Each clause is checked directly: the real clauses from the rules of an ordered field, the [0,∞] clause from associativity of its product, the affine clauses by an ε-δ estimate and by solving the inequalities u < ax+b ≤ v, and the remaining clauses from the definitions they concern.
Routine facts about real numbers, maps and the type are used without comment (Routine Facts, Continued: Typed Arithmetic, Maps and Predicativity, Arithmetic and Order Rules in the Real Numbers, Stated for ℝ). Recall that means and (Partial and Total Orders on a Set and the Associated Strict Relation (iii)).
Proof of (i). By Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (vii), , and in particular .
Proof of (ii). Let with . Then by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (vii), and by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iii), applied to the two nonzero factors and . Hence .
Proof of (iii). Let . If , then . So forces .
Proof of (iv). Let be an element of . Two elements of are equal exactly when their sets are (The Real Numbers as a Type (i)), and , , and of are those of (The Real Numbers as a Type (ii)); so it suffices to show in for the real number . In , and by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (vii), and adding to both sides of preserves the strict inequality (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iv)):
Suppose . Then , that is, and (Partial and Total Orders on a Set and the Associated Strict Relation (iii)). Together with , antisymmetry of (Arithmetic and Order Rules in the Real Numbers, Stated for ℝ (viii)) gives , a contradiction. Hence .
Proof of (v). Let with . By Arithmetic and Order Rules in the Real Numbers, Stated for ℝ (ix), and ; and , since only for (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x)). Hence . As , its reciprocal is defined and satisfies (Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients (ii), The Real Numbers as a Type (vii)), so by commutativity of the product. Finally by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (viii).
Proof of (vi). Let with and , and let . Then by The Extended Real Line, Its Order, and [0,∞] (ii), and the product of and in is their product in , as both are real (Addition and Multiplication on [0,∞] (ii)). The product on is associative (Arithmetic in [0,∞]: Monoid Laws, Distributivity, Monotonicity and Cancellation (ii)), so is the product in of and , that is, .
Proof of (vii). Let and be as stated. The real line is a metric space by The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Numbers (i), and for (The Distance on the Real Numbers Is a Map with Values the Absolute Differences (ii)). For , using (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x), Differences, Quotients and Absolute Values of Real Numbers, and Their Order in the Extended Real Line, Read in the Type Real (iv)),
As is a real number with (Arithmetic and Order Rules in the Real Numbers, Stated for ℝ (ix)), is Lipschitz with constant , and therefore continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous (ii).
Proof of (viii). Let and be as stated. Both sides of each identity are subsets of , and a real number lies in exactly when (The Image and the Preimage of a Class under a Class (ii), Intervals of the Real Line (ii)), that is, when . Adding , resp. , to all sides (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iv)), this holds if and only if
Put and . A quotient is the real number whose product with is (Differences, Quotients and Absolute Values of Real Numbers, and Their Order in the Extended Real Line, Read in the Type Real (ii)), so
We compare with and by multiplying with a positive factor, which preserves and reflects both and (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (vi)).
Case . Multiplying by , we get if and only if , that is, ; and if and only if , that is, . So the condition is , that is, .
Case . Put ; then (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (v)), and for every (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (ii)); in particular
Negation reverses , and hence also (Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (v)). So if and only if , that is, multiplying by , if and only if ; and if and only if , that is, . So the condition is , that is, .
In either case the two sides have the same elements, so they are equal.
Proof of (ix). Let and . For every ,
by Euclidean Space : n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations (iv) and commutativity of the sum of . As and lie in , they are equal by Euclidean Space : n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations (iii).
Proof of (x). Let . Both Real Matrices: the Set of Real m x n Matrices with Their Entrywise Operations (i) and Real Matrices: the Set of Real m x n Matrices with Their Entrywise Operations (i) define as , the set of all maps , from the same segment and the same set . So the two sets are the same set.
Proof of (xi). Let be a measure space and . (The earlier versions of -algebras, of measure spaces, of and of its integral, in which the results used below are stated, define the same objects: The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of σ-Algebras, Measures, Measurable Functions and Integrals Agree (i), The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of σ-Algebras, Measures, Measurable Functions and Integrals Agree (iii), The Earlier and the New Versions of the Definitions of σ-Algebras, Measures, Measurable Functions and Integrals Agree (v).) For each , the map lies in and the integral of over (Integrals of Functions over a Measurable Subset (ii)) is
by Integrals over Measurable Subsets (i). (So is a map : the map from to , Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (i), followed by the integral on .) By Measure with a Density (i), is the function on with these values; hence and for every .
Loading…