Proof of Semicontinuity via Sublevel and Superlevel Sets
lemmalem:semicontinuity-sublevel-superlevel-2026aThroughout, denotes the open ball in , so that because agrees with on . We use the order arithmetic of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and the fact that the order of is a total order, hence reflexive, antisymmetric and comparing any two elements. We write for .
Step 0: complements. Let and . The conditions and cannot both hold, since together with antisymmetry they would give , contradicting . If fails, then either fails, in which case comparability gives , or holds and , in which case by reflexivity. Hence exactly one of the two conditions holds, and
the second identity following in the same way.
Claim 1, necessity. Suppose is upper semicontinuous on , and let and . From , claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied by adding , gives . Applying the defining condition of upper semicontinuity at with produces with such that every with satisfies
Thus . As was arbitrary, is open in .
Claim 1, sufficiency. Suppose is open in for every . Let and let satisfy . Put ; adding to gives by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so . By openness there is with and , that is, every with satisfies . Hence is upper semicontinuous at relative to , and, being arbitrary, on .
Claim 2, necessity. Suppose is lower semicontinuous on , and let and . From , adding gives . Applying the defining condition of lower semicontinuity at with produces with such that every with satisfies
Thus , so is open in .
Claim 2, sufficiency. Let and . Put ; adding to , which holds by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives , so . By openness there is with and , that is, every with satisfies . Hence is lower semicontinuous at relative to , and on .
Claim 3. Suppose is upper semicontinuous on and let . By claim 1 the set is open in , hence belongs to the topology of , and by Step 0 the set is its complement relative to . By the definition of a closed subset, is closed in . The lower semicontinuous case is identical, using claim 2 and the second identity of Step 0.
Loading…
Prerequisites
066f8544-7f0c-4b87-ac98-4e49d3a48c60