TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, BdA(x,Ī“)B_{d_A}(x,\delta) denotes the open ball in (A,dA)(A,d_A), so that BdA(x,Ī“)={y∈A:d(x,y)<Ī“}B_{d_A}(x,\delta)=\{y\in A: d(x,y)<\delta\} because dAd_A agrees with dd on AA. We use the order arithmetic of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and the fact that the order ≤\le of R\mathbb{R} is a total order, hence reflexive, antisymmetric and comparing any two elements. We write sāˆ’ts-t for s+(āˆ’t)s+(-t).

Step 0: complements. Let y∈Ay\in A and c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}. The conditions u(y)<cu(y)<c and c≤u(y)c\le u(y) cannot both hold, since together with antisymmetry they would give u(y)=cu(y)=c, contradicting u(y)≠cu(y)\ne c. If u(y)<cu(y)<c fails, then either u(y)≤cu(y)\le c fails, in which case comparability gives c≤u(y)c\le u(y), or u(y)≤cu(y)\le c holds and u(y)=cu(y)=c, in which case c≤u(y)c\le u(y) by reflexivity. Hence exactly one of the two conditions holds, and

Ac≤u=Aāˆ–Au<c,Au≤c=Aāˆ–Ac<u,A_{c\le u}=A\setminus A_{u<c},\qquad A_{u\le c}=A\setminus A_{c<u},

the second identity following in the same way.

Claim 1, necessity. Suppose uu is upper semicontinuous on AA, and let c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and x∈Au<cx\in A_{u<c}. From u(x)<cu(x)<c, claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied by adding āˆ’u(x)-u(x), gives 0<cāˆ’u(x)0<c-u(x). Applying the defining condition of upper semicontinuity at xx with ε=cāˆ’u(x)\varepsilon=c-u(x) produces Ī“\delta with 0<Ī“0<\delta such that every y∈Ay\in A with d(x,y)<Ī“d(x,y)<\delta satisfies

u(y)<u(x)+(cāˆ’u(x))=c.u(y)<u(x)+(c-u(x))=c .

Thus BdA(x,Ī“)āŠ†Au<cB_{d_A}(x,\delta)\subseteq A_{u<c}. As xx was arbitrary, Au<cA_{u<c} is open in (A,dA)(A,d_A).

Claim 1, sufficiency. Suppose Au<cA_{u<c} is open in (A,dA)(A,d_A) for every c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}. Let x∈Ax\in A and let ε\varepsilon satisfy 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Put c=u(x)+εc=u(x)+\varepsilon; adding u(x)u(x) to 0<ε0<\varepsilon gives u(x)<cu(x)<c by claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so x∈Au<cx\in A_{u<c}. By openness there is Ī“\delta with 0<Ī“0<\delta and BdA(x,Ī“)āŠ†Au<cB_{d_A}(x,\delta)\subseteq A_{u<c}, that is, every y∈Ay\in A with d(x,y)<Ī“d(x,y)<\delta satisfies u(y)<u(x)+εu(y)<u(x)+\varepsilon. Hence uu is upper semicontinuous at xx relative to AA, and, xx being arbitrary, on AA.

Claim 2, necessity. Suppose uu is lower semicontinuous on AA, and let c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and x∈Ac<ux\in A_{c<u}. From c<u(x)c<u(x), adding āˆ’c-c gives 0<u(x)āˆ’c0<u(x)-c. Applying the defining condition of lower semicontinuity at xx with ε=u(x)āˆ’c\varepsilon=u(x)-c produces Ī“\delta with 0<Ī“0<\delta such that every y∈Ay\in A with d(x,y)<Ī“d(x,y)<\delta satisfies

c=u(x)āˆ’(u(x)āˆ’c)<u(y).c=u(x)-(u(x)-c)<u(y) .

Thus BdA(x,Ī“)āŠ†Ac<uB_{d_A}(x,\delta)\subseteq A_{c<u}, so Ac<uA_{c<u} is open in (A,dA)(A,d_A).

Claim 2, sufficiency. Let x∈Ax\in A and 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Put c=u(x)āˆ’Īµc=u(x)-\varepsilon; adding u(x)u(x) to āˆ’Īµ<0-\varepsilon<0, which holds by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives c<u(x)c<u(x), so x∈Ac<ux\in A_{c<u}. By openness there is Ī“\delta with 0<Ī“0<\delta and BdA(x,Ī“)āŠ†Ac<uB_{d_A}(x,\delta)\subseteq A_{c<u}, that is, every y∈Ay\in A with d(x,y)<Ī“d(x,y)<\delta satisfies u(x)āˆ’Īµ<u(y)u(x)-\varepsilon<u(y). Hence uu is lower semicontinuous at xx relative to AA, and on AA.

Claim 3. Suppose uu is upper semicontinuous on AA and let c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 1 the set Au<cA_{u<c} is open in (A,dA)(A,d_A), hence belongs to the topology of AA, and by Step 0 the set Ac≤uA_{c\le u} is its complement relative to AA. By the definition of a closed subset, Ac≤uA_{c\le u} is closed in AA. The lower semicontinuous case is identical, using claim 2 and the second identity of Step 0.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…