TheoremBase

Both scalar equations are instances of the published Riccati existence results in dimension one; the closed forms are verified by differentiation and the fundamental theorem of calculus, and the two-dimensional families are then obtained from the rank-one algebra of the tangential and normal directions together with uniqueness.

Proof

Throughout write

y+=Δ−14χ,y−=−Δ+14χ,p+=Γ−22d~,p−=−Γ+22d~,y_{+}=\frac{\Delta-1}{4\chi},\qquad y_{-}=-\frac{\Delta+1}{4\chi},\qquad p_{+}=\frac{\Gamma-2}{2\tilde{d}},\qquad p_{-}=-\frac{\Gamma+2}{2\tilde{d}} ,

and N=nn⊤N=\mathsf{n}\mathsf{n}^{\top}. Since χ>0\chi>0 and ψ>0\psi>0 we have 1+χψ>11+\chi\psi>1, so Δ>1\Delta>1, y+>0>y−y_{+}>0>y_{-} and ρ=(Δ−1)/(Δ+1)∈(0,1)\rho=(\Delta-1)/(\Delta+1)\in(0,1); since d~>0\tilde{d}>0 we have Γ>2\Gamma>2, p+>0>p−p_{+}>0>p_{-} and ρΠ∈(0,1)\rho_{\Pi}\in(0,1). Note y+=−ρ y−y_{+}=-\rho\,y_{-} and p+=−ρΠ p−p_{+}=-\rho_{\Pi}\,p_{-}, and, from Γ2−4=2d~\Gamma^{2}-4=2\tilde{d}, that p+=(Γ−2)/((Γ−2)(Γ+2))=1/(Γ+2)p_{+}=(\Gamma-2)/\bigl((\Gamma-2)(\Gamma+2)\bigr)=1/(\Gamma+2). Two factorisations will be used: by the quadratic formula the roots of 8χy2+4y−12ψ8\chi y^{2}+4y-\tfrac12\psi are (−1±Δ)/(4χ)(-1\pm\Delta)/(4\chi), that is y±y_{\pm}, so

−4y−8χy2+12ψ=−8χ (y−y+)(y−y−)(y∈R),-4y-8\chi y^{2}+\tfrac12\psi=-8\chi\,(y-y_{+})(y-y_{-})\qquad(y\in\mathbb{R}),

and likewise the roots of 2d~ p2+4p−12\tilde{d}\,p^{2}+4p-1 are (−2±Γ)/(2d~)(-2\pm\Gamma)/(2\tilde{d}), that is p±p_{\pm}, so

−4p−2d~ p2+1=−2d~ (p−p+)(p−p−)(p∈R).-4p-2\tilde{d}\,p^{2}+1=-2\tilde{d}\,(p-p_{+})(p-p_{-})\qquad(p\in\mathbb{R}).

For a continuous integrand on a compact interval the Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree, by Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval, so the integral equations below may be read in either sense.

In the two instantiations below, the symbols ll and kk are the dimension parameters of the cited Riccati results and are set to 11; they are unrelated to the number l=2l=2 of states of the present model; that model parameter is left as ll rather than renamed. Claim 1. Existence and uniqueness. Apply The Control Riccati Equation with Cross Term: Global Existence and Uniqueness, Positive Semidefiniteness, and the Lyapunov Bound with l=k=1l=k=1, horizon TT, and the constant data A(t)=−2A(t)=-2, B(t)=2B(t)=\sqrt{2}, Q(t)=12ψQ(t)=\tfrac12\psi, V(t)=0V(t)=0, R(t)=(4χ)−1R(t)=(4\chi)^{-1} and F=0F=0. All entries are continuous; Q(t)=12ψ≥0Q(t)=\tfrac12\psi\ge0 is symmetric, R(t)>0R(t)>0 is symmetric positive definite, F=0F=0 is symmetric positive semidefinite, and Q(t)−V(t)R(t)−1V(t)⊤=12ψ≥0Q(t)-V(t)R(t)^{-1}V(t)^{\top}=\tfrac12\psi\ge0. The corollary's equation reads, in this one-dimensional case,

Z(t)=0+∫tT(−2Z(r)−2Z(r)−(2 Z(r))⋅4χ⋅(2 Z(r))+12ψ)dr=∫tT(−4Z(r)−8χZ(r)2+12ψ)dr,Z(t)=0+\int_{t}^{T}\Bigl(-2Z(r)-2Z(r)-\bigl(\sqrt{2}\,Z(r)\bigr)\cdot4\chi\cdot\bigl(\sqrt{2}\,Z(r)\bigr)+\tfrac12\psi\Bigr)dr=\int_{t}^{T}\Bigl(-4Z(r)-8\chi Z(r)^{2}+\tfrac12\psi\Bigr)dr ,

which is the displayed equation. The corollary provides exactly one continuous solution on [0,T][0,T]; call it zz.

The closed form. Put gt=exp⁡(−4Δ(T−t))=exp⁡(−4ΔT)exp⁡(4Δt)g_{t}=\exp\bigl(-4\Delta(T-t)\bigr)=\exp(-4\Delta T)\exp(4\Delta t) and z^t=y+(1−gt)/(1+ρgt)\hat{z}_{t}=y_{+}(1-g_{t})/(1+\rho g_{t}). The exponential is positive, so gt>0g_{t}>0; and gt≤1g_{t}\le1 with equality exactly at t=Tt=T, because −4Δ(T−t)≤0-4\Delta(T-t)\le0 there and the exponential is increasing. In particular 1+ρgt≥11+\rho g_{t}\ge1, so z^\hat{z} is well defined and continuous. By Derivative and Continuity of the Scaled Exponential Function, gg is differentiable with gt′=4Δ gtg'_{t}=4\Delta\,g_{t}. By the reciprocal rule Reciprocal Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives and the sum and product rules of Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers,

z^′(t)=y+ −gt′ (1+ρgt)−(1−gt) ρgt′(1+ρgt)2=− y+ gt′ (1+ρ)(1+ρgt)2=− 4Δ (1+ρ) y+ gt(1+ρgt)2,\hat{z}'(t)=y_{+}\,\frac{-g'_{t}\,(1+\rho g_{t})-(1-g_{t})\,\rho g'_{t}}{(1+\rho g_{t})^{2}}=-\,y_{+}\,\frac{g'_{t}\,(1+\rho)}{(1+\rho g_{t})^{2}}=-\,\frac{4\Delta\,(1+\rho)\,y_{+}\,g_{t}}{(1+\rho g_{t})^{2}} ,

the middle step because (1+ρg)+ρ(1−g)=1+ρ(1+\rho g)+\rho(1-g)=1+\rho. On the other hand, using y−=−y+/ρy_{-}=-y_{+}/\rho,

z^t−y+=y+(1−gt)−(1+ρgt)1+ρgt=− y+(1+ρ)gt1+ρgt,z^t−y−=y+ρ(1−gt)+1+ρgtρ (1+ρgt)=y+(1+ρ)ρ (1+ρgt),\hat{z}_{t}-y_{+}=y_{+}\frac{(1-g_{t})-(1+\rho g_{t})}{1+\rho g_{t}}=-\,\frac{y_{+}(1+\rho)g_{t}}{1+\rho g_{t}},\qquad \hat{z}_{t}-y_{-}=y_{+}\frac{\rho(1-g_{t})+1+\rho g_{t}}{\rho\,(1+\rho g_{t})}=\frac{y_{+}(1+\rho)}{\rho\,(1+\rho g_{t})} ,

so that

−8χ (z^t−y+)(z^t−y−)=8χ y+2(1+ρ)2gtρ (1+ρgt)2.-8\chi\,(\hat{z}_{t}-y_{+})(\hat{z}_{t}-y_{-})=\frac{8\chi\,y_{+}^{2}(1+\rho)^{2}g_{t}}{\rho\,(1+\rho g_{t})^{2}} .

Since 8χy+=2(Δ−1)8\chi y_{+}=2(\Delta-1) and (1+ρ)/ρ=2Δ/(Δ−1)(1+\rho)/\rho=2\Delta/(\Delta-1), we have 8χy+(1+ρ)/ρ=4Δ8\chi y_{+}(1+\rho)/\rho=4\Delta, and the last display equals 4Δ(1+ρ)y+gt/(1+ρgt)2=−z^′(t)4\Delta(1+\rho)y_{+}g_{t}/(1+\rho g_{t})^{2}=-\hat{z}'(t). By the factorisation recorded above this says

z^′(t)=−(−4z^t−8χz^t2+12ψ)(t∈[0,T]).\hat{z}'(t)=-\Bigl(-4\hat{z}_{t}-8\chi\hat{z}_{t}^{2}+\tfrac12\psi\Bigr)\qquad(t\in[0,T]).

The right-hand side is continuous in tt, so by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II: Evaluating an Integral by an Antiderivative applied on [t,T][t,T], z^T−z^t=∫[t,T]z^′(r) dr\hat{z}_{T}-\hat{z}_{t}=\int_{[t,T]}\hat{z}'(r)\,dr; and z^T=0\hat{z}_{T}=0 because gT=1g_{T}=1. Rearranging gives exactly the integral equation of the claim, so z^=z\hat{z}=z by the uniqueness above.

Bounds and monotonicity. From 0<gt≤10<g_{t}\le1 we get 0≤1−gt<1≤1+ρgt0\le1-g_{t}<1\le1+\rho g_{t}, hence 0≤zt<y+0\le z_{t}<y_{+}, with zT=0z_{T}=0. The displayed formula for z^′\hat{z}' is negative at every tt, so zz is nonincreasing. Finally, from the first displayed factorisation of z^t−y+\hat{z}_{t}-y_{+}, ρ<1\rho<1 and 1+ρgt≥11+\rho g_{t}\ge1,

0≤y+−zt=y+(1+ρ)gt1+ρgt≤2y+gt=Δ−12χexp⁡(−4Δ(T−t)).0\le y_{+}-z_{t}=\frac{y_{+}(1+\rho)g_{t}}{1+\rho g_{t}}\le2y_{+}g_{t}=\frac{\Delta-1}{2\chi}\exp\bigl(-4\Delta(T-t)\bigr).

Claim 2. Apply The Filter Riccati Equation: Global Existence and Uniqueness, Symmetry, and the Lyapunov Bound on [0,T][0,T] with k=1k=1 and the constant data A(t)=−2A(t)=-2, C(t)=1C(t)=1, D(t)=2d~D(t)=2\tilde{d} and P0=0P_{0}=0: the entries are continuous, and C(t)C(t), D(t)D(t), P0P_{0} are positive semidefinite because 1>01>0, 2d~>02\tilde{d}>0 and 0≥00\ge0. Its equation reads

P(t)=0+∫0t(−2P(r)−2P(r)−2d~ P(r)2+1)dr=∫0t(−4P(r)−2d~P(r)2+1)dr,P(t)=0+\int_{0}^{t}\bigl(-2P(r)-2P(r)-2\tilde{d}\,P(r)^{2}+1\bigr)dr=\int_{0}^{t}\bigl(-4P(r)-2\tilde{d}P(r)^{2}+1\bigr)dr ,

which is the displayed equation, and the theorem provides exactly one continuous solution; call it pp.

Put ht=exp⁡(−2Γt)h_{t}=\exp(-2\Gamma t) and p^t=p+(1−ht)/(1+ρΠht)\hat{p}_{t}=p_{+}(1-h_{t})/(1+\rho_{\Pi}h_{t}), so that 0<ht≤10<h_{t}\le1 with equality exactly at t=0t=0, and ht′=−2Γhth'_{t}=-2\Gamma h_{t} by Derivative and Continuity of the Scaled Exponential Function. Exactly as in claim 1,

p^′(t)=− ht′(1+ρΠ)p+(1+ρΠht)2=2Γ(1+ρΠ)p+ht(1+ρΠht)2,−2d~(p^t−p+)(p^t−p−)=2d~ p+2(1+ρΠ)2htρΠ(1+ρΠht)2,\hat{p}'(t)=-\,\frac{h'_{t}(1+\rho_{\Pi})p_{+}}{(1+\rho_{\Pi}h_{t})^{2}}=\frac{2\Gamma(1+\rho_{\Pi})p_{+}h_{t}}{(1+\rho_{\Pi}h_{t})^{2}},\qquad -2\tilde{d}(\hat{p}_{t}-p_{+})(\hat{p}_{t}-p_{-})=\frac{2\tilde{d}\,p_{+}^{2}(1+\rho_{\Pi})^{2}h_{t}}{\rho_{\Pi}(1+\rho_{\Pi}h_{t})^{2}} ,

using p−=−p+/ρΠp_{-}=-p_{+}/\rho_{\Pi}. Since 2d~ p+=Γ−22\tilde{d}\,p_{+}=\Gamma-2 and (1+ρΠ)/ρΠ=2Γ/(Γ−2)(1+\rho_{\Pi})/\rho_{\Pi}=2\Gamma/(\Gamma-2), we get 2d~p+(1+ρΠ)/ρΠ=2Γ2\tilde{d}p_{+}(1+\rho_{\Pi})/\rho_{\Pi}=2\Gamma, so the two displayed quantities are equal; by the second factorisation, p^′(t)=−4p^t−2d~p^t2+1\hat{p}'(t)=-4\hat{p}_{t}-2\tilde{d}\hat{p}_{t}^{2}+1, a continuous function of tt. By Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II: Evaluating an Integral by an Antiderivative on [0,t][0,t] and p^0=0\hat{p}_{0}=0 we obtain the integral equation, so p^=p\hat{p}=p. The bounds 0≤pt<p+=(Γ+2)−10\le p_{t}<p_{+}=(\Gamma+2)^{-1}, the monotonicity (p^′>0\hat{p}'>0) and the estimate 0≤p+−pt=p+(1+ρΠ)ht/(1+ρΠht)≤2p+ht0\le p_{+}-p_{t}=p_{+}(1+\rho_{\Pi})h_{t}/(1+\rho_{\Pi}h_{t})\le2p_{+}h_{t} follow as in claim 1.

Claim 3. We use the rank-one algebra v⊤v=2v^{\top}v=2, n⊤v=0\mathsf{n}^{\top}v=0, hence

(vv⊤)(vv⊤)=2 vv⊤,(vv⊤)N=N(vv⊤)=0.(vv^{\top})(vv^{\top})=2\,vv^{\top},\qquad (vv^{\top})N=N(vv^{\top})=0 .

Each ZtZ_{t} is symmetric because vv⊤vv^{\top} and NN are, and its entries are continuous in tt because zz is continuous and t↦μ(T−t)t\mapsto\mu(T-t) is. At t=Tt=T both terms vanish, so ZT=0=F^Z_{T}=0=\hat{F} by claim The Fluctuation LQG Data of the Ising Equilibrium and Its Joint Coercivity (ii).

By claim The Fluctuation LQG Data of the Ising Equilibrium and Its Joint Coercivity (ii), Er=−vv⊤E_{r}=-vv^{\top} is symmetric, Br=−12vv⊤\mathsf{B}_{r}=-\tfrac12vv^{\top}, Vr=0V_{r}=0, Rr−1=4χIR_{r}^{-1}=4\chi I and Qr=12ψ vv⊤+μNQ_{r}=\tfrac12\psi\,vv^{\top}+\mu N. Hence

Er⊤Zr+ZrEr=−(vv⊤)(zrvv⊤+μ(T−r)N)−(zrvv⊤+μ(T−r)N)(vv⊤)=−4zr vv⊤,E_{r}^{\top}Z_{r}+Z_{r}E_{r}=-\bigl(vv^{\top}\bigr)\bigl(z_{r}vv^{\top}+\mu(T-r)N\bigr)-\bigl(z_{r}vv^{\top}+\mu(T-r)N\bigr)\bigl(vv^{\top}\bigr)=-4z_{r}\,vv^{\top}, Wr=ZrBr+12Vr=−12(zrvv⊤+μ(T−r)N)(vv⊤)=−zr vv⊤,W_{r}=Z_{r}\mathsf{B}_{r}+\tfrac12V_{r}=-\tfrac12\bigl(z_{r}vv^{\top}+\mu(T-r)N\bigr)\bigl(vv^{\top}\bigr)=-z_{r}\,vv^{\top}, WrRr−1Wr⊤=4χ zr2 (vv⊤)(vv⊤)=8χ zr2 vv⊤=Ξr.W_{r}R_{r}^{-1}W_{r}^{\top}=4\chi\,z_{r}^{2}\,(vv^{\top})(vv^{\top})=8\chi\,z_{r}^{2}\,vv^{\top}=\Xi_{r} .

Therefore

Er⊤Zr+ZrEr−WrRr−1Wr⊤+Qr=(−4zr−8χzr2+12ψ)vv⊤+μN.E_{r}^{\top}Z_{r}+Z_{r}E_{r}-W_{r}R_{r}^{-1}W_{r}^{\top}+Q_{r}=\Bigl(-4z_{r}-8\chi z_{r}^{2}+\tfrac12\psi\Bigr)vv^{\top}+\mu N .

Integrating entrywise over [t,T][t,T] and using claim 1 for the first coefficient and ∫[t,T]μ dr=μ(T−t)\int_{[t,T]}\mu\,dr=\mu(T-t) for the second gives

∫[t,T](Er⊤Zr+ZrEr−WrRr−1Wr⊤+Qr)dr=zt vv⊤+μ(T−t)N=Zt=F^+Zt−F^,\int_{[t,T]}\bigl(E_{r}^{\top}Z_{r}+Z_{r}E_{r}-W_{r}R_{r}^{-1}W_{r}^{\top}+Q_{r}\bigr)dr=z_{t}\,vv^{\top}+\mu(T-t)N=Z_{t}=\hat{F}+Z_{t}-\hat{F} ,

which, since F^=0\hat{F}=0, is the asserted integral equation entry by entry. The integrand is continuous in rr, so subtracting the equations at tt and at 00 gives the equivalent forward form Ztγδ=Z0γδ+∫[0,t]z˙γδ(r) drZ^{\gamma\delta}_{t}=Z^{\gamma\delta}_{0}+\int_{[0,t]}\dot{z}^{\gamma\delta}(r)\,dr with the stated continuous densities. Symmetry, continuity of the entries, the density identity and the terminal condition ZT=F^Z_{T}=\hat{F} are precisely what hypothesis (H2) asks for.

Claim 4. The matrices Et\mathcal{E}_{t}, Θt⋆\Theta^{\star}_{t} and D~t\tilde{D}_{t} are constant in tt by claims The Fluctuation LQG Data of the Ising Equilibrium and Its Joint Coercivity (iii) and The Fluctuation LQG Data of the Ising Equilibrium and Its Joint Coercivity (iv), hence have continuous entries. For z∈R2z\in\mathbb{R}^{2} we have z⋅Θt⋆z=(v⋅z)2≥0z\cdot\Theta^{\star}_{t}z=(v\cdot z)^{2}\ge0, so Θt⋆\Theta^{\star}_{t} is symmetric positive semidefinite; and, writing c=q2+q0>0c=\tfrac{q}{2}+q_{0}>0, D~t=c−1E~t⊤E~t\tilde{D}_{t}=c^{-1}\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t}^{\top}\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t} is symmetric with z⋅D~tz=c−1∣E~tz∣2≥0z\cdot\tilde{D}_{t}z=c^{-1}|\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t}z|^{2}\ge0, hence positive semidefinite; the zero matrix is positive semidefinite. So The Filter Riccati Equation: Global Existence and Uniqueness, Symmetry, and the Lyapunov Bound applies and furnishes a unique Π\Pi.

Put Π^t=ptvv⊤\hat{\Pi}_{t}=p_{t}vv^{\top}, which has continuous entries. Using Et=−vv⊤\mathcal{E}_{t}=-vv^{\top}, the rank-one algebra of claim 3 and the identity vv⊤D~t=d~ vv⊤vv^{\top}\tilde{D}_{t}=\tilde{d}\,vv^{\top} of claim The Fluctuation LQG Data of the Ising Equilibrium and Its Joint Coercivity (iv),

ErΠ^r+Π^rEr⊤=−4pr vv⊤,Π^rD~rΠ^r=pr2 d~ (vv⊤)(vv⊤)=2d~ pr2 vv⊤,Θr⋆=vv⊤,\mathcal{E}_{r}\hat{\Pi}_{r}+\hat{\Pi}_{r}\mathcal{E}_{r}^{\top}=-4p_{r}\,vv^{\top},\qquad \hat{\Pi}_{r}\tilde{D}_{r}\hat{\Pi}_{r}=p_{r}^{2}\,\tilde{d}\,(vv^{\top})(vv^{\top})=2\tilde{d}\,p_{r}^{2}\,vv^{\top},\qquad \Theta^{\star}_{r}=vv^{\top},

so the integrand of the Kalman equation is (−4pr−2d~pr2+1)vv⊤\bigl(-4p_{r}-2\tilde{d}p_{r}^{2}+1\bigr)vv^{\top}. Integrating entrywise over [0,t][0,t] and using claim 2 gives ∫0t(⋯ )dr=ptvv⊤=Π^t\int_{0}^{t}(\cdots)dr=p_{t}vv^{\top}=\hat{\Pi}_{t}, and P0=0P_{0}=0; so Π^\hat{\Pi} solves the equation. By the uniqueness in The Filter Riccati Equation: Global Existence and Uniqueness, Symmetry, and the Lyapunov Bound, Πt=ptvv⊤\Pi_{t}=p_{t}vv^{\top}.

Claim 5. For real 2×22\times2 matrices of the form λvv⊤\lambda vv^{\top} and κvv⊤\kappa vv^{\top} the entrywise pairing is

∑γ,δλvγvδ κvγvδ=λκ(∑γ(vγ)2)2=4λκ,\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\lambda v^{\gamma}v^{\delta}\,\kappa v^{\gamma}v^{\delta}=\lambda\kappa\Bigl(\sum_{\gamma}(v^{\gamma})^{2}\Bigr)^{2}=4\lambda\kappa ,

while

∑γ,δnγnδ vγvδ=(∑γnγvγ)2=0.\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\mathsf{n}^{\gamma}\mathsf{n}^{\delta}\,v^{\gamma}v^{\delta}=\Bigl(\sum_{\gamma}\mathsf{n}^{\gamma}v^{\gamma}\Bigr)^{2}=0 .

With Zt=ztvv⊤+μ(T−t)NZ_{t}=z_{t}vv^{\top}+\mu(T-t)N and Θt⋆=vv⊤\Theta^{\star}_{t}=vv^{\top} the first pairing is 4zt⋅1+μ(T−t)⋅0=4zt4z_{t}\cdot1+\mu(T-t)\cdot0=4z_{t}; with Ξt=8χzt2vv⊤\Xi_{t}=8\chi z_{t}^{2}vv^{\top} and Πt=ptvv⊤\Pi_{t}=p_{t}vv^{\top} the second is 4⋅8χzt2⋅pt=32χzt2pt4\cdot8\chi z_{t}^{2}\cdot p_{t}=32\chi z_{t}^{2}p_{t}. Neither expression contains μ\mu. Both zz and pp are continuous by claims 1 and 2, so t↦4zt+32χzt2ptt\mapsto4z_{t}+32\chi z_{t}^{2}p_{t} is continuous by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…