset of a Topological Space and Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls there is φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with ∥ζk−φ∥<ε\lVert\zeta_{k}-\varphi\rVert<\varepsilon. If (m,ψ)(m,\psi) represents φ\varphi, its class is Jmψ∈VmJ_{m}\psi\in V_{m} (as in claim 4), so the class of φ\varphi lies in VnV_{n} for n≥mn\ge m by claim 3, and then ∥ζk−Πnζk∥≤∥ζk−φ∥<ε\lVert\zeta_{k}-\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert\le\lVert\zeta_{k}-\varphi\rVert<\varepsilon. Hence ∥Πnζk∥→∥ζk∥\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert\to\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert (The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity). Now let ε>0\varepsilon>0; first choose KK with ∑k=1Kak∥ζk∥2≥Ia−ε\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}\ge\mathcal{I}_{a}-\varepsilon (Series of Real Numbers §convergent); then, the finite sum ∑k=1Kak∥Πnζk∥2\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2} converging to ∑k=1Kak∥ζk∥2\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}, choose N≥KN\ge K with ∑k=1Kak∥Πnζk∥2≥Ia−2ε\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}\ge\mathcal{I}_{a}-2\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N. For n≥Nn\ge N, dropping the nonnegative terms with K<k≤nK<k\le n,

Ia−2ε≤∑k=1Kak∥Πnζk∥2≤Ia(n)(μn)≤Ia,\mathcal{I}_{a}-2\varepsilon\le\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}\lVert\Pi_{n}\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}\le\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})\le\mathcal{I}_{a},

so Ia(n)(μn)→Ia\mathcal{I}^{(n)}_{a}(\mu_{n})\to\mathcal{I}_{a}.

Claim 7. For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and k∈[m]k\in[m] put Gkm=ζk(m)∘pm∈VmG^{m}_{k}=\zeta^{(m)}_{k}\circ p_{m}\in V_{m}. Step 1: for k≤mk\le m and every φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with a representation (n,ψ)(n,\psi) such that n≤mn\le m,

⟨Gkm,φ⟩L2(μ)=∫X(xkckφ(x)−∂kφ(x))μ(dx).(∗)\langle G^{m}_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\int_{X}\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}\varphi(x)-\partial_{k}\varphi(x)\Bigr)\mu(dx).\qquad(*)

Put π=πm,n\pi=\pi_{m,n} and ψ′=ψ∘π\psi'=\psi\circ\pi. Write εl(m)\varepsilon^{(m)}_{l} for the ll-th standard basis vector of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} and εl(n)\varepsilon^{(n)}_{l} for that of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} (not to be confused with the basis (ek)(e_{k}) of XX). For y∈Rmy\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, l∈[m]l\in[m] and real tt, π(y+tεl(m))=π(y)+tεl(n)\pi(y+t\varepsilon^{(m)}_{l})=\pi(y)+t\varepsilon^{(n)}_{l} if l≤nl\le n and π(y+tεl(m))=π(y)\pi(y+t\varepsilon^{(m)}_{l})=\pi(y) if l>nl>n; so the difference quotients of Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set give ∂lψ′(y)=∂lψ(π(y))\partial_{l}\psi'(y)=\partial_{l}\psi(\pi(y)) for l≤nl\le n and ∂lψ′(y)=0\partial_{l}\psi'(y)=0 for l>nl>n. Since ∑i=1n(π(y′)i−π(y)i)2≤∑i=1m(yi′−yi)2\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\pi(y')_{i}-\pi(y)_{i})^{2}\le\sum_{i=1}^{m}(y'_{i}-y_{i})^{2}, continuity at every point (Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces) of ψ\psi and of the ∂lψ\partial_{l}\psi (clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set) passes to ψ′\psi' and to ∂lψ′=(∂lψ)∘π\partial_{l}\psi'=(\partial_{l}\psi)\circ\pi for l≤nl\le n, and ∂lψ′=0\partial_{l}\psi'=0 is continuous for l>nl>n; so ψ′\psi' is of class C1C^{1}, and bounded with bounded partial derivatives, i.e. ψ′∈Cb1(Rm)\psi'\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded with q=mq=m). As ψ′∘pm=φ\psi'\circ p_{m}=\varphi, the class of φ\varphi is Jmψ′J_{m}\psi'. By (IP), Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §agreement at level mm (which applies since μm\mu_{m} has finite Fisher information) and claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables (the integrand being μm\mu_{m}-integrable by Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §integrable),

⟨Gkm,φ⟩L2(μ)=⟨ζk(m),ψ′⟩L2(μm)=∫X(xkckψ′(pm(x))−∂kψ′(pm(x)))μ(dx),\langle G^{m}_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\langle\zeta^{(m)}_{k},\psi'\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu_{m})}=\int_{X}\Bigl(\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}\psi'(p_{m}(x))-\partial_{k}\psi'(p_{m}(x))\Bigr)\mu(dx),

using (pm(x))k=xk(p_{m}(x))_{k}=x_{k}. Here ψ′(pm(x))=φ(x)\psi'(p_{m}(x))=\varphi(x), and ∂kψ′(pm(x))\partial_{k}\psi'(p_{m}(x)) equals ∂kψ(pn(x))=∂kφ(x)\partial_{k}\psi(p_{n}(x))=\partial_{k}\varphi(x) if k≤nk\le n and 0=∂kφ(x)0=\partial_{k}\varphi(x) if k>nk>n, by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial. This proves (∗)(*).

Step 2: for k≤n≤mk\le n\le m, ΠnGkm=Gkn\Pi_{n}G^{m}_{k}=G^{n}_{k}. Write ΠnGkm=Jnh\Pi_{n}G^{m}_{k}=J_{n}h with h∈L2(μn)h\in L^{2}(\mu_{n}). For ψ∈Cb1(Rn)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and φ=ψ∘pn\varphi=\psi\circ p_{n}, by (IP), orthogonality of Gkm−ΠnGkmG^{m}_{k}-\Pi_{n}G^{m}_{k} to Vn∋JnψV_{n}\ni J_{n}\psi, (∗)(*), Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial and claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables as in claim 4,

⟨h,ψ⟩L2(μn)=⟨Gkm,φ⟩L2(μ)=∫Rn(ykckψ(y)−∂kψ(y))μn(dy).\langle h,\psi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu_{n})}=\langle G^{m}_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Bigl(\frac{y_{k}}{c_{k}}\psi(y)-\partial_{k}\psi(y)\Bigr)\mu_{n}(dy).

So hh satisfies (Sn,k)(\mathrm{S}_{n,k}), and h=ζk(n)h=\zeta^{(n)}_{k} by the uniqueness in Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §agreement. By Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §pythagoras,

∥Gkm∥2=∥Gkn∥2+∥Gkm−Gkn∥2(k≤n≤m).\lVert G^{m}_{k}\rVert^{2}=\lVert G^{n}_{k}\rVert^{2}+\lVert G^{m}_{k}-G^{n}_{k}\rVert^{2}\qquad(k\le n\le m).

Step 3: limits. Fix kk and put sm=∥Gkm∥2s_{m}=\lVert G^{m}_{k}\rVert^{2} for m≥km\ge k. By Step 2, (sm)m≥k(s_{m})_{m\ge k} is nondecreasing, and by (E) and positivity of the weights aksm≤Ia(m)(μm)≤Ca_{k}s_{m}\le\mathcal{I}^{(m)}_{a}(\mu_{m})\le C; so (sm)(s_{m}) converges, hence is Cauchy. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose N≥kN\ge k with ∣sm−sn∣<ε2|s_{m}-s_{n}|<\varepsilon^{2} for m,n≥Nm,n\ge N; then by Step 2 ∥Gkm−Gkn∥2=sm−sn<ε2\lVert G^{m}_{k}-G^{n}_{k}\rVert^{2}=s_{m}-s_{n}<\varepsilon^{2} for m≥n≥Nm\ge n\ge N. So (Gkm)m≥k(G^{m}_{k})_{m\ge k} is Cauchy in L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu) and converges to some ζk∈L2(μ)\zeta_{k}\in L^{2}(\mu) (Real Hilbert Space §hilbert). Let φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with representation (n,ψ)(n,\psi). For every m≥max⁡(n,k)m\ge\max(n,k), (∗)(*) gives ⟨Gkm,φ⟩\langle G^{m}_{k},\varphi\rangle equal to the right side of the score identity; by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity, ⟨Gkm,φ⟩→⟨ζk,φ⟩\langle G^{m}_{k},\varphi\rangle\to\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle, so ζk\zeta_{k} satisfies the identity of The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score. Hence μ\mu (which lies in P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X)) has the relative score (ζk)k∈N(\zeta_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}. Finally let K∈NK\in\mathbb{N}. For m≥Km\ge K, (E) and the nonnegativity of the omitted terms give ∑k=1Kak∥Gkm∥2≤Ia(m)(μm)≤C\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}\lVert G^{m}_{k}\rVert^{2}\le\mathcal{I}^{(m)}_{a}(\mu_{m})\le C; letting m→∞m\to\infty, with ∥Gkm∥→∥ζk∥\lVert G^{m}_{k}\rVert\to\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity, gives ∑k=1Kak∥ζk∥2≤C\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2}\le C. The terms being nonnegative, Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion shows that ∑k=1∞ak∥ζk∥2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert^{2} converges with sum at most CC; by Weight Sequences and the Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §information, μ\mu has finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa and Ia(μ ∣ γc)≤C\mathcal{I}_{a}(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})\le C.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…