TheoremBase

Proof of A Priori Bounded Solutions of Locally Lipschitz Ordinary Differential Equations Exist Globally

theoremthm:ode-a-priori-bound-global-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 4,297 chars · 5 deps · depth 16 Reason: Kalman-Bucy phase Block B: radial-truncation proof of global existence under a priori bounds; internally reviewed and validated; batch-approved by Aaron on 2026-07-31.

Proof

We use the componentwise inequalities ∣xi∣≤∣x∣≤∑l∣xl∣|x^{i}|\le|x|\le\sum_l|x^{l}| and d(x,y)=∣x−y∣d(x,y)=|x-y| of claim 1 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals, and the reverse triangle inequality ∣∣x∣−∣y∣∣≤d(x,y)\bigl||x|-|y|\bigr|\le d(x,y), which follows from the triangle inequality for the Euclidean distance (Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) since ∣x∣=d(x,0)≤d(x,y)+d(y,0)|x|=d(x,0)\le d(x,y)+d(y,0) and symmetrically.

The truncation. Define π:Rk→Rk\pi:\mathbb{R}^{k}\to\mathbb{R}^{k} by π(x)=x\pi(x)=x if ∣x∣≤ρ+1|x|\le\rho+1 and π(x)=ρ+1∣x∣ x\pi(x)=\frac{\rho+1}{|x|}\,x otherwise. Then ∣π(x)∣≤ρ+1|\pi(x)|\le\rho+1 for all xx, and π(x)=x\pi(x)=x exactly when ∣x∣≤ρ+1|x|\le\rho+1.

π\pi is Lipschitz with constant 22: d(π(x),π(y))≤2 d(x,y)d(\pi(x),\pi(y))\le2\,d(x,y) for all x,yx,y. If ∣x∣,∣y∣≤ρ+1|x|,|y|\le\rho+1 this is clear. If ∣x∣,∣y∣>ρ+1|x|,|y|>\rho+1, then with s=ρ+1s=\rho+1,

π(x)−π(y)=s(x∣x∣−y∣y∣)=s(x−y∣x∣+y(1∣x∣−1∣y∣)),\pi(x)-\pi(y)=s\Bigl(\frac{x}{|x|}-\frac{y}{|y|}\Bigr)=s\Bigl(\frac{x-y}{|x|}+y\Bigl(\frac1{|x|}-\frac1{|y|}\Bigr)\Bigr),

so, using ∣y∣ ∣1∣x∣−1∣y∣∣=∣∣y∣−∣x∣∣∣x∣≤d(x,y)∣x∣|y|\,\bigl|\frac1{|x|}-\frac1{|y|}\bigr|=\frac{\bigl||y|-|x|\bigr|}{|x|}\le\frac{d(x,y)}{|x|} and ∣x∣>s|x|>s,

d(π(x),π(y))≤s d(x,y)∣x∣+s d(x,y)∣x∣≤2 d(x,y).d(\pi(x),\pi(y))\le s\,\frac{d(x,y)}{|x|}+s\,\frac{d(x,y)}{|x|}\le2\,d(x,y).

If ∣x∣≤ρ+1<∣y∣|x|\le\rho+1<|y|: π(y)\pi(y) lies on the segment from 00 to yy with ∣π(y)∣=ρ+1|\pi(y)|=\rho+1, and d(y,π(y))=∣y∣−(ρ+1)≤∣y∣−∣x∣≤d(x,y)d(y,\pi(y))=|y|-(\rho+1)\le|y|-|x|\le d(x,y), so d(π(x),π(y))=d(x,π(y))≤d(x,y)+d(y,π(y))≤2 d(x,y)d(\pi(x),\pi(y))=d(x,\pi(y))\le d(x,y)+d(y,\pi(y))\le2\,d(x,y); the case ∣y∣≤ρ+1<∣x∣|y|\le\rho+1<|x| is symmetric.

Composition: if h:[a,b]→Rkh:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{k} has continuous components, so does π∘h\pi\circ h: given a point tt and ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose δ>0\delta>0 so that ∣s−t∣<δ|s-t|<\delta makes every ∣hl(s)−hl(t)∣<ε/(2k)|h^{l}(s)-h^{l}(t)|<\varepsilon/(2k); then for each component ii,

∣(π∘h)i(s)−(π∘h)i(t)∣≤d(π(h(s)),π(h(t)))≤2 d(h(s),h(t))≤2∑l∣hl(s)−hl(t)∣<ε.|(\pi\circ h)^{i}(s)-(\pi\circ h)^{i}(t)|\le d\bigl(\pi(h(s)),\pi(h(t))\bigr)\le2\,d\bigl(h(s),h(t)\bigr)\le2\sum_{l}|h^{l}(s)-h^{l}(t)|<\varepsilon .

The truncated equation. Define F~(t,x)=F(t,π(x))\widetilde{F}(t,x)=F(t,\pi(x)). Composition continuity (hypothesis (i) of Global Existence and Uniqueness for Lipschitz Ordinary Differential Equations in Integral Form) holds for F~\widetilde{F}, since F~(t,h(t))=F(t,(π∘h)(t))\widetilde F(t,h(t))=F(t,(\pi\circ h)(t)) with π∘h\pi\circ h continuous. And F~\widetilde{F} is globally Lipschitz: ∣π(x)∣,∣π(y)∣≤ρ+1|\pi(x)|,|\pi(y)|\le\rho+1, so by hypothesis (ii),

d(F~(t,x),F~(t,y))≤Lρ+1 d(π(x),π(y))≤2Lρ+1 d(x,y).d\bigl(\widetilde F(t,x),\widetilde F(t,y)\bigr)\le L_{\rho+1}\,d\bigl(\pi(x),\pi(y)\bigr)\le2L_{\rho+1}\,d(x,y).

By Global Existence and Uniqueness for Lipschitz Ordinary Differential Equations in Integral Form there is exactly one x~:[a,b]→Rk\widetilde x:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{k} with continuous components satisfying x~(t)=ξ+∫atF~(r,x~(r)) dr\widetilde x(t)=\xi+\int_a^t\widetilde F(r,\widetilde x(r))\,dr on [a,b][a,b].

The bound ∣x~∣≤ρ|\widetilde x|\le\rho. The function t↦∣x~(t)∣t\mapsto|\widetilde x(t)| is continuous (reverse triangle inequality and componentwise continuity, as above). Let

S={c∈[a,b]: ∣x~(t)∣≤ρ+1 for all t∈[a,c]},c∗=sup⁡S.S=\bigl\{c\in[a,b]:\ |\widetilde x(t)|\le\rho+1\ \text{for all }t\in[a,c]\bigr\},\qquad c^{*}=\sup S .

SS contains aa because ∣x~(a)∣=∣ξ∣≤ρ|\widetilde x(a)|=|\xi|\le\rho (hypothesis (iii)); SS is an interval containing [a,c][a,c] for each of its members cc; and by continuity ∣x~∣≤ρ+1|\widetilde x|\le\rho+1 on [a,c∗][a,c^{*}], so c∗∈Sc^{*}\in S. On [a,c∗][a,c^{*}] we have π(x~(r))=x~(r)\pi(\widetilde x(r))=\widetilde x(r), so if c∗>ac^{*}>a the restriction of x~\widetilde x is a solution on [a,c∗][a,c^{*}] in the sense of the statement, and hypothesis (iii) gives ∣x~(t)∣≤ρ|\widetilde x(t)|\le\rho on [a,c∗][a,c^{*}]; if c∗=ac^{*}=a this bound holds at t=at=a anyway. If c∗<bc^{*}<b, then since ∣x~(c∗)∣≤ρ|\widetilde x(c^{*})|\le\rho and ∣x~∣|\widetilde x| is continuous, there is c′∈(c∗,b]c'\in(c^{*},b] with ∣x~∣<ρ+1|\widetilde x|<\rho+1 on [c∗,c′][c^{*},c'], whence c′∈Sc'\in S, contradicting c∗=sup⁡Sc^{*}=\sup S. Therefore c∗=bc^{*}=b, and by the argument just given (now on [a,b][a,b]), ∣x~(t)∣≤ρ|\widetilde x(t)|\le\rho for all t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b].

Conclusion. Since ∣x~∣≤ρ≤ρ+1|\widetilde x|\le\rho\le\rho+1 everywhere, π∘x~=x~\pi\circ\widetilde x=\widetilde x, so F~(r,x~(r))=F(r,x~(r))\widetilde F(r,\widetilde x(r))=F(r,\widetilde x(r)) and x~\widetilde x is a solution on [a,b][a,b] of the original equation, with ∣x~∣≤ρ|\widetilde x|\le\rho. Conversely, if hh is any solution on [a,b][a,b], hypothesis (iii) gives ∣h∣≤ρ|h|\le\rho, hence π∘h=h\pi\circ h=h and hh satisfies the truncated equation; by the uniqueness in Global Existence and Uniqueness for Lipschitz Ordinary Differential Equations in Integral Form, h=x~h=\widetilde x. This proves existence and uniqueness of the solution x=x~x=\widetilde x. ■\blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…