TheoremBase

Proof of Uniform Partitions and Order Bounds for the Riemann Integral

lemmalem:riemann-partition-bounds-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of uniform partitions of arbitrarily small mesh via the Archimedean property, and of the order bounds via a Riemann sum with left endpoint tags.

Proof

Throughout, βˆ£β‹…βˆ£|\cdot| is the absolute value on R\mathbb{R}, and elementary manipulations of sums, products, reciprocals and the order in the ordered field R\mathbb{R} are used as recorded in Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. For a partition PP, the symbol ∣P∣|P| denotes its mesh, as in Partition of a Closed Interval, never an absolute value.

Claim 1. Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, set x0=px_0=p, and set xi=p+i (qβˆ’p)/nx_i=p+i\,(q-p)/n for i=1,…,ni=1,\dots,n. Then xn=p+(qβˆ’p)=qx_n=p+(q-p)=q. For each ii with 1≀i≀n1\le i\le n,

xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1=qβˆ’pn,x_i-x_{i-1}=\frac{q-p}{n},

which is positive: by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field we have 0<n0<n in R\mathbb{R}, and nβˆ’1n^{-1} exists with 0<nβˆ’10<n^{-1}, so (qβˆ’p)/n(q-p)/n is a product of positive factors and is positive. Hence p=x0<x1<β‹―<xn=qp=x_0<x_1<\cdots<x_n=q, so Pn=(x0,x1,…,xn)P_n=(x_0,x_1,\dots,x_n) is a partition of [p,q][p,q], and its mesh ∣Pn∣|P_n|, the maximum of the increments xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1x_i-x_{i-1}, which are all equal, is (qβˆ’p)/n(q-p)/n.

Now let Ξ΄>0\delta>0 be real. By claim 2 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers, applied with x=qβˆ’px=q-p and Ξ΅=Ξ΄\varepsilon=\delta, there exists n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with qβˆ’p<n δq-p<n\,\delta; dividing by n>0n>0 gives (qβˆ’p)/n<Ξ΄(q-p)/n<\delta.

Claim 2. Write I=∫pqf(u) duI=\int_p^q f(u)\,du for the Riemann integral of ff over [p,q][p,q], and let Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 be real. By the definition of Riemann integrability there exists a real Ξ΄>0\delta>0 with the following property: whenever PP is a partition of [p,q][p,q] with mesh ∣P∣<Ξ΄|P|<\delta and one chooses a tagged partition of [p,q][p,q] relative to PP, the corresponding Riemann sum SS of ff satisfies ∣Sβˆ’I∣<Ξ΅|S-I|<\varepsilon.

By claim 1 there is a partition Pn=(x0,x1,…,xn)P_n=(x_0,x_1,\dots,x_n) of [p,q][p,q] with mesh ∣Pn∣<Ξ΄|P_n|<\delta. Choose the tags ti=xiβˆ’1∈[xiβˆ’1,xi]t_i=x_{i-1}\in[x_{i-1},x_i] for 1≀i≀n1\le i\le n; these form a tagged partition of [p,q][p,q] relative to PnP_n, and the corresponding Riemann sum of ff is

S=βˆ‘i=1nf(ti) (xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1).S=\sum_{i=1}^n f(t_i)\,(x_i-x_{i-1}) .

Since xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1>0x_i-x_{i-1}>0 and m≀f(ti)≀Mm\le f(t_i)\le M for each ii, comparing term by term gives

m (qβˆ’p)=mβˆ‘i=1n(xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1)≀S≀Mβˆ‘i=1n(xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1)=M (qβˆ’p),m\,(q-p)=m\sum_{i=1}^n(x_i-x_{i-1})\le S\le M\sum_{i=1}^n(x_i-x_{i-1})=M\,(q-p),

where βˆ‘i=1n(xiβˆ’xiβˆ’1)=xnβˆ’x0=qβˆ’p\sum_{i=1}^n(x_i-x_{i-1})=x_n-x_0=q-p by cancellation of the telescoping sum (finite induction on nn).

From ∣Sβˆ’I∣<Ξ΅|S-I|<\varepsilon we get Sβˆ’Ξ΅<I<S+Ξ΅S-\varepsilon<I<S+\varepsilon, and combining with the bounds on SS,

m (qβˆ’p)βˆ’Ξ΅<I<M (qβˆ’p)+Ξ΅.m\,(q-p)-\varepsilon<I<M\,(q-p)+\varepsilon .

Since Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, we conclude that m (qβˆ’p)≀I≀M (qβˆ’p)m\,(q-p)\le I\le M\,(q-p): if I<m (qβˆ’p)I<m\,(q-p) held, the choice Ξ΅=m (qβˆ’p)βˆ’I>0\varepsilon=m\,(q-p)-I>0 would give I<II<I, and if M (qβˆ’p)<IM\,(q-p)<I held, the choice Ξ΅=Iβˆ’M (qβˆ’p)>0\varepsilon=I-M\,(q-p)>0 would give I<II<I; both are impossible. β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…