TheoremBase

Transfers both Hamiltonians to a common coupling and bounds the difference termwise by the Lipschitz bounds of the datum and Cauchy-Schwarz; the score-perturbation bound follows by expanding the square and AM-GM, and the structure bound by pulling H(nu, alpha vS)v_S) back to mu along the optimal map T, where the quadratic terms cancel.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Conventions. LL is the constant of the datum (b,f)(b,f). For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and its norm ∥⋅∥μ\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\mu} are those of Optimal Transport on the Flat Torus: Standing Notation §fields; for a Borel representative ξ\xi of a class one has ∥ξ∥μ2=∫∥ξ∥2 dμ\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\,d\mu by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §inner-product, and the class of a pointwise combination ξ+cζ\xi+c\zeta of representatives is the combination of the classes, by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors §classes. For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and p∈Tμp\in T_{\mu} with a Borel representative, again written pp, put

hμ,p(x)=12∥p(x)∥2−b(x,μ)⋅p(x)−f(x,μ)(x∈Rd);h_{\mu,p}(x)=\tfrac12\lVert p(x)\rVert^{2}-b(x,\mu)\cdot p(x)-f(x,\mu)\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d});

by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §hamiltonian this function is Borel and integrable with respect to μ\mu, H(μ,p)=∫hμ,p dμH(\mu,p)=\int h_{\mu,p}\,d\mu, and this value does not depend on the representative. Two estimates are used repeatedly. First, let κ\kappa be a probability measure on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} for some m≥1m\ge1 and let u,v:Rm→[0,∞)u,v:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to[0,\infty) be Borel with ∫u2 dκ<∞\int u^{2}\,d\kappa<\infty and ∫v2 dκ<∞\int v^{2}\,d\kappa<\infty. Then uu and vv are square-integrable random variables on the probability space (Rm,B(Rm),κ)(\mathbb{R}^{m},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}),\kappa), and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm, gives

∫uv dκ≤(∫u2 dκ)1/2(∫v2 dκ)1/2;in particular∫u dκ≤(∫u2 dκ)1/2(∗)\int uv\,d\kappa\le\Bigl(\int u^{2}\,d\kappa\Bigr)^{1/2}\Bigl(\int v^{2}\,d\kappa\Bigr)^{1/2};\qquad\text{in particular}\qquad\int u\,d\kappa\le\Bigl(\int u^{2}\,d\kappa\Bigr)^{1/2}\qquad(\ast)

(take v=1v=1). Second, for x,y,z∈Rdx,y,z\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and μ,ν∈P(Td)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product and the bounds of Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §data give

∣b(x,μ)⋅z∣≤L∥z∥,∣(b(x,μ)−b(y,ν))⋅z∣≤L(dT(x,y)+WT(μ,ν))∥z∥.(∗∗)|b(x,\mu)\cdot z|\le L\lVert z\rVert,\qquad\bigl|(b(x,\mu)-b(y,\nu))\cdot z\bigr|\le L\bigl(d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,y)+W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu)\bigr)\lVert z\rVert .\qquad(\ast\ast)

Integrals of nonnegative Borel functions are compared and split using the monotonicity and additivity of claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and integrals of integrable functions using claim 2 there.

Step 1 (Continuity along couplings). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), p∈Tμp\in T_{\mu}, and let μn∈P(Td)\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and pn∈Tμnp_{n}\in T_{\mu_{n}} be such that ((μn,pn))n∈N((\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges along couplings to (μ,p)(\mu,p). By Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus §convergence there are γn∈Π(μn,μ)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) such that In=IT(γn)I_{n}=I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n}) and Dn=Dγn(pn,p)D_{n}=D_{\gamma_{n}}(p_{n},p) both converge to 00. Fix Borel representatives of pnp_{n} and pp, and define on Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} the functions

en(w)=∥pn(pr1(w))−p(pr2(w))∥,a(w)=∥p(pr2(w))∥,τ(w)=dT(pr1(w),pr2(w)).e_{n}(w)=\bigl\lVert p_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-p(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert,\qquad a(w)=\bigl\lVert p(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr\rVert,\qquad\tau(w)=d_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)\bigr).

They are Borel and nonnegative: ene_{n} and aa by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections, and τ\tau by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz. By the definition of DγD_{\gamma} in the preamble of Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus and of the torus cost in Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost, ∫en2 dγn=Dn\int e_{n}^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=D_{n} and ∫τ2 dγn=In\int\tau^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=I_{n}. Since (pr1)#γn=μn(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\mu_{n} and (pr2)#γn=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\mu by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling, the change-of-variables formula gives ∫a2 dγn=∫∥p∥2 dμ=∥p∥μ2\int a^{2}\,d\gamma_{n}=\int\lVert p\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}^{2}. Finally, Wn=WT(μn,μ)W_{n}=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu) satisfies Wn2≤InW_{n}^{2}\le I_{n}, because Wn2W_{n}^{2} is the greatest lower bound of the torus costs of the members of Π(μn,μ)\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance and γn\gamma_{n} is one of them; hence Wn≤InW_{n}\le\sqrt{I_{n}}.

Write hn=hμn,pnh_{n}=h_{\mu_{n},p_{n}} and h=hμ,ph=h_{\mu,p}. By the same change-of-variables formula, hn∘pr1h_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} and h∘pr2h\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} are integrable with respect to γn\gamma_{n}, with H(μn,pn)=∫hn∘pr1 dγnH(\mu_{n},p_{n})=\int h_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}\,d\gamma_{n} and H(μ,p)=∫h∘pr2 dγnH(\mu,p)=\int h\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}\,d\gamma_{n}. By claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,

∣H(μn,pn)−H(μ,p)∣≤∫∣hn(pr1(w))−h(pr2(w))∣ γn(dw).\bigl|H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\int\bigl|h_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-h(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr|\,\gamma_{n}(dw).

Fix ww and write x=pr1(w)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w), y=pr2(w)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w), q=pn(x)q=p_{n}(x) and s=p(y)s=p(y), so that en(w)=∥q−s∥e_{n}(w)=\lVert q-s\rVert and a(w)=∥s∥a(w)=\lVert s\rVert. Since ∥q∥2−∥s∥2=(q−s)⋅(q+s)\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert s\rVert^{2}=(q-s)\cdot(q+s) and q+s=(q−s)+2sq+s=(q-s)+2s, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product and the triangle inequality give ∣∥q∥2−∥s∥2∣≤en(w)(en(w)+2a(w))\bigl|\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert s\rVert^{2}\bigr|\le e_{n}(w)\bigl(e_{n}(w)+2a(w)\bigr). Next, b(x,μn)⋅q−b(y,μ)⋅s=b(x,μn)⋅(q−s)+(b(x,μn)−b(y,μ))⋅sb(x,\mu_{n})\cdot q-b(y,\mu)\cdot s=b(x,\mu_{n})\cdot(q-s)+(b(x,\mu_{n})-b(y,\mu))\cdot s, so by (∗∗)(\ast\ast) its absolute value is at most Len(w)+L(τ(w)+Wn)a(w)Le_{n}(w)+L(\tau(w)+W_{n})a(w). Finally ∣f(x,μn)−f(y,μ)∣≤L(τ(w)+Wn)|f(x,\mu_{n})-f(y,\mu)|\le L(\tau(w)+W_{n}) by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §data. Adding,

∣hn(pr1(w))−h(pr2(w))∣≤12en2+ena+Len+Lτa+LWna+Lτ+LWn,\bigl|h_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))-h(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w))\bigr|\le\tfrac12e_{n}^{2}+e_{n}a+Le_{n}+L\tau a+LW_{n}a+L\tau+LW_{n},

all functions evaluated at ww. Integrating against the probability measure γn\gamma_{n} and bounding each term by (∗)(\ast) with the three integrals computed above, together with Wn≤InW_{n}\le\sqrt{I_{n}},

∣H(μn,pn)−H(μ,p)∣≤12Dn+Dn (∥p∥μ+L)+2LIn (∥p∥μ+1).\bigl|H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\tfrac12D_{n}+\sqrt{D_{n}}\,\bigl(\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+L\bigr)+2L\sqrt{I_{n}}\,\bigl(\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+1\bigr).

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0, put K=12+∥p∥μ+L+2L(∥p∥μ+1)>0K=\tfrac12+\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+L+2L(\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}+1)>0 and t=min⁡{1,ε/(2K)}t=\min\{1,\varepsilon/(2K)\}. As (Dn)(D_{n}) and (In)(I_{n}) converge to 00, there is NN with Dn<t2D_{n}<t^{2} and In<t2I_{n}<t^{2} for all n≥Nn\ge N; then Dn<t\sqrt{D_{n}}<t, In<t\sqrt{I_{n}}<t and Dn<t2≤tD_{n}<t^{2}\le t, so ∣H(μn,pn)−H(μ,p)∣≤Kt≤ε/2<ε|H(\mu_{n},p_{n})-H(\mu,p)|\le Kt\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon. Thus (H(μn,pn))n∈N(H(\mu_{n},p_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to H(μ,p)H(\mu,p), and HH is continuous along couplings. This proves The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §continuous.

Step 2 (Score perturbation). Put δ0=σ2/4>0\delta_{0}=\sigma^{2}/4>0 and, for real R>0R>0, CR=2(R+L)2/σ2≥0C_{R}=2(R+L)^{2}/\sigma^{2}\ge0. Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), p,ζ∈Tμp,\zeta\in T_{\mu} with ∥p∥μ≤R\lVert p\rVert_{\mu}\le R, and 0<δ≤δ00<\delta\le\delta_{0}. Fix Borel representatives pp and ζ\zeta; then p+δζp+\delta\zeta is a Borel representative of the class p+δζp+\delta\zeta. For every xx,

hμ,p+δζ(x)−hμ,p(x)=δ p(x)⋅ζ(x)+δ22∥ζ(x)∥2−δ b(x,μ)⋅ζ(x),h_{\mu,p+\delta\zeta}(x)-h_{\mu,p}(x)=\delta\,p(x)\cdot\zeta(x)+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}\lVert\zeta(x)\rVert^{2}-\delta\,b(x,\mu)\cdot\zeta(x),

and both functions on the left are integrable, so by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product and (∗∗)(\ast\ast),

∣H(μ,p+δζ)−H(μ,p)∣≤δ∫∥p∥ ∥ζ∥ dμ+δ22∫∥ζ∥2 dμ+δL∫∥ζ∥ dμ.\bigl|H(\mu,p+\delta\zeta)-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\delta\int\lVert p\rVert\,\lVert\zeta\rVert\,d\mu+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}\int\lVert\zeta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu+\delta L\int\lVert\zeta\rVert\,d\mu .

By (∗)(\ast) for κ=μ\kappa=\mu, with z=∥ζ∥μz=\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu} this is at most δRz+δ22z2+δLz=δ(R+L)z+δ22z2\delta Rz+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}z^{2}+\delta Lz=\delta(R+L)z+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}z^{2}. Since δ≤σ2/4\delta\le\sigma^{2}/4, one has δ22z2≤σ2δ8z2\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}z^{2}\le\tfrac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{8}z^{2}; and (R+L)z=(σz2)(2(R+L)σ)≤12(σ2z24+4(R+L)2σ2)=σ28z2+CR(R+L)z=\bigl(\tfrac{\sigma z}{2}\bigr)\bigl(\tfrac{2(R+L)}{\sigma}\bigr)\le\tfrac12\bigl(\tfrac{\sigma^{2}z^{2}}{4}+\tfrac{4(R+L)^{2}}{\sigma^{2}}\bigr)=\tfrac{\sigma^{2}}{8}z^{2}+C_{R}, by the elementary inequality uv≤12(u2+v2)uv\le\tfrac12(u^{2}+v^{2}). Hence

∣H(μ,p+δζ)−H(μ,p)∣≤σ2δ8z2+CR δ+σ2δ8z2=σ2δ4∥ζ∥μ2+CR δ,\bigl|H(\mu,p+\delta\zeta)-H(\mu,p)\bigr|\le\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{8}z^{2}+C_{R}\,\delta+\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{8}z^{2}=\frac{\sigma^{2}\delta}{4}\lVert\zeta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}+C_{R}\,\delta ,

which is the score-perturbation bound with these δ0\delta_{0} and CRC_{R}. This proves The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §score-perturbation.

Step 3 (The structure estimate). Let μ,ν∈Pac(Td)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), let TT be an optimal map from μ\mu to ν\nu, SS one from ν\nu to μ\mu, let α>0\alpha>0, and put W=WT(μ,ν)W=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu). The Borel maps vTv_{T} and vSv_{S} of Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement serve as representatives. By The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance and Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement,

dT(x,T(x))=∥ϖ(T(x)−x)∥=∥vT(x)∥(x∈Rd).d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,T(x))=\lVert\varpi(T(x)-x)\rVert=\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).

By Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §map, T#μ=νT_{\#}\mu=\nu and (id,T)#μ(\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu is optimal, that is, its torus cost equals W2W^{2} by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §optimal. Since pr1∘(id,T)=id\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ(\mathrm{id},T)=\mathrm{id} and pr2∘(id,T)=T\mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ(\mathrm{id},T)=T by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §pairing, the change-of-variables formula applied to the torus cost of Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost gives

W2=IT((id,T)#μ)=∫dT(x,T(x))2 μ(dx)=∫∥vT∥2 dμ,hence∫∥vT∥ dμ≤WW^{2}=I_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl((\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu\bigr)=\int d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,T(x))^{2}\,\mu(dx)=\int\lVert v_{T}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu,\qquad\text{hence}\qquad\int\lVert v_{T}\rVert\,d\mu\le W

by (∗)(\ast) for κ=μ\kappa=\mu.

By McCann's Theorem on the Flat Torus: Optimal Couplings out of an Absolutely Continuous Measure are Induced by a Unique Map with a Periodic Potential §inverse, applicable as μ\mu and ν\nu are absolutely continuous (Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures), there is D′∈B(Rd)D'\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) with μ(D′)=1\mu(D')=1 and vS(T(x))=−vT(x)v_{S}(T(x))=-v_{T}(x) for x∈D′x\in D'. The function g=hν,αvSg=h_{\nu,\alpha v_{S}} is Borel and ν\nu-integrable with H(ν,αvS)=∫g dνH(\nu,\alpha v_{S})=\int g\,d\nu; since T#μ=νT_{\#}\mu=\nu, the change-of-variables formula gives that g∘Tg\circ T is μ\mu-integrable with ∫g dν=∫g∘T dμ\int g\,d\nu=\int g\circ T\,d\mu. For x∈D′x\in D',

g(T(x))=α22∥vT(x)∥2+α b(T(x),ν)⋅vT(x)−f(T(x),ν)=:G(x),g(T(x))=\tfrac{\alpha^{2}}{2}\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert^{2}+\alpha\,b(T(x),\nu)\cdot v_{T}(x)-f(T(x),\nu)=:G(x),

and GG is Borel (compositions of the Borel maps TT, vTv_{T}, b(⋅,ν)b(\cdot,\nu), f(⋅,ν)f(\cdot,\nu) (Borel by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §hamiltonian) with the functions of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions), so GG is μ\mu-integrable with ∫G dμ=∫g∘T dμ=H(ν,αvS)\int G\,d\mu=\int g\circ T\,d\mu=H(\nu,\alpha v_{S}), by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison. On the other hand −αvT-\alpha v_{T} represents −αvT∈Tμ-\alpha v_{T}\in T_{\mu}, so

H(μ,−αvT)=∫(α22∥vT(x)∥2+α b(x,μ)⋅vT(x)−f(x,μ)) μ(dx).H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})=\int\Bigl(\tfrac{\alpha^{2}}{2}\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert^{2}+\alpha\,b(x,\mu)\cdot v_{T}(x)-f(x,\mu)\Bigr)\,\mu(dx).

Subtracting by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, the quadratic terms cancel:

H(ν,αvS)−H(μ,−αvT)=∫(α(b(T(x),ν)−b(x,μ))⋅vT(x)+f(x,μ)−f(T(x),ν)) μ(dx).H(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})=\int\Bigl(\alpha\bigl(b(T(x),\nu)-b(x,\mu)\bigr)\cdot v_{T}(x)+f(x,\mu)-f(T(x),\nu)\Bigr)\,\mu(dx).

By (∗∗)(\ast\ast), applied with the pairs (x,μ)(x,\mu) and (T(x),ν)(T(x),\nu), and by Control Data and the Control Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §data, together with dT(x,T(x))=∥vT(x)∥d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,T(x))=\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert, the absolute value of the integrand is at most

αL(∥vT(x)∥+W)∥vT(x)∥+L(∥vT(x)∥+W).\alpha L\bigl(\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert+W\bigr)\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert+L\bigl(\lVert v_{T}(x)\rVert+W\bigr).

Integrating with claims 1 and 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and using ∫∥vT∥2 dμ=W2\int\lVert v_{T}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=W^{2} and ∫∥vT∥ dμ≤W\int\lVert v_{T}\rVert\,d\mu\le W,

H(ν,αvS)−H(μ,−αvT)≤αL(W2+W⋅W)+L(W+W)=2L(αW2+W).H(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})\le\alpha L\bigl(W^{2}+W\cdot W\bigr)+L(W+W)=2L\bigl(\alpha W^{2}+W\bigr).

This is the inequality of The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §structure.

Step 4 (The structure condition). Let η>0\eta>0. If L>0L>0 put r=η/(2L)r=\eta/(2L); if L=0L=0 put r=1r=1. Let μ,ν,T,S,α\mu,\nu,T,S,\alpha be as in The Structure Condition Along Optimal Maps for a Hamiltonian on the Torus Wasserstein Space §structure with αW2+W<r\alpha W^{2}+W<r, where W=WT(μ,ν)W=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu). By Step 3, if L>0L>0 then H(ν,αvS)−H(μ,−αvT)≤2L(αW2+W)<2Lr=ηH(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})\le2L(\alpha W^{2}+W)<2Lr=\eta, and if L=0L=0 then H(ν,αvS)−H(μ,−αvT)≤0<ηH(\nu,\alpha v_{S})-H(\mu,-\alpha v_{T})\le0<\eta. Hence HH satisfies the structure condition, completing the proof of The Control Hamiltonian is Continuous Along Couplings and Satisfies the Score-Perturbation Bound and the Structure Condition §structure.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…