TheoremBase

Proof of Causality of the Mean-Field Flow and Observation-Adaptedness of the Realized Mean-Field Flow

lemmalem:realized-mean-field-flow-adapted-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the causality and observation-adaptedness lemma for the realized mean-field flow: Gronwall causality, sequential closedness of sublevel sets in the weak metric, composition through the truncated realized control, and the deviation process.

Proof

For a measurable space (Ξ,H)(\Xi,\mathcal{H}), call a real-valued map on Ξ\Xi H\mathcal{H}-measurable when it is measurable with respect to H\mathcal{H} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). By Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable, a sequentially continuous real-valued function on a nonempty ERdE\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d, composed with an EE-valued map whose components are H\mathcal{H}-measurable, is H\mathcal{H}-measurable; we refer to this as (D1). We also use the elementary inequality xγ=1lxγ|x|\le\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}|x^\gamma| for xRlx\in\mathbb{R}^l: by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, x2=γ(xγ)2(γxγ)2|x|^2=\sum_\gamma(x^\gamma)^2\le\bigl(\sum_\gamma|x^\gamma|\bigr)^2, the right side expanding into the left side plus nonnegative cross terms, and the nonnegative square root is nondecreasing by the uniqueness of nonnegative square roots.

Claim 1. Put x=S(x0,ξ)x=S(x_0,\xi) and x=S(x0,ζ)x'=S(x_0,\zeta). By claim 2 of Stability of the Mean-Field Flow under Perturbation of the Initial State and Weak Convergence of Controls, xx is the map furnished by claim 1 of Existence and Uniqueness of the Generalized Mean-Field Trajectory for a Measurable Control for the initial value x0x_0 and the control uu, and xx' the one for x0x_0 and vv; thus both are continuous, and for every s[0,T]s\in[0,T] and γ\gamma,

xsγ=x0γ+[0,s]b^γ(xr,ur)dr,xsγ=x0γ+[0,s]b^γ(xr,vr)dr,x^\gamma_s=x^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,s]}\hat{b}^\gamma(x_r,u_r)\,dr,\qquad x'^\gamma_s=x^\gamma_0+\int_{[0,s]}\hat{b}^\gamma(x'_r,v_r)\,dr,

the integrands being, for s(0,T]s\in(0,T], bounded and measurable on [0,s][0,s]: by claims 4 and 6 of The Transition-Rate Family and Aggregate Drift of Affine-Controlled Data, b^(y,α)Kb|\hat{b}(y,\alpha)|\le K_b and b^(y,α)b^(y,α)Λbyy+2l(l1)K1αα|\hat{b}(y,\alpha)-\hat{b}(y',\alpha')|\le\Lambda_b|y-y'|+2\sqrt{l}\,(l-1)K_1|\alpha-\alpha'| for y,yRly,y'\in\mathbb{R}^l and α,αA\alpha,\alpha'\in\mathcal{A} (the second bound combining, via the triangle inequality of claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, the state-Lipschitz bound of claim 6 of the affine-rate lemma with the control-Lipschitz bound of its claim 4 applied at the projected points), so each component b^γ\hat{b}^\gamma, which satisfies the same bounds by claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, is bounded and sequentially continuous on Rl×ARl+m\mathbb{R}^l\times\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{l+m} (both coordinate blocks of a pair converge whenever the pair converges, by the same coordinate bound), and (D1) applies to the continuous map rxrr\mapsto x_r and the measurable map rurr\mapsto u_r (restricted to [0,s][0,s], where measurability with respect to B[0,s]\mathcal{B}_{[0,s]} follows from that with respect to B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]} by intersecting preimages with the Borel set [0,s][0,s]), and likewise to xx' and vv. If t=0t=0 there is nothing to prove, since x0=x0x_0=x'_0. Let t>0t>0 and s(0,t]s\in(0,t]. We use repeatedly that a bounded B[0,s]\mathcal{B}_{[0,s]}-measurable φ:[0,s]R\varphi:[0,s]\to\mathbb{R} with φK|\varphi|\le K is integrable: [0,s]φ2dλ[0,s]K2s<\int_{[0,s]}\varphi^2\,d\lambda_{[0,s]}\le K^2s<\infty by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval, so φ|\varphi| is integrable by claim 4 of the latter with the constant function 11, which is what integrability of the measurable φ\varphi means. In particular the two integrands are integrable, so by linearity, claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, xsγxsγ=[0,s]gγ(r)drx^\gamma_s-x'^\gamma_s=\int_{[0,s]}g^\gamma(r)\,dr with gγ(r)=b^γ(xr,ur)b^γ(xr,vr)g^\gamma(r)=\hat{b}^\gamma(x_r,u_r)-\hat{b}^\gamma(x'_r,v_r); write g=(g1,,gl)g=(g^1,\dots,g^l), whose components are bounded and measurable, and Norm Bound for a Vector-Valued Lebesgue Integral over a Compact Interval gives that rg(r)r\mapsto|g(r)| is bounded and measurable on [0,s][0,s] and

xsxs[0,s]g(r)dr.|x_s-x'_s|\le\int_{[0,s]}|g(r)|\,dr .

Let N={r[0,s]:u(r)v(r)}N=\{r\in[0,s]:u(r)\neq v(r)\}; it belongs to B[0,s]\mathcal{B}_{[0,s]}, being the set where the measurable map ru(r)v(r)r\mapsto|u(r)-v(r)| (by (D1), the components of the admissible representatives being measurable by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Vector-Valued Functions on a Compact Interval) is positive, and, both λ[0,s]\lambda_{[0,s]} and λ[0,T]\lambda_{[0,T]} being restrictions of Lebesgue measure λ\lambda on the real line (claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval), λ[0,s](N)=λ(N)λ({r[0,t]:u(r)v(r)})=0\lambda_{[0,s]}(N)=\lambda(N)\le\lambda(\{r\in[0,t]:u(r)\neq v(r)\})=0 by monotonicity of λ\lambda, claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure. For r[0,s]Nr\in[0,s]\setminus N we have g(r)=b^(xr,ur)b^(xr,ur)g(r)=\hat{b}(x_r,u_r)-\hat{b}(x'_r,u_r), so g(r)Λbxrxr|g(r)|\le\Lambda_b|x_r-x'_r| by claim 6 of The Transition-Rate Family and Aggregate Drift of Affine-Controlled Data. The function w(r)=xrxrw(r)=|x_r-x'_r| is continuous on [0,T][0,T] (the components of xxx-x' being continuous and the norm sequentially continuous), hence measurable and Riemann integrable with Lebesgue integral equal to its Riemann integral by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval. The product g1[0,s]N|g|\mathbf{1}_{[0,s]\setminus N} is measurable, since for real aa the set where it exceeds aa is ([0,s]N){g>a}([0,s]\setminus N)\cap\{|g|>a\} if a0a\ge0 and [0,s][0,s] if a<0a<0 (claim 3 of Rational Intervals and Rays Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line), and it is bounded, hence integrable by the remark above; so is Λbw\Lambda_bw, which is continuous, hence measurable and bounded by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval and Continuous Real-Valued Functions on a Compact Interval are Bounded. Since g|g| and g1[0,s]N|g|\mathbf{1}_{[0,s]\setminus N} agree off the null set NN, claim 2 of Integrals of Functions Vanishing or Agreeing off a Null Set on a Compact Interval gives [0,s]g(r)dr=[0,s]g(r)1[0,s]N(r)dr\int_{[0,s]}|g(r)|\,dr=\int_{[0,s]}|g(r)|\mathbf{1}_{[0,s]\setminus N}(r)\,dr, and the latter integrand is bounded everywhere by Λbw(r)\Lambda_bw(r), so by monotonicity

w(s)Λb0sw(r)dr(0<st),w(s)\le\Lambda_b\int_0^s w(r)\,dr\qquad(0<s\le t),

while w(0)=0w(0)=0. Gronwall's Lemma (Integral Form), applied on [0,t][0,t] with a=0a=0 and b=Λb0b=\Lambda_b\ge0 (nonnegative by its definition in The Transition-Rate Family and Aggregate Drift of Affine-Controlled Data, the quantities BB, Λ\Lambda and RR there being nonnegative), yields w(s)0w(s)\le0 for s[0,t]s\in[0,t]; as w0w\ge0, w=0w=0 on [0,t][0,t], that is, xs=xsx_s=x'_s for every s[0,t]s\in[0,t] by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Claim 2. Fix x0x_0, tt, γ\gamma and write f(ξ)=Stγ(x0,ξ)f(\xi)=S^\gamma_t(x_0,\xi). Let aa be real and Ca={ξUA:f(ξ)a}C_a=\{\xi\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}:f(\xi)\le a\}. We show CaC_a is sequentially closed in (UA,ρ)(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho). Let (ξn)nN(\xi_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in CaC_a converging to ξUA\xi\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}, so that ρ(ξn,ξ)0\rho(\xi_n,\xi)\to0. By claim 2 of The Set of Controls with Values in a Compact Convex Set is Weakly Metrizable and Compact, ξnξ\xi_n\rightharpoonup\xi in the sense of weak convergence. Claim 6 of Stability of the Mean-Field Flow under Perturbation of the Initial State and Weak Convergence of Controls, applied with the constant sequence x0n=x0x^n_0=x_0, shows that for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is n0n_0 with St(x0,ξn)St(x0,ξ)ε|S_t(x_0,\xi_n)-S_t(x_0,\xi)|\le\varepsilon for nn0n\ge n_0; by claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the same bound holds for f(ξn)f(ξ)|f(\xi_n)-f(\xi)|, so f(ξn)f(ξ)f(\xi_n)\to f(\xi), and f(ξ)af(\xi)\le a: otherwise ε=f(ξ)a>0\varepsilon=f(\xi)-a>0, and the convergence gives f(ξn)f(ξ)<ε|f(\xi_n)-f(\xi)|<\varepsilon, hence f(ξn)>af(\xi_n)>a, for all large nn, contradicting f(ξn)af(\xi_n)\le a. Hence ξCa\xi\in C_a. By Sequential Characterization of Closed Subsets of a Metric Space, CaC_a is closed for the topology of (UA,ρ)(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho), so it belongs to B(UA,ρ)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho) by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and its complement {f>a}\{f>a\} does as well. Since aa was arbitrary, ff is measurable with respect to B(UA,ρ)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by the criterion of claim 3 of Rational Intervals and Rays Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line.

Claim 3. Fix t[0,T]t\in[0,T] and let α^(t)\hat{\alpha}^{(t)} be the truncated realized control of claim 4 of Progressive Measurability of the Realized Control with Respect to the Observation Filtration. For every ω\omega, the paths α^(ω)\hat{\alpha}(\omega) and α^(t)(ω)\hat{\alpha}^{(t)}(\omega) are admissible representatives (claim 3 of The Realized Control of the Controlled N-Agent Dynamics as a Random Element of the Control Set and claim 4 of the progressive measurability lemma) that agree at every point of [0,t][0,t], so claim 1 gives Φt(ω)=St(x0,α^(ω))=St(x0,α^(t)(ω))\Phi_t(\omega)=S_t(x_0,\hat{\alpha}(\omega))=S_t(x_0,\hat{\alpha}^{(t)}(\omega)). The map ωα^(t)(ω)\omega\mapsto\hat{\alpha}^{(t)}(\omega) is measurable with respect to Gt\mathcal{G}_t and B(UA,ρ)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho) by claim 4 of the progressive measurability lemma, and ξStγ(x0,ξ)\xi\mapsto S^\gamma_t(x_0,\xi) is measurable with respect to B(UA,ρ)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claim 2; their composition Φtγ\Phi^\gamma_t is Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. The identities Φ0(ω)=x0\Phi_0(\omega)=x_0 and Φt(ω)Φr(ω)Kbtr|\Phi_t(\omega)-\Phi_r(\omega)|\le K_b|t-r|, and Φt(ω)Δl\Phi_t(\omega)\in\Delta^l, are claim 2 of Stability of the Mean-Field Flow under Perturbation of the Initial State and Weak Convergence of Controls applied to S(x0,α^(ω))S(x_0,\hat{\alpha}(\omega)). By claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Φtγ(ω)Φrγ(ω)Kbtr|\Phi^\gamma_t(\omega)-\Phi^\gamma_r(\omega)|\le K_b|t-r|, so each path tΦtγ(ω)t\mapsto\Phi^\gamma_t(\omega) is Lipschitz from [0,T][0,T] to R\mathbb{R}, both with the metric of the real line, hence continuous on [0,T][0,T] by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous. A path continuous on [0,T][0,T] is right-continuous in the sense of Progressive Measurability: Sections, Right-Continuous Adapted Processes, Arithmetic, and Indefinite Time Integrals: if (sj)(s_j) is a sequence in [s,T][s,T] converging to ss, then for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 the δ\delta of continuity at ss relative to [0,T][0,T] shows Φsjγ(ω)Φsγ(ω)<ε|\Phi^\gamma_{s_j}(\omega)-\Phi^\gamma_s(\omega)|<\varepsilon for all large jj. Since (Φtγ)t[0,T](\Phi^\gamma_t)_{t\in[0,T]} is adapted to (Gt)t[0,T](\mathcal{G}_t)_{t\in[0,T]} with every path right-continuous, claim 2 of Progressive Measurability: Sections, Right-Continuous Adapted Processes, Arithmetic, and Indefinite Time Integrals makes it progressively measurable with respect to (Gt)t[0,T](\mathcal{G}_t)_{t\in[0,T]}; and since GtFtsys\mathcal{G}_t\subseteq\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t for every tt (claim 1 of Progressive Measurability of the Realized Control with Respect to the Observation Filtration), every generating rectangle of B[0,t]Gt\mathcal{B}_{[0,t]}\otimes\mathcal{G}_t is one of B[0,t]Ftsys\mathcal{B}_{[0,t]}\otimes\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t, so the former product σ\sigma-algebra is contained in the latter and the family is progressively measurable with respect to (Ftsys)t[0,T](\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{sys}}_t)_{t\in[0,T]} as well.

Claim 4. Fix tt. The map Yt=ΦtStY_t=|\Phi_t-S^*_t| is a sequentially continuous function (the Euclidean norm of a difference) of the Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable maps Φtγ\Phi^\gamma_t and the constants StγS^{*\gamma}_t, hence Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable by (D1). For the paths, fix ω\omega and r,t[0,T]r,t\in[0,T]. By the triangle inequality, claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied twice, pqpq\bigl|\,|p|-|q|\,\bigr|\le|p-q| for p,qRlp,q\in\mathbb{R}^l; with p=Φt(ω)Stp=\Phi_t(\omega)-S^*_t and q=Φr(ω)Srq=\Phi_r(\omega)-S^*_r this gives

Yt(ω)Yr(ω)Φt(ω)Φr(ω)+StSrKbtr+γ=1lStγSrγ.|Y_t(\omega)-Y_r(\omega)|\le|\Phi_t(\omega)-\Phi_r(\omega)|+|S^*_t-S^*_r|\le K_b|t-r|+\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}|S^{*\gamma}_t-S^{*\gamma}_r| .

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0 and r[0,T]r\in[0,T], continuity of each SγS^{*\gamma} at rr relative to [0,T][0,T] provides δγ>0\delta_\gamma>0 with StγSrγ<ε/(2l)|S^{*\gamma}_t-S^{*\gamma}_r|<\varepsilon/(2l) whenever t[0,T]t\in[0,T] and tr<δγ|t-r|<\delta_\gamma; with δ=min(δ1,,δl,ε/(2Kb+2))\delta=\min(\delta_1,\dots,\delta_l,\varepsilon/(2K_b+2)) we get Yt(ω)Yr(ω)<ε|Y_t(\omega)-Y_r(\omega)|<\varepsilon whenever tr<δ|t-r|<\delta. So every path of YY is continuous on [0,T][0,T]. For the bound, each SγS^{*\gamma} is bounded on [0,T][0,T] by Continuous Real-Valued Functions on a Compact Interval are Bounded, say Stγcγ|S^{*\gamma}_t|\le c_\gamma, while Φt(ω)1|\Phi_t(\omega)|\le1 by claim 1 of The Simplex, the Control Set and Their Product are Compact Separable Metric Spaces; hence, by claims 5 and 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the inequality xγxγ|x|\le\sum_\gamma|x^\gamma| noted at the outset, 0Yt(ω)Φt(ω)+St1+γcγ=:KY0\le Y_t(\omega)\le|\Phi_t(\omega)|+|S^*_t|\le1+\sum_\gamma c_\gamma=:K_Y.

Finally, the family (Yt)t[0,T](Y_t)_{t\in[0,T]} consists of random variables on the probability space (Ω,GT,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}_T,P) (the restriction of PP to the sub-σ\sigma-algebra GT\mathcal{G}_T being a probability measure), each YtY_t being Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable and GtGT\mathcal{G}_t\subseteq\mathcal{G}_T. Every path is bounded by KYK_Y and, being continuous on [0,T][0,T], is right-continuous at every t[0,T)t\in[0,T) in the sense of The Supremum of a Bounded Right-Continuous Process is a Random Variable (given ε>0\varepsilon>0, the δ\delta of continuity at tt serves as η\eta). Applying that lemma on (Ω,GT,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}_T,P) with Ω0=Ω\Omega_0=\Omega and Zt=Yt0Z_t=Y_t\ge0 shows that Y=suptDYt\overline{Y}=\sup_{t\in D}Y_t, where DD denotes the set of dyadic partition points of [0,T][0,T] of that lemma (a symbol used with this meaning only here), is GT\mathcal{G}_T-measurable and equals supt[0,T]Yt(ω)\sup_{t\in[0,T]}Y_t(\omega) at every ωΩ\omega\in\Omega; in particular the latter supremum exists for every ω\omega. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…