TheoremBase

Pointwise absolute convergence comes from domination by the convergent majorant series; the tail bound comes from splitting the partial sums at an index, bounding the block by the corresponding block of the majorant, and letting the block length tend to infinity.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named in the step where it is cited. Write Ξ£=βˆ‘k=1∞Mk\Sigma=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k} and, for m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, Οƒm=βˆ‘k=1mMk\sigma_{m}=\sum_{k=1}^{m}M_{k}, so that Ο„m=Ξ£βˆ’Οƒm\tau_{m}=\Sigma-\sigma_{m}.

Claim 1. Fix x∈Sx\in S. By hypothesis ∣gk(x)βˆ£β‰€Mk|g_{k}(x)|\le M_{k} for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, and βˆ‘k=1∞Mk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k} converges. The domination clause An Absolutely Convergent Series of Real Numbers Converges (iii), applied to the sequences (gk(x))k∈N(g_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (Mk)k∈N(M_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, shows that βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x) converges absolutely; An Absolutely Convergent Series of Real Numbers Converges (i) then shows that it converges.

Claim 2.

Step 1 (the numbers Ο„m\tau_{m}). Since 0≀Mk0\le M_{k} for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and βˆ‘k=1∞Mk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k} converges, the domination clause Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series (ii) gives

0≀σm≀ΣforΒ everyΒ m∈N.0\le\sigma_{m}\le\Sigma\qquad\text{for every }m\in\mathbb{N}.

By claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, the inequality Οƒm≀Σ\sigma_{m}\le\Sigma is exactly 0β‰€Ξ£βˆ’Οƒm=Ο„m0\le\Sigma-\sigma_{m}=\tau_{m}.

The sequence (Οƒm)m∈N(\sigma_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges to Ξ£\Sigma by Series of Real Numbers (ii). The constant sequence with every term equal to Ξ£\Sigma converges to Ξ£\Sigma directly from Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, since βˆ£Ξ£βˆ’Ξ£βˆ£=0<Ξ΅|\Sigma-\Sigma|=0<\varepsilon for every real Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0. By claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, applied with the convergent sequence (Οƒm)m∈N(\sigma_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} in both sequence slots and with the scalar βˆ’1-1, the sequence (βˆ’Οƒm)m∈N(-\sigma_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges to βˆ’Ξ£-\Sigma; by claim 1 of that theorem, applied to the constant sequence and to (βˆ’Οƒm)m∈N(-\sigma_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}, the sequence (Ο„m)m∈N(\tau_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges to Ξ£+(βˆ’Ξ£)=0\Sigma+(-\Sigma)=0.

Step 2 (a block estimate). Assume now that f:Dβ†’Rf:D\to\mathbb{R} satisfies f(x)=βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)f(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x) for every x∈Sx\in S, and fix x∈Sx\in S and m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. Let p∈Np\in\mathbb{N}.

Apply Splitting a Finite Sum at an Index with the field R\mathbb{R}, the natural numbers mm and pp, and the map k↦gk(x)k\mapsto g_{k}(x) on the initial segment [m+p][m+p]. Writing uj=gm+j(x)u_{j}=g_{m+j}(x) for j∈[p]j\in[p], and recalling from Series of Real-Valued Functions and Their Partial Sums (i) that sn(x)=βˆ‘k=1ngk(x)s_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}g_{k}(x), that lemma gives

sm+p(x)=sm(x)+βˆ‘j=1puj.s_{m+p}(x)=s_{m}(x)+\sum_{j=1}^{p}u_{j}.

The same lemma applied to the map k↦Mkk\mapsto M_{k} on [m+p][m+p] gives Οƒm+p=Οƒm+βˆ‘j=1pMm+j\sigma_{m+p}=\sigma_{m}+\sum_{j=1}^{p}M_{m+j}.

By claim 2 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, and then by claim 1 of that lemma applied to the bounds ∣uj∣=∣gm+j(x)βˆ£β‰€Mm+j|u_{j}|=|g_{m+j}(x)|\le M_{m+j}, which hold because x∈Sx\in S,

βˆ£βˆ‘j=1pujβˆ£β‰€βˆ‘j=1p∣ujβˆ£β‰€βˆ‘j=1pMm+j=Οƒm+pβˆ’Οƒm.\Bigl|\sum_{j=1}^{p}u_{j}\Bigr|\le\sum_{j=1}^{p}|u_{j}|\le\sum_{j=1}^{p}M_{m+j}=\sigma_{m+p}-\sigma_{m}.

Step 1 gives Οƒm+p≀Σ\sigma_{m+p}\le\Sigma, so (Ξ£βˆ’Οƒm)βˆ’(Οƒm+pβˆ’Οƒm)=Ξ£βˆ’Οƒm+p\bigl(\Sigma-\sigma_{m}\bigr)-\bigl(\sigma_{m+p}-\sigma_{m}\bigr)=\Sigma-\sigma_{m+p} is nonnegative by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and a second use of that claim gives Οƒm+pβˆ’Οƒmβ‰€Ξ£βˆ’Οƒm=Ο„m\sigma_{m+p}-\sigma_{m}\le\Sigma-\sigma_{m}=\tau_{m}. Since sm+p(x)βˆ’sm(x)=βˆ‘j=1pujs_{m+p}(x)-s_{m}(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{p}u_{j}, we conclude

∣sm+p(x)βˆ’sm(x)βˆ£β‰€Ο„mforΒ everyΒ p∈N.|s_{m+p}(x)-s_{m}(x)|\le\tau_{m}\qquad\text{for every }p\in\mathbb{N}.

Step 3 (passing to the limit in pp). By Claim 1 and Series of Real Numbers (ii), the sequence (sn(x))n∈N(s_{n}(x))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to βˆ‘k=1∞gk(x)=f(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(x)=f(x). The sequence (sm+p(x))p∈N(s_{m+p}(x))_{p\in\mathbb{N}} also converges to f(x)f(x): given a real Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0, choose N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∣sn(x)βˆ’f(x)∣<Ξ΅|s_{n}(x)-f(x)|<\varepsilon for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with N≀nN\le n; by claim 6 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers we have p<p+mp<p+m, hence p≀p+mp\le p+m by claim 1 of that lemma, and p+m=m+pp+m=m+p by claim 4 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers; so if N≀pN\le p then N≀m+pN\le m+p, by the transitivity of ≀\le recorded in claim 1 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers and hence ∣sm+p(x)βˆ’f(x)∣<Ξ΅|s_{m+p}(x)-f(x)|<\varepsilon.

The constant sequence with every term equal to sm(x)s_{m}(x) converges to sm(x)s_{m}(x), as in Step 1. Hence, by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences applied with the constant sequence in both sequence slots and with the scalar βˆ’1-1, and then by claim 1 of that theorem, applied to (sm+p(x))p∈N\bigl(s_{m+p}(x)\bigr)_{p\in\mathbb{N}} and to the constant sequence with every term equal to βˆ’sm(x)-s_{m}(x), the sequence (sm+p(x)βˆ’sm(x))p∈N\bigl(s_{m+p}(x)-s_{m}(x)\bigr)_{p\in\mathbb{N}} converges to f(x)βˆ’sm(x)f(x)-s_{m}(x); by claim 4 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences the sequence (∣sm+p(x)βˆ’sm(x)∣)p∈N\bigl(|s_{m+p}(x)-s_{m}(x)|\bigr)_{p\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ∣f(x)βˆ’sm(x)∣|f(x)-s_{m}(x)|. The constant sequence with every term equal to Ο„m\tau_{m} converges to Ο„m\tau_{m}, and by Step 2 each term of the former sequence is at most the corresponding term of the latter, so claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences gives

∣f(x)βˆ’sm(x)βˆ£β‰€Ο„m.|f(x)-s_{m}(x)|\le\tau_{m} .

As x∈Sx\in S and m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} were arbitrary, this is the asserted bound.

Claim 3. Let Ξ΅\varepsilon be a real number with 0<Ξ΅0<\varepsilon. By Claim 2 the sequence (Ο„m)m∈N(\tau_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00, so Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers provides K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} such that βˆ£Ο„mβˆ’0∣<Ξ΅|\tau_{m}-0|<\varepsilon for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with K≀mK\le m. Since 0≀τm0\le\tau_{m}, Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives βˆ£Ο„m∣=Ο„m|\tau_{m}|=\tau_{m}, so Ο„m<Ξ΅\tau_{m}<\varepsilon for every such mm.

Let m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with K≀mK\le m and let x∈Sx\in S. By claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and Claim 2 above,

∣sm(x)βˆ’f(x)∣=∣f(x)βˆ’sm(x)βˆ£β‰€Ο„m<Ξ΅.|s_{m}(x)-f(x)|=|f(x)-s_{m}(x)|\le\tau_{m}<\varepsilon .

This is exactly the condition of Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Maps (ii) for the sequence of partial sums (sm)m∈N(s_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} and the function ff on SS, so that sequence converges uniformly to ff on SS; by Series of Real-Valued Functions and Their Partial Sums (iii) the series βˆ‘k=1∞gk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k} converges uniformly to ff on SS.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…