Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Conventions. L L L is the constant of the datum ( b , f ) (b,f) ( b , f ) . For μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , L 2 ( μ ; R d ) L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( μ ; R d ) and its norm ∥ ⋅ ∥ μ \lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} ∥ ⋅ ∥ μ are those of Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields ; for a Borel representative ξ \xi ξ of a class one has ∥ ξ ∥ μ 2 = ∫ ∥ ξ ∥ 2 d μ \lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\,d\mu ∥ ξ ∥ μ 2 = ∫ ∥ ξ ∥ 2 d μ by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product , and the class of a pointwise combination ξ + c ζ \xi+c\zeta ξ + c ζ of representatives is the combination of the classes, by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes . For μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) and p ∈ T μ p\in T_{\mu} p ∈ T μ with a Borel representative, again written p p p , put
h μ , p ( x ) = 1 2 ∥ p ( x ) ∥ 2 − b ( x , μ ) ⋅ p ( x ) − f ( x , μ ) ( x ∈ R d ) ; h_{\mu,p}(x)=\tfrac12\lVert p(x)\rVert^{2}-b(x,\mu)\cdot p(x)-f(x,\mu)\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}); h μ , p ( x ) = 2 1 ∥ p ( x ) ∥ 2 − b ( x , μ ) ⋅ p ( x ) − f ( x , μ ) ( x ∈ R d ) ;
by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §hamiltonian this function is Borel and integrable with respect to μ \mu μ , H ( μ , p ) = ∫ h μ , p d μ H(\mu,p)=\int h_{\mu,p}\,d\mu H ( μ , p ) = ∫ h μ , p d μ , and this value does not depend on the representative. Two estimates are used repeatedly. First, let κ \kappa κ be a probability measure on R m \mathbb{R}^{m} R m for some m ≥ 1 m\ge1 m ≥ 1 and let u , v : R m → [ 0 , ∞ ) u,v:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to[0,\infty) u , v : R m → [ 0 , ∞ ) be Borel with ∫ u 2 d κ < ∞ \int u^{2}\,d\kappa<\infty ∫ u 2 d κ < ∞ and ∫ v 2 d κ < ∞ \int v^{2}\,d\kappa<\infty ∫ v 2 d κ < ∞ . Then u u u and v v v are square-integrable random variables on the probability space ( R m , B ( R m ) , κ ) (\mathbb{R}^{m},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}),\kappa) ( R m , B ( R m ) , κ ) , and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm , gives
∫ u v d κ ≤ ( ∫ u 2 d κ ) 1 / 2 ( ∫ v 2 d κ ) 1 / 2 ; in particular ∫ u d κ ≤ ( ∫ u 2 d κ ) 1 / 2 ( ∗ ) \int uv\,d\kappa\le\Bigl(\int u^{2}\,d\kappa\Bigr)^{1/2}\Bigl(\int v^{2}\,d\kappa\Bigr)^{1/2};\qquad\text{in particular}\qquad\int u\,d\kappa\le\Bigl(\int u^{2}\,d\kappa\Bigr)^{1/2}\qquad(\ast) ∫ uv d κ ≤ ( ∫ u 2 d κ ) 1/2 ( ∫ v 2 d κ ) 1/2 ; in particular ∫ u d κ ≤ ( ∫ u 2 d κ ) 1/2 ( ∗ )
(take v = 1 v=1 v = 1 ). Second, for x , y , z ∈ R d x,y,z\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x , y , z ∈ R d and μ , ν ∈ P ( T d ) \mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ , ν ∈ P ( T d ) , the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product and the bounds of Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §data give
∣ b ( x , μ ) ⋅ z ∣ ≤ L ∥ z ∥ , ∣ ( b ( x , μ ) − b ( y , ν ) ) ⋅ z ∣ ≤ L ( d T ( x , y ) + W T ( μ , ν ) ) ∥ z ∥ . ( ∗ ∗ ) |b(x,\mu)\cdot z|\le L\lVert z\rVert,\qquad\bigl|(b(x,\mu)-b(y,\nu))\cdot z\bigr|\le L\bigl(d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y)+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)\bigr)\lVert z\rVert .\qquad(\ast\ast) ∣ b ( x , μ ) ⋅ z ∣ ≤ L ∥ z ∥ , ( b ( x , μ ) − b ( y , ν )) ⋅ z ≤ L ( d T ( x , y ) + W T ( μ , ν ) ) ∥ z ∥ . ( ∗ ∗ )
Integrals of nonnegative Borel functions are compared and split using the monotonicity and additivity of claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral , and integrals of integrable functions using claim 2 there.
Step 1 (Continuity along couplings). Let μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , p ∈ T μ p\in T_{\mu} p ∈ T μ , and let μ n ∈ P ( T d ) \mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ n ∈ P ( T d ) and p n ∈ T μ n p_{n}\in T_{\mu_{n}} p n ∈ T μ n be such that ( ( μ n , p n ) ) n ∈ N ((\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} (( μ n , p n ) ) n ∈ N converges along couplings to ( μ , p ) (\mu,p) ( μ , p ) . By Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus §convergence there are γ n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) \gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) γ n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) such that I n = I T ( γ n ) I_{n}=I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}) I n = I T ( γ n ) and D n = D γ n ( p n , p ) D_{n}=D_{\gamma_{n}}(p_{n},p) D n = D γ n ( p n , p ) both converge to 0 0 0 . Fix Borel representatives of p n p_{n} p n and p p p , and define on R d + d \mathbb{R}^{d+d} R d + d the functions
e n ( w ) = ∥ p n ( p r 1 ( w ) ) − p ( p r 2 ( w ) ) ∥ , a ( w ) = ∥ p ( p r 2 ( w ) ) ∥ , τ ( w ) = d T ( p r 1 ( w ) , p r 2 ( w ) ) . e_{n}(w)=\bigl\lVert p_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-p(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert,\qquad a(w)=\bigl\lVert p(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert,\qquad\tau(w)=d_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)\bigr). e n ( w ) = p n ( pr 1 ( w )) − p ( pr 2 ( w )) , a ( w ) = p ( pr 2 ( w )) , τ ( w ) = d T ( pr 1 ( w ) , pr 2 ( w ) ) .
They are Borel and nonnegative: e n e_{n} e n and a a a by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections , and τ \tau τ by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz . By the definition of D γ D_{\gamma} D γ in the preamble of Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus and of the torus cost in Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost , ∫ e n 2 d γ n = D n \int e_{n}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=D_{n} ∫ e n 2 d γ n = D n and ∫ τ 2 d γ n = I n \int\tau^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=I_{n} ∫ τ 2 d γ n = I n . Since ( p r 1 ) # γ n = μ n (\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\mu_{n} ( pr 1 ) # γ n = μ n and ( p r 2 ) # γ n = μ (\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\mu ( pr 2 ) # γ n = μ by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling , the change-of-variables formula gives ∫ a 2 d γ n = ∫ ∥ p ∥ 2 d μ = ∥ p ∥ μ 2 \int a^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\lVert p\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}^{2} ∫ a 2 d γ n = ∫ ∥ p ∥ 2 d μ = ∥ p ∥ μ 2 . Finally, W n = W T ( μ n , μ ) W_{n}=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu) W n = W T ( μ n , μ ) satisfies W n 2 ≤ I n W_{n}^{2}\le I_{n} W n 2 ≤ I n , because W n 2 W_{n}^{2} W n 2 is the greatest lower bound of the torus costs of the members of Π ( μ n , μ ) \Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) Π ( μ n , μ ) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance and γ n \gamma_{n} γ n is one of them; hence W n ≤ I n W_{n}\le\sqrt{I_{n}} W n ≤ I n .
Write h n = h μ n , p n h_{n}=h_{\mu_{n},p_{n}} h n = h μ n , p n and h = h μ , p h=h_{\mu,p} h = h μ , p . By the same change-of-variables formula, h n ∘ p r 1 h_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} h n ∘ pr 1 and h ∘ p r 2 h\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} h ∘ pr 2 are integrable with respect to γ n \gamma_{n} γ n , with H ( μ n , p n ) = ∫ h n ∘ p r 1 d γ n H(\mu_{n},p_{n})=\int h_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}\,d\gamma_{n} H ( μ n , p n ) = ∫ h n ∘ pr 1 d γ n and H ( μ , p ) = ∫ h ∘ p r 2 d γ n H(\mu,p)=\int h\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}\,d\gamma_{n} H ( μ , p ) = ∫ h ∘ pr 2 d γ n . By claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral ,
∣ H ( μ n , p n ) − H ( μ , p ) ∣ ≤ ∫ ∣ h n ( p r 1 ( w ) ) − h ( p r 2 ( w ) ) ∣ γ n ( d w ) . \bigl|H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\int\bigl|h_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-h(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr|\,\gamma_{n}(dw). H ( μ n , p n ) − H ( μ , p ) ≤ ∫ h n ( pr 1 ( w )) − h ( pr 2 ( w )) γ n ( d w ) .
Fix w w w and write x = p r 1 ( w ) x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w) x = pr 1 ( w ) , y = p r 2 ( w ) y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w) y = pr 2 ( w ) , q = p n ( x ) q=p_{n}(x) q = p n ( x ) and s = p ( y ) s=p(y) s = p ( y ) , so that e n ( w ) = ∥ q − s ∥ e_{n}(w)=\lVert q-s\rVert e n ( w ) = ∥ q − s ∥ and a ( w ) = ∥ s ∥ a(w)=\lVert s\rVert a ( w ) = ∥ s ∥ . Since ∥ q ∥ 2 − ∥ s ∥ 2 = ( q − s ) ⋅ ( q + s ) \lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert s\rVert^{2}=(q-s)\cdot(q+s) ∥ q ∥ 2 − ∥ s ∥ 2 = ( q − s ) ⋅ ( q + s ) and q + s = ( q − s ) + 2 s q+s=(q-s)+2s q + s = ( q − s ) + 2 s , the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product and the triangle inequality give ∣ ∥ q ∥ 2 − ∥ s ∥ 2 ∣ ≤ e n ( w ) ( e n ( w ) + 2 a ( w ) ) \bigl|\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert s\rVert^{2}\bigr|\le e_{n}(w)\bigl(e_{n}(w)+2a(w)\bigr) ∥ q ∥ 2 − ∥ s ∥ 2 ≤ e n ( w ) ( e n ( w ) + 2 a ( w ) ) . Next, b ( x , μ n ) ⋅ q − b ( y , μ ) ⋅ s = b ( x , μ n ) ⋅ ( q − s ) + ( b ( x , μ n ) − b ( y , μ ) ) ⋅ s b(x,\mu_{n})\cdot q-b(y,\mu)\cdot s=b(x,\mu_{n})\cdot(q-s)+(b(x,\mu_{n})-b(y,\mu))\cdot s b ( x , μ n ) ⋅ q − b ( y , μ ) ⋅ s = b ( x , μ n ) ⋅ ( q − s ) + ( b ( x , μ n ) − b ( y , μ )) ⋅ s , so by ( ∗ ∗ ) (\ast\ast) ( ∗ ∗ ) its absolute value is at most L e n ( w ) + L ( τ ( w ) + W n ) a ( w ) Le_{n}(w)+L(\tau(w)+W_{n})a(w) L e n ( w ) + L ( τ ( w ) + W n ) a ( w ) . Finally ∣ f ( x , μ n ) − f ( y , μ ) ∣ ≤ L ( τ ( w ) + W n ) |f(x,\mu_{n})-f(y,\mu)|\le L(\tau(w)+W_{n}) ∣ f ( x , μ n ) − f ( y , μ ) ∣ ≤ L ( τ ( w ) + W n ) by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §data . Adding,
∣ h n ( p r 1 ( w ) ) − h ( p r 2 ( w ) ) ∣ ≤ 1 2 e n 2 + e n a + L e n + L τ a + L W n a + L τ + L W n , \bigl|h_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-h(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr|\le\tfrac12e_{n}^{2}+e_{n}a+Le_{n}+L\tau a+LW_{n}a+L\tau+LW_{n}, h n ( pr 1 ( w )) − h ( pr 2 ( w )) ≤ 2 1 e n 2 + e n a + L e n + Lτ a + L W n a + Lτ + L W n ,
all functions evaluated at w w w . Integrating against the probability measure γ n \gamma_{n} γ n and bounding each term by ( ∗ ) (\ast) ( ∗ ) with the three integrals computed above, together with W n ≤ I n W_{n}\le\sqrt{I_{n}} W n ≤ I n ,
∣ H ( μ n , p n ) − H ( μ , p ) ∣ ≤ 1 2 D n + D n ( ∥ p ∥ μ + L ) + 2 L I n ( ∥ p ∥ μ + 1 ) . \bigl|H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\tfrac12D_{n}+\sqrt{D_{n}}\,\bigl(\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+L\bigr)+2L\sqrt{I_{n}}\,\bigl(\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+1\bigr). H ( μ n , p n ) − H ( μ , p ) ≤ 2 1 D n + D n ( ∥ p ∥ μ + L ) + 2 L I n ( ∥ p ∥ μ + 1 ) .
Let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 , put K = 1 2 + ∥ p ∥ μ + L + 2 L ( ∥ p ∥ μ + 1 ) > 0 K=\tfrac12+\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+L+2L(\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+1)>0 K = 2 1 + ∥ p ∥ μ + L + 2 L (∥ p ∥ μ + 1 ) > 0 and t = min { 1 , ε / ( 2 K ) } t=\min\{1,\varepsilon/(2K)\} t = min { 1 , ε / ( 2 K )} . As ( D n ) (D_{n}) ( D n ) and ( I n ) (I_{n}) ( I n ) converge to 0 0 0 , there is N N N with D n < t 2 D_{n}<t^{2} D n < t 2 and I n < t 2 I_{n}<t^{2} I n < t 2 for all n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N ; then D n < t \sqrt{D_{n}}<t D n < t , I n < t \sqrt{I_{n}}<t I n < t and D n < t 2 ≤ t D_{n}<t^{2}\le t D n < t 2 ≤ t , so ∣ H ( μ n , p n ) − H ( μ , p ) ∣ ≤ K t ≤ ε / 2 < ε |H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-H(\mu,p)|\le Kt\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon ∣ H ( μ n , p n ) − H ( μ , p ) ∣ ≤ K t ≤ ε /2 < ε . Thus ( H ( μ n , p n ) ) n ∈ N (H(\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( H ( μ n , p n ) ) n ∈ N converges to H ( μ , p ) H(\mu,p) H ( μ , p ) , and H H H is continuous along couplings . This proves The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §continuous .
Step 2 (Score perturbation). Put δ 0 = σ 2 / 4 > 0 \delta_{0}=\sigma^{2}/4>0 δ 0 = σ 2 /4 > 0 and, for real R > 0 R>0 R > 0 , C R = 2 ( R + L ) 2 / σ 2 ≥ 0 C_{R}=2(R+L)^{2}/\sigma^{2}\ge0 C R = 2 ( R + L ) 2 / σ 2 ≥ 0 . Let μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , p , ζ ∈ T μ p,\zeta\in T_{\mu} p , ζ ∈ T μ with ∥ p ∥ μ ≤ R \lVert p\rVert_{\mu}\le R ∥ p ∥ μ ≤ R , and 0 < δ ≤ δ 0 0<\delta\le\delta_{0} 0 < δ ≤ δ 0 . Fix Borel representatives p p p and ζ \zeta ζ ; then p + δ ζ p+\delta\zeta p + δ ζ is a Borel representative of the class p + δ ζ p+\delta\zeta p + δ ζ . For every x x x ,
h μ , p + δ ζ ( x ) − h μ , p ( x ) = δ p ( x ) ⋅ ζ ( x ) + δ 2 2 ∥ ζ ( x ) ∥ 2 − δ b ( x , μ ) ⋅ ζ ( x ) , h_{\mu,p+\delta\zeta}(x)-h_{\mu,p}(x)=\delta\,p(x)\cdot\zeta(x)+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}\lVert\zeta(x)\rVert^{2}-\delta\,b(x,\mu)\cdot\zeta(x), h μ , p + δ ζ ( x ) − h μ , p ( x ) = δ p ( x ) ⋅ ζ ( x ) + 2 δ 2 ∥ ζ ( x ) ∥ 2 − δ b ( x , μ ) ⋅ ζ ( x ) ,
and both functions on the left are integrable, so by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral , the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product and ( ∗ ∗ ) (\ast\ast) ( ∗ ∗ ) ,
∣ H ( μ , p + δ ζ ) − H ( μ , p ) ∣ ≤ δ ∫ ∥ p ∥ ∥ ζ ∥ d μ + δ 2 2 ∫ ∥ ζ ∥ 2 d μ + δ L ∫ ∥ ζ ∥ d μ . \bigl|H(\mu,p+\delta\zeta)-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\delta\int\lVert p\rVert\,\lVert\zeta\rVert\,d\mu+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}\int\lVert\zeta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu+\delta L\int\lVert\zeta\rVert\,d\mu . H ( μ , p + δ ζ ) − H ( μ , p ) ≤ δ ∫ ∥ p ∥ ∥ ζ ∥ d μ + 2 δ 2 ∫ ∥ ζ ∥ 2 d μ + δ L ∫ ∥ ζ ∥ d μ .
By ( ∗ ) (\ast) ( ∗ ) for κ = μ \kappa=\mu κ = μ , with z = ∥ ζ ∥ μ z=\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu} z = ∥ ζ ∥ μ this is at most δ R z + δ 2 2 z 2 + δ L z = δ ( R + L ) z + δ 2 2 z 2 \delta Rz+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}z^{2}+\delta Lz=\delta(R+L)z+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}z^{2} δ R z + 2 δ 2 z 2 + δ L z = δ ( R + L ) z + 2 δ 2 z 2 . Since δ ≤ σ 2 / 4 \delta\le\sigma^{2}/4 δ ≤ σ 2 /4 , one has δ 2 2 z 2 ≤ σ 2 δ 8 z 2 \tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}z^{2}\le\tfrac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{8}z^{2} 2 δ 2 z 2 ≤ 8 σ 2 δ z 2 ; and ( R + L ) z = ( σ z 2 ) ( 2 ( R + L ) σ ) ≤ 1 2 ( σ 2 z 2 4 + 4 ( R + L ) 2 σ 2 ) = σ 2 8 z 2 + C R (R+L)z=\bigl(\tfrac{\sigma z}{2}\bigr)\bigl(\tfrac{2(R+L)}{\sigma}\bigr)\le\tfrac12\bigl(\tfrac{\sigma^{2}z^{2}}{4}+\tfrac{4(R+L)^{2}}{\sigma^{2}}\bigr)=\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{8}z^{2}+C_{R} ( R + L ) z = ( 2 σ z ) ( σ 2 ( R + L ) ) ≤ 2 1 ( 4 σ 2 z 2 + σ 2 4 ( R + L ) 2 ) = 8 σ 2 z 2 + C R , by the elementary inequality u v ≤ 1 2 ( u 2 + v 2 ) uv\le\tfrac12(u^{2}+v^{2}) uv ≤ 2 1 ( u 2 + v 2 ) . Hence
∣ H ( μ , p + δ ζ ) − H ( μ , p ) ∣ ≤ σ 2 δ 8 z 2 + C R δ + σ 2 δ 8 z 2 = σ 2 δ 4 ∥ ζ ∥ μ 2 + C R δ , \bigl|H(\mu,p+\delta\zeta)-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{8}z^{2}+C_{R}\,\delta+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{8}z^{2}=\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}+C_{R}\,\delta , H ( μ , p + δ ζ ) − H ( μ , p ) ≤ 8 σ 2 δ z 2 + C R δ + 8 σ 2 δ z 2 = 4 σ 2 δ ∥ ζ ∥ μ 2 + C R δ ,
which is the score-perturbation bound with these δ 0 \delta_{0} δ 0 and C R C_{R} C R . This proves The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §score-perturbation .
Step 3 (The structure estimate). Let μ , ν ∈ P a c ( T d ) \mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ , ν ∈ P ac ( T d ) , let T T T be an optimal map from μ \mu μ to ν \nu ν , S S S one from ν \nu ν to μ \mu μ , let α > 0 \alpha>0 α > 0 , and put W = W T ( μ , ν ) W=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu) W = W T ( μ , ν ) . The Borel maps v T v_{T} v T and v S v_{S} v S of Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement serve as representatives. By The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance and Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement ,
d T ( x , T ( x ) ) = ∥ ϖ ( T ( x ) − x ) ∥ = ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ ( x ∈ R d ) . d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,T(x))=\lVert\varpi(T(x)-x)\rVert=\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}). d T ( x , T ( x )) = ∥ ϖ ( T ( x ) − x )∥ = ∥ v T ( x )∥ ( x ∈ R d ) .
By Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §map , T # μ = ν T_{\#}\mu=\nu T # μ = ν and ( i d , T ) # μ (\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu ( id , T ) # μ is optimal, that is, its torus cost equals W 2 W^{2} W 2 by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §optimal . Since p r 1 ∘ ( i d , T ) = i d \mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ(\mathrm{id},T)=\mathrm{id} pr 1 ∘ ( id , T ) = id and p r 2 ∘ ( i d , T ) = T \mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ(\mathrm{id},T)=T pr 2 ∘ ( id , T ) = T by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §pairing , the change-of-variables formula applied to the torus cost of Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost gives
W 2 = I T ( ( i d , T ) # μ ) = ∫ d T ( x , T ( x ) ) 2 μ ( d x ) = ∫ ∥ v T ∥ 2 d μ , hence ∫ ∥ v T ∥ d μ ≤ W W^{2}=I_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl((\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu\bigr)=\int d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,T(x))^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\int\lVert v_{T}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu,\qquad\text{hence}\qquad\int\lVert v_{T}\rVert\,d\mu\le W W 2 = I T ( ( id , T ) # μ ) = ∫ d T ( x , T ( x ) ) 2 μ ( d x ) = ∫ ∥ v T ∥ 2 d μ , hence ∫ ∥ v T ∥ d μ ≤ W
by ( ∗ ) (\ast) ( ∗ ) for κ = μ \kappa=\mu κ = μ .
By McCann's Theorem on the Flat Torus: Optimal Couplings out of an Absolutely Continuous Measure are Induced by a Unique Map with a Periodic Potential §inverse , applicable as μ \mu μ and ν \nu ν are absolutely continuous (Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures ), there is D ′ ∈ B ( R d ) D'\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) D ′ ∈ B ( R d ) with μ ( D ′ ) = 1 \mu(D')=1 μ ( D ′ ) = 1 and v S ( T ( x ) ) = − v T ( x ) v_{S}(T(x))=-v_{T}(x) v S ( T ( x )) = − v T ( x ) for x ∈ D ′ x\in D' x ∈ D ′ . The function g = h ν , α v S g=h_{\nu,\alpha v_{S}} g = h ν , α v S is Borel and ν \nu ν -integrable with H ( ν , α v S ) = ∫ g d ν H(\nu,\alpha v_{S})=\int g\,d\nu H ( ν , α v S ) = ∫ g d ν ; since T # μ = ν T_{\#}\mu=\nu T # μ = ν , the change-of-variables formula gives that g ∘ T g\circ T g ∘ T is μ \mu μ -integrable with ∫ g d ν = ∫ g ∘ T d μ \int g\,d\nu=\int g\circ T\,d\mu ∫ g d ν = ∫ g ∘ T d μ . For x ∈ D ′ x\in D' x ∈ D ′ ,
g ( T ( x ) ) = α 2 2 ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ 2 + α b ( T ( x ) , ν ) ⋅ v T ( x ) − f ( T ( x ) , ν ) = : G ( x ) , g(T(x))=\tfrac{\alpha^{2}}{2}\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert^{2}+\alpha\,b(T(x),\nu)\cdot v_{T}(x)-f(T(x),\nu)=:G(x), g ( T ( x )) = 2 α 2 ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ 2 + α b ( T ( x ) , ν ) ⋅ v T ( x ) − f ( T ( x ) , ν ) =: G ( x ) ,
and G G G is Borel (compositions of the Borel maps T T T , v T v_{T} v T , b ( ⋅ , ν ) b(\cdot,\nu) b ( ⋅ , ν ) , f ( ⋅ , ν ) f(\cdot,\nu) f ( ⋅ , ν ) (Borel by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §hamiltonian ) with the functions of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions ), so G G G is μ \mu μ -integrable with ∫ G d μ = ∫ g ∘ T d μ = H ( ν , α v S ) \int G\,d\mu=\int g\circ T\,d\mu=H(\nu,\alpha v_{S}) ∫ G d μ = ∫ g ∘ T d μ = H ( ν , α v S ) , by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison . On the other hand − α v T -\alpha v_{T} − α v T represents − α v T ∈ T μ -\alpha v_{T}\in T_{\mu} − α v T ∈ T μ , so
H ( μ , − α v T ) = ∫ ( α 2 2 ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ 2 + α b ( x , μ ) ⋅ v T ( x ) − f ( x , μ ) ) μ ( d x ) . H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})=\int\Bigl(\tfrac{\alpha^{2}}{2}\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert^{2}+\alpha\,b(x,\mu)\cdot v_{T}(x)-f(x,\mu)\Bigr)\,\mu(dx). H ( μ , − α v T ) = ∫ ( 2 α 2 ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ 2 + α b ( x , μ ) ⋅ v T ( x ) − f ( x , μ ) ) μ ( d x ) .
Subtracting by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral , the quadratic terms cancel:
H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) = ∫ ( α ( b ( T ( x ) , ν ) − b ( x , μ ) ) ⋅ v T ( x ) + f ( x , μ ) − f ( T ( x ) , ν ) ) μ ( d x ) . H(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})=\int\Bigl(\alpha\bigl(b(T(x),\nu)-b(x,\mu)\bigr)\cdot v_{T}(x)+f(x,\mu)-f(T(x),\nu)\Bigr)\,\mu(dx). H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) = ∫ ( α ( b ( T ( x ) , ν ) − b ( x , μ ) ) ⋅ v T ( x ) + f ( x , μ ) − f ( T ( x ) , ν ) ) μ ( d x ) .
By ( ∗ ∗ ) (\ast\ast) ( ∗ ∗ ) , applied with the pairs ( x , μ ) (x,\mu) ( x , μ ) and ( T ( x ) , ν ) (T(x),\nu) ( T ( x ) , ν ) , and by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §data , together with d T ( x , T ( x ) ) = ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,T(x))=\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert d T ( x , T ( x )) = ∥ v T ( x )∥ , the absolute value of the integrand is at most
α L ( ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ + W ) ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ + L ( ∥ v T ( x ) ∥ + W ) . \alpha L\bigl(\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert+W\bigr)\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert+L\bigl(\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert+W\bigr). αL ( ∥ v T ( x )∥ + W ) ∥ v T ( x )∥ + L ( ∥ v T ( x )∥ + W ) .
Integrating with claims 1 and 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral , and using ∫ ∥ v T ∥ 2 d μ = W 2 \int\lVert v_{T}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=W^{2} ∫ ∥ v T ∥ 2 d μ = W 2 and ∫ ∥ v T ∥ d μ ≤ W \int\lVert v_{T}\rVert\,d\mu\le W ∫ ∥ v T ∥ d μ ≤ W ,
H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) ≤ α L ( W 2 + W ⋅ W ) + L ( W + W ) = 2 L ( α W 2 + W ) . H(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})\le\alpha L\bigl(W^{2}+W\cdot W\bigr)+L(W+W)=2L\bigl(\alpha W^{2}+W\bigr). H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) ≤ αL ( W 2 + W ⋅ W ) + L ( W + W ) = 2 L ( α W 2 + W ) .
This is the inequality of The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §structure .
Step 4 (The structure condition). Let η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 . If L > 0 L>0 L > 0 put r = η / ( 2 L ) r=\eta/(2L) r = η / ( 2 L ) ; if L = 0 L=0 L = 0 put r = 1 r=1 r = 1 . Let μ , ν , T , S , α \mu,\nu,T,S,\alpha μ , ν , T , S , α be as in The Structure Condition Along Optimal Maps for a Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §structure with α W 2 + W < r \alpha W^{2}+W<r α W 2 + W < r , where W = W T ( μ , ν ) W=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu) W = W T ( μ , ν ) . By Step 3, if L > 0 L>0 L > 0 then H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) ≤ 2 L ( α W 2 + W ) < 2 L r = η H(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})\le2L(\alpha W^{2}+W)<2Lr=\eta H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) ≤ 2 L ( α W 2 + W ) < 2 L r = η , and if L = 0 L=0 L = 0 then H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) ≤ 0 < η H(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})\le0<\eta H ( ν , α v S ) − H ( μ , − α v T ) ≤ 0 < η . Hence H H H satisfies the structure condition , completing the proof of The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §structure .