TheoremBase

A coordinatewise mean value argument gives |psi(y)| <= C(1+||y||^2), so phi, phiiphi_i, xkx_k phi and phi2phi^2 are dominated by a multiple of exp(alpha|x|^2), integrable by the exponential-moment lemma; lhl_h phi is a product of square-integrable functions. For claim 2, lift psi to RmR^m, transfer to Lebesgue measure with the Gaussian density, integrate by parts against cutoff times density and let the cutoff radius grow by dominated convergence; directions k > n have zero partial derivative. Claim 3 follows from claim 2 for the partial sums plus Cauchy-Schwarz and mean-square convergence.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, Borel on XX and on each Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} (m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, with the distance dEd_{E}) is as in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §measures, and γc∈P(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}(X), so (X,B(X),γc)(X,\mathcal{B}(X),\gamma_{c}) is a probability space in the sense of Probability Space, Event, and Random Variable. We use the following domination principle repeatedly: if (E,E,ν)(E,\mathcal{E},\nu) is a measure space, u:E→Ru:E\to\mathbb{R} is measurable, v:E→Rv:E\to\mathbb{R} is integrable and ∣u(z)∣≤v(z)|u(z)|\le v(z) for every z∈Ez\in E, then uu is integrable. Indeed ∣u∣|u| is measurable by claim 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, v=∣v∣v=|v|, and the monotonicity of the nonnegative integral in Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative gives ∫E∣u∣ dν≤∫E∣v∣ dν<∞\int_{E}|u|\,d\nu\le\int_{E}|v|\,d\nu<\infty, so uu is integrable by the criterion recorded in Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. Finite linear combinations of integrable functions are integrable, with the integral of the combination equal to the combination of the integrals, by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable and induction on the number of terms; and ∣u∣|u| is integrable whenever uu is, by the same criterion.

Step 1. A growth bound for ψ\psi. By claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous (with k=1k=1 and ψ\psi regarded as a map into R1\mathbb{R}^{1}), ψ\psi is continuous at every point of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} relative to Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, as a map from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). Fix y=(y1,…,yn)∈Rny=(y_{1},\dots,y_{n})\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. For i∈{0,1,…,n}i\in\{0,1,\dots,n\} let z(i)∈Rnz^{(i)}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} have coordinates zl(i)=ylz^{(i)}_{l}=y_{l} for l≤il\le i and zl(i)=0z^{(i)}_{l}=0 for l>il>i, so z(0)=0Rnz^{(0)}=0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} and z(n)=yz^{(n)}=y. Fix i∈[n]i\in[n] and, for s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}, let w(s)∈Rnw(s)\in\mathbb{R}^{n} be the point with iith coordinate ss and llth coordinate zl(i)z^{(i)}_{l} for l≠il\ne i; thus w(0)=z(i−1)w(0)=z^{(i-1)} and w(yi)=z(i)w(y_{i})=z^{(i)}. Put g(s)=ψ(w(s))g(s)=\psi(w(s)). For s,t∈Rs,t\in\mathbb{R} the point w(t)−w(s)w(t)-w(s) has the single nonzero coordinate t−st-s (if any), so by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §distance, dE(w(s),w(t))=∥w(t)−w(s)∥=∣t−s∣d_{E}(w(s),w(t))=\lVert w(t)-w(s)\rVert=|t-s|. Hence, given s0s_{0} and ε>0\varepsilon>0, a δ>0\delta>0 witnessing the continuity of ψ\psi at w(s0)w(s_{0}) in the sense of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces also witnesses the continuity of gg at s0s_{0}; so gg is continuous on every closed interval. Moreover, for s,h∈Rs,h\in\mathbb{R} the point w(s+h)w(s+h) is obtained from w(s)w(s) by adding hh to its iith coordinate, so the difference quotient (g(s+h)−g(s))/h(g(s+h)-g(s))/h is exactly the quotient in Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set for ψ\psi at w(s)w(s) in the iith variable; comparing that definition with Derivative at an Interior Point (every point of an interval [a,b][a,b] strictly between aa and bb being interior), the number ∂iψ(w(s))\partial_{i}\psi(w(s)) satisfies the condition defining the derivative of gg at every such point ss, so gg is differentiable at ss with g′(s)=∂iψ(w(s))g'(s)=\partial_{i}\psi(w(s)); a number with that property is unique, since two such numbers L,L′L,L' satisfy ∣L−L′∣<2ε|L-L'|<2\varepsilon for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 (choosing an admissible hh for the smaller of the two δ\delta's). If yi=0y_{i}=0 then ψ(z(i))=ψ(z(i−1))\psi(z^{(i)})=\psi(z^{(i-1)}). If yi≠0y_{i}\ne0, apply Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval to the restriction of gg to the closed interval with endpoints 00 and yiy_{i}: there is ss strictly between 00 and yiy_{i} with ψ(z(i))−ψ(z(i−1))=g(yi)−g(0)=∂iψ(w(s)) yi\psi(z^{(i)})-\psi(z^{(i-1)})=g(y_{i})-g(0)=\partial_{i}\psi(w(s))\,y_{i}. Since ∣s∣≤∣yi∣|s|\le|y_{i}|, every coordinate of w(s)w(s) has absolute value at most the corresponding coordinate of yy, so ∥w(s)∥2≤∥y∥2\lVert w(s)\rVert^{2}\le\lVert y\rVert^{2} and ∥w(s)∥≤∥y∥\lVert w(s)\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square; with the hypothesis on ∂iψ\partial_{i}\psi and ∣yi∣≤∥y∥|y_{i}|\le\lVert y\rVert (Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate),

∣ψ(z(i))−ψ(z(i−1))∣≤M(1+∥y∥)∥y∥,|\psi(z^{(i)})-\psi(z^{(i-1)})|\le M\bigl(1+\lVert y\rVert\bigr)\lVert y\rVert,

which also holds trivially when yi=0y_{i}=0. Writing ψ(y)−ψ(0Rn)\psi(y)-\psi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}) as the telescoping sum of these nn differences and using the triangle inequality,

∣ψ(y)∣≤∣ψ(0Rn)∣+nM(∥y∥+∥y∥2)≤C(1+∥y∥2),C=∣ψ(0Rn)∣+2nM,|\psi(y)|\le|\psi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}})|+nM\bigl(\lVert y\rVert+\lVert y\rVert^{2}\bigr)\le C\bigl(1+\lVert y\rVert^{2}\bigr),\qquad C=|\psi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}})|+2nM,

where we used u≤1+u2u\le1+u^{2} for real u≥0u\ge0 (if u≤1u\le1 then u≤1u\le1, otherwise u≤u2u\le u^{2}). The constant C≥0C\ge0 does not depend on yy.

Step 2. Bounds on XX. Let x∈Xx\in X and q∈Nq\in\mathbb{N}. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, ∣Pqx∣=∥pq(x)∥|P_{q}x|=\lVert p_{q}(x)\rVert and ∣x∣2=∣Pqx∣2+∣Qqx∣2|x|^{2}=|P_{q}x|^{2}+|Q_{q}x|^{2}, so ∥pq(x)∥2≤∣x∣2\lVert p_{q}(x)\rVert^{2}\le|x|^{2} and ∥pq(x)∥≤∣x∣\lVert p_{q}(x)\rVert\le|x|. Since xkx_{k} is the kkth coordinate of pk(x)p_{k}(x), Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate gives ∣xk∣≤∥pk(x)∥≤∣x∣|x_{k}|\le\lVert p_{k}(x)\rVert\le|x| for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Put W(x)=(1+∣x∣2)2W(x)=(1+|x|^{2})^{2}. Using Step 1, the hypothesis on ∂iψ\partial_{i}\psi, and ∣x∣≤1+∣x∣2|x|\le1+|x|^{2}, 1≤1+∣x∣21\le1+|x|^{2}, we get for all x∈Xx\in X, i∈[n]i\in[n] and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}:

∣φ(x)∣≤C W(x),∣φi(x)∣≤M(1+∣x∣)≤2M W(x),∣xkφ(x)∣≤C∣x∣(1+∣x∣2)≤C W(x),φ(x)2≤C2W(x).|\varphi(x)|\le C\,W(x),\qquad|\varphi_{i}(x)|\le M(1+|x|)\le2M\,W(x),\qquad|x_{k}\varphi(x)|\le C|x|(1+|x|^{2})\le C\,W(x),\qquad\varphi(x)^{2}\le C^{2}W(x).

Step 3. An integrable majorant. Let s=∑k=1∞cks=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}, a real number since cc is a variance sequence, so that the series converges and every ckc_{k} is positive. For every kk, ck≤∑j=1kcjc_{k}\le\sum_{j=1}^{k}c_{j}, since the other terms are positive, and ∑j=1kcj≤s\sum_{j=1}^{k}c_{j}\le s by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates; hence ck≤sc_{k}\le s for every kk, and in particular s≥c1>0s\ge c_{1}>0. Put α=1/(2+4s)\alpha=1/(2+4s) and θ=12\theta=\tfrac12. Then 0≤α0\le\alpha, θ<1\theta<1 and 2αck≤2s/(2+4s)<12=θ2\alpha c_{k}\le2s/(2+4s)<\tfrac12=\theta for every kk, so by Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §exponential the function V(x)=exp⁡(α∣x∣2)V(x)=\exp(\alpha|x|^{2}) is Borel and integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. Let β=α/2\beta=\alpha/2, so 0<β≤10<\beta\le1. For real t≥0t\ge0, claims 1 and 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function give exp⁡(αt)=exp⁡(βt)exp⁡(βt)≥(1+βt)2≥β2(1+t)2\exp(\alpha t)=\exp(\beta t)\exp(\beta t)\ge(1+\beta t)^{2}\ge\beta^{2}(1+t)^{2}, the last step because 1+βt≥β+βt≥01+\beta t\ge\beta+\beta t\ge0. With t=∣x∣2t=|x|^{2} this gives W(x)≤β−2V(x)W(x)\le\beta^{-2}V(x) for every x∈Xx\in X. Consequently every Borel function u:X→Ru:X\to\mathbb{R} with ∣u∣≤K W|u|\le K\,W for a real K≥0K\ge0 is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, by the domination principle with the integrable majorant Kβ−2VK\beta^{-2}V.

Step 4. Claim 1 (Borel measurability and integrability). By claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and claim 2 of the same lemma (which identifies B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) with the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}})), together with Step 1, ψ\psi is Borel; each ∂iψ\partial_{i}\psi is continuous at every point of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, hence continuous relative to Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) by claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions, hence Borel by the same claims 2 and 3. The map pnp_{n} and every coordinate function x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} are Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, so φ=ψ∘pn\varphi=\psi\circ p_{n} and φi=(∂iψ)∘pn\varphi_{i}=(\partial_{i}\psi)\circ p_{n} are Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and x↦xkφ(x)x\mapsto x_{k}\varphi(x) and φ2\varphi^{2} are Borel by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. By Steps 2 and 3, φ\varphi, φi\varphi_{i} (i∈[n]i\in[n]), x↦xkφ(x)x\mapsto x_{k}\varphi(x) (k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}) and φ2\varphi^{2} are integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. In particular φ\varphi is a square-integrable random variable on (X,B(X),γc)(X,\mathcal{B}(X),\gamma_{c}), the expectation being the integral against γc\gamma_{c} by Expectation, Variance, and Moments. Let h∈Hch\in H_{c}. By The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Cameron-Martin Vector: Borel Measurability, Almost Everywhere and Mean-Square Convergence, Mean Zero and Variance the Cameron-Martin Square §borel ℓh\ell_{h} is Borel and by The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Cameron-Martin Vector: Borel Measurability, Almost Everywhere and Mean-Square Convergence, Mean Zero and Variance the Cameron-Martin Square §integrable (ℓh)2(\ell_{h})^{2} is integrable, so ℓh\ell_{h} is square-integrable; by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product the product ℓhφ\ell_{h}\varphi of two square-integrable random variables is a random variable (hence Borel) and is integrable. This proves claim 1.

Step 5. Lifting ψ\psi to Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with m≥nm\ge n, let π:Rm→Rn\pi:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}, π(y)=(y1,…,yn)\pi(y)=(y_{1},\dots,y_{n}), and f=ψ∘π:Rm→Rf=\psi\circ\pi:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R} (for m=nm=n, π\pi is the identity and f=ψf=\psi). For y,y′∈Rmy,y'\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, ∑l=1n(yl−yl′)2≤∑l=1m(yl−yl′)2\sum_{l=1}^{n}(y_{l}-y'_{l})^{2}\le\sum_{l=1}^{m}(y_{l}-y'_{l})^{2}, the omitted terms being nonnegative. We claim that ff is of class C1C^{1} on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} (open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous) with

∂jf(y)=∂jψ(π(y))(j≤n),∂jf(y)=0(n<j≤m),y∈Rm.\partial_{j}f(y)=\partial_{j}\psi(\pi(y))\quad(j\le n),\qquad\partial_{j}f(y)=0\quad(n<j\le m),\qquad y\in\mathbb{R}^{m}.

Let a∈Rma\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, j∈[m]j\in[m] and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, and let a′a' be aa with tt added to its jjth coordinate. If j≤nj\le n, then π(a′)\pi(a') is π(a)\pi(a) with tt added to its jjth coordinate, so the difference quotient (f(a′)−f(a))/t(f(a')-f(a))/t in Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set for ff at aa coincides with the one for ψ\psi at π(a)\pi(a); hence the partial derivative of ff in the jjth variable exists at aa with value ∂jψ(π(a))\partial_{j}\psi(\pi(a)). If j>nj>n, then π(a′)=π(a)\pi(a')=\pi(a), every such quotient is 00, and the partial derivative exists at aa with value 00. These values are the partial derivatives by Uniqueness of the Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set. Next, if u:Rn→Ru:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} is continuous at π(a)\pi(a) in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces, then so is u∘πu\circ\pi at aa: a δ\delta that works for uu and ε\varepsilon works for u∘πu\circ\pi, by the inequality between sums of squares above. Applied to u=ψu=\psi (claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous) and u=∂jψu=\partial_{j}\psi (clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), and noting that the constant function 00 is trivially continuous, this shows that ff and all ∂jf\partial_{j}f are continuous at every point; so ff is of class C1C^{1} on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} by clauses 1 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set. Since π∘pm=pn\pi\circ p_{m}=p_{n}, we have for x∈Xx\in X:

f∘pm=φ,(∂jf)∘pm=φj (j≤n),(∂jf)∘pm=0 (n<j≤m),πj∘pm=(x↦xj),f\circ p_{m}=\varphi,\qquad(\partial_{j}f)\circ p_{m}=\varphi_{j}\ (j\le n),\qquad(\partial_{j}f)\circ p_{m}=0\ (n<j\le m),\qquad\pi_{j}\circ p_{m}=\bigl(x\mapsto x_{j}\bigr),

where πj(y)=yj\pi_{j}(y)=y_{j}. The functions ff and ∂jf\partial_{j}f are continuous on (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}) (claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions); and πj\pi_{j} is smooth on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} by claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, hence continuous relative to Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} at every point, as a map into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. So ff, ∂jf\partial_{j}f and πj\pi_{j} are Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and claim 2 of the same lemma (which identifies B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) with the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}})), and so is πjf\pi_{j}f by claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions.

Step 6. Transfer to Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. Let ρ=ρc(m)\rho=\rho_{c^{(m)}} be the diagonal Gaussian density with the variance vector c(m)=(c1,…,cm)c^{(m)}=(c_{1},\dots,c_{m}) of Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations, and λm\lambda_{m} the Lebesgue measure on B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}); ρ\rho is smooth, positive and Borel by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §regularity. By Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, (pm)#γc=γc(m)(p_{m})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(m)}}, the image measure of γc\gamma_{c} under the Borel map pmp_{m} (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward); and by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure, γc(m)\gamma_{c^{(m)}} is the measure with density ρ\rho with respect to λm\lambda_{m}. Let u:Rm→Ru:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R} be Borel with u∘pmu\circ p_{m} integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. By claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, uu is integrable with respect to γc(m)\gamma_{c^{(m)}} and ∫Xu∘pm dγc=∫Rmu dγc(m)\int_{X}u\circ p_{m}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}u\,d\gamma_{c^{(m)}}; by claim 3 of the same lemma, uρu\rho is integrable with respect to λm\lambda_{m} and

∫Xu∘pm dγc=∫Rmu ρ dλm.\int_{X}u\circ p_{m}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}u\,\rho\,d\lambda_{m}.

By Step 4 and Step 5 this applies to u=fu=f, u=πjfu=\pi_{j}f and u=∂jfu=\partial_{j}f for every j∈[m]j\in[m] (for j>nj>n, (∂jf)∘pm(\partial_{j}f)\circ p_{m} is the zero function, integrable with integral 00).

Step 7. Integration by parts on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}. Fix j∈[m]j\in[m]. We show

∫Rm(∂jf) ρ dλm=1cj∫Rmπjf ρ dλm.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}(\partial_{j}f)\,\rho\,d\lambda_{m}=\frac{1}{c_{j}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\pi_{j}f\,\rho\,d\lambda_{m}.

By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §gradient, Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set and The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling, ∂jρ(y)=−ρ(y) yj/cj\partial_{j}\rho(y)=-\rho(y)\,y_{j}/c_{j} for every yy. Let χR\chi_{R} (R>0R>0) be the cutoffs of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball with q=mq=m, and M1≥0M_{1}\ge0 the constant of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff. For N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} put gN=χNρg_{N}=\chi_{N}\rho. By that clause and claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, gNg_{N} is smooth, hence of class C1C^{1} by Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set; it vanishes whenever ∥y∥>2N\lVert y\rVert>2N, so it is compactly supported by claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set; and by the product rule of claim 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set,

∂jgN(y)=∂jχN(y) ρ(y)−χN(y) ρ(y) yjcj.\partial_{j}g_{N}(y)=\partial_{j}\chi_{N}(y)\,\rho(y)-\chi_{N}(y)\,\rho(y)\,\frac{y_{j}}{c_{j}}.

By Integration by Parts on Euclidean Space Against a Compactly Supported Function of Class C1C^{1} §parts (with q=mq=m, i=ji=j, the C1C^{1} function ff of Step 5 and g=gNg=g_{N}), the functions f ∂jgNf\,\partial_{j}g_{N} and (∂jf) gN(\partial_{j}f)\,g_{N} are integrable with respect to λm\lambda_{m} and ∫f ∂jgN dλm=−∫(∂jf) gN dλm\int f\,\partial_{j}g_{N}\,d\lambda_{m}=-\int(\partial_{j}f)\,g_{N}\,d\lambda_{m}. Hence FN=f ∂jgN+(∂jf) gNF_{N}=f\,\partial_{j}g_{N}+(\partial_{j}f)\,g_{N} is integrable with ∫RmFN dλm=0\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}F_{N}\,d\lambda_{m}=0, and

FN(y)=f(y) ∂jχN(y) ρ(y)+χN(y)(∂jf(y)−yjf(y)cj)ρ(y).F_{N}(y)=f(y)\,\partial_{j}\chi_{N}(y)\,\rho(y)+\chi_{N}(y)\Bigl(\partial_{j}f(y)-\frac{y_{j}f(y)}{c_{j}}\Bigr)\rho(y).

Let F=(∂jf)ρ−cj−1πjfρF=(\partial_{j}f)\rho-c_{j}^{-1}\pi_{j}f\rho and G=M1∣fρ∣+∣(∂jf)ρ∣+cj−1∣πjfρ∣G=M_{1}|f\rho|+|(\partial_{j}f)\rho|+c_{j}^{-1}|\pi_{j}f\rho|; both are integrable with respect to λm\lambda_{m} by Step 6 and the remarks at the start. Since ρ>0\rho>0, 0≤χN≤10\le\chi_{N}\le1 and ∣∂jχN∣≤M1N−1≤M1|\partial_{j}\chi_{N}|\le M_{1}N^{-1}\le M_{1}, we have ∣FN(y)∣≤G(y)|F_{N}(y)|\le G(y) for all yy and NN. Fix yy; for every N≥∥y∥N\ge\lVert y\rVert, χN(y)=1\chi_{N}(y)=1 by Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff, so ∣FN(y)−F(y)∣=∣f(y) ∂jχN(y) ρ(y)∣≤M1∣f(y)∣ρ(y)N−1|F_{N}(y)-F(y)|=|f(y)\,\partial_{j}\chi_{N}(y)\,\rho(y)|\le M_{1}|f(y)|\rho(y)N^{-1}, which tends to 00; thus FN(y)→F(y)F_{N}(y)\to F(y) for every yy. By claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem, 0=∫FN dλm→∫F dλm0=\int F_{N}\,d\lambda_{m}\to\int F\,d\lambda_{m}, so ∫F dλm=0\int F\,d\lambda_{m}=0, and linearity (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable) gives the displayed identity.

Step 8. Claim 2. Let i∈[n]i\in[n] and take m=nm=n, j=ij=i in Steps 5 to 7. By Step 6 (applied to u=∂ifu=\partial_{i}f and u=πifu=\pi_{i}f) and Step 7,

∫Xφi dγc=∫Rn(∂if) ρ dλn=1ci∫Rnπif ρ dλn=1ci∫Xxi φ(x) γc(dx),\int_{X}\varphi_{i}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}(\partial_{i}f)\,\rho\,d\lambda_{n}=\frac{1}{c_{i}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\pi_{i}f\,\rho\,d\lambda_{n}=\frac{1}{c_{i}}\int_{X}x_{i}\,\varphi(x)\,\gamma_{c}(dx),

which is the first identity of claim 2. Now let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with k>nk>n and take m=km=k, j=kj=k. Then ∂kf=0\partial_{k}f=0 by Step 5, so the left side of Step 7 is 00, and by Step 6

∫Xxk φ(x) γc(dx)=∫Rkπkf ρ dλk=ck∫Rk(∂kf) ρ dλk=0,\int_{X}x_{k}\,\varphi(x)\,\gamma_{c}(dx)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{k}}\pi_{k}f\,\rho\,d\lambda_{k}=c_{k}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{k}}(\partial_{k}f)\,\rho\,d\lambda_{k}=0,

which is the second identity of claim 2. This proves claim 2.

Step 9. Claim 3. Let h∈Hch\in H_{c} and S=∑i=1nhi∫Xφi dγcS=\sum_{i=1}^{n}h_{i}\int_{X}\varphi_{i}\,d\gamma_{c}. Let m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} with m≥nm\ge n. By The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Vector Relative to a Variance Sequence §partial-sums, ℓh,mφ=∑k=1m(hk/ck) xkφ\ell_{h,m}\varphi=\sum_{k=1}^{m}(h_{k}/c_{k})\,x_{k}\varphi, a linear combination of functions integrable by claim 1, so by linearity and claim 2,

∫Xℓh,m φ dγc=∑k=1nhk⋅1ck∫Xxkφ dγc+∑k=n+1mhkck⋅0=∑k=1nhk∫Xφk dγc=S.\int_{X}\ell_{h,m}\,\varphi\,d\gamma_{c}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}h_{k}\cdot\frac{1}{c_{k}}\int_{X}x_{k}\varphi\,d\gamma_{c}+\sum_{k=n+1}^{m}\frac{h_{k}}{c_{k}}\cdot0=\sum_{k=1}^{n}h_{k}\int_{X}\varphi_{k}\,d\gamma_{c}=S.

By The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Cameron-Martin Vector: Borel Measurability, Almost Everywhere and Mean-Square Convergence, Mean Zero and Variance the Cameron-Martin Square §integrable and The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Cameron-Martin Vector: Borel Measurability, Almost Everywhere and Mean-Square Convergence, Mean Zero and Variance the Cameron-Martin Square §borel, ℓh\ell_{h} and ℓh,m\ell_{h,m} are square-integrable random variables on (X,B(X),γc)(X,\mathcal{B}(X),\gamma_{c}), hence so is ℓh−ℓh,m\ell_{h}-\ell_{h,m} by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product; and φ\varphi is square-integrable by Step 4. Let D=∫Xℓhφ dγc−SD=\int_{X}\ell_{h}\varphi\,d\gamma_{c}-S, a real number not depending on mm. By linearity, D=∫X(ℓh−ℓh,m)φ dγcD=\int_{X}(\ell_{h}-\ell_{h,m})\varphi\,d\gamma_{c}, so claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm, squared, together with The Paley-Wiener Functional of a Cameron-Martin Vector: Borel Measurability, Almost Everywhere and Mean-Square Convergence, Mean Zero and Variance the Cameron-Martin Square §mean-square, gives

D2≤∫X(ℓh−ℓh,m)2 dγc∫Xφ2 dγc=(∑k=m+1∞hk2ck)∫Xφ2 dγcD^{2}\le\int_{X}(\ell_{h}-\ell_{h,m})^{2}\,d\gamma_{c}\int_{X}\varphi^{2}\,d\gamma_{c}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=m+1}^{\infty}\frac{h_{k}^{2}}{c_{k}}\Bigr)\int_{X}\varphi^{2}\,d\gamma_{c}

for every m≥nm\ge n. By the same clause the right side tends to 00 as m→∞m\to\infty; since the nonnegative number D2D^{2} is bounded by every term of a sequence tending to 00, D2=0D^{2}=0, so D=0D=0, that is ∫Xℓhφ dγc=S\int_{X}\ell_{h}\varphi\,d\gamma_{c}=S. This proves claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…