TheoremBase

Realise lambda with a free semicircular family S and multiply each UjU_j by the Cayley transform of (i sqrt(t)/2) SjS_j; the laws of the perturbed tuples form a path in the unitary laws. Expanding each word to second order, the centring and covariance relations give lambda(w) + t Theta lambda(w) up to an error of at most 27 2^k t3/2t^{3/2}, which is summable in the word gauge and yields the inward tangent vector.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Operators are handled in the notation of Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation, and for a tracial W*-probability space and a dd-tuple VV of unitaries in it we use the notation V(l)V^{(l)}, V(w)V^{(w)}, AV\mathcal{A}_{V} and λV\lambda_{V} fixed in the statement of Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family. For letters we use Words in Unitary Letters: Generators, Signs, Inverse Letters, Lengths and Adjoint Words §letters: a letter ll with ε(l)=1\varepsilon(l)=1 is the letter g(l)g(l), one with ε(l)=−1\varepsilon(l)=-1 is the letter d+g(l)d+g(l).

Fix λ∈Ld\lambda\in\mathcal{L}_{d}. By Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family §realisation there are a tracial W*-probability space (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega) with trace τ=τM\tau=\tau_{M}, a dd-tuple UU of unitary operators on HH belonging to MM with λU=λ\lambda_{U}=\lambda, and self-adjoint S1,…,Sd∈MS_{1},\dots,S_{d}\in M with ∥Sj∥op≤2\lVert S_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le2, satisfying Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family §centred and Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family §covariance. We fix these data.

Step 0 (elementary facts). (O1) For T∈MT\in M, ∣τ(T)∣=∣⟨Ω,TΩ⟩∣≤∥Ω∥ ∥TΩ∥≤∥T∥op|\tau(T)|=|\langle\Omega,T\Omega\rangle|\le\lVert\Omega\rVert\,\lVert T\Omega\rVert\le\lVert T\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}. Here the equality is Tracial W*-Probability Spaces §trace with Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §trace. For the first inequality, Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Complex Inner Product Space gives ∣⟨Ω,TΩ⟩∣2≤⟨Ω,Ω⟩⟨TΩ,TΩ⟩=∥Ω∥2∥TΩ∥2=(∥Ω∥ ∥TΩ∥)2|\langle\Omega,T\Omega\rangle|^{2}\le\langle\Omega,\Omega\rangle\langle T\Omega,T\Omega\rangle=\lVert\Omega\rVert^{2}\lVert T\Omega\rVert^{2}=(\lVert\Omega\rVert\,\lVert T\Omega\rVert)^{2}, and since both ∣⟨Ω,TΩ⟩∣|\langle\Omega,T\Omega\rangle| and ∥Ω∥ ∥TΩ∥\lVert\Omega\rVert\,\lVert T\Omega\rVert are nonnegative, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field yields ∣⟨Ω,TΩ⟩∣≤∥Ω∥ ∥TΩ∥|\langle\Omega,T\Omega\rangle|\le\lVert\Omega\rVert\,\lVert T\Omega\rVert. For the second, ∥T∥op\lVert T\rVert_{\mathrm{op}} is a bound for TT by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound, so ∥TΩ∥≤∥T∥op∥Ω∥\lVert T\Omega\rVert\le\lVert T\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\lVert\Omega\rVert by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §bounded, and ∥Ω∥=1\lVert\Omega\rVert=1 (Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §cyclic). (O2) τ(AB)=τ(BA)\tau(AB)=\tau(BA) for A,B∈MA,B\in M (Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §tracial), τ\tau is linear and τ(I)=1\tau(I)=1 (The Trace, the Conjugation and the Right Action of a Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebra §trace). (O3) For every letter ll, ∥U(l)∥op≤1\lVert U^{(l)}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le1, by claim 3 of Properties of Unitary Operators and ∥Uj∗∥op=∥Uj∥op\lVert U_{j}^{*}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}=\lVert U_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}} (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint). (O4) U(u)U(v)=U(uv)U^{(u)}U^{(v)}=U^{(uv)} for u,v∈W2du,v\in W_{2d}, since U(∅)=IU^{(\varnothing)}=I and the letters of uvuv are those of uu followed by those of vv (Words over a Finite Alphabet: the Empty Word, Concatenation and Reversal §concatenation); in particular every U(u)U^{(u)} lies in AU\mathcal{A}_{U} and every product of operators U(u)U^{(u)} lies in AU\mathcal{A}_{U}. (O5) A map T∈L(H)T\in\mathcal{L}(H) with T∗T=TT∗=IT^{*}T=TT^{*}=I is unitary: every vv equals T(T∗v)T(T^{*}v), and ⟨Tu,Tv⟩=⟨u,T∗Tv⟩=⟨u,v⟩\langle Tu,Tv\rangle=\langle u,T^{*}Tv\rangle=\langle u,v\rangle, because TT is the adjoint of T∗T^{*} (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus, Adjoint of a Linear Map between Complex Inner Product Spaces §adjoint). Conversely, each UjU_{j} is a bounded linear operator on HH by claim 3 of Properties of Unitary Operators, so Uj∈L(H)U_{j}\in\mathcal{L}(H) by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound, and hence UjU_{j} has an adjoint Uj∗∈L(H)U_{j}^{*}\in\mathcal{L}(H) by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint; it satisfies Uj∗Uj=UjUj∗=IU_{j}^{*}U_{j}=U_{j}U_{j}^{*}=I: from ⟨u,Uj∗Ujv⟩=⟨Uju,Ujv⟩=⟨u,v⟩\langle u,U_{j}^{*}U_{j}v\rangle=\langle U_{j}u,U_{j}v\rangle=\langle u,v\rangle with u=Uj∗Ujv−vu=U_{j}^{*}U_{j}v-v we get Uj∗Ujv=vU_{j}^{*}U_{j}v=v, and writing v=Ujuv=U_{j}u by surjectivity, UjUj∗v=Uj(Uj∗Uju)=vU_{j}U_{j}^{*}v=U_{j}(U_{j}^{*}U_{j}u)=v. (O6) For 0≤t≤1160\le t\le\frac1{16} let t\sqrt t be the nonnegative square root; then t≤14\sqrt t\le\frac14 by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, hence t=t t≤14tt=\sqrt t\,\sqrt t\le\frac14\sqrt t and tt≤14t≤116tt\sqrt t\le\frac14 t\le\frac1{16}\sqrt t.

Step 1 (Cayley transforms). Let 0≤t≤1160\le t\le\frac1{16} and j∈[d]j\in[d]. Put Xj=it2Sj∈MX_{j}=\frac{i\sqrt t}{2}S_{j}\in M; then ∥Xj∥op≤t≤14<1\lVert X_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le\sqrt t\le\frac14<1 by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations. By The Neumann Series, Inverses in Double Commutants, and Invertibility of A - iyI for Self-Adjoint A §neumann, Tj=I−XjT_{j}=I-X_{j} is a bijection of HH onto HH with Tj−1∈L(H)T_{j}^{-1}\in\mathcal{L}(H) and ∥Tj−1∥op≤11−1/4=43\lVert T_{j}^{-1}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le\frac{1}{1-1/4}=\frac43; as Tj∈MT_{j}\in M and M=M′′M=M'' (Tracial W*-Probability Spaces §space), Tj−1∈MT_{j}^{-1}\in M by The Neumann Series, Inverses in Double Commutants, and Invertibility of A - iyI for Self-Adjoint A §commutant. Put Tj′=I+XjT'_{j}=I+X_{j} and Cj=Tj′Tj−1∈MC_{j}=T'_{j}T_{j}^{-1}\in M (Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §star-algebra); we write Cj(t)C_{j}(t) when tt matters.

(a) Cj∗Cj=CjCj∗=IC_{j}^{*}C_{j}=C_{j}C_{j}^{*}=I. Since SjS_{j} is self-adjoint, Sj∗=SjS_{j}^{*}=S_{j} and Xj∗=it2‾Sj=−XjX_{j}^{*}=\overline{\tfrac{i\sqrt t}{2}}S_{j}=-X_{j} (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus, Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-unique); so Tj∗=Tj′T_{j}^{*}=T'_{j} and Tj′∗=TjT'^{*}_{j}=T_{j}. Also TjTj′=I−Xj2=Tj′TjT_{j}T'_{j}=I-X_{j}^{2}=T'_{j}T_{j}, so Tj−1T_{j}^{-1} commutes with Tj′T'_{j} by The Neumann Series, Inverses in Double Commutants, and Invertibility of A - iyI for Self-Adjoint A §commutant. From TjTj−1=Tj−1Tj=IT_{j}T_{j}^{-1}=T_{j}^{-1}T_{j}=I and Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus, (Tj−1)∗Tj′=(TjTj−1)∗=I(T_{j}^{-1})^{*}T'_{j}=(T_{j}T_{j}^{-1})^{*}=I and Tj′(Tj−1)∗=IT'_{j}(T_{j}^{-1})^{*}=I; so Tj′T'_{j} is a bijection with inverse Tj′−1=(Tj−1)∗T'^{-1}_{j}=(T_{j}^{-1})^{*}, and Cj∗=Tj′−1TjC_{j}^{*}=T'^{-1}_{j}T_{j}. Then Cj∗Cj=Tj′−1TjTj′Tj−1=Tj′−1Tj′TjTj−1=IC_{j}^{*}C_{j}=T'^{-1}_{j}T_{j}T'_{j}T_{j}^{-1}=T'^{-1}_{j}T'_{j}T_{j}T_{j}^{-1}=I. Multiplying Tj−1Tj′=Tj′Tj−1T_{j}^{-1}T'_{j}=T'_{j}T_{j}^{-1} by Tj′−1T'^{-1}_{j} on both sides gives Tj′−1Tj−1=Tj−1Tj′−1T'^{-1}_{j}T_{j}^{-1}=T_{j}^{-1}T'^{-1}_{j}, and hence CjCj∗=Tj′Tj−1Tj′−1Tj=Tj′Tj′−1Tj−1Tj=IC_{j}C_{j}^{*}=T'_{j}T_{j}^{-1}T'^{-1}_{j}T_{j}=T'_{j}T'^{-1}_{j}T_{j}^{-1}T_{j}=I.

(b) The path. Put Vj=UjCj∈MV_{j}=U_{j}C_{j}\in M and V=V(t)=(V1,…,Vd)V=V(t)=(V_{1},\dots,V_{d}). By (O5) and (a), Vj∗Vj=Cj∗Uj∗UjCj=IV_{j}^{*}V_{j}=C_{j}^{*}U_{j}^{*}U_{j}C_{j}=I and VjVj∗=UjCjCj∗Uj∗=IV_{j}V_{j}^{*}=U_{j}C_{j}C_{j}^{*}U_{j}^{*}=I, so VjV_{j} is unitary by (O5). Define γ(t)=λV(t)\gamma(t)=\lambda_{V(t)}; it belongs to Ld\mathcal{L}_{d} by Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family §law. For t=0t=0 we have Xj=0X_{j}=0, Tj=Tj′=Tj−1=IT_{j}=T'_{j}=T_{j}^{-1}=I, Cj=IC_{j}=I, V=UV=U, so γ(0)=λU=λ\gamma(0)=\lambda_{U}=\lambda.

(c) Expansion. Since Tj′=Tj+2XjT'_{j}=T_{j}+2X_{j}, Cj=I+2XjTj−1C_{j}=I+2X_{j}T_{j}^{-1}; and Tj−1=I+XjTj−1T_{j}^{-1}=I+X_{j}T_{j}^{-1}, because Tj−1−XjTj−1=TjTj−1=IT_{j}^{-1}-X_{j}T_{j}^{-1}=T_{j}T_{j}^{-1}=I. Substituting twice, XjTj−1=Xj+Xj2+Xj3Tj−1X_{j}T_{j}^{-1}=X_{j}+X_{j}^{2}+X_{j}^{3}T_{j}^{-1}, so, with 2Xj=it Sj2X_{j}=i\sqrt t\,S_{j} and 2Xj2=−t2Sj22X_{j}^{2}=-\frac t2S_{j}^{2},

Dj:=Cj−I=it Sj−t2Sj2+Rj,Rj=2Xj3Tj−1,∥Rj∥op≤2(t)343=83tt,D_{j}:=C_{j}-I=i\sqrt t\,S_{j}-\tfrac t2S_{j}^{2}+R_{j},\qquad R_{j}=2X_{j}^{3}T_{j}^{-1},\qquad\lVert R_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le2(\sqrt t)^{3}\tfrac43=\tfrac83t\sqrt t,

and, by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus, Dj∗=Cj∗−I=−it Sj−t2Sj2+Rj∗D_{j}^{*}=C_{j}^{*}-I=-i\sqrt t\,S_{j}-\frac t2S_{j}^{2}+R_{j}^{*} with ∥Rj∗∥op=∥Rj∥op\lVert R_{j}^{*}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}=\lVert R_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}} (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint). By Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations and (O6), for e∈{1,−1}e\in\{1,-1\} and Dj(1)=DjD^{(1)}_{j}=D_{j}, Dj(−1)=Dj∗D^{(-1)}_{j}=D_{j}^{*},

∥Dj(e)∥op≤2t+2t+83tt≤(2+12+16)t≤3t,∥Dj(e)−iet Sj∥op≤2t+83tt≤3t.(B)\lVert D^{(e)}_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le2\sqrt t+2t+\tfrac83t\sqrt t\le\bigl(2+\tfrac12+\tfrac16\bigr)\sqrt t\le3\sqrt t,\qquad\lVert D^{(e)}_{j}-ie\sqrt t\,S_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le2t+\tfrac83t\sqrt t\le3t.\tag{B}

Step 2 (expansion along a word). Let 0<t≤1160<t\le\frac1{16} and let w∈W2dw\in W_{2d} have length k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. For m∈[k]m\in[k] put jm=g(wm)j_{m}=g(w_{m}), εm=ε(wm)\varepsilon_{m}=\varepsilon(w_{m}), Am=U(wm)A_{m}=U^{(w_{m})}, Ym=iεmt SjmY_{m}=i\varepsilon_{m}\sqrt t\,S_{j_{m}}, and

Bm=AmDjm  if εm=1,Bm=Djm∗Am  if εm=−1.B_{m}=A_{m}D_{j_{m}}\ \text{ if }\varepsilon_{m}=1,\qquad B_{m}=D_{j_{m}}^{*}A_{m}\ \text{ if }\varepsilon_{m}=-1 .

Then V(wm)=Am+BmV^{(w_{m})}=A_{m}+B_{m}: if εm=1\varepsilon_{m}=1, V(wm)=UjmCjm=Am(I+Djm)V^{(w_{m})}=U_{j_{m}}C_{j_{m}}=A_{m}(I+D_{j_{m}}); if εm=−1\varepsilon_{m}=-1, V(wm)=(UjmCjm)∗=Cjm∗Ujm∗=(I+Djm∗)AmV^{(w_{m})}=(U_{j_{m}}C_{j_{m}})^{*}=C_{j_{m}}^{*}U_{j_{m}}^{*}=(I+D_{j_{m}}^{*})A_{m} (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus). Write Bm=Gm+EmB_{m}=G_{m}+E_{m}, where Gm=AmYmG_{m}=A_{m}Y_{m} if εm=1\varepsilon_{m}=1 and Gm=YmAmG_{m}=Y_{m}A_{m} if εm=−1\varepsilon_{m}=-1. By (O3), (B) and Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations,

∥Bm∥op≤3t,∥Gm∥op≤2t,∥Em∥op≤3t.\lVert B_{m}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le3\sqrt t,\qquad\lVert G_{m}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le2\sqrt t,\qquad\lVert E_{m}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le3t .

For J⊆[k]J\subseteq[k] let ΠJ=F1JF2J⋯FkJ\Pi^{J}=F^{J}_{1}F^{J}_{2}\cdots F^{J}_{k} with FmJ=BmF^{J}_{m}=B_{m} for m∈Jm\in J and FmJ=AmF^{J}_{m}=A_{m} for m∉Jm\notin J. Multiplying out the product V(w)=(A1+B1)⋯(Ak+Bk)V^{(w)}=(A_{1}+B_{1})\cdots(A_{k}+B_{k}) by distributivity of composition over sums (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations; induction on kk) gives V(w)=∑J⊆[k]ΠJV^{(w)}=\sum_{J\subseteq[k]}\Pi^{J}, a sum over the 2k2^{k} subsets of [k][k] (their number, by induction on kk). Since all AmA_{m} have norm at most 11, ∥ΠJ∥op≤∏m∈J∥Bm∥op\lVert\Pi^{J}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le\prod_{m\in J}\lVert B_{m}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}.

Step 3 (the terms). (i) J=∅J=\varnothing: Π∅=A1⋯Ak=U(w)\Pi^{\varnothing}=A_{1}\cdots A_{k}=U^{(w)} by (O4) and induction on the number of factors, and τ(Π∅)=λU(w)=λ(w)\tau(\Pi^{\varnothing})=\lambda_{U}(w)=\lambda(w).

(ii) J={m}J=\{m\}. Let P=A1⋯AmP=A_{1}\cdots A_{m} and Q=Am+1⋯AkQ=A_{m+1}\cdots A_{k} if εm=1\varepsilon_{m}=1, and P=A1⋯Am−1P=A_{1}\cdots A_{m-1} and Q=Am⋯AkQ=A_{m}\cdots A_{k} if εm=−1\varepsilon_{m}=-1 (empty products being II). By (O4) and induction on the number of factors, P=U(u)P=U^{(u)} and Q=U(u′)Q=U^{(u')} for words with uu′=wuu'=w, PQ=U(w)PQ=U^{(w)}, and QP=U(u′u)∈AUQP=U^{(u'u)}\in\mathcal{A}_{U}. By (c), Π{m}=P(Ym−t2Sjm2+R)Q\Pi^{\{m\}}=P\bigl(Y_{m}-\frac t2S_{j_{m}}^{2}+R\bigr)Q with R=RjmR=R_{j_{m}} or R=Rjm∗R=R_{j_{m}}^{*}. By (O2), Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family §centred with Z=QPZ=QP, and Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family §covariance with i=l=jmi=l=j_{m}, Z=I=U(∅)Z=I=U^{(\varnothing)} and Z′=QPZ'=QP:

τ(PYmQ)=iεmt τ(SjmQP)=0,τ(PSjm2Q)=τ(SjmISjmQP)=τ(I)τ(QP)=τ(PQ)=λ(w),\tau(PY_{m}Q)=i\varepsilon_{m}\sqrt t\,\tau(S_{j_{m}}QP)=0,\qquad\tau(PS_{j_{m}}^{2}Q)=\tau(S_{j_{m}}IS_{j_{m}}QP)=\tau(I)\tau(QP)=\tau(PQ)=\lambda(w),

and ∣τ(PRQ)∣≤∥PRQ∥op≤∥P∥op∥R∥op∥Q∥op≤∥R∥op≤83tt|\tau(PRQ)|\le\lVert PRQ\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le\lVert P\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\lVert R\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\lVert Q\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le\lVert R\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le\frac83t\sqrt t by (O1) and submultiplicativity (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations), since PP and QQ are products of the AnA_{n}, each of operator norm at most 11 by (O3) (an empty product II having norm at most 11 by the same clause), so that ∥P∥op≤1\lVert P\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le1 and ∥Q∥op≤1\lVert Q\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le1 by induction on the number of factors. Hence τ(Π{m})=−t2λ(w)+e{m}\tau(\Pi^{\{m\}})=-\frac t2\lambda(w)+e_{\{m\}} with ∣e{m}∣≤3tt|e_{\{m\}}|\le3t\sqrt t.

(iii) J={p,q}J=\{p,q\} with p<qp<q. Let ΠGJ\Pi^{J}_{G} be ΠJ\Pi^{J} with Bp,BqB_{p},B_{q} replaced by Gp,GqG_{p},G_{q}. By distributivity, ΠJ−ΠGJ\Pi^{J}-\Pi^{J}_{G} is the sum of the product with BpB_{p} and EqE_{q} in the places p,qp,q and of the product with EpE_{p} and GqG_{q} there, so

∥ΠJ−ΠGJ∥op≤3t⋅3t+3t⋅2t=15 tt.\lVert\Pi^{J}-\Pi^{J}_{G}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le3\sqrt t\cdot3t+3t\cdot2\sqrt t=15\,t\sqrt t .

Let σp,τq\sigma_{p},\tau_{q} be defined by the same formulas as in The Free Unitary Heat Generator on Unitary Laws §positions, which involve only pp, qq and the signs εp,εq\varepsilon_{p},\varepsilon_{q} and not the generators g(wp),g(wq)g(w_{p}),g(w_{q}); thus σp∈{p,p+1}\sigma_{p}\in\{p,p+1\} and τq∈{q−1,q}\tau_{q}\in\{q-1,q\}. Since 1≤p<q≤k1\le p<q\le k, we get 1≤p≤σp≤p+1≤q≤τq+11\le p\le\sigma_{p}\le p+1\le q\le\tau_{q}+1 and 1≤q−1≤τq≤q≤k1\le q-1\le\tau_{q}\le q\le k, so σp,τq∈[k]\sigma_{p},\tau_{q}\in[k] and σp≤q≤τq+1\sigma_{p}\le q\le\tau_{q}+1. In ΠGJ\Pi^{J}_{G} the factor YpY_{p} stands right after ApA_{p} if εp=1\varepsilon_{p}=1 and right before ApA_{p} if εp=−1\varepsilon_{p}=-1; in both cases the factors AnA_{n} to its left are those with n<σpn<\sigma_{p} and those to its right begin with n=σpn=\sigma_{p}. Likewise YqY_{q} stands right after AqA_{q} if εq=1\varepsilon_{q}=1 (τq=q\tau_{q}=q) and right before AqA_{q} if εq=−1\varepsilon_{q}=-1 (τq=q−1\tau_{q}=q-1), so the factors AnA_{n} to its left end with n=τqn=\tau_{q} and those to its right are those with n>τqn>\tau_{q}. By (O4) and induction on the number of factors, and the definition of w[a,b]w_{[a,b]} in The Free Unitary Heat Generator on Unitary Laws,

ΠGJ=U(a) Yp U(y) Yq U(b),a=w[1,σp−1],y=w[σp,τq],b=w[τq+1,k],\Pi^{J}_{G}=U^{(a)}\,Y_{p}\,U^{(y)}\,Y_{q}\,U^{(b)},\qquad a=w_{[1,\sigma_{p}-1]},\quad y=w_{[\sigma_{p},\tau_{q}]},\quad b=w_{[\tau_{q}+1,k]},

with a=∅a=\varnothing if σp=1\sigma_{p}=1, b=∅b=\varnothing if τq=k\tau_{q}=k, and y=∅y=\varnothing (so U(y)=IU^{(y)}=I) if τq<σp\tau_{q}<\sigma_{p}; when (p,q)∈P(w)(p,q)\in P(w), y=ypq(w)y=y_{pq}(w) and ba=xpq(w)ba=x_{pq}(w) by The Free Unitary Heat Generator on Unitary Laws §pieces. By (O2), (O4) and Unitary Laws Are the Laws of Unitary Tuples, and Are Realised Together with a Free Semicircular Family §covariance with Z=U(y)Z=U^{(y)} and Z′=U(ba)Z'=U^{(ba)},

τ(ΠGJ)=(iεpt)(iεqt) τ(SjpU(y)SjqU(ba))=−εpεq t δjpjq λ(y) λ(ba).\tau(\Pi^{J}_{G})=(i\varepsilon_{p}\sqrt t)(i\varepsilon_{q}\sqrt t)\,\tau\bigl(S_{j_{p}}U^{(y)}S_{j_{q}}U^{(ba)}\bigr)=-\varepsilon_{p}\varepsilon_{q}\,t\,\delta_{j_{p}j_{q}}\,\lambda(y)\,\lambda(ba).

So τ(ΠJ)=−t εpεqλ(ypq(w))λ(xpq(w))+eJ\tau(\Pi^{J})=-t\,\varepsilon_{p}\varepsilon_{q}\lambda(y_{pq}(w))\lambda(x_{pq}(w))+e_{J} if (p,q)∈P(w)(p,q)\in P(w), and τ(ΠJ)=eJ\tau(\Pi^{J})=e_{J} if g(wp)≠g(wq)g(w_{p})\neq g(w_{q}), where ∣eJ∣≤15tt|e_{J}|\le15t\sqrt t by (O1).

(iv) JJ with at least three elements: as 3t≤34≤13\sqrt t\le\frac34\le1, ∥ΠJ∥op≤(3t)3=27tt\lVert\Pi^{J}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le(3\sqrt t)^{3}=27t\sqrt t, so τ(ΠJ)=eJ\tau(\Pi^{J})=e_{J} with ∣eJ∣≤27tt|e_{J}|\le27t\sqrt t by (O1).

Since γ(t)(w)=τ(V(w))=∑J⊆[k]τ(ΠJ)\gamma(t)(w)=\tau(V^{(w)})=\sum_{J\subseteq[k]}\tau(\Pi^{J}) by the linearity of τ\tau, and the pairs J={p,q}J=\{p,q\} with g(wp)=g(wq)g(w_{p})=g(w_{q}) correspond to the elements (p,q)(p,q) of P(w)P(w), the main terms of (i)-(iii) add up to λ(w)−k2tλ(w)−t∑(p,q)∈P(w)ε(wp)ε(wq)λ(ypq(w))λ(xpq(w))=λ(w)+t Θλ(w)\lambda(w)-\frac{k}{2}t\lambda(w)-t\sum_{(p,q)\in P(w)}\varepsilon(w_{p})\varepsilon(w_{q})\lambda(y_{pq}(w))\lambda(x_{pq}(w))=\lambda(w)+t\,\Theta\lambda(w) by The Free Unitary Heat Generator on Unitary Laws §generator. Every nonempty JJ has ∣eJ∣≤27tt|e_{J}|\le27t\sqrt t and there are fewer than 2k2^{k} of them, so by Sums over Finite Index Sets: Finite Unions, Disjoint Unions, Vanishing Terms, Dependent Pairs, Conjugation and the Modulus §modulus

∣γ(t)(w)−λ(w)−t Θλ(w)∣≤27⋅2k tt(0<t≤116, w of length k).(∗)\bigl|\gamma(t)(w)-\lambda(w)-t\,\Theta\lambda(w)\bigr|\le27\cdot2^{k}\,t\sqrt t\qquad(0<t\le\tfrac1{16},\ w\text{ of length }k).\tag{$\ast$}

Step 4 (the inward tangent vector). Put s0=116s_{0}=\frac1{16}; by Step 1(b), γ\gamma maps {s:0≤s≤s0}\{s:0\le s\le s_{0}\} into Ld\mathcal{L}_{d} with γ(0)=λ\gamma(0)=\lambda. For 0<s≤s00<s\le s_{0} let vs=1s(ιd(γ(s))−ιd(λ))−Θ^λ∈Edv_{s}=\frac1s\bigl(\iota_{d}(\gamma(s))-\iota_{d}(\lambda)\bigr)-\widehat{\Theta}\lambda\in E_{d} (The Word Gauge: Weights, the Space of Weighted Square-Summable Word Functions, Its Norm and Inner Product, and the Length-Weighted Gauge §space, The Embedding of Unitary Laws into the Word Gauge Space and the Gauge Distance §embedding, The Free Unitary Heat Generator: Bound, Continuity and Strict Dissipation in the Length-Weighted Gauge §bound); its value at w∈Wd∘w\in W^{\circ}_{d} is vs(w)=1s(γ(s)(w)−λ(w))−Θλ(w)v_{s}(w)=\frac1s(\gamma(s)(w)-\lambda(w))-\Theta\lambda(w), the operations being pointwise. At w=∅w=\varnothing, vs(∅)=0v_{s}(\varnothing)=0, since γ(s)(∅)=λ(∅)=1\gamma(s)(\varnothing)=\lambda(\varnothing)=1 (Laws of d-Tuples of Unitaries §normalised) and Θλ(∅)=0\Theta\lambda(\varnothing)=0. For w∈Wd,k∘w\in W^{\circ}_{d,k}, (∗\ast) gives ∣vs(w)∣≤27⋅2ks|v_{s}(w)|\le27\cdot2^{k}\sqrt s, so cw∣vs(w)∣2≤729 s (4θd)kc_{w}|v_{s}(w)|^{2}\le729\,s\,(4\theta_{d})^{k} by Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and claim 3 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field. By Counting Cyclically Reduced Words: Finiteness and the Bound (2d)^k §count and claim 3 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, the kk-th block sum satisfies

0≤∑w∈Wd,k∘cw∣vs(w)∣2≤729 s (8d θd)k=729 s (1768)k,0\le\sum_{w\in W^{\circ}_{d,k}}c_{w}|v_{s}(w)|^{2}\le729\,s\,(8d\,\theta_{d})^{k}=729\,s\,\bigl(\tfrac1{768}\bigr)^{k},

as θd=16144d\theta_{d}=\frac1{6144d} (The Word Gauge: Weights, the Space of Weighted Square-Summable Word Functions, Its Norm and Inner Product, and the Length-Weighted Gauge §weights). By Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §geometric and Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity, ∑k=1∞729 s (1768)k=729 s⋅1/7681−1/768=729767s≤s\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}729\,s\,(\frac1{768})^{k}=729\,s\cdot\frac{1/768}{1-1/768}=\frac{729}{767}s\le s, so by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §comparison and The Word Gauge: Weights, the Space of Weighted Square-Summable Word Functions, Its Norm and Inner Product, and the Length-Weighted Gauge §norm, ∥vs∥d2=0+∑k=1∞∑w∈Wd,k∘cw∣vs(w)∣2≤s\lVert v_{s}\rVert_{d}^{2}=0+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sum_{w\in W^{\circ}_{d,k}}c_{w}|v_{s}(w)|^{2}\le s.

Now let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be given, and choose δ=ε2>0\delta=\varepsilon^{2}>0. For every real ss with 0<s≤s00<s\le s_{0} and s<δs<\delta we get ∥vs∥d2≤s<ε2\lVert v_{s}\rVert_{d}^{2}\le s<\varepsilon^{2}, hence ∥vs∥d≤ε\lVert v_{s}\rVert_{d}\le\varepsilon by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. By Inward and Two-Sided Tangent Vectors to the Space of Unitary Laws §inward, Θ^λ∈Tλ+\widehat{\Theta}\lambda\in T^{+}_{\lambda}. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…