TheoremBase

Proof of Mean-Square Deviation of the Empirical Average of a Bounded Borel Function under a Tensor Power

lemmalem:empirical-average-variance-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 6,225 chars · 20 deps · depth 37 Reason: New proof (N4).

The particle laws of the tensor power give the one- and two-particle moments of phi along the blocks: the centred block values have second moment b - a2a^2 and are uncorrelated across distinct blocks, by the product-integral formula; expanding the square of the centred average then gives (b - a2)/Na^2)/N.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named here. The field axioms and the rules for adding inequalities, for multiplying them by nonnegative or positive real numbers, and for handling absolute values, from Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, are used without further mention.

Step 0 (Conventions). N−1N^{-1} exists and 0<N−10<N^{-1} by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field. For every real λ\lambda, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums gives ∑k=1Nλ=λ∑k=1N1=λN\sum_{k=1}^{N}\lambda=\lambda\sum_{k=1}^{N}1=\lambda N, the image of NN being the sum of NN ones by The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field. Write Q=ρ⊗NQ=\rho^{\otimes N}, and fix a bound M≥0M\ge0 for φ\varphi (Bounded Real-Valued Function on a Set). For k∈[N]k\in[N] the block map pk\mathfrak{p}_{k} is Borel by Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §linear, so φk=φ∘pk\varphi_{k}=\varphi\circ\mathfrak{p}_{k} is Borel (a composition of Borel maps, Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps) with ∣φk∣≤M|\varphi_{k}|\le M. Every bounded Borel function on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} or on RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN} is integrable with respect to every probability measure there (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures); products of two bounded Borel functions are bounded Borel functions (claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions); and constant functions are bounded and Borel (claim 1 there), a constant cc having integral cc against a probability measure by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

Step 1 (Claim 1). By Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §integral, applied to the Borel function φ:Rq→R\varphi:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R}, φ\varphi is integrable with respect to μxN\mu^{N}_{x} and g(x)=N−1∑k=1Nφk(x)g(x)=N^{-1}\sum_{k=1}^{N}\varphi_{k}(x) for every xx. Hence gg is Borel by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and by claims 2 and 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and Step 0,

∣g(x)∣≤N−1∑k=1N∣φk(x)∣≤N−1∑k=1NM=N−1MN=M,|g(x)|\le N^{-1}\sum_{k=1}^{N}|\varphi_{k}(x)|\le N^{-1}\sum_{k=1}^{N}M=N^{-1}MN=M ,

so gg is bounded.

Step 2 (One- and two-particle moments). Let k∈[N]k\in[N]. By Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §particle-laws, (pk)#Q=ρ(\mathfrak{p}_{k})_{\#}Q=\rho, so the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward, applied to the bounded Borel functions φ\varphi and φ2\varphi^{2}, gives

∫RqNφk dQ=a,∫RqNφkφk dQ=b.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{qN}}\varphi_{k}\,dQ=a,\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{qN}}\varphi_{k}\varphi_{k}\,dQ=b .

Now let k,l∈[N]k,l\in[N] with k≠lk\ne l. For m∈[N]m\in[N] let fm=φf_{m}=\varphi if m∈{k,l}m\in\{k,l\} and let fmf_{m} be the constant function 11 otherwise; these are bounded Borel functions, so Tensor Powers and One-Particle Marginals: Particle Laws, Product Integrals, Push-Forwards, Moments, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts §product-integral gives

∫RqN∏m=1Nfm∘pm dQ=∏m=1N∫Rqfm dρ.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{qN}}\prod_{m=1}^{N}f_{m}\circ\mathfrak{p}_{m}\,dQ=\prod_{m=1}^{N}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}f_{m}\,d\rho .

The finite products of Finite Product Notation are those of Finite Product Notation in a Field in the field R\mathbb{R}, both being given by the recursion recorded in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Products. Fix x∈RqNx\in\mathbb{R}^{qN} and, for m∈[N]m\in[N], let αm=φk(x)\alpha_{m}=\varphi_{k}(x) if m=km=k and αm=1\alpha_{m}=1 otherwise, and βm=φl(x)\beta_{m}=\varphi_{l}(x) if m=lm=l and βm=1\beta_{m}=1 otherwise. Since k≠lk\ne l, fm(pm(x))=αmβmf_{m}(\mathfrak{p}_{m}(x))=\alpha_{m}\beta_{m} for every mm, so claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Products give ∏m=1Nfm(pm(x))=(∏mαm)(∏mβm)=φk(x)φl(x)\prod_{m=1}^{N}f_{m}(\mathfrak{p}_{m}(x))=\bigl(\prod_{m}\alpha_{m}\bigr)\bigl(\prod_{m}\beta_{m}\bigr)=\varphi_{k}(x)\varphi_{l}(x). In the same way, since ∫fm dρ\int f_{m}\,d\rho is aa for m∈{k,l}m\in\{k,l\} and ρ(Rq)=1\rho(\mathbb{R}^{q})=1 otherwise (Step 0), ∏m=1N∫fm dρ=a⋅a\prod_{m=1}^{N}\int f_{m}\,d\rho=a\cdot a. Therefore

∫RqNφkφl dQ=a2(k≠l).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{qN}}\varphi_{k}\varphi_{l}\,dQ=a^{2}\qquad(k\ne l).

Step 3 (The pair integrals). For k∈[N]k\in[N] let hk=φk−ah_{k}=\varphi_{k}-a on RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN}. For k,l∈[N]k,l\in[N] the field axioms give, pointwise, hkhl=φkφl−a φk−a φl+a2⋅1h_{k}h_{l}=\varphi_{k}\varphi_{l}-a\,\varphi_{k}-a\,\varphi_{l}+a^{2}\cdot1, a linear combination of four integrable functions; so by Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §integrable and Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §linear, hkhlh_{k}h_{l} is integrable and, by Steps 0 and 2,

ekl:=∫RqNhkhl dQ=∫φkφl dQ−a∫φk dQ−a∫φl dQ+a2={b−a2−a2+a2=b−a2,k=l,a2−a2−a2+a2=0,k≠l.e_{kl}:=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{qN}}h_{k}h_{l}\,dQ=\int\varphi_{k}\varphi_{l}\,dQ-a\int\varphi_{k}\,dQ-a\int\varphi_{l}\,dQ+a^{2}=\begin{cases}b-a^{2}-a^{2}+a^{2}=b-a^{2},&k=l,\\ a^{2}-a^{2}-a^{2}+a^{2}=0,&k\ne l.\end{cases}

Step 4 (Claim 2). Fix xx and put T(x)=∑k=1Nhk(x)T(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{N}h_{k}(x). By claim 2 of Properties of Finite Sums and Step 0, T(x)=∑k=1Nφk(x)−aNT(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\varphi_{k}(x)-aN, so by Step 1 and N−1N=1N^{-1}N=1, N−1T(x)=g(x)−aN^{-1}T(x)=g(x)-a. Two applications of claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums (with λ=T(x)\lambda=T(x), then with λ=hk(x)\lambda=h_{k}(x)) and commutativity give

(g(x)−a)2=N−2T(x)T(x)=∑k=1NN−2Hk(x),Hk(x)=∑l=1Nhk(x)hl(x).\bigl(g(x)-a\bigr)^{2}=N^{-2}T(x)T(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{N}N^{-2}H_{k}(x),\qquad H_{k}(x)=\sum_{l=1}^{N}h_{k}(x)h_{l}(x).

For each kk, Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §integrable and Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions §linear show that HkH_{k} is integrable with ∫Hk dQ=∑l=1Nekl=ekk=b−a2\int H_{k}\,dQ=\sum_{l=1}^{N}e_{kl}=e_{kk}=b-a^{2}, the middle equality by claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums, as ekl=0e_{kl}=0 for l≠kl\ne k. Applying the same lemma once more, (g−a)2(g-a)^{2} is integrable and

∫RqN(g−a)2 dQ=∑k=1NN−2(b−a2)=N−2(b−a2)N=1N(b−a2),\int_{\mathbb{R}^{qN}}(g-a)^{2}\,dQ=\sum_{k=1}^{N}N^{-2}\bigl(b-a^{2}\bigr)=N^{-2}\bigl(b-a^{2}\bigr)N=\frac{1}{N}\bigl(b-a^{2}\bigr),

by Step 0. The integral in claim 2 is that of the nonnegative Borel function (g−a)2(g-a)^{2}; it equals the real integral just computed, because the negative part of a nonnegative function is 00 and its positive part is the function itself (Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral). Finally 0≤a20\le a^{2} by claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, so b−a2≤bb-a^{2}\le b, and multiplying by 0<N−10<N^{-1} gives 1N(b−a2)≤1Nb\frac{1}{N}(b-a^{2})\le\frac{1}{N}b. This proves claim 2.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…