TheoremBase

Proof of Fresh-Start Property for Independent Poisson Clocks Read at Levels Satisfying a Clock-Reading Bound

lemmalem:poisson-clocks-fresh-start-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the fresh-start property for independent Poisson clocks with a horizon read at levels satisfying a clock-reading bound.

Proof

Throughout, aa ranges over the clock labels A\mathsf{A}, Ta\mathcal{T}^a is the consumed level of clock aa, an F\mathfrak{F}-measurable random variable with 0Tacˉ0\le\mathcal{T}^a\le\bar{c}, and Y^a\hat{Y}^a is the residual clock of the statement. This argument is adapted from the proof of Fresh-Start Property of the Controlled N-Agent Dynamics, of which the present lemma is the abstract form: there F\mathfrak{F} is the system filtration at time rr, I\mathcal{I} is generated by the initial states, and the clock-reading bound is clause (vi) of Existence, Uniqueness, and Regularity for the Controlled N-Agent Dynamics.

Step 1: pathwise part of (a). For every ω\omega and every clock, uY^ua=YTa+uaYTaau\mapsto\hat{Y}^a_u=Y^a_{\mathcal{T}^a+u}-Y^a_{\mathcal{T}^a} starts at 00, is nondecreasing, integer-valued, right-continuous, and has unit jumps, all inherited from the counting path of YaY^a; so every residual path is a counting path. Each Y^ua\hat{Y}^a_u is a random variable: for a natural number mm and s0s\ge0, {Ysam}={τm(Ya)s}\{Y^a_s\ge m\}=\{\tau_m(Y^a)\le s\} with τm(Ya)\tau_m(Y^a) the mm-th jump time, by monotonicity and right-continuity of counting paths, so τm(Ya)\tau_m(Y^a) is a [0,][0,\infty]-valued measurable map, and, since Ta+ucˉ+u\mathcal{T}^a+u\le\bar{c}+u, {YTa+uam}={τm(Ya)Ta+u}={min(τm(Ya),cˉ+u+1)Ta+u}\{Y^a_{\mathcal{T}^a+u}\ge m\}=\{\tau_m(Y^a)\le\mathcal{T}^a+u\}=\{\min(\tau_m(Y^a),\bar{c}+u+1)\le\mathcal{T}^a+u\} is an event, the minimum being a real-valued measurable map compared with another one (Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions); differences of random variables are random variables.

Step 2: grid approximation. Fix δ>0\delta>0. For each clock let JaJ_a be the smallest nonnegative integer with TaJaδ\mathcal{T}^a\le J_a\delta; then Jacˉ/δJ_a\le\lceil\bar{c}/\delta\rceil, and the events Cj={Ja=ja for all a}C_{\mathbf{j}}=\{J_a=j_a\ \text{for all}\ a\}, over the finitely many integer vectors j\mathbf{j}, partition Ω\Omega and lie in F\mathfrak{F}, since each Ta\mathcal{T}^a is F\mathfrak{F}-measurable. For an integer vector k\mathbf{k} write Ck={Takaδ for all a}C'_{\mathbf{k}}=\{\mathcal{T}^a\le k_a\delta\ \text{for all}\ a\} and

Hk=the σ-algebra generated by I and the variables Yua, 0ukaδ, all a,\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{k}}=\text{the $\sigma$-algebra generated by }\mathcal{I}\text{ and the variables }Y^a_u,\ 0\le u\le k_a\delta,\ \text{all}\ a,

as in the statement, so that HkHj\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{k}}\subseteq\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}} whenever kj\mathbf{k}\le\mathbf{j} componentwise. By the clock-reading bound with caps kaδk_a\delta, each CkC'_{\mathbf{k}} agrees up to a null event with an event of Hk\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{k}}. Since

Cj=CjaCjeaC_{\mathbf{j}}=C'_{\mathbf{j}}\setminus\bigcup_aC'_{\mathbf{j}-e_a}

(where jea\mathbf{j}-e_a decrements the aa-th cap; the set subtracted for ja=0j_a=0 is empty), the cell CjC_{\mathbf{j}} agrees up to a null event with an event GjHjG_{\mathbf{j}}\in\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}}. Moreover, for FFF\in\mathfrak{F}, the clock-reading bound with caps jaδj_a\delta gives HHjH'\in\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}} with FCjF\cap C'_{\mathbf{j}} equal to HCjH'\cap C'_{\mathbf{j}} up to a null event; intersecting with CjCjC_{\mathbf{j}}\subseteq C'_{\mathbf{j}} and replacing CjC_{\mathbf{j}} by GjG_{\mathbf{j}},

FCj agrees up to a null event with HjF:=HGjHj,soP(HjF)=P(FCj).F\cap C_{\mathbf{j}}\ \text{agrees up to a null event with}\ H^F_{\mathbf{j}}:=H'\cap G_{\mathbf{j}}\in\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}},\qquad\text{so}\qquad P\big(H^F_{\mathbf{j}}\big)=P\big(F\cap C_{\mathbf{j}}\big).

Define the grid residuals Y^ua,δ=YJaδ+uaYJaδa\hat{Y}^{a,\delta}_u=Y^a_{J_a\delta+u}-Y^a_{J_a\delta}, which on CjC_{\mathbf{j}} equal Yjaδ+uaYjaδaY^a_{j_a\delta+u}-Y^a_{j_a\delta}. For fixed j\mathbf{j}, the family of σ\sigma-algebras consisting of Hj\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}} together with σ(Yjaδ+uaYjaδa:u0)\sigma(Y^a_{j_a\delta+u}-Y^a_{j_a\delta}:u\ge0), one per clock, is independent: the family consisting of I\mathcal{I} and the full clock σ\sigma-algebras is independent by hypothesis, within each clock the pre-jaδj_a\delta σ\sigma-algebra and the shifted-increment σ\sigma-algebra are independent, which we check as follows. The lemma Increments Are Independent of the Natural Filtration Past gives, for any s<ts<t, that the single increment YtaYsaY^a_t-Y^a_s is independent of the natural filtration of YaY^a up to time ss; it does not by itself cover the whole shifted σ\sigma-algebra, so we build the latter from finitely many increments. Fix 0=u0<u1<<up0=u_0<u_1<\dots<u_p, nonnegative integers m1,,mpm_1,\dots,m_p, an event EE of the σ\sigma-algebra generated by the variables YuaY^a_u with ujaδu\le j_a\delta, and set Aq={Yjaδ+uqaYjaδ+uq1a=mq}A_q=\{Y^a_{j_a\delta+u_q}-Y^a_{j_a\delta+u_{q-1}}=m_q\}. The event EA1Ap1E\cap A_1\cap\dots\cap A_{p-1} lies in the natural filtration of YaY^a up to time jaδ+up1j_a\delta+u_{p-1}, so the cited lemma applied at that time gives P(EA1Ap)=P(EA1Ap1)P(Ap)P(E\cap A_1\cap\dots\cap A_p)=P(E\cap A_1\cap\dots\cap A_{p-1})\,P(A_p); descending induction on pp yields P(EqAq)=P(E)qP(Aq)P\big(E\cap\bigcap_qA_q\big)=P(E)\prod_qP(A_q). The sets qAq\bigcap_qA_q, together with Ω\Omega and \emptyset, form a π\pi-system generating σ(Yjaδ+uaYjaδa:u0)\sigma(Y^a_{j_a\delta+u}-Y^a_{j_a\delta}:u\ge0), so Dynkin's Pi-Lambda Theorem upgrades the displayed factorization to independence of the two σ\sigma-algebras. The two levels then combine by factorizing P(D0a(PaRa))=P(D0)aP(PaRa)=P(D0)aP(Pa)P(Ra)P\big(D_0\cap\bigcap_a(P_a\cap R_a)\big)=P(D_0)\prod_aP(P_a\cap R_a)=P(D_0)\prod_aP(P_a)P(R_a) for D0ID_0\in\mathcal{I}, PaP_a in the π\pi-system of finite-dimensional cylinder events of YaY^a at times jaδ\le j_a\delta (together with Ω\Omega), and RaR_a in the π\pi-system of the sets qAq\bigcap_qA_q above (together with Ω\Omega); the sets D0aPaD_0\cap\bigcap_aP_a form a π\pi-system generating Hj\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}}, so, fixing all other entries and applying Dynkin's Pi-Lambda Theorem to one entry at a time (first the entry from Hj\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}}, then each shifted-increment σ\sigma-algebra in turn), the factorization extends to arbitrary events of the respective σ\sigma-algebras, which is the independence of the whole family; each shifted process uYjaδ+uaYjaδau\mapsto Y^a_{j_a\delta+u}-Y^a_{j_a\delta} has independent increments, and its increment over (uq1,uq](u_{q-1},u_q] has the Poisson distribution with parameter uquq1u_q-u_{q-1} whenever jaδ+uqRj_a\delta+u_q\le R (properties 2 and 3 of Poisson Clock with a Horizon, a deterministic shift preserving both; for R=+R=+\infty this is the defining property of a rate-11 Poisson process, Stochastic Process, Independent Increments, and Inhomogeneous Poisson Process). The lemma Increments Are Independent of the Natural Filtration Past used above applies to YaY^a because a Poisson clock with horizon RR has independent increments and starts at 00.

Step 3: the limit identity. Let 0=u0<u1<<up<R0=u_0<u_1<\dots<u_p<R^-, let mqam^a_q be nonnegative integers (q{1,,p}q\in\{1,\dots,p\}, finitely many clocks), write π(μ;m)=eμμm/m!\pi(\mu;m)=e^{-\mu}\mu^m/m! for the Poisson probabilities, and fix FFF\in\mathfrak{F}. Take δ=δn=2n\delta=\delta_n=2^{-n} with nn so large that cˉ+δn+up<R\bar{c}+\delta_n+u_p<R (possible since up<Rcˉu_p<R-\bar{c}; no restriction when R=+R=+\infty), so that Jaδn+upcˉ+δn+up<RJ_a\delta_n+u_p\le\bar{c}+\delta_n+u_p<R on every cell and the shifted increments of Step 2 over (uq1,uq](u_{q-1},u_q] have the Poisson distributions with parameters uquq1u_q-u_{q-1}. The caps JaδnJ_a\delta_n decrease to Ta\mathcal{T}^a pointwise as nn\to\infty (they lie in [Ta,Ta+δn)[\mathcal{T}^a,\mathcal{T}^a+\delta_n)), so by right-continuity of the clock paths, for every ω\omega and every uu,

Y^ua,δnY^ua(n),\hat{Y}^{a,\delta_n}_u\longrightarrow\hat{Y}^a_u\qquad(n\to\infty),

and since all values are integers the corresponding indicator variables converge pointwise. Fix nn and a cell j\mathbf{j}. On CjC_{\mathbf{j}} the grid residuals are the shifted increments of the cell, so 1Cja,q1{Y^uqa,δnY^uq1a,δn=mqa}=1CjΠj\mathbf{1}_{C_{\mathbf{j}}}\prod_{a,q}\mathbf{1}_{\{\hat{Y}^{a,\delta_n}_{u_q}-\hat{Y}^{a,\delta_n}_{u_{q-1}}=m^a_q\}}=\mathbf{1}_{C_{\mathbf{j}}}\Pi_{\mathbf{j}} with Πj=a,q1{Yjaδ+uqaYjaδ+uq1a=mqa}\Pi_{\mathbf{j}}=\prod_{a,q}\mathbf{1}_{\{Y^a_{j_a\delta+u_q}-Y^a_{j_a\delta+u_{q-1}}=m^a_q\}}, a product of indicators of events of the shifted-increment σ\sigma-algebras of the cell. Since FCjF\cap C_{\mathbf{j}} agrees with HjFHjH^F_{\mathbf{j}}\in\mathcal{H}_{\mathbf{j}} up to a null event, E[1FCjΠj]=E[1HjFΠj]\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{F\cap C_{\mathbf{j}}}\Pi_{\mathbf{j}}]=\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{H^F_{\mathbf{j}}}\Pi_{\mathbf{j}}], and the independence of Step 2 gives

E[1FCja,q1{Y^uqa,δnY^uq1a,δn=mqa}]=P(HjF)a,qπ(uquq1;mqa).\mathbb{E}\Big[\mathbf{1}_{F\cap C_{\mathbf{j}}}\prod_{a,q}\mathbf{1}_{\{\hat{Y}^{a,\delta_n}_{u_q}-\hat{Y}^{a,\delta_n}_{u_{q-1}}=m^a_q\}}\Big]=P\big(H^F_{\mathbf{j}}\big)\prod_{a,q}\pi\big(u_q-u_{q-1};m^a_q\big).

Summing over j\mathbf{j} and using jP(HjF)=jP(FCj)=P(F)\sum_{\mathbf{j}}P(H^F_{\mathbf{j}})=\sum_{\mathbf{j}}P(F\cap C_{\mathbf{j}})=P(F), then letting nn\to\infty with dominated convergence,

E[1Fa,q1{Y^uqaY^uq1a=mqa}]=P(F)a,qπ(uquq1;mqa).\mathbb{E}\Big[\mathbf{1}_F\prod_{a,q}\mathbf{1}_{\{\hat{Y}^a_{u_q}-\hat{Y}^a_{u_{q-1}}=m^a_q\}}\Big]=P(F)\prod_{a,q}\pi\big(u_q-u_{q-1};m^a_q\big).

Step 4: conclusion. Taking F=ΩF=\Omega and one clock at a time (summing the product formula over all values of the increments of the remaining clocks, whose Poisson probabilities sum to 11), the increments of Y^a\hat{Y}^a over any finite partition 0=u0<u1<<up<R0=u_0<u_1<\dots<u_p<R^- anchored at 00 are independent with the Poisson distributions of parameters uquq1u_q-u_{q-1} (the joint probability mass function factorizes into the required product for every such partition, and events involving the increments of integer-valued variables are unions of such atoms). This is the increment assertion of (a); with Step 1 it proves (a). When R=+R=+\infty, for times 0<v1<<vp0<v_1<\dots<v_p not anchored at 00, apply this to the partition 0<v1<<vp0<v_1<\dots<v_p and sum the resulting product formula over all values of the leading increment Y^v1aY^0a\hat{Y}^a_{v_1}-\hat{Y}^a_0, whose Poisson probabilities sum to 11; this marginalization gives the same factorization and the same Poisson laws for the increments over v1<<vpv_1<\dots<v_p, and together with Y^0a=0\hat{Y}^a_0=0 it shows that each residual clock is a homogeneous Poisson process with rate 11 all of whose paths are counting paths.

For (b): for each clock, the collection of events {Y^u1a=w1,,Y^upa=wp}\{\hat{Y}^a_{u_1}=w_1,\dots,\hat{Y}^a_{u_p}=w_p\} over finite time sets 0<u1<<up<R0<u_1<\dots<u_p<R^- and integer values, together with Ω\Omega and \emptyset, is a π\pi-system generating σ(Y^ua:0u<R)\sigma(\hat{Y}^a_u:0\le u<R^-) (the variables are integer-valued, so these cylinder atoms generate). Step 3 shows that for every FFF\in\mathfrak{F} and every choice of one such event EaE_a per clock (finitely many clocks, the remaining ones taken to be Ω\Omega; refine all the time sets involved to their common union, which still lies in [0,R)[0,R^-), write each EaE_a as the disjoint union of the atoms of the refined grid it contains, and sum the product formula of Step 3 over these atoms),

P(FaEa)=P(F)aP(Ea),P\Big(F\cap\bigcap_aE_a\Big)=P(F)\prod_aP(E_a),

since P(Ea)P(E_a) is exactly the corresponding product of Poisson probabilities by (a). Fixing all but one entry and letting the remaining entry range over a π\pi-system, Dynkin's π\pi-λ\lambda theorem upgrades each π\pi-system in turn to the generated σ\sigma-algebra, one at a time; after finitely many applications this yields the factorization for arbitrary events from F\mathfrak{F} and from the residual clock σ\sigma-algebras, which is the asserted independence of the family (b). \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…