TheoremBase

Proves the nonnegative-combination clause first (setwise for the measure, then for simple functions and by monotone convergence for the integral), reads off the Jordan form of the total variation from the existence lemma, and derives the bound, the nonnegative case, closure under linear combinations, the behaviour of the total variation under them, the normed space and the integrability criterion.

Proof

Throughout, the values of a finite measure are real numbers ≥0\ge0, on which the sum and the product of [0,∞][0,\infty] are those of R\mathbb{R}; two functions on F\mathcal{F} are equal when their values agree at every A∈FA\in\mathcal{F}; and F\mathcal{F} is closed under the set operations used below (routine facts and background of the setting).

Step 1: the Jordan form; a finite measure. By the Hahn decomposition theorem (which uses the axiom of dependent choice), every finite signed measure on (X,F)(X,\mathcal{F}) has a Hahn set; in particular the Jordan decompositions used below exist. Let PP be a Hahn set for ν\nu and A∈FA\in\mathcal{F}. By Total Variation and Total Variation Norm of a Finite Signed Measure (i) and Existence of the Total Variation of a Finite Signed Measure (i),

∣ν∣(A)=ν(A∩P)−ν(A∖P)=ν+(A)+ν−(A).|\nu|(A)=\nu(A\cap P)-\nu(A\setminus P)=\nu^{+}(A)+\nu^{-}(A).

As ν+(A)≥0\nu^{+}(A)\ge0 and ν−(A)≥0\nu^{-}(A)\ge0, both are at most ∣ν∣(A)|\nu|(A); this proves (ii). Thus ∣ν∣=ν++ν−|\nu|=\nu^{+}+\nu^{-} setwise, a finite measure by Nonnegative Combinations of Finite Measures and Their Integrals (i) with a1=a2=1a_{1}=a_{2}=1, which proves (i).

Step 2: the bound. Let A∈FA\in\mathcal{F}. Taking B=AB=A and B=∅B=\emptyset in Total Variation and Total Variation Norm of a Finite Signed Measure (i), and using ν(∅)=0\nu(\emptyset)=0, both ν(A)\nu(A) and −ν(A)-\nu(A) are at most ∣ν∣(A)|\nu|(A), so ∣ν(A)∣≤∣ν∣(A)|\nu(A)|\le|\nu|(A). Since ∣ν∣|\nu| is a measure by Step 1, it is monotone, and ∣ν∣(A)≤∣ν∣(X)=∥ν∥|\nu|(A)\le|\nu|(X)=\|\nu\|. This proves (iii).

Step 3: nonnegative signed measures. Suppose ν(A)≥0\nu(A)\ge0 for every A∈FA\in\mathcal{F}. Every measurable subset of XX has nonnegative measure, and the only subset of X∖X=∅X\setminus X=\emptyset is ∅\emptyset, of measure 00; so XX is a Hahn set for ν\nu. Forming the Jordan decomposition with P=XP=X,

ν+(A)=ν(A∩X)=ν(A),ν−(A)=−ν(A∖X)=−ν(∅)=0(A∈F),\nu^{+}(A)=\nu(A\cap X)=\nu(A),\qquad\nu^{-}(A)=-\nu(A\setminus X)=-\nu(\emptyset)=0\qquad(A\in\mathcal{F}),

and Step 1 gives ∣ν∣(A)=ν(A)|\nu|(A)=\nu(A). Hence ν=∣ν∣=ν+\nu=|\nu|=\nu^{+} is a finite measure by Step 1. Moreover ν−\nu^{-} is the zero measure, so ∫g dν−=0\int g\,d\nu^{-}=0 for every g∈M+g\in\mathcal{M}^{+}. Let f∈L1(ν)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu). Since ν+=ν\nu^{+}=\nu, f∈L1(ν+)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu^{+}) with ∫f dν+=∫f dν\int f\,d\nu^{+}=\int f\,d\nu; and ∫f+ dν−=∫f− dν−=0\int f^{+}\,d\nu^{-}=\int f^{-}\,d\nu^{-}=0, so f∈L1(ν−)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu^{-}) with ∫f dν−=0\int f\,d\nu^{-}=0. This proves (iv).

Step 4: linear combinations. Let ν′+\nu'^{+} and ν′−\nu'^{-} be the Jordan decomposition of ν′\nu'. For every A∈FA\in\mathcal{F},

(ν+ν′)(A)=(ν+(A)+ν′+(A))−(ν−(A)+ν′−(A)),(\nu+\nu')(A)=\bigl(\nu^{+}(A)+\nu'^{+}(A)\bigr)-\bigl(\nu^{-}(A)+\nu'^{-}(A)\bigr),

and ν++ν′+\nu^{+}+\nu'^{+} and ν−+ν′−\nu^{-}+\nu'^{-} are finite measures by Nonnegative Combinations of Finite Measures and Their Integrals (i); a difference of two finite measures is a finite signed measure, so ν+ν′\nu+\nu' is one. Likewise (cν)(A)=c ν+(A)−c ν−(A)(c\nu)(A)=c\,\nu^{+}(A)-c\,\nu^{-}(A) if c≥0c\ge0, and (cν)(A)=∣c∣ ν−(A)−∣c∣ ν+(A)(c\nu)(A)=|c|\,\nu^{-}(A)-|c|\,\nu^{+}(A) if c<0c<0, where cν±c\nu^{\pm} and ∣c∣ν±|c|\nu^{\pm} are finite measures by Nonnegative Combinations of Finite Measures and Their Integrals (i) with μ2=μ1\mu_{2}=\mu_{1} and a2=0a_{2}=0. This proves (v).

Step 5: total variation of linear combinations. Let A∈FA\in\mathcal{F}; by Step 4 the total variations of ν+ν′\nu+\nu' and cνc\nu are defined. For B∈FB\in\mathcal{F} with B⊆AB\subseteq A,

(ν+ν′)(B)−(ν+ν′)(A∖B)=(ν(B)−ν(A∖B))+(ν′(B)−ν′(A∖B))≤∣ν∣(A)+∣ν′∣(A),(\nu+\nu')(B)-(\nu+\nu')(A\setminus B)=\bigl(\nu(B)-\nu(A\setminus B)\bigr)+\bigl(\nu'(B)-\nu'(A\setminus B)\bigr)\le|\nu|(A)+|\nu'|(A),

so the greatest of these numbers, ∣ν+ν′∣(A)|\nu+\nu'|(A), is at most ∣ν∣(A)+∣ν′∣(A)|\nu|(A)+|\nu'|(A). Next, (cν)(B)−(cν)(A∖B)=c(ν(B)−ν(A∖B))(c\nu)(B)-(c\nu)(A\setminus B)=c\bigl(\nu(B)-\nu(A\setminus B)\bigr). If c≥0c\ge0, the set of these numbers is {ct:t∈Sν(A)}\{ct:t\in S_{\nu}(A)\}, with Sν(A)S_{\nu}(A) as in Existence of the Total Variation of a Finite Signed Measure (i), and since t↦ctt\mapsto ct is nondecreasing its greatest element is c ∣ν∣(A)c\,|\nu|(A). If c<0c<0, put B′=A∖BB'=A\setminus B, a measurable subset of AA with A∖B′=BA\setminus B'=B; then

c(ν(B)−ν(A∖B))=∣c∣(ν(B′)−ν(A∖B′)),c\bigl(\nu(B)-\nu(A\setminus B)\bigr)=|c|\bigl(\nu(B')-\nu(A\setminus B')\bigr),

and as BB runs through the measurable subsets of AA so does B′B', the function B↦A∖BB\mapsto A\setminus B being its own inverse on them. So the set of these numbers is {∣c∣t:t∈Sν(A)}\{|c|t:t\in S_{\nu}(A)\}, with greatest element ∣c∣ ∣ν∣(A)|c|\,|\nu|(A). This proves (vi).

Step 6: the normed space. M(X,F)M(X,\mathcal{F}) is the subset of RF\mathbb{R}^{\mathcal{F}} given by the condition of being a finite signed measure, a set by the routine facts of the setting. The zero function zz on F\mathcal{F} lies in it: z(∅)=0z(\emptyset)=0, and for every sequence the series of zeros converges with sum 00. By Step 4 the sum is a binary operation on M(X,F)M(X,\mathcal{F}) and the scalar multiplication a function R×M(X,F)→M(X,F)\mathbb{R}\times M(X,\mathcal{F})\to M(X,\mathcal{F}). Each law of a real vector space not involving the zero or negatives, and the identity ν+z=ν\nu+z=\nu, reduces at every A∈FA\in\mathcal{F} to the corresponding law of the field R\mathbb{R}; so Vector Space over a Field (iii) holds with zz. For Vector Space over a Field (iv), let v∈M(X,F)v\in M(X,\mathcal{F}) and let w∈M(X,F)w\in M(X,\mathcal{F}) satisfy ρ+w=ρ\rho+w=\rho for every ρ∈M(X,F)\rho\in M(X,\mathcal{F}); taking ρ=z\rho=z gives w=zw=z, and y=(−1)vy=(-1)v lies in M(X,F)M(X,\mathcal{F}) with v+y=zv+y=z. Hence M(X,F)M(X,\mathcal{F}) is a real vector space, and zz is its zero vector.

We check the conditions of Norms and Real Normed Spaces (v). Nonnegativity: ∥ν∥=∣ν∣(X)≥0\|\nu\|=|\nu|(X)\ge0, ∣ν∣|\nu| being a measure. Definiteness: if ∥ν∥=0\|\nu\|=0, then ∣ν(A)∣≤0|\nu(A)|\le0 for every A∈FA\in\mathcal{F} by Step 2, so ν=z\nu=z. Absolute homogeneity and the triangle inequality are Step 5 with A=XA=X. Hence ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| is a norm on M(X,F)M(X,\mathcal{F}). Finally ∥z∥=∥0z∥=0 ∥z∥=0\|z\|=\|0z\|=0\,\|z\|=0, which with definiteness gives the last assertion. This proves (vii).

Step 7: integrability. Let f:X→Rf:X\to\mathbb{R} be measurable. By the integrability criterion of the base, ∣f∣∈M+|f|\in\mathcal{M}^{+}, and for every measure ρ\rho on (X,F)(X,\mathcal{F}), f∈L1(ρ)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\rho) if and only if ∫∣f∣ dρ<∞\int|f|\,d\rho<\infty. Since ∣ν∣=ν++ν−|\nu|=\nu^{+}+\nu^{-} setwise by Step 1, Nonnegative Combinations of Finite Measures and Their Integrals (ii) with a1=a2=1a_{1}=a_{2}=1 and g=∣f∣g=|f| gives

∫∣f∣ d∣ν∣=∫∣f∣ dν++∫∣f∣ dν−.\int|f|\,d|\nu|=\int|f|\,d\nu^{+}+\int|f|\,d\nu^{-}.

A sum of two elements of [0,∞][0,\infty] is finite exactly when both are, so f∈L1(∣ν∣)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(|\nu|) if and only if f∈L1(ν+)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu^{+}) and f∈L1(ν−)f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\nu^{-}). This proves (viii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…