TheoremBase

Proof of A Displacement Convex Penalty Pair Has a Monotone Score Along Optimal Couplings

lemmalem:displacement-convex-pair-monotone-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 4,281 chars · 13 deps · depth 33 Reason: First publication of the proof: the two above-tangent inequalities added after a swap of the coupling.

The swapped coupling is again optimal, so displacement convexity applies in both directions; adding the two inequalities cancels the two penalty values and leaves the sum of the two pairings bounded above by zero, which is the assertion after a change of variables along the swap and the bilinearity of the dot product.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write σ:Rd+dRd+d\sigma:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d+d} for the swap, a Borel map with pr1(σ(z))=y\mathrm{pr}_{1}(\sigma(z))=y and pr2(σ(z))=x\mathrm{pr}_{2}(\sigma(z))=x for zRd+dz\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections.

The swapped coupling is optimal. By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §swap one has σ#πΠ(ν,μ)\sigma_{\#}\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu) and I(σ#π)=I(π)I(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=I(\pi). Since π\pi is optimal, I(π)=W2(μ,ν)2I(\pi)=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2} by Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §optimal, and W2(μ,ν)=W2(ν,μ)W_{2}(\mu,\nu)=W_{2}(\nu,\mu) by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §symmetry. Hence I(σ#π)=W2(ν,μ)2I(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=W_{2}(\nu,\mu)^{2}, so σ#π\sigma_{\#}\pi is an optimal coupling of ν\nu and μ\mu.

The two integrals. By Displacement Convexity of a Penalty Pair on the Wasserstein Space §displacement, applied to μ\mu, ν\nu and π\pi, the displacement plan π=(pr1,pr2pr1)#π\pi^{-}=(\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2}-\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi is a plan with first marginal μ\mu and

A=Σ(μ)(x)pπ(dz)A=\int\Sigma(\mu)(x)\cdot p\,\pi^{-}(dz)

is a real number, the variables x,px,p being those of Plans, Marginals, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §plans for the plan π\pi^{-}. The function zΣ(μ)(x)(yx)z\mapsto\Sigma(\mu)(x)\cdot(y-x) on Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} is the composition with (pr1,pr2pr1)(\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2}-\mathrm{pr}_{1}) of the integrand defining AA, by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §pairing; hence it is integrable with respect to π\pi with integral AA, by the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward.

Applying Displacement Convexity of a Penalty Pair on the Wasserstein Space §displacement to ν\nu, μ\mu and the optimal coupling σ#π\sigma_{\#}\pi in the same way, the real number

B=Σ(ν)(x)p(σ#π)(dz)B=\int\Sigma(\nu)(x)\cdot p\,(\sigma_{\#}\pi)^{-}(dz)

is the integral with respect to σ#π\sigma_{\#}\pi of the function wΣ(ν)(pr1(w))(pr2(w)pr1(w))w\mapsto\Sigma(\nu)(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w))\cdot(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w)), which is integrable with respect to it; composing with σ\sigma and using the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward once more, now for the push-forward σ#π\sigma_{\#}\pi, the function zΣ(ν)(y)(xy)z\mapsto\Sigma(\nu)(y)\cdot(x-y) is integrable with respect to π\pi with integral BB.

The two inequalities. Both μ\mu and ν\nu lie in DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, hence in D\mathcal{D}, so Displacement Convexity of a Penalty Pair on the Wasserstein Space §convex applies in both directions and gives

E(μ)+AE(ν),E(ν)+BE(μ).\mathcal{E}(\mu)+A\le\mathcal{E}(\nu),\qquad\mathcal{E}(\nu)+B\le\mathcal{E}(\mu).

Adding these two inequalities, by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and the compatibility of the order with addition (an axiom of Ordered Field), and cancelling the real numbers E(μ)\mathcal{E}(\mu) and E(ν)\mathcal{E}(\nu) by the associativity, commutativity, inverse and identity axioms of a field, gives A+B0A+B\le0.

Conclusion. By the previous paragraphs the two functions zΣ(μ)(x)(yx)z\mapsto\Sigma(\mu)(x)\cdot(y-x) and zΣ(ν)(y)(xy)z\mapsto\Sigma(\nu)(y)\cdot(x-y) are integrable with respect to π\pi, so their sum is, and its integral is A+BA+B by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. At each zz that sum equals

Σ(μ)(x)(yx)+Σ(ν)(y)(xy)=(Σ(μ)(x)Σ(ν)(y))(xy):\Sigma(\mu)(x)\cdot(y-x)+\Sigma(\nu)(y)\cdot(x-y)=-\bigl(\Sigma(\mu)(x)-\Sigma(\nu)(y)\bigr)\cdot(x-y):

by claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n one has w(yx)=wywx=(wxwy)=(w(xy))w\cdot(y-x)=w\cdot y-w\cdot x=-(w\cdot x-w\cdot y)=-\bigl(w\cdot(x-y)\bigr) for every wRdw\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, so the left-hand side is Σ(ν)(y)(xy)Σ(μ)(x)(xy)\Sigma(\nu)(y)\cdot(x-y)-\Sigma(\mu)(x)\cdot(x-y), which by claim 3 of that lemma is (Σ(ν)(y)Σ(μ)(x))(xy)\bigl(\Sigma(\nu)(y)-\Sigma(\mu)(x)\bigr)\cdot(x-y), and this is the right-hand side by claim 3 once more together with the field identity (st)=ts-(s-t)=t-s for real numbers. Hence the function of the statement is integrable with respect to π\pi, being (1)(-1) times this sum, with integral (A+B)-(A+B) by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral; and 0(A+B)0\le-(A+B) follows from A+B0A+B\le0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…