TheoremBase

Proof of Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l

lemmalem:lebesgue-product-coordinate-integration-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Β· 12,459 chars Β· 12 deps Β· depth 11 Reason: Proof of lem:lebesgue-product-coordinate-integration-2026a: pi-lambda uniqueness principle, induction on l for generation and rectangle values, insertion-map bimeasurability, image-measure identification, and reduction to the two-factor Tonelli-Fubini theorem. Internally reviewed.

Proof

Throughout, integrals of [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable functions are those of Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function, with the [0,∞][0,\infty] conventions of the statement; Ο€\pi-systems and Ξ»\lambda-systems are those of Dynkin's Pi-Lambda Theorem; generated Οƒ\sigma-algebras are those of Generated Sigma-Algebra; and Οƒ\sigma-algebra manipulations use Sigma-Algebra and Measurable Space. Write Rl\mathcal{R}_l for the family of Borel rectangles in Rl\mathbb{R}^{l}. We use two elementary consequences of countable additivity (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure) for a measure mm: finite additivity and monotonicity β€” padding a finite disjoint family with copies of βˆ…\varnothing gives m(UβˆͺV)=m(U)+m(V)m(U\cup V)=m(U)+m(V) for disjoint U,VU,V, whence m(U)≀m(V)m(U)\le m(V) for UβŠ†VU\subseteq V, as m(V)=m(U)+m(Vβˆ–U)m(V)=m(U)+m(V\setminus U) β€” and continuity from below: if E1βŠ†E2βŠ†β€¦E_1\subseteq E_2\subseteq\dots, then m(⋃jEj)=lim⁑jm(Ej)m(\bigcup_jE_j)=\lim_jm(E_j), since the union is the disjoint union of the successive differences Ejβˆ–Ejβˆ’1E_j\setminus E_{j-1} (with E0=βˆ…E_0=\varnothing) and the partial sums of their masses are the m(Ej)m(E_j).

Step 1 (a uniqueness principle). We first record: let ZZ be a set, P\mathcal{P} a Ο€\pi-system of subsets of ZZ, and mm, mβ€²m' measures on Οƒ(P)\sigma(\mathcal{P}) with m(C)=mβ€²(C)m(C)=m'(C) for every C∈PC\in\mathcal{P}; suppose there are pairwise disjoint Z1,Z2,β‹―βˆˆPZ_1,Z_2,\dots\in\mathcal{P} with ⋃nZn=Z\bigcup_nZ_n=Z and m(Zn)<∞m(Z_n)<\infty for every nn. Then m=mβ€²m=m'.

Indeed, fix nn and let Dn\mathcal{D}_n be the class of EβˆˆΟƒ(P)E\in\sigma(\mathcal{P}) with m(E∩Zn)=mβ€²(E∩Zn)m(E\cap Z_n)=m'(E\cap Z_n). It contains ZZ, both sides being the common finite value m(Zn)=mβ€²(Zn)m(Z_n)=m'(Z_n) (as Zn∈PZ_n\in\mathcal{P}). It is closed under proper differences: for FβŠ†EF\subseteq E both in Dn\mathcal{D}_n, finite additivity gives m(E∩Zn)=m((Eβˆ–F)∩Zn)+m(F∩Zn)m(E\cap Z_n)=m((E\setminus F)\cap Z_n)+m(F\cap Z_n), all terms being finite by monotonicity (each is at most m(Zn)<∞m(Z_n)<\infty), so m((Eβˆ–F)∩Zn)=m(E∩Zn)βˆ’m(F∩Zn)m((E\setminus F)\cap Z_n)=m(E\cap Z_n)-m(F\cap Z_n), and likewise for mβ€²m'. It is closed under increasing countable unions by continuity from below. Hence Dn\mathcal{D}_n is a Ξ»\lambda-system; it contains P\mathcal{P}, since for E∈PE\in\mathcal{P} the set E∩ZnE\cap Z_n again lies in the Ο€\pi-system P\mathcal{P}, on which mm and mβ€²m' agree; so DnβŠ‡Οƒ(P)\mathcal{D}_n\supseteq\sigma(\mathcal{P}) by Dynkin's Pi-Lambda Theorem. Finally, for EβˆˆΟƒ(P)E\in\sigma(\mathcal{P}), countable additivity along the pairwise disjoint sets E∩ZnE\cap Z_n gives m(E)=βˆ‘nm(E∩Zn)=βˆ‘nmβ€²(E∩Zn)=mβ€²(E)m(E)=\sum_nm(E\cap Z_n)=\sum_nm'(E\cap Z_n)=m'(E).

Step 2 (claim 1). Induction on ll. For l=1l=1 the Borel rectangles are exactly the Borel sets, so generation is trivial; Ξ»\lambda is Οƒ\sigma-finite by Existence of Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line; and the rectangle values prescribe the measure on every Borel set, so uniqueness is immediate. Let lβ‰₯2l\ge2 and assume claim 1 for lβˆ’1l-1.

Generation. Every Borel rectangle A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Al=(A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Alβˆ’1)Γ—AlA_1\times\dots\times A_l=(A_1\times\dots\times A_{l-1})\times A_l is a measurable rectangle of Blβˆ’1βŠ—B(R)\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) (Product Sigma-Algebra), since A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Alβˆ’1∈Blβˆ’1A_1\times\dots\times A_{l-1}\in\mathcal{B}_{l-1} by the induction hypothesis; hence Οƒ(Rl)βŠ†Bl\sigma(\mathcal{R}_l)\subseteq\mathcal{B}_l. Conversely, fix A∈B(R)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and let CA\mathcal{C}_A be the class of all HβŠ†Rlβˆ’1H\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{l-1} with HΓ—AβˆˆΟƒ(Rl)H\times A\in\sigma(\mathcal{R}_l). Then Rlβˆ’1∈CA\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\in\mathcal{C}_A, as Rlβˆ’1Γ—A∈Rl\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\times A\in\mathcal{R}_l; CA\mathcal{C}_A is closed under complements, since (Rlβˆ’1βˆ–H)Γ—A=(Rlβˆ’1Γ—A)βˆ–(HΓ—A)(\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\setminus H)\times A=(\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\times A)\setminus(H\times A) and Οƒ\sigma-algebras are closed under set differences; and it is closed under countable unions, since (⋃mHm)Γ—A=⋃m(HmΓ—A)(\bigcup_mH_m)\times A=\bigcup_m(H_m\times A). So CA\mathcal{C}_A is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra containing Rlβˆ’1\mathcal{R}_{l-1}, hence CAβŠ‡Blβˆ’1\mathcal{C}_A\supseteq\mathcal{B}_{l-1} by the induction hypothesis. Thus every measurable rectangle HΓ—AH\times A generating Blβˆ’1βŠ—B(R)\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) lies in Οƒ(Rl)\sigma(\mathcal{R}_l), and BlβŠ†Οƒ(Rl)\mathcal{B}_l\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal{R}_l).

Rectangle values and Οƒ\sigma-finiteness. By Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, Ξ»l=Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—Ξ»\lambda_l=\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\lambda is a Οƒ\sigma-finite measure on Bl\mathcal{B}_l with Ξ»l((A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Alβˆ’1)Γ—Al)=Ξ»lβˆ’1(A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Alβˆ’1) λ(Al)\lambda_l((A_1\times\dots\times A_{l-1})\times A_l)=\lambda_{l-1}(A_1\times\dots\times A_{l-1})\,\lambda(A_l), which equals Ξ»(A1)β‹―Ξ»(Al)\lambda(A_1)\cdots\lambda(A_l) by the induction hypothesis.

Uniqueness. Rl\mathcal{R}_l is a Ο€\pi-system, intersections being formed coordinatewise: (A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Al)∩(A1β€²Γ—β‹―Γ—Alβ€²)=(A1∩A1β€²)Γ—β‹―Γ—(Al∩Alβ€²)(A_1\times\dots\times A_l)\cap(A_1'\times\dots\times A_l')=(A_1\cap A_1')\times\dots\times(A_l\cap A_l'). For each ll-tuple q=(q1,…,ql)q=(q_1,\dots,q_l) of integers put Zq=[q1,q1+1)Γ—β‹―Γ—[ql,ql+1)Z_q=[q_1,q_1+1)\times\dots\times[q_l,q_l+1); each factor is an interval, hence a Borel set of Lebesgue measure 11 by Existence of Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line, so the ZqZ_q are countably many pairwise disjoint members of Rl\mathcal{R}_l covering Rl\mathbb{R}^{l} with Ξ»l(Zq)=1\lambda_l(Z_q)=1 by the rectangle values. Any measure on Bl\mathcal{B}_l with the stated rectangle values agrees with Ξ»l\lambda_l on Rl\mathcal{R}_l, so Step 1 gives uniqueness.

Step 3 (claim 2 for lβ‰₯2l\ge2: generation and bimeasurability). Let lβ‰₯2l\ge2, (Y,G,ΞΌ)(Y,\mathcal{G},\mu) and ii be as in claim 2, and write Plβ€²\mathcal{P}_{l'} for the family of sets RΓ—GR\times G with R∈Rlβ€²R\in\mathcal{R}_{l'} and G∈GG\in\mathcal{G}.

(a) For every lβ€²β‰₯1l'\ge1, Blβ€²βŠ—G\mathcal{B}_{l'}\otimes\mathcal{G} is generated by Plβ€²\mathcal{P}_{l'}: each RΓ—GR\times G is a measurable rectangle of Blβ€²βŠ—G\mathcal{B}_{l'}\otimes\mathcal{G}, since RβˆˆΟƒ(Rlβ€²)=Blβ€²R\in\sigma(\mathcal{R}_{l'})=\mathcal{B}_{l'} by claim 1; conversely, for fixed G∈GG\in\mathcal{G}, the class of HβŠ†Rlβ€²H\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{l'} with HΓ—GβˆˆΟƒ(Plβ€²)H\times G\in\sigma(\mathcal{P}_{l'}) is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra (it contains Rlβ€²\mathbb{R}^{l'} as Rlβ€²Γ—G∈Plβ€²\mathbb{R}^{l'}\times G\in\mathcal{P}_{l'}, and is closed under complements and countable unions exactly as in Step 2) containing Rlβ€²\mathcal{R}_{l'}, hence containing Blβ€²\mathcal{B}_{l'} by claim 1; so every generator HΓ—GH\times G of Blβ€²βŠ—G\mathcal{B}_{l'}\otimes\mathcal{G} lies in Οƒ(Plβ€²)\sigma(\mathcal{P}_{l'}). This proves in particular the generation assertion of claim 2.

(b) B(R)βŠ—(Blβˆ’1βŠ—G)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes(\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{G}) is generated by the family Q\mathcal{Q} of sets AΓ—(Rβ€²Γ—G)A\times(R'\times G) with A∈B(R)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), Rβ€²βˆˆRlβˆ’1R'\in\mathcal{R}_{l-1}, G∈GG\in\mathcal{G}: each such set is a measurable rectangle, since Rβ€²Γ—G∈Blβˆ’1βŠ—GR'\times G\in\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{G}; conversely, for fixed A∈B(R)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), the class of KβŠ†Rlβˆ’1Γ—YK\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\times Y with AΓ—KβˆˆΟƒ(Q)A\times K\in\sigma(\mathcal{Q}) is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra (it contains Rlβˆ’1Γ—Y\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\times Y since AΓ—(Rlβˆ’1Γ—Y)∈QA\times(\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\times Y)\in\mathcal{Q}, and is closed under complements and countable unions as before) containing the sets Rβ€²Γ—GR'\times G, hence containing Blβˆ’1βŠ—G\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{G} by (a) applied with lβ€²=lβˆ’1l'=l-1; so every generator AΓ—KA\times K lies in Οƒ(Q)\sigma(\mathcal{Q}).

Ξ¨i\Psi_i is a bijection; its inverse Ξ\Xi sends (ΞΈ,y)(\theta,y) to (ΞΈi,((ΞΈ1,…,ΞΈiβˆ’1,ΞΈi+1,…,ΞΈl),y))(\theta_i,((\theta_1,\dots,\theta_{i-1},\theta_{i+1},\dots,\theta_l),y)). For R=A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Al∈RlR=A_1\times\dots\times A_l\in\mathcal{R}_l and G∈GG\in\mathcal{G},

Ξ¨iβˆ’1(RΓ—G)=AiΓ—((A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Aiβˆ’1Γ—Ai+1Γ—β‹―Γ—Al)Γ—G)∈Q,\Psi_i^{-1}(R\times G)=A_i\times\bigl((A_1\times\dots\times A_{i-1}\times A_{i+1}\times\dots\times A_l)\times G\bigr)\in\mathcal{Q},

and for A∈B(R)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), Rβ€²=A1β€²Γ—β‹―Γ—Alβˆ’1β€²βˆˆRlβˆ’1R'=A_1'\times\dots\times A_{l-1}'\in\mathcal{R}_{l-1}, G∈GG\in\mathcal{G},

Ξžβˆ’1(AΓ—(Rβ€²Γ—G))=(A1β€²Γ—β‹―Γ—Aiβˆ’1β€²Γ—AΓ—Aiβ€²Γ—β‹―Γ—Alβˆ’1β€²)Γ—G∈Pl.\Xi^{-1}\bigl(A\times(R'\times G)\bigr)=(A_1'\times\dots\times A_{i-1}'\times A\times A_i'\times\dots\times A_{l-1}')\times G\in\mathcal{P}_l .

By the generator criterion of Measurable Function and Real-Valued Measurable Function together with (a) and (b), both Ψi\Psi_i and Ξ\Xi are measurable.

Step 4 (claim 2 for lβ‰₯2l\ge2: the image measure). The measures Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—ΞΌ\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\mu, Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌ\lambda_l\otimes\mu and Ξ»βŠ—(Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—ΞΌ)\lambda\otimes(\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\mu) are defined and Οƒ\sigma-finite by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, their factors being Οƒ\sigma-finite by claim 1 and by hypothesis. Let mm be the image measure of Ξ»βŠ—(Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—ΞΌ)\lambda\otimes(\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\mu) under Ξ¨i\Psi_i, a measure on BlβŠ—G\mathcal{B}_l\otimes\mathcal{G} by Step 3 and claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. For R=A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Al∈RlR=A_1\times\dots\times A_l\in\mathcal{R}_l and G∈GG\in\mathcal{G}, the preimage computed in Step 3 and the rectangle property of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, applied twice, give

m(RΓ—G)=Ξ»(Ai)β‹…Ξ»lβˆ’1(A1Γ—β‹―Γ—Aiβˆ’1Γ—Ai+1Γ—β‹―Γ—Al)β‹…ΞΌ(G)=Ξ»(A1)β‹―Ξ»(Al) μ(G)=(Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌ)(RΓ—G),m(R\times G)=\lambda(A_i)\cdot\lambda_{l-1}(A_1\times\dots\times A_{i-1}\times A_{i+1}\times\dots\times A_l)\cdot\mu(G)=\lambda(A_1)\cdots\lambda(A_l)\,\mu(G)=(\lambda_l\otimes\mu)(R\times G),

using the rectangle values of claim 1 for Ξ»lβˆ’1\lambda_{l-1} and for Ξ»l\lambda_l. The family Pl\mathcal{P}_l is a Ο€\pi-system (coordinatewise intersections). By Οƒ\sigma-finiteness of ΞΌ\mu there are Y1β€²β€²,Y2β€²β€²,β‹―βˆˆGY_1'',Y_2'',\dots\in\mathcal{G} covering YY with ΞΌ(Ynβ€²β€²)<∞\mu(Y_n'')<\infty; setting Y1=Y1β€²β€²Y_1=Y_1'' and Yn=Ynβ€²β€²βˆ–(Y1β€²β€²βˆͺβ‹―βˆͺYnβˆ’1β€²β€²)Y_n=Y_n''\setminus(Y_1''\cup\dots\cup Y_{n-1}'') yields pairwise disjoint members of G\mathcal{G} with ⋃nYn=Y\bigcup_nY_n=Y and ΞΌ(Yn)≀μ(Ynβ€²β€²)<∞\mu(Y_n)\le\mu(Y_n'')<\infty by monotonicity. The countably many sets ZqΓ—YnZ_q\times Y_n (with ZqZ_q as in Step 2) are pairwise disjoint members of Pl\mathcal{P}_l covering RlΓ—Y\mathbb{R}^{l}\times Y, with (Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌ)(ZqΓ—Yn)=ΞΌ(Yn)<∞(\lambda_l\otimes\mu)(Z_q\times Y_n)=\mu(Y_n)<\infty. Step 1 applied to mm and Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌ\lambda_l\otimes\mu gives m=Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌm=\lambda_l\otimes\mu.

Step 5 (claims 3 and 4 for lβ‰₯2l\ge2). Write m0=Ξ»βŠ—(Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—ΞΌ)m_0=\lambda\otimes(\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\mu). Let f:RlΓ—Yβ†’[0,∞]f:\mathbb{R}^{l}\times Y\to[0,\infty] be BlβŠ—G\mathcal{B}_l\otimes\mathcal{G}-measurable. Then f∘Ψif\circ\Psi_i is measurable, since for real aa one has {f∘Ψi>a}=Ξ¨iβˆ’1({f>a})\{f\circ\Psi_i>a\}=\Psi_i^{-1}(\{f>a\}), measurable by Step 3; and claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, applied to T=Ξ¨iT=\Psi_i whose image measure is Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌ\lambda_l\otimes\mu by Step 4, gives

∫RlΓ—Yf d(Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌ)=∫f∘Ψi dm0.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{l}\times Y}f\,d(\lambda_l\otimes\mu)=\int f\circ\Psi_i\,dm_0 .

The Sections clause of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems, applied to the Οƒ\sigma-finite factors (R,B(R),Ξ»)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),\lambda) and (Rlβˆ’1Γ—Y,Blβˆ’1βŠ—G,Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—ΞΌ)(\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\times Y,\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{G},\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\mu), shows that for every (ΞΈβ€²,y)(\theta',y) the section t↦(f∘Ψi)(t,(ΞΈβ€²,y))=f(Ξ¨i(t,(ΞΈβ€²,y)))t\mapsto(f\circ\Psi_i)(t,(\theta',y))=f(\Psi_i(t,(\theta',y))) is B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})-measurable, and the Tonelli clause β€” the second iterated integral of its display, which integrates over the first factor innermost β€” shows that (ΞΈβ€²,y)β†¦βˆ«Rf(Ξ¨i(t,(ΞΈβ€²,y))) dΞ»(t)(\theta',y)\mapsto\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(\Psi_i(t,(\theta',y)))\,d\lambda(t) is Blβˆ’1βŠ—G\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{G}-measurable with

∫f∘Ψi dm0=∫Rlβˆ’1Γ—Y(∫Rf(Ξ¨i(t,(ΞΈβ€²,y))) dΞ»(t))d(Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—ΞΌ)(ΞΈβ€²,y).\int f\circ\Psi_i\,dm_0=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{l-1}\times Y}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}f\bigl(\Psi_i(t,(\theta',y))\bigr)\,d\lambda(t)\Bigr)d(\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\mu)(\theta',y).

Chaining the two displays proves claim 3. For claim 4, let f:RlΓ—Yβ†’Rf:\mathbb{R}^{l}\times Y\to\mathbb{R} be integrable with respect to Ξ»lβŠ—ΞΌ\lambda_l\otimes\mu; by the integrable clause of claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, f∘Ψif\circ\Psi_i is integrable with respect to m0m_0 with the same integral, and the Fubini clause of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems β€” its symmetric statement in the other order, whose exceptional set lies in the second factor β€” provides exactly the set N∈Blβˆ’1βŠ—GN\in\mathcal{B}_{l-1}\otimes\mathcal{G} of (Ξ»lβˆ’1βŠ—ΞΌ)(\lambda_{l-1}\otimes\mu)-measure zero and the integrability statements and identity asserted in claim 4.

Step 6 (claims 2, 3, and 4 for l=1l=1). Under the conventions of the statement: the generation assertion of claim 2 is that B(R)βŠ—G\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{G} is generated by the measurable rectangles AΓ—GA\times G, which is Product Sigma-Algebra directly; Ξ¨1\Psi_1 is the identity map of RΓ—Y\mathbb{R}\times Y, trivially a bijection that is measurable with measurable inverse, and the image measure of Ξ»βŠ—ΞΌ\lambda\otimes\mu under it is Ξ»βŠ—ΞΌ=Ξ»1βŠ—ΞΌ\lambda\otimes\mu=\lambda_1\otimes\mu itself (its value on each B∈B(R)βŠ—GB\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{G} being unchanged); and claims 3 and 4 are precisely the Sections, Tonelli, and symmetric Fubini clauses of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems applied to the Οƒ\sigma-finite factors (R,B(R),Ξ»)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),\lambda) and (Y,G,ΞΌ)(Y,\mathcal{G},\mu), in the order that integrates over R\mathbb{R} innermost. β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…