TheoremBase

Proof of Existence and Uniqueness for Ordinary Differential Equations with Measurable Time Dependence

theoremthm:caratheodory-ode-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published version of the proof for ordinary differential equations with measurable time dependence, by piecewise-constant approximation for measurability along paths and Picard iteration in the complete space of continuous vector-valued maps.

Proof

Throughout we use the coordinate bound xix|x^i|\le|x| from the elementary properties of the Euclidean norm, and the following consequence of linearity of the integral: if 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T and gg is bounded and measurable on [0,T][0,T], then [0,t]g=[0,r]g+[r,t]g\int_{[0,t]}g=\int_{[0,r]}g+\int_{[r,t]}g, because 1[0,t]=1[0,r]+1[r,t]1{r}\mathbf{1}_{[0,t]}=\mathbf{1}_{[0,r]}+\mathbf{1}_{[r,t]}-\mathbf{1}_{\{r\}} and the integral of g1{r}g\,\mathbf{1}_{\{r\}} vanishes, the single point rr having Lebesgue measure zero. Here 1D\mathbf{1}_D is the function equal to 11 on DD and 00 elsewhere.

Part (a). Let y:[0,T]Rny:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^n be continuous and fix ii. For a natural number qq put tk=kT/qt_k=kT/q for k{0,,q}k\in\{0,\dots,q\} and define y(q):[0,T]Rny^{(q)}:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^n by ys(q)=ytky^{(q)}_s=y_{t_k} for s[tk,tk+1)s\in[t_k,t_{k+1}) and k{0,,q1}k\in\{0,\dots,q-1\}, and yT(q)=yTy^{(q)}_T=y_T.

For every real number cc,

{s[0,T]:fi(s,ys(q))>c}=k=0q1([tk,tk+1){s:fi(s,ytk)>c})  ({T}{s:fi(s,yT)>c}),\{s\in[0,T]:f^i(s,y^{(q)}_s)>c\}=\bigcup_{k=0}^{q-1}\Big([t_k,t_{k+1})\cap\{s:f^i(s,y_{t_k})>c\}\Big)\ \cup\ \big(\{T\}\cap\{s:f^i(s,y_T)>c\}\big),

a finite union of intersections of intervals with sets that belong to the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra by hypothesis 1. Hence sfi(s,ys(q))s\mapsto f^i(s,y^{(q)}_s) is measurable, and fi(s,ys(q))f(s,ys(q))K|f^i(s,y^{(q)}_s)|\le|f(s,y^{(q)}_s)|\le K by hypothesis 2.

The map yy is continuous on the compact interval [0,T][0,T], hence uniformly continuous. Every s[0,T]s\in[0,T] satisfies suT/q|s-u|\le T/q for the point u{t0,,tq}u\in\{t_0,\dots,t_q\} with ys(q)=yuy^{(q)}_s=y_u, so ys(q)ysω(T/q)|y^{(q)}_s-y_s|\le\omega(T/q) where ω\omega is a modulus of uniform continuity of yy, and therefore ys(q)ys0|y^{(q)}_s-y_s|\to0 as qq\to\infty, uniformly in ss. By hypothesis 3 and the coordinate bound,

fi(s,ys(q))fi(s,ys)f(s,ys(q))f(s,ys)Λys(q)ys,\big|f^i(s,y^{(q)}_s)-f^i(s,y_s)\big|\le\big|f(s,y^{(q)}_s)-f(s,y_s)\big|\le\Lambda\,|y^{(q)}_s-y_s| ,

so fi(s,ys(q))f^i(s,y^{(q)}_s) converges to fi(s,ys)f^i(s,y_s) for every s[0,T]s\in[0,T]. All these functions are bounded in absolute value by KK, so by measurability of bounded pointwise limits, sfi(s,ys)s\mapsto f^i(s,y_s) is measurable; it is bounded by KK, hence integrable over [0,t][0,t] for every tt.

Part (b), existence. Let CC denote the set of continuous maps [0,T]Rn[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^n equipped with the supremum metric d(y,z)=supt[0,T]ytztd_\infty(y,z)=\sup_{t\in[0,T]}|y_t-z_t|, which is a complete metric space by completeness of the space of continuous vector-valued functions. Define xt(0)=x0x^{(0)}_t=x_0 for all tt, and recursively

xt(j+1),i=x0i+[0,t]fi(s,xs(j))ds(i{1,,n}, t[0,T]).x^{(j+1),i}_t=x^i_0+\int_{[0,t]}f^i(s,x^{(j)}_s)\,ds\qquad(i\in\{1,\dots,n\},\ t\in[0,T]).

Assuming inductively that x(j)Cx^{(j)}\in C, part (a) shows that all these integrals exist. For 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T the ii-th component of xt(j+1)xr(j+1)x^{(j+1)}_t-x^{(j+1)}_r is [r,t]fi(s,xs(j))ds\int_{[r,t]}f^i(s,x^{(j)}_s)\,ds, so by the norm bound for vector-valued integrals and hypothesis 2,

xt(j+1)xr(j+1)[r,t]f(s,xs(j))dsK(tr).\big|x^{(j+1)}_t-x^{(j+1)}_r\big|\le\int_{[r,t]}\big|f(s,x^{(j)}_s)\big|\,ds\le K(t-r) .

Hence x(j+1)Cx^{(j+1)}\in C, and by induction every iterate lies in CC.

We show by induction on jj that

xt(j+1)xt(j)KΛjtj+1(j+1)!for all t[0,T].\big|x^{(j+1)}_t-x^{(j)}_t\big|\le\frac{K\Lambda^j\,t^{j+1}}{(j+1)!}\qquad\text{for all }t\in[0,T].

For j=0j=0 this is the display above with r=0r=0. Assuming it for jj, the norm bound, hypothesis 3 and monotonicity give

xt(j+2)xt(j+1)[0,t]f(s,xs(j+1))f(s,xs(j))dsΛ[0,t]KΛjsj+1(j+1)!ds=KΛj+1tj+2(j+2)!,\big|x^{(j+2)}_t-x^{(j+1)}_t\big|\le\int_{[0,t]}\big|f(s,x^{(j+1)}_s)-f(s,x^{(j)}_s)\big|\,ds\le\Lambda\int_{[0,t]}\frac{K\Lambda^{j}s^{j+1}}{(j+1)!}\,ds=\frac{K\Lambda^{j+1}t^{j+2}}{(j+2)!},

the last integral being computed as a Riemann integral of a continuous integrand, which agrees with the Lebesgue integral by the compact-interval toolkit, and evaluated by the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Consequently d(x(j+1),x(j))KΛjTj+1/(j+1)!d_\infty(x^{(j+1)},x^{(j)})\le K\Lambda^jT^{j+1}/(j+1)!. The series j0KΛjTj+1/(j+1)!\sum_{j\ge0}K\Lambda^jT^{j+1}/(j+1)! converges, its partial sums being bounded by KTeΛTKT\,e^{\Lambda T}, so for j<jj<j' the triangle inequality gives

d(x(j),x(j))i=jj1KΛiTi+1(i+1)!,d_\infty\big(x^{(j)},x^{(j')}\big)\le\sum_{i=j}^{j'-1}\frac{K\Lambda^iT^{i+1}}{(i+1)!},

a tail of a convergent series, which tends to 00 as jj\to\infty. Thus (x(j))(x^{(j)}) is a Cauchy sequence in CC and converges to some xCx\in C; in particular xx is continuous.

Fix t[0,T]t\in[0,T] and ii. By hypothesis 3, the coordinate bound and monotonicity,

[0,t]fi(s,xs(j))ds[0,t]fi(s,xs)ds[0,t]Λxs(j)xsdsΛTd(x(j),x)0.\Big|\int_{[0,t]}f^i(s,x^{(j)}_s)\,ds-\int_{[0,t]}f^i(s,x_s)\,ds\Big|\le\int_{[0,t]}\Lambda\big|x^{(j)}_s-x_s\big|\,ds\le\Lambda T\,d_\infty\big(x^{(j)},x\big)\longrightarrow0 .

Since also xt(j+1),ixtix^{(j+1),i}_t\to x^i_t, letting jj\to\infty in the recursion gives

xti=x0i+[0,t]fi(s,xs)ds.x^i_t=x^i_0+\int_{[0,t]}f^i(s,x_s)\,ds .

At t=0t=0 all integrals vanish, so the value of xx at 00 is x0x_0.

Part (b), uniqueness. Let xx and x~\tilde{x} be continuous maps satisfying the integral equation with the same x0x_0. The map u(t)=xtx~tu(t)=|x_t-\tilde{x}_t| is continuous, and u(0)=0u(0)=0. Subtracting the two equations componentwise and applying the norm bound and hypothesis 3,

u(t)[0,t]f(s,xs)f(s,x~s)dsΛ[0,t]u(s)ds.u(t)\le\int_{[0,t]}\big|f(s,x_s)-f(s,\tilde{x}_s)\big|\,ds\le\Lambda\int_{[0,t]}u(s)\,ds .

The integrand is continuous, so the Lebesgue and Riemann integrals agree, and Gronwall's lemma in integral form, applied with a=0a=0 and b=Λb=\Lambda, gives u(t)0u(t)\le0 for every tt. Since u0u\ge0, we get u0u\equiv0, that is x=x~x=\tilde{x}.

Part (c). For 0rtT0\le r\le t\le T the same computation as for the iterates gives xtxr[r,t]f(s,xs)dsK(tr)|x_t-x_r|\le\int_{[r,t]}|f(s,x_s)|\,ds\le K(t-r), and the case trt\le r follows by symmetry. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…