Proof of The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure
lemmalem:borel-subspace-metric-2026aThe two continuity conditions unfold to the same epsilon-delta clause; the trace family is a sigma-algebra containing the relatively open sets and is contained in one, and the restriction claims follow from the assembly of measure spaces applied through that identification.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named where it is used.
Claim 1(a). By Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, read with the ambient metric space , the subset and the map , the first assertion says: for every and every positive real there is a positive real such that every with satisfies . Read instead with the ambient metric space , the subset of itself and the same map , the same definition gives the second assertion: for every and every positive real there is a positive real such that every with satisfies . Since is the restriction of , one has for all , so the two displayed conditions are the same condition on , and each assertion holds exactly when the other does.
Claim 1(b). Likewise, by Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces the continuity of on as a map into says: for every and every positive real there is a positive real such that every with satisfies ; and the continuity of on as a map into says the same with in place of . Since for every and is the restriction of , one has for all , so again the two conditions coincide.
Claim 2. Put , a collection of subsets of .
is a -algebra on . The requirements of Sigma-Algebra and Measurable Space hold: and ; for one has with ; and for a sequence in one has with , the three properties of used here being the same requirements for the -algebra .
. Let be open in the metric space . By claim 2 of The Restriction of a Metric to a Subset Induces the Subspace Topology there is with , and by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space applied to ; hence . By Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Metric Space, is the -algebra generated by the subsets of open in ; since is a -algebra on containing all of them, Intersections of Sigma-Algebras and Minimality of the Generated Sigma-Algebra gives .
. Put . Then is a -algebra on : ; if then ; and if is a sequence in then , again by the requirements of Sigma-Algebra and Measurable Space for . Moreover every belongs to : the set is open in by claim 2 of The Restriction of a Metric to a Subset Induces the Subspace Topology, hence lies in by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space applied to the metric space . Since is the -algebra generated by , Intersections of Sigma-Algebras and Minimality of the Generated Sigma-Algebra gives , which says precisely that for every , that is, .
The two inclusions give .
Claim 3. Assume .
If and , then by claim 2. Conversely let . By claim 2 there is with ; then , and belongs to because contains and and is closed under complements and countable unions by Sigma-Algebra and Measurable Space, a union of two members being the union of a sequence in which they alternate. Hence , which is the family written in claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions, read for a measure space of the form and the set ; the description of that family in the cited claim involves only , the -algebra and , not the measure.
Let now be a Borel measure on , so that is a measure space by Borel Measure on a Metric Space. By claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions, setting for defines a measure on . Since , this is a measure on , that is, a Borel measure on by Borel Measure on a Metric Space. Taking , which lies in , gives .
Claim 4. Assume and let and be as stated.
Measurability of . For one has , and by the measurability of , so by claim 2.
The positive and negative parts. Let and be the positive and negative parts of in the sense of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral; by that item they are measurable with respect to , they are nonnegative, and . For we have , hence and . Also, directly from the defining formulas of that item, and as functions on .
Fix one of the two signs and write for the corresponding part, so that is nonnegative, measurable with respect to , and vanishes on ; read as a map into it is measurable in the sense of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §measurable, the two readings agreeing there. Then is exactly the zero extension of in the sense of claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions: the two functions agree on by definition and both vanish off . Applying that claim to the measure space and the set , whose restriction is the measure space by claim 3, the function is measurable with respect to and
Conclusion. Since is integrable with respect to , both and are finite by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. By the displayed identity applied to each sign, together with and , both and are finite, so is integrable with respect to by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, and
the first and the last equality being the definition of the integral of an integrable function in Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral.
Loading…
Prerequisites
60f7bd51-37c9-41e2-a9c8-5173bc747874