· 10,976 chars · 9 deps · depth 39 Reason: New: obtains both scalar Riccati solutions from the published existence results in dimension one, verifies the closed forms by differentiation, and lifts them to the matrix families by uniqueness.
Both scalar equations are instances of the published Riccati existence results in dimension one; the closed forms are verified by differentiation and the fundamental theorem of calculus, and the two-dimensional families are then obtained from the rank-one algebra of the tangential and normal directions together with uniqueness.
Proof
Throughout write
y+=4χΔ−1,y−=−4χΔ+1,p+=2d~Γ−2,p−=−2d~Γ+2,
and N=nn⊤. Since χ>0 and ψ>0 we have 1+χψ>1, so Δ>1, y+>0>y− and ρ=(Δ−1)/(Δ+1)∈(0,1); since d~>0 we have Γ>2, p+>0>p− and ρΠ∈(0,1). Note y+=−ρy− and p+=−ρΠp−, and, from Γ2−4=2d~, that p+=(Γ−2)/((Γ−2)(Γ+2))=1/(Γ+2). Two factorisations will be used: by the quadratic formula the roots of 8χy2+4y−21ψ are (−1±Δ)/(4χ), that is y±, so
−4y−8χy2+21ψ=−8χ(y−y+)(y−y−)(y∈R),
and likewise the roots of 2d~p2+4p−1 are (−2±Γ)/(2d~), that is p±, so
In the two instantiations below, the symbols l and k are the dimension parameters of the cited Riccati results and are set to 1; they are unrelated to the number l=2 of states of the present model; that model parameter is left as l rather than renamed. Claim 1.Existence and uniqueness. Apply Global Existence for the Backward Riccati Equation under Convexity Conditions with l=k=1, horizon T, and the constant data A(t)=−2, B(t)=2, Q(t)=21ψ, V(t)=0, R(t)=(4χ)−1 and F=0. All entries are continuous; Q(t)=21ψ≥0 is symmetric, R(t)>0 is symmetric positive definite, F=0 is symmetric positive semidefinite, and Q(t)−V(t)R(t)−1V(t)⊤=21ψ≥0. The corollary's equation reads, in this one-dimensional case,
Since 8χy+=2(Δ−1) and (1+ρ)/ρ=2Δ/(Δ−1), we have 8χy+(1+ρ)/ρ=4Δ, and the last display equals 4Δ(1+ρ)y+gt/(1+ρgt)2=−z^′(t). By the factorisation recorded above this says
z^′(t)=−(−4z^t−8χz^t2+21ψ)(t∈[0,T]).
The right-hand side is continuous in t, so by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II, on a Closed Real Interval applied on [t,T], z^T−z^t=∫[t,T]z^′(r)dr; and z^T=0 because gT=1. Rearranging gives exactly the integral equation of the claim, so z^=z by the uniqueness above.
Bounds and monotonicity. From 0<gt≤1 we get 0≤1−gt<1≤1+ρgt, hence 0≤zt<y+, with zT=0. The displayed formula for z^′ is negative at every t, so z is nonincreasing. Finally, from the first displayed factorisation of z^t−y+, ρ<1 and 1+ρgt≥1,
using p−=−p+/ρΠ. Since 2d~p+=Γ−2 and (1+ρΠ)/ρΠ=2Γ/(Γ−2), we get 2d~p+(1+ρΠ)/ρΠ=2Γ, so the two displayed quantities are equal; by the second factorisation, p^′(t)=−4p^t−2d~p^t2+1, a continuous function of t. By Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II, on a Closed Real Interval on [0,t] and p^0=0 we obtain the integral equation, so p^=p. The bounds 0≤pt<p+=(Γ+2)−1, the monotonicity (p^′>0) and the estimate 0≤p+−pt=p+(1+ρΠ)ht/(1+ρΠht)≤2p+ht follow as in claim 1.
Claim 3. We use the rank-one algebra v⊤v=2, n⊤v=0, hence
which, since F^=0, is the asserted integral equation entry by entry. The integrand is continuous in r, so subtracting the equations at t and at 0 gives the equivalent forward form Ztγδ=Z0γδ+∫[0,t]z˙γδ(r)dr with the stated continuous densities. Symmetry, continuity of the entries, the density identity and the terminal condition ZT=F^ are precisely what hypothesis (H2) asks for.
Claim 5. For real 2×2 matrices of the form λvv⊤ and κvv⊤ the entrywise pairing is
γ,δ∑λvγvδκvγvδ=λκ(γ∑(vγ)2)2=4λκ,
while
γ,δ∑nγnδvγvδ=(γ∑nγvγ)2=0.
With Zt=ztvv⊤+μ(T−t)N and Θt⋆=vv⊤ the first pairing is 4zt⋅1+μ(T−t)⋅0=4zt; with Ξt=8χzt2vv⊤ and Πt=ptvv⊤ the second is 4⋅8χzt2⋅pt=32χzt2pt. Neither expression contains μ. Both z and p are continuous by claims 1 and 2, so t↦4zt+32χzt2pt is continuous by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space.