TheoremBase

The bridge theorem turns continuous viscosity sub- and supersolutions into entropy-penalised ones, the penalised comparison gives u <= v on finite-entropy measures, and heat smoothing with continuity extends this to all measures; uniqueness follows by symmetry.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Write WW for WTW_{\mathbb{T}} and PEnt\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}} for PEnt(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}).

Step 1 (Continuous functions are semicontinuous). Let w:P(Td)→Rw:\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\to\mathbb{R} be continuous, let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0. By the definition of continuity for WW and the absolute-value metric there is a real r>0r>0 such that ∣w(ν)−w(μ)∣<ε|w(\nu)-w(\mu)|<\varepsilon, hence w(μ)−ε<w(ν)<w(μ)+εw(\mu)-\varepsilon<w(\nu)<w(\mu)+\varepsilon, for every ν\nu with W(μ,ν)<rW(\mu,\nu)<r. So ww is upper semicontinuous and lower semicontinuous on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}).

Step 2 (Comparison on finite-entropy measures). Let u,vu,v be as in clause 1. By Step 1, uu is upper semicontinuous and vv is lower semicontinuous. Since HH is continuous along couplings and satisfies the score-perturbation bound, Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions on the Torus Wasserstein Space are Entropy-Penalised Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions §sub shows that uu is an entropy-penalised viscosity subsolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}), and Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions on the Torus Wasserstein Space are Entropy-Penalised Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions §super shows that vv is an entropy-penalised viscosity supersolution of (E)(\mathrm{E}). Since HH also satisfies the structure condition, Comparison Principle for Entropy-Penalised Viscosity Solutions of the Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation on the Torus Wasserstein Space §comparison gives u(μ)≤v(μ)u(\mu)\le v(\mu) for every μ∈PEnt\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}}.

Step 3 (Extension to all measures, clause 1). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0. By the continuity of uu and of vv at μ\mu, as unfolded in Step 1, and taking the smaller of the two radii, there is a real r>0r>0 such that ∣u(ν)−u(μ)∣<ε|u(\nu)-u(\mu)|<\varepsilon and ∣v(ν)−v(μ)∣<ε|v(\nu)-v(\mu)|<\varepsilon for every ν\nu with W(μ,ν)<rW(\mu,\nu)<r. Choose a real ss with 0<s≤120<s\le\tfrac12 and d s<r2d\,s<r^{2}, and put ν=Ssμ\nu=S_{s}\mu, with SsS_{s} the heat semigroup of Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §conventions. Then W(ν,μ)2≤d s<r2W(\nu,\mu)^{2}\le d\,s<r^{2} by Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §distance, so W(μ,ν)<rW(\mu,\nu)<r (symmetry of WW, The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §metric), and ν\nu has finite entropy by Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §entropy, that is ν∈PEnt\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{Ent}} in the notation of The Entropy of Measures on the Torus: Nonnegativity, Absolute Continuity and Closed Sublevel Sets §finite-entropy-set. By Step 2,

u(μ)<u(ν)+ε≤v(ν)+ε<v(μ)+2ε.u(\mu)<u(\nu)+\varepsilon\le v(\nu)+\varepsilon<v(\mu)+2\varepsilon .

As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, u(μ)≤v(μ)u(\mu)\le v(\mu). This proves clause 1.

Step 4 (Uniqueness, clause 2). Let u1,u2u_{1},u_{2} be continuous viscosity solutions of (E)(\mathrm{E}). Then u1u_{1} is a viscosity subsolution and u2u_{2} a viscosity supersolution, so u1≤u2u_{1}\le u_{2} on P(Td)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by clause 1; exchanging the roles gives u2≤u1u_{2}\le u_{1}. Hence u1=u2u_{1}=u_{2}, which proves clause 2.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…