TheoremBase

Sketch: induction on the number of summands, expanding with the binomial theorem and combining the coefficients by the binomial-product rule for multinomial coefficients.

Proof

For p∈Np\in\mathbb{N} and s∈N0s\in\mathbb{N}_{0} write

Kp(s)={k∈N0p:k1+β‹―+kp=s},K_{p}(s)=\{k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}^{p}:k_{1}+\dots+k_{p}=s\},

so that K=Km(n)K=K_{m}(n); for k∈Kp(s)k\in K_{p}(s) we write the multinomial coefficient (k1+β‹―+kpk1,…,kp)\binom{k_{1}+\dots+k_{p}}{k_{1},\dots,k_{p}} as (sk1,…,kp)\binom{s}{k_{1},\dots,k_{p}}. Throughout, Kp(s)K_{p}(s) is finite by Counting Tuples with a Given Sum (i), applied with p=q+1p=q+1 for the q∈N0q\in\mathbb{N}_{0} given by 1≀p1\le p (The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion (v), Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (vii)); x1+β‹―+xp=βˆ‘i=1pxix_{1}+\dots+x_{p}=\sum_{i=1}^{p}x_{i} and x1k1β‹―xpkp=∏i=1pxikix_{1}^{k_{1}}\cdots x_{p}^{k_{p}}=\prod_{i=1}^{p}x_{i}^{k_{i}} are formed in RR; and for k∈N0pk\in\mathbb{N}_{0}^{p} and j∈N0j\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, (k1,…,kp,j)(k_{1},\dots,k_{p},j) is the tuple of Finite Sets: Removing an Element, Injective Self-Maps, Infinite Sets, Sets of Permutations, Pairs and Extended Tuples (vi), so that (k,j)↦(k1,…,kp,j)(k,j)\mapsto(k_{1},\dots,k_{p},j) is a bijection from N0pΓ—N0\mathbb{N}_{0}^{p}\times\mathbb{N}_{0} onto N0p+1\mathbb{N}_{0}^{p+1}. We prove the theorem by induction on mm (The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion (viii)), for all n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0} and all x1,…,xm∈Rx_{1},\dots,x_{m}\in R.

Step 1 (one summand). Let m=1m=1. Since [1]={1}[1]=\{1\}, sums and products over [1][1] have the single term at 11 (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (i)): the left side is x1nx_{1}^{n}, and K1(n)K_{1}(n) consists of the 11-tuples with k1=nk_{1}=n, of which there is exactly one, the map on [1][1] with value nn (Maps Formed Pointwise: Constant Maps, Pairs of Values, Maps Applied to Values, and Families of Maps (i)). Its multinomial coefficient is (nn)=1\binom{n}{n}=1, the only M∈N0M\in\mathbb{N}_{0} with Mβ‹…n!=n!M\cdot n!=n! (The Multinomial Coefficient (i), Existence and Uniqueness of the Multinomial Coefficients (i), Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (iii)). So the right side is 1β‹…x1n=x1n1\cdot x_{1}^{n}=x_{1}^{n}, again by Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (i).

Step 2 (binomial expansion). Assume the theorem for mm, and let x1,…,xm+1∈Rx_{1},\dots,x_{m+1}\in R and n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}. Put s=x1+β‹―+xms=x_{1}+\dots+x_{m}, so that x1+β‹―+xm+1=s+xm+1x_{1}+\dots+x_{m+1}=s+x_{m+1} (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (vii)). By The Binomial Theorem in a Commutative Ring (i) with x=xm+1x=x_{m+1} and y=sy=s, and the induction hypothesis applied to snβˆ’js^{n-j} for each j∈{0,…,n}j\in\{0,\dots,n\},

(x1+β‹―+xm+1)n=βˆ‘j=0n(nj)xm+1j snβˆ’j=βˆ‘j=0n(nj)xm+1jβˆ‘k∈Km(nβˆ’j)(nβˆ’jk1,…,km)x1k1β‹―xmkm.(x_{1}+\dots+x_{m+1})^{n}=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}x_{m+1}^{j}\,s^{n-j}=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{j}x_{m+1}^{j}\sum_{k\in K_{m}(n-j)}\binom{n-j}{k_{1},\dots,k_{m}}x_{1}^{k_{1}}\cdots x_{m}^{k_{m}}.

Step 3 (one sum over pairs). For j∈{0,…,n}j\in\{0,\dots,n\} and k∈Km(nβˆ’j)k\in K_{m}(n-j) let

u(j,k)=(nj)(nβˆ’jk1,…,km)x1k1β‹―xmkm xm+1j.u(j,k)=\binom{n}{j}\binom{n-j}{k_{1},\dots,k_{m}}x_{1}^{k_{1}}\cdots x_{m}^{k_{m}}\,x_{m+1}^{j}.

Moving the factor (nj)xm+1j\binom{n}{j}x_{m+1}^{j} into the inner sum (Sums over Finite Sets in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Products of Sums, Vanishing Terms, Sums over Pairs, Expanding Products of Sums, Counting, Comparison, Monotonicity and the Triangle Inequality (i)) and writing the double sum as one sum over the set TT of pairs (j,k)(j,k) with j∈{0,…,n}j\in\{0,\dots,n\} and k∈Km(nβˆ’j)k\in K_{m}(n-j) (Sums over Finite Sets in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Products of Sums, Vanishing Terms, Sums over Pairs, Expanding Products of Sums, Counting, Comparison, Monotonicity and the Triangle Inequality (vi), over the finite index set {0,…,n}\{0,\dots,n\} of Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vii), for the family (Km(nβˆ’j))j∈{0,…,n}(K_{m}(n-j))_{j\in\{0,\dots,n\}}), Step 2 becomes

(x1+β‹―+xm+1)n=βˆ‘(j,k)∈Tu(j,k).(x_{1}+\dots+x_{m+1})^{n}=\sum_{(j,k)\in T}u(j,k).

Step 4 (appending the last exponent is a bijection Tβ†’Km+1(n)T\to K_{m+1}(n)). Let Ξ¦(j,k)=(k1,…,km,j)\Phi(j,k)=(k_{1},\dots,k_{m},j). For (j,k)∈T(j,k)\in T the entries of Ξ¦(j,k)\Phi(j,k) add up to (k1+β‹―+km)+j=(nβˆ’j)+j=n(k_{1}+\dots+k_{m})+j=(n-j)+j=n (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (vii), The Difference of Two Natural Numbers with Zero (i)), so Ξ¦\Phi maps TT into Km+1(n)K_{m+1}(n). It is injective because the bijection of Finite Sets: Removing an Element, Injective Self-Maps, Infinite Sets, Sets of Permutations, Pairs and Extended Tuples (vi) is. It is onto Km+1(n)K_{m+1}(n): every kβ€²βˆˆKm+1(n)k'\in K_{m+1}(n) is (k1,…,km,j)(k_{1},\dots,k_{m},j) for some k∈N0mk\in\mathbb{N}_{0}^{m} and j∈N0j\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, and then (k1+β‹―+km)+j=n(k_{1}+\dots+k_{m})+j=n; hence j≀nj\le n by Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order (vii) and k1+β‹―+km=nβˆ’jk_{1}+\dots+k_{m}=n-j by The Difference of Two Natural Numbers with Zero (i), that is, (j,k)∈T(j,k)\in T and Ξ¦(j,k)=kβ€²\Phi(j,k)=k'.

Step 5 (matching the terms). Let (j,k)∈T(j,k)\in T and kβ€²=Ξ¦(j,k)k'=\Phi(j,k), so kiβ€²=kik'_{i}=k_{i} for i∈[m]i\in[m] and km+1β€²=jk'_{m+1}=j. By Multinomial Coefficients: Binomial Products and Counting (i), with km+1=jk_{m+1}=j, and since k1+β‹―+km=nβˆ’jk_{1}+\dots+k_{m}=n-j and k1β€²+β‹―+km+1β€²=nk'_{1}+\dots+k'_{m+1}=n by Step 4,

(nk1β€²,…,km+1β€²)=(nβˆ’jk1,…,km)(nj)\binom{n}{k'_{1},\dots,k'_{m+1}}=\binom{n-j}{k_{1},\dots,k_{m}}\binom{n}{j}

in N0\mathbb{N}_{0}, and hence in RR (The Image of the Natural Numbers with Zero in a Commutative Ring Respects Zero, One, Sums, Products, Differences, Powers, and Finite Sums and Products (iii)). Splitting off the last factor of the monomial (Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (vii)),

x1k1β€²β‹―xm+1km+1β€²=x1k1β‹―xmkm xm+1j.x_{1}^{k'_{1}}\cdots x_{m+1}^{k'_{m+1}}=x_{1}^{k_{1}}\cdots x_{m}^{k_{m}}\,x_{m+1}^{j}.

Therefore u(j,k)=f(Ξ¦(j,k))u(j,k)=f(\Phi(j,k)) for f(kβ€²)=(nk1β€²,…,km+1β€²)x1k1β€²β‹―xm+1km+1β€²f(k')=\binom{n}{k'_{1},\dots,k'_{m+1}}x_{1}^{k'_{1}}\cdots x_{m+1}^{k'_{m+1}} on Km+1(n)K_{m+1}(n).

Step 6 (the claim for m+1m+1). By Steps 3 to 5 and Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals (iii), applied to the addition of RR and the bijection Φ:T→Km+1(n)\Phi:T\to K_{m+1}(n),

(x1+β‹―+xm+1)n=βˆ‘(j,k)∈Tf(Ξ¦(j,k))=βˆ‘kβ€²βˆˆKm+1(n)(nk1β€²,…,km+1β€²)x1k1β€²β‹―xm+1km+1β€²,(x_{1}+\dots+x_{m+1})^{n}=\sum_{(j,k)\in T}f(\Phi(j,k))=\sum_{k'\in K_{m+1}(n)}\binom{n}{k'_{1},\dots,k'_{m+1}}x_{1}^{k'_{1}}\cdots x_{m+1}^{k'_{m+1}},

which is the theorem for m+1m+1 and completes the induction.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…