TheoremBase

Proof

Define f:[0,T]×Rl→Rlf:[0,T]\times\mathbb{R}^l\to\mathbb{R}^l by f(t,y)=b^(y,At)f(t,y)=\hat{b}(y,A_t).

Step 1: ff satisfies the hypotheses of the differential equation theorem. Fix y∈Rly\in\mathbb{R}^l and γ\gamma. By the lemma on affine-controlled data, b^(y,α)=b(πΔl(y),α)\hat{b}(y,\alpha)=b(\pi_{\Delta^l}(y),\alpha) and ∣b(Σ,α)−b(Σ,α′)∣≤2l(l−1)K1∣α−α′∣|b(\Sigma,\alpha)-b(\Sigma,\alpha')|\le2\sqrt{l}(l-1)K_1|\alpha-\alpha'| for Σ∈Δl\Sigma\in\Delta^l, so α↦b^γ(y,α)\alpha\mapsto\hat{b}^\gamma(y,\alpha) is sequentially continuous on A\mathcal{A}. Since the components of AA are measurable and AA takes values in A\mathcal{A}, measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps, applied with E=AE=\mathcal{A}, shows that t↦fγ(t,y)=b^γ(y,At)t\mapsto f^\gamma(t,y)=\hat{b}^\gamma(y,A_t) is measurable. The bound and the state-Lipschitz property of the projected drift in the lemma on affine-controlled data give ∣f(t,y)∣=∣b^(y,At)∣≤Kb|f(t,y)|=|\hat{b}(y,A_t)|\le K_b for all (t,y)(t,y), and

∣f(t,y)−f(t,y′)∣=∣b^(y,At)−b^(y′,At)∣≤Λb∣y−y′∣,|f(t,y)-f(t,y')|=|\hat{b}(y,A_t)-\hat{b}(y',A_t)|\le\Lambda_b|y-y'| ,

with Λb=2l(l−1)(B+Λβ)\Lambda_b=2\sqrt{l}(l-1)(B+\Lambda_\beta) as in that lemma. Thus ff satisfies hypotheses 1, 2 and 3 of the existence and uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations with measurable time dependence, with constants KbK_b and Λb\Lambda_b.

Step 2: the solution and its values. By that theorem there is exactly one continuous x:[0,T]→Rlx:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^l with

xtγ=S0γ+∫[0,t]fγ(s,xs) ds=S0γ+∫[0,t]b^γ(xs,As) ds(t∈[0,T], γ∈{1,…,l}),x^\gamma_t=S^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,t]}f^\gamma(s,x_s)\,ds=S^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,t]}\hat{b}^\gamma(x_s,A_s)\,ds\qquad(t\in[0,T],\ \gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\}),

its value at t=0t=0 is S0S_0, and it satisfies ∣xt−xr∣≤Kb∣t−r∣|x_t-x_r|\le K_b|t-r|, which is claim 3.

The hypotheses of the forward invariance lemma hold for this xx: the components of AA are measurable, xx is continuous, x0=S0∈Δlx_0=S_0\in\Delta^l, and the displayed integral equation is exactly the one required. Hence xt∈Δlx_t\in\Delta^l for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and b^(xt,At)=b(xt,At)\hat{b}(x_t,A_t)=b(x_t,A_t) for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T].

Step 3: (S,A)(S,A) is a generalized mean-field trajectory pair. Put S=xS=x. Then SS maps [0,T][0,T] into Δl\Delta^l and AA maps [0,T][0,T] into A\mathcal{A} by hypothesis. Condition 1 of the definition holds: the components of SS are continuous and those of AA are measurable. For condition 2, the identity b^γ(Ss,As)=bγ(Ss,As)\hat{b}^\gamma(S_s,A_s)=b^\gamma(S_s,A_s), valid for every s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T] by Step 2, turns the displayed integral equation into

Stγ=S0γ+∫[0,t]bγ(Ss,As) ds(t∈[0,T], γ∈{1,…,l}),S^\gamma_t=S^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,t]}b^\gamma(S_s,A_s)\,ds\qquad(t\in[0,T],\ \gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\}),

as required. This proves claim 1.

Step 4: uniqueness. Let (S~,A)(\tilde{S},A) be a generalized mean-field trajectory pair with horizon TT whose value at t=0t=0 is S0S_0. Then S~\tilde{S} is continuous with values in Δl\Delta^l, so the fixed-point clause of the projection lemma gives πΔl(S~s)=S~s\pi_{\Delta^l}(\tilde{S}_s)=\tilde{S}_s and hence bγ(S~s,As)=b^γ(S~s,As)b^\gamma(\tilde{S}_s,A_s)=\hat{b}^\gamma(\tilde{S}_s,A_s) for every ss. Condition 2 of the definition therefore states that

S~tγ=S0γ+∫[0,t]b^γ(S~s,As) ds=S0γ+∫[0,t]fγ(s,S~s) ds,\tilde{S}^\gamma_t=S^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,t]}\hat{b}^\gamma(\tilde{S}_s,A_s)\,ds=S^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,t]}f^\gamma(s,\tilde{S}_s)\,ds ,

so S~\tilde{S} is a continuous solution of the same integral equation as xx with the same initial value. By the uniqueness clause of that theorem, S~=x=S\tilde{S}=x=S. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…