TheoremBase

Closures of the Hermite spans are closed subspaces, mutually orthogonal by the orthogonality of the cylindrical Hermite polynomials, and the projection onto the chaos up to order m is identified by the orthogonality characterisation. Density follows by approximating with bounded cylindrical functions and then with polynomials in finitely many coordinates, and the decomposition follows from the nearest-point property and Pythagoras.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Write L2=L2(γc)L^{2}=L^{2}(\gamma_{c}), a real Hilbert space with inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩=⟨⋅,⋅⟩L2(γc)\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle=\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{L^{2}(\gamma_{c})} whose norm is ∥⋅∥2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{2}, by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §lebesgue and The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product; its distance is d(F,G)=∥F−G∥2d(F,G)=\lVert F-G\rVert_{2}, and closures, closedness and convergence refer to the metric space (L2,d)(L^{2},d) as in Real Hilbert Space §topology. Each HαH_{\alpha} lies in L2L^{2} by Cylindrical Hermite Polynomials: Growth and Integrability, Partial Derivatives, Orthogonality, and Monomials as Hermite Combinations §cylindrical. For m∈N0m\in\mathbb{N}_{0} let SmS_{m} be the linear span (in the sense of The Wiener Chaoses of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space) of {Hα:α∈Am}\{H_{\alpha}:\alpha\in\mathcal{A}_{m}\} and S≤mS_{\le m} that of {Hα:∣α∣≤m}\{H_{\alpha}:|\alpha|\le m\}, so that Hm\mathcal{H}_{m} and H≤m\mathcal{H}_{\le m} are their closures by The Wiener Chaoses of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §chaos and The Wiener Chaoses of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §chaos-up-to. For a closed linear subspace NN, PNP_{N} is the orthogonal projection of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §projections, the nearest-point map of Nearest-Point Projection onto a Nonempty Closed Convex Subset of a Real Hilbert Space §existence; in particular PNF∈NP_{N}F\in N and ∥F−PNF∥2≤∥F−G∥2\lVert F-P_{N}F\rVert_{2}\le\lVert F-G\rVert_{2} for all G∈NG\in N.

Step 1 (Spans and their closures are linear subspaces). Let B⊆AB\subseteq\mathcal{A} and let SS be the linear span of {Hα:α∈B}\{H_{\alpha}:\alpha\in B\}. It contains the zero vector 00 of L2L^{2}. Let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 4 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, t 0=0t\,0=0; and for an element ∑i=1rtiFi\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}F_{i} of SS, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors and the axiom t(tiFi)=(tti)Fit(t_{i}F_{i})=(tt_{i})F_{i} of Vector Space over a Field give t∑i=1rtiFi=∑i=1r(tti)Fi∈St\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}F_{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{r}(tt_{i})F_{i}\in S. For sums, 0+G=G+0=G0+G=G+0=G for every G∈SG\in S; so let u=∑i=1ruiu=\sum_{i=1}^{r}u_{i} and u′=∑j=1r′uj′u'=\sum_{j=1}^{r'}u'_{j} with ui=tiFiu_{i}=t_{i}F_{i}, uj′=tj′Fj′u'_{j}=t'_{j}F'_{j}, all Fi,Fj′F_{i},F'_{j} in {Hα:α∈B}\{H_{\alpha}:\alpha\in B\}, and let w∈(L2)r+r′w\in(L^{2})^{r+r'} be the concatenation, wi=uiw_{i}=u_{i} for i≤ri\le r and wr+j=uj′w_{r+j}=u'_{j} for j≤r′j\le r'. Let AA be the set of l∈Nl\in\mathbb{N} such that, if l≤r′l\le r', then ∑i=1r+lwi=u+∑j=1luj′\sum_{i=1}^{r+l}w_{i}=u+\sum_{j=1}^{l}u'_{j}. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors (restriction: the sums of ww up to rr are those of (ui)i≤r(u_{i})_{i\le r}; recursion: ∑i=1r+l+1wi=∑i=1r+lwi+wr+l+1\sum_{i=1}^{r+l+1}w_{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{r+l}w_{i}+w_{r+l+1}), ∑i=1r+1wi=u+u1′=u+∑j=11uj′\sum_{i=1}^{r+1}w_{i}=u+u'_{1}=u+\sum_{j=1}^{1}u'_{j}, so 1∈A1\in A; and if l∈Al\in A and l+1≤r′l+1\le r', then ∑i=1r+l+1wi=(u+∑j=1luj′)+ul+1′=u+∑j=1l+1uj′\sum_{i=1}^{r+l+1}w_{i}=\bigl(u+\sum_{j=1}^{l}u'_{j}\bigr)+u'_{l+1}=u+\sum_{j=1}^{l+1}u'_{j} by associativity (Vector Space over a Field) and claim 1 again, so l+1∈Al+1\in A (trivially if r′<l+1r'<l+1). Hence A=NA=\mathbb{N} by Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, and l=r′l=r' gives u+u′=∑i=1r+r′wi∈Su+u'=\sum_{i=1}^{r+r'}w_{i}\in S. So SS is a linear subspace. Let Sˉ\bar{S} be its closure. It is closed and contains SS, by claims 2 and 1 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset, so it contains the zero vector. Let F,G∈SˉF,G\in\bar{S} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space there are sequences (Fj)(F_{j}), (Gj)(G_{j}) in SS converging to FF and GG; then Fj+Gj∈SF_{j}+G_{j}\in S and tFj∈StF_{j}\in S converge to F+GF+G and tFtF by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §linear-limits, so F+G,tF∈SˉF+G,tF\in\bar{S} by Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space again. Thus Sˉ\bar{S} is a closed linear subspace (Real Hilbert Space §closed-subspace). In particular Hm\mathcal{H}_{m} and H≤m\mathcal{H}_{\le m} are closed linear subspaces of L2L^{2} for every m∈N0m\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, and the projections Jm=PHmJ_{m}=P_{\mathcal{H}_{m}} are defined.

Step 2 (Orthogonality to a closed span). Let B⊆AB\subseteq\mathcal{A}, let Sˉ\bar{S} be as in Step 1, and let F∈L2F\in L^{2} with ⟨F,Hα⟩=0\langle F,H_{\alpha}\rangle=0 for every α∈B\alpha\in B. Then ⟨F,G⟩=0\langle F,G\rangle=0 for every G∈SˉG\in\bar{S}. Indeed, for G=∑i=1rtiHαi∈SG=\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}H_{\alpha_{i}}\in S we get ⟨F,G⟩=∑i=1rti⟨F,Hαi⟩=0\langle F,G\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}\langle F,H_{\alpha_{i}}\rangle=0 by Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space §combinations and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums, every term being ti⋅0=0t_{i}\cdot0=0, and ⟨F,0⟩=0\langle F,0\rangle=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §zero; for G∈SˉG\in\bar{S} take Gj∈SG_{j}\in S converging to GG (Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space), so that ⟨F,G⟩=lim⁡j⟨F,Gj⟩=0\langle F,G\rangle=\lim_{j}\langle F,G_{j}\rangle=0 by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §continuity, applied to the constant sequence with every term FF and to (Gj)(G_{j}).

Step 3 (The chaos of order 00). Let 0A0_{\mathcal{A}} be the zero multi-index, the sequence all of whose terms are 00; 11 is a length bound for it (Finitely Supported Multi-Indices: Order, Factorial, Powers and Weighted Order §multi-indices), and its order is ∑k=110=0\sum_{k=1}^{1}0=0 by Finitely Supported Multi-Indices: Order, Factorial, Powers and Weighted Order §order and claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, so 0A∈A00_{\mathcal{A}}\in\mathcal{A}_{0}. Conversely, let α∈A0\alpha\in\mathcal{A}_{0} have length bound nn. Then ∑k=1nαk=∣α∣=0\sum_{k=1}^{n}\alpha_{k}=|\alpha|=0 with nonnegative summands, so αk=0\alpha_{k}=0 for every k≤nk\le n by claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums, and αk=0\alpha_{k}=0 for k>nk>n as nn is a length bound; thus α=0A\alpha=0_{\mathcal{A}}. So A0={0A}\mathcal{A}_{0}=\{0_{\mathcal{A}}\}, and with the length bound 11, H0A(x)=H0c1(x1)=1H_{0_{\mathcal{A}}}(x)=H^{c_{1}}_{0}(x_{1})=1 by The Cylindrical Hermite Polynomials of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §hermite and Hermite Polynomials: Low Orders, Derivatives, Recursion, Scaling, the Addition Formula, Gaussian Orthogonality and the Mehler Identity §low-orders. Write 1\mathbf{1} for the class of the constant function 11. For r∈Nr\in\mathbb{N} and t1,…,tr∈Rt_{1},\dots,t_{r}\in\mathbb{R} we have ∑i=1rti1=(∑i=1rti)1\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}\mathbf{1}=\bigl(\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}\bigr)\mathbf{1}: the set of l∈Nl\in\mathbb{N} such that, if l≤rl\le r, then ∑i=1lti1=(∑i=1lti)1\sum_{i=1}^{l}t_{i}\mathbf{1}=\bigl(\sum_{i=1}^{l}t_{i}\bigr)\mathbf{1} contains 11 by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors and claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, and contains l+1l+1 whenever it contains ll, by the recursions in those claims and the axiom (a+b)v=av+bv(a+b)v=av+bv of Vector Space over a Field; so it is N\mathbb{N} by Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers. Hence S0={t1:t∈R}S_{0}=\{t\mathbf{1}:t\in\mathbb{R}\}, the zero vector being 0 10\,\mathbf{1} (claim 3 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space); the class of the constant function tt is t1t\mathbf{1} by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §space, so S0S_{0} is the set of classes of constant functions. Since γc∈P(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}(X) by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, γc(X)=1\gamma_{c}(X)=1 by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §measures, so The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product and claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space give ∥1∥22=⟨1,1⟩=∫X1⋅1 dγc=γc(X)=1\lVert\mathbf{1}\rVert_{2}^{2}=\langle\mathbf{1},\mathbf{1}\rangle=\int_{X}1\cdot1\,d\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c}(X)=1, so the 11-tuple (1)(\mathbf{1}) is orthonormal (Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space §orthonormal) and S0S_{0} is its span, which is closed by Projection onto the Span of an Orthonormal Tuple, and Coordinates on a Finite-Dimensional Subspace §closed. By claim 4 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset, H0=S0\mathcal{H}_{0}=S_{0} is the set of classes of constant functions.

Step 4 (Orthogonality of different chaoses). Let m≠m′m\ne m' in N0\mathbb{N}_{0}. For α∈Am\alpha\in\mathcal{A}_{m} and β∈Am′\beta\in\mathcal{A}_{m'} we have ∣α∣≠∣β∣|\alpha|\ne|\beta|, so α≠β\alpha\ne\beta and ⟨Hα,Hβ⟩=0\langle H_{\alpha},H_{\beta}\rangle=0 by Cylindrical Hermite Polynomials: Growth and Integrability, Partial Derivatives, Orthogonality, and Monomials as Hermite Combinations §orthogonality. Fix α∈Am\alpha\in\mathcal{A}_{m}; Step 2 (with B=Am′B=\mathcal{A}_{m'}, F=HαF=H_{\alpha}, and the symmetry of the inner product) gives ⟨G,Hα⟩=0\langle G,H_{\alpha}\rangle=0 for every G∈Hm′G\in\mathcal{H}_{m'}. Now fix G∈Hm′G\in\mathcal{H}_{m'}; Step 2 (with B=AmB=\mathcal{A}_{m}, F=GF=G) gives ⟨G,F′⟩=0\langle G,F'\rangle=0 for every F′∈HmF'\in\mathcal{H}_{m}. So every element of Hm\mathcal{H}_{m} is orthogonal to every element of Hm′\mathcal{H}_{m'}.

Step 5 (The projection onto H≤m\mathcal{H}_{\le m}). Let F∈L2F\in L^{2}, m∈N0m\in\mathbb{N}_{0} and S=∑j=0mJjFS=\sum_{j=0}^{m}J_{j}F. For j≤mj\le m, every HαH_{\alpha} with α∈Aj\alpha\in\mathcal{A}_{j} lies in S≤mS_{\le m}, a linear subspace (Step 1), so Sj⊆S≤mS_{j}\subseteq S_{\le m} and Hj⊆H≤m\mathcal{H}_{j}\subseteq\mathcal{H}_{\le m} by claim 5 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset. To handle the sum from 00, let b∈(L2)m+1b\in(L^{2})^{m+1} have components bk=Jk−1Fb_{k}=J_{k-1}F (k∈[m+1]k\in[m+1]). By Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §integers, S=J0FS=J_{0}F if m=0m=0 and S=J0F+∑i=1mJiFS=J_{0}F+\sum_{i=1}^{m}J_{i}F if m≥1m\ge1. In the first case S=b1=∑k=11bkS=b_{1}=\sum_{k=1}^{1}b_{k} by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors; in the second, Extraction of a Summand from a Finite Sum of Vectors (with n=mn=m and the index 11) gives ∑k=1m+1bk=∑k=1mbk+1+b1=∑i=1mJiF+J0F\sum_{k=1}^{m+1}b_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{m}b_{k+1}+b_{1}=\sum_{i=1}^{m}J_{i}F+J_{0}F; so in both cases S=∑k=1m+1bkS=\sum_{k=1}^{m+1}b_{k}, by commutativity of addition. Each bk=Jk−1F=PHk−1Fb_{k}=J_{k-1}F=P_{\mathcal{H}_{k-1}}F lies in Hk−1\mathcal{H}_{k-1}, which is contained in H≤m\mathcal{H}_{\le m} by the preceding inclusion with j=k−1≤mj=k-1\le m; and H≤m\mathcal{H}_{\le m} is a linear subspace of L2L^{2} by Step 1. So claim 3 of The Span of a Finite Family is the Smallest Subspace Containing It, applied with W=H≤mW=\mathcal{H}_{\le m} to the (m+1)(m+1)-tuple bb, gives span⁡(b)⊆H≤m\operatorname{span}(b)\subseteq\mathcal{H}_{\le m}. Since ∑k=1m+1bk=∑k=1m+11 bk\sum_{k=1}^{m+1}b_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{m+1}1\,b_{k} by the axiom 1v=v1v=v of Vector Space over a Field, SS belongs to the span of bb (take all coefficients equal to 11), hence S∈H≤mS\in\mathcal{H}_{\le m}. Let α∈A\alpha\in\mathcal{A} with j=∣α∣≤mj=|\alpha|\le m. If m=0m=0, then j=0j=0 and ⟨F−S,Hα⟩=⟨F−JjF,Hα⟩\langle F-S,H_{\alpha}\rangle=\langle F-J_{j}F,H_{\alpha}\rangle. If m≥1m\ge1, Extraction of a Summand from a Finite Sum of Vectors (with n=mn=m and the index j+1j+1) gives S=∑k=1mbk(j+1)+JjFS=\sum_{k=1}^{m}b^{(j+1)}_{k}+J_{j}F, where each component bk(j+1)b^{(j+1)}_{k} is JiFJ_{i}F for some i∈{0,…,m}i\in\{0,\dots,m\} with i≠ji\ne j; so, by bilinearity (Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space §sums, Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear),

⟨F−S,Hα⟩=⟨F−JjF,Hα⟩−∑k=1m⟨bk(j+1),Hα⟩.\langle F-S,H_{\alpha}\rangle=\langle F-J_{j}F,H_{\alpha}\rangle-\sum_{k=1}^{m}\bigl\langle b^{(j+1)}_{k},H_{\alpha}\bigr\rangle .

The first term vanishes because F−JjF∈Hj⊥F-J_{j}F\in\mathcal{H}_{j}^{\perp} by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §characterisation and Hα∈Sj⊆HjH_{\alpha}\in S_{j}\subseteq\mathcal{H}_{j}; each term of the sum vanishes by Step 4, since bk(j+1)=JiF∈Hib^{(j+1)}_{k}=J_{i}F\in\mathcal{H}_{i} and Hα∈HjH_{\alpha}\in\mathcal{H}_{j} with i≠ji\ne j, so the sum is 00 by claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums. By Step 2 with B={α:∣α∣≤m}B=\{\alpha:|\alpha|\le m\}, F−S∈H≤m⊥F-S\in\mathcal{H}_{\le m}^{\perp}, so S=PH≤mFS=P_{\mathcal{H}_{\le m}}F by Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §characterisation. Steps 1 and 3 to 5 prove claim 1.

Step 6 (Claim 2). Let F∈L2F\in L^{2} and ε>0\varepsilon>0. Since γc∈P(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}(X), Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §density and Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space give φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with ∥F−φ∥2<ε/2\lVert F-\varphi\rVert_{2}<\varepsilon/2: FF lies in the closure of the set of classes of such functions, so some sequence of such classes converges to FF, and one of its terms, the class of some φ\varphi, has distance less than ε/2\varepsilon/2 from FF; here φ\varphi is 22-integrable and its class lies in L2L^{2} by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §square-integrable. By Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical, φ=ψ∘pn\varphi=\psi\circ p_{n} with n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and ψ∈Cb1(Rn)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). The function ψ\psi is continuous by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, hence Borel by claims 3 and 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and bounded by some b≥0b\ge0 (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded). So ψ2\psi^{2} is Borel by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, with 0≤ψ2≤b20\le\psi^{2}\le b^{2}. Since (pn)#γc=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}} (Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure) is the image measure of γc\gamma_{c} (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward), claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives γc(n)(Rn)=γc(X)=1\gamma_{c^{(n)}}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=\gamma_{c}(X)=1, and claims 6(b) and 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space give ∫Rnψ2 dγc(n)≤b2<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\psi^{2}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\le b^{2}<\infty. The truncation c(n)c^{(n)} is a variance vector (Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations), so Polynomial Functions Are Dense in the Square-Integrable Functions of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space §dense gives a polynomial function PP on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with ∫Rn(ψ−P)2 dγc(n)<ε2/4\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}(\psi-P)^{2}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}<\varepsilon^{2}/4; PP is Borel with ∫P2 dγc(n)<∞\int P^{2}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}<\infty by Polynomial Functions Are Dense in the Square-Integrable Functions of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space §integrable. Since pnp_{n} is Borel (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity), P∘pnP\circ p_{n} is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. The functions P2P^{2} and (ψ−P)2(\psi-P)^{2} are nonnegative and Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, so claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, applied to them with (pn)#γc=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}, gives ∫X(P∘pn)2 dγc=∫RnP2 dγc(n)<∞\int_{X}(P\circ p_{n})^{2}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}P^{2}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}<\infty and

∥φ−P∘pn∥22=∫X(ψ∘pn−P∘pn)2 dγc=∫Rn(ψ−P)2 dγc(n)<ε24,\lVert\varphi-P\circ p_{n}\rVert_{2}^{2}=\int_{X}(\psi\circ p_{n}-P\circ p_{n})^{2}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}(\psi-P)^{2}\,d\gamma_{c^{(n)}}<\frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4},

using Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm and The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §norm; so ∥φ−P∘pn∥2<ε/2\lVert\varphi-P\circ p_{n}\rVert_{2}<\varepsilon/2. Write P=∑i=1rtiμiP=\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}\mu_{i} with monomials μi(y)=∏k=1nykιi,k\mu_{i}(y)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}y_{k}^{\iota_{i,k}} of exponents ιi\iota_{i} of length nn (Polynomial Functions Are Dense in the Square-Integrable Functions of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space). Let αi∈A\alpha^{i}\in\mathcal{A} have terms ιi,1,…,ιi,n\iota_{i,1},\dots,\iota_{i,n} followed by zeros, so that nn is a length bound for αi\alpha^{i} and μi(pn(x))=∏k=1nxkαki\mu_{i}(p_{n}(x))=\prod_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}^{\alpha^{i}_{k}}. By Cylindrical Hermite Polynomials: Growth and Integrability, Partial Derivatives, Orthogonality, and Monomials as Hermite Combinations §monomials each μi∘pn\mu_{i}\circ p_{n} is a finite linear combination of functions HβH_{\beta}, hence so is P∘pn=∑iti μi∘pnP\circ p_{n}=\sum_{i}t_{i}\,\mu_{i}\circ p_{n}, and by the operations of The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §space its class GG is the same linear combination of the classes HβH_{\beta}; thus G∈HfinG\in\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{fin}} (The Wiener Chaoses of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §span). By the triangle inequality The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle, ∥F−G∥2≤∥F−φ∥2+∥φ−G∥2<ε\lVert F-G\rVert_{2}\le\lVert F-\varphi\rVert_{2}+\lVert\varphi-G\rVert_{2}<\varepsilon. This proves claim 2.

Step 7 (Claim 3). Let F∈L2F\in L^{2} and, for M∈N0M\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, SMF=∑m=0MJmFS_{M}^{F}=\sum_{m=0}^{M}J_{m}F (a sum from 00 as in Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §integers), which equals PH≤MFP_{\mathcal{H}_{\le M}}F by Step 5. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and take G∈HfinG\in\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{fin}} with ∥F−G∥2<ε\lVert F-G\rVert_{2}<\varepsilon (Step 6). Either GG is the zero vector, and we put M0=1M_{0}=1, or G=∑i=1rtiHαiG=\sum_{i=1}^{r}t_{i}H_{\alpha_{i}}, and we let M0M_{0} be a largest component of the (r+1)(r+1)-tuple (1,∣α1∣,…,∣αr∣)(1,|\alpha_{1}|,\dots,|\alpha_{r}|) of real numbers, which exists by Greatest Element of a Finite Family in a Totally Ordered Set; in either case M0∈NM_{0}\in\mathbb{N}. For M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} with M≥M0M\ge M_{0} we have ∣αi∣≤M|\alpha_{i}|\le M for every ii, so GG is an element of the span S≤MS_{\le M} as defined, and G∈S≤M⊆H≤MG\in S_{\le M}\subseteq\mathcal{H}_{\le M} (claim 1 of The Closure is the Smallest Closed Superset), so by the nearest-point property ∥F−SMF∥2≤∥F−G∥2<ε\lVert F-S^{F}_{M}\rVert_{2}\le\lVert F-G\rVert_{2}<\varepsilon. Hence (∥F−SMF∥2)M∈N(\lVert F-S^{F}_{M}\rVert_{2})_{M\in\mathbb{N}}, a sequence of nonnegative reals, converges to 00.

By Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §pythagoras with the closed linear subspace H≤M\mathcal{H}_{\le M}, ∥F∥22=∥SMF∥22+∥F−SMF∥22\lVert F\rVert_{2}^{2}=\lVert S^{F}_{M}\rVert_{2}^{2}+\lVert F-S^{F}_{M}\rVert_{2}^{2}. Put xm=∥JmF∥22x_{m}=\lVert J_{m}F\rVert_{2}^{2} for m∈N0m\in\mathbb{N}_{0}. For M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} we have

SMF=SM−1F+JMF,∑m=0Mxm=∑m=0M−1xm+xM:S^{F}_{M}=S^{F}_{M-1}+J_{M}F,\qquad\sum_{m=0}^{M}x_{m}=\sum_{m=0}^{M-1}x_{m}+x_{M}:

by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §integers, SMF=J0F+∑m=1MJmFS^{F}_{M}=J_{0}F+\sum_{m=1}^{M}J_{m}F; if M=1M=1, ∑m=11JmF=J1F\sum_{m=1}^{1}J_{m}F=J_{1}F and S0F=J0FS^{F}_{0}=J_{0}F, while if M≥2M\ge2, the recursion of claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors and associativity give J0F+∑m=1MJmF=(J0F+∑m=1M−1JmF)+JMF=SM−1F+JMFJ_{0}F+\sum_{m=1}^{M}J_{m}F=\bigl(J_{0}F+\sum_{m=1}^{M-1}J_{m}F\bigr)+J_{M}F=S^{F}_{M-1}+J_{M}F; the same argument with claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums gives the identity for the xmx_{m}. Let AA be the set of M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} such that ∥SM−1F∥22=∑m=0M−1xm\lVert S^{F}_{M-1}\rVert_{2}^{2}=\sum_{m=0}^{M-1}x_{m}. Then 1∈A1\in A, as both sides equal x0x_{0} by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §integers. Let M∈AM\in A. By Step 5 (with M−1M-1 in place of mm), SM−1F=∑k=1MbkS^{F}_{M-1}=\sum_{k=1}^{M}b_{k} with bk=Jk−1Fb_{k}=J_{k-1}F, so ⟨SM−1F,JMF⟩=∑k=1M⟨Jk−1F,JMF⟩=0\langle S^{F}_{M-1},J_{M}F\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{M}\langle J_{k-1}F,J_{M}F\rangle=0 by Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space §sums, Step 4 (as k−1≠Mk-1\ne M) and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums. Hence Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §expansion and the displayed identities give ∥SMF∥22=∥SM−1F∥22+2⟨SM−1F,JMF⟩+∥JMF∥22=∑m=0M−1xm+xM=∑m=0Mxm\lVert S^{F}_{M}\rVert_{2}^{2}=\lVert S^{F}_{M-1}\rVert_{2}^{2}+2\langle S^{F}_{M-1},J_{M}F\rangle+\lVert J_{M}F\rVert_{2}^{2}=\sum_{m=0}^{M-1}x_{m}+x_{M}=\sum_{m=0}^{M}x_{m}, that is, M+1∈AM+1\in A. So A=NA=\mathbb{N} by Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, and ∥SMF∥22=∑m=0Mxm\lVert S^{F}_{M}\rVert_{2}^{2}=\sum_{m=0}^{M}x_{m} for every M∈N0M\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, since M+1∈AM+1\in A. Then ∑m=0Mxm=∥F∥22−∥F−SMF∥22\sum_{m=0}^{M}x_{m}=\lVert F\rVert_{2}^{2}-\lVert F-S^{F}_{M}\rVert_{2}^{2}, which converges to ∥F∥22\lVert F\rVert_{2}^{2} as M→∞M\to\infty by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §products and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar. By Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §integers, ∑m=0Mxm=x0+∑m=1Mxm\sum_{m=0}^{M}x_{m}=x_{0}+\sum_{m=1}^{M}x_{m}, so the partial sums of ∑m=1∞xm\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}x_{m} converge to ∥F∥22−x0\lVert F\rVert_{2}^{2}-x_{0} (Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar); that series converges in the sense of Series of Real Numbers §convergent with this sum, and by Gaussian Analysis Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure with Noise Weights: Standing Notation §integers the series ∑m=0∞xm\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}x_{m} converges with sum x0+(∥F∥22−x0)=∥F∥22x_{0}+(\lVert F\rVert_{2}^{2}-x_{0})=\lVert F\rVert_{2}^{2}. This proves claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…