Sketch: put a basis of U and a basis of W side by side; the family is longer than dim V, so it is linearly dependent, and splitting a nontrivial dependence relation into its U-part and its W-part gives a nonzero common vector.
Routine facts about concatenating tuples, splitting their linear combinations, and negatives in a vector space are used without comment (Toolkit for AL3).
Assume , and let and . The subspaces and are vector spaces with the operations of (Linear Subspaces Are Vector Spaces; Intersections (i)), so by Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces and Their Dimension (ii) we may choose a basis of and a basis of . Each of these families is linearly independent in its subspace, and therefore also as a family in , by Linear Subspaces Are Vector Spaces; Intersections (iv).
Consider the -tuple in . Its length exceeds , so by Properties of Dimension (ii) it is not linearly independent, that is, it is linearly dependent. Hence there are scalars , not all , with
Put ; by the display, also . A linear combination of vectors of a subspace lies in that subspace (Linear Subspaces Are Vector Spaces; Intersections (iv)), so the first expression shows and the second . Thus .
It remains to see that . Suppose . Then , and the independence of forces every to be . The display then reads , and the independence of forces every to be . So all the scalars vanish, contrary to their choice. Hence is a nonzero vector of , which proves (i).
Loadingβ¦