TheoremBase

Claim 1 checks that the inverse of a symmetric positive definite Jacobian is again such, and uses the shifted-heads identities of the head lift together with the decomposition of a point into rescaled head and tail to invert TFT_F. Claim 2 pushes the change-of-variables density through the Gaussian-tail reconstruction of the reference measure, and claim 3 takes logarithms of the explicit Gaussian density.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, write ρ=ρc~(n)\rho=\rho_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}} and γ~=γ~n\tilde{\gamma}=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}, let λn\lambda_{n} be Lebesgue measure on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), and write uku_{k} for the kkth coordinate of u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and FkF_{k} for the kkth coordinate function of FF. Continuity of maps between metric spaces is that of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces. A composite β∘α\beta\circ\alpha of continuous maps between metric spaces is continuous, by two applications of that definition: given a point xx and ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose η>0\eta>0 for β\beta at α(x)\alpha(x) and ε\varepsilon, and then δ>0\delta>0 for α\alpha at xx and η\eta. Maps continuous for the Borel σ\sigma-algebras of their metric spaces are Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and composites of Borel maps are Borel by claim 4 there.

Claim 1.

Step 1 (Coordinates). For u,u′∈Rnu,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and k∈[n]k\in[n] we have ∣uk−uk′∣≤∥u−u′∥|u_{k}-u'_{k}|\le\lVert u-u'\rVert by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §coordinate, so the coordinate function u↦uku\mapsto u_{k} is continuous from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) to R\mathbb{R}. Since FF is continuous by Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §regularity, each FkF_{k} is continuous as a composite, and so is u↦Fk(u)−uku\mapsto F_{k}(u)-u_{k}, by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set (a sum of FkF_{k} and the multiple of the coordinate function by −1-1).

Step 2 (The inverse map satisfies the hypotheses). The map F−1F^{-1} is a bijection of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} whose inverse is FF, and the components of F−1F^{-1} and of FF are of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by hypothesis. Let v∈Rnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, put u=F−1(v)u=F^{-1}(v), A=DF(u)A=DF(u) and C=D(F−1)(v)C=D(F^{-1})(v). Since v=F(u)v=F(u), the hypothesis at uu says that AA is symmetric and positive definite (Symmetric, Positive Semidefinite, and Positive Definite Real Matrices) and that CC is the inverse matrix of AA, that is, AC=CA=InAC=CA=I_{n}. First, CC is symmetric: by claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Transpose of a Real Matrix, A⊤A^{\top} is invertible with (A⊤)−1=(A−1)⊤(A^{\top})^{-1}=(A^{-1})^{\top}; as A⊤=AA^{\top}=A, this reads C=C⊤C=C^{\top}. Second, CC is positive definite: let y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} be nonzero and put z=Cyz=Cy. Then Az=(AC)y=Iny=yAz=(AC)y=I_{n}y=y, so z≠0z\ne0 (otherwise y=A0=0y=A0=0), and, the dot product being symmetric, y⋅(Cy)=(Az)⋅z=z⋅(Az)>0y\cdot(Cy)=(Az)\cdot z=z\cdot(Az)>0 by positive definiteness of AA. Third, the relations CA=AC=InCA=AC=I_{n} say that AA is an inverse of CC, so AA is the inverse matrix of CC by the uniqueness recorded in Inverse Matrix and Invertible Real Square Matrix; and A=DF(u)=D((F−1)−1)(F−1(v))A=DF(u)=D\bigl((F^{-1})^{-1}\bigr)\bigl(F^{-1}(v)\bigr). Hence for every vv the Jacobian matrix D(F−1)(v)D(F^{-1})(v) is symmetric and positive definite and the Jacobian matrix of the inverse map FF at F−1(v)F^{-1}(v) is its inverse matrix: F−1F^{-1} satisfies the hypotheses imposed on FF, and TF−1T_{F^{-1}} is defined, with (F−1)−1=F(F^{-1})^{-1}=F.

Step 3 (Shifted heads and tails). The map η=F−id\eta=F-\mathrm{id} is Borel, as recorded in the statement, so Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §shift, whose claims are in force by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §heads (for instance with μ=γc∈P2(X)\mu=\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian; that claim does not involve μ\mu), gives for every x∈Xx\in X

rn(TF(x))=rn(x)+F(rn(x))−rn(x)=F(rn(x)),QnTF(x)=Qnx.r_{n}(T_{F}(x))=r_{n}(x)+F(r_{n}(x))-r_{n}(x)=F(r_{n}(x)),\qquad Q_{n}T_{F}(x)=Q_{n}x .

By Step 2, Steps 1 and 3 apply to F−1F^{-1}; so the same holds with F−1F^{-1} in place of FF.

Step 4 (A point is determined by its rescaled head and its tail). Let x∈Xx\in X. By Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, x=Pnx+Qnxx=P_{n}x+Q_{n}x and Pnx=pn∗(pn(x))=∑k=1nxkek=∑k=1nak1/2 (rn(x))k ekP_{n}x=p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))=\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}e_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}\,(r_{n}(x))_{k}\,e_{k}, since ak1/2ak−1/2xk=xka_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{-1/2}x_{k}=x_{k}. Hence if x,y∈Xx,y\in X satisfy rn(x)=rn(y)r_{n}(x)=r_{n}(y) and Qnx=QnyQ_{n}x=Q_{n}y, then x=yx=y.

Step 5 (The inverse). Let x∈Xx\in X, y=TF(x)y=T_{F}(x) and z=TF−1(y)z=T_{F^{-1}}(y). By Step 3, applied to F−1F^{-1} and then to FF, rn(z)=F−1(rn(y))=F−1(F(rn(x)))=rn(x)r_{n}(z)=F^{-1}(r_{n}(y))=F^{-1}(F(r_{n}(x)))=r_{n}(x) and Qnz=Qny=QnxQ_{n}z=Q_{n}y=Q_{n}x; so z=xz=x by Step 4. Interchanging the roles of FF and F−1F^{-1}, which is legitimate by Step 2, gives TF(TF−1(y))=yT_{F}(T_{F^{-1}}(y))=y for every y∈Xy\in X. Hence TFT_{F} is a bijection of XX and TF−1T_{F^{-1}} is its inverse.

Step 6 (Continuity). For k∈[n]k\in[n] let φk(x)=Fk(rn(x))−(rn(x))k\varphi_{k}(x)=F_{k}(r_{n}(x))-(r_{n}(x))_{k} for x∈Xx\in X; it is continuous as the composite of rnr_{n}, continuous by Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §head (for instance with μ=γc∈P2(X)\mu=\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian), with the continuous function of Step 1. By the definition of Λn\Lambda_{n} in Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space, TF(x)=x+∑k=1nak1/2φk(x) ekT_{F}(x)=x+\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}\varphi_{k}(x)\,e_{k}, so the triangle inequality and ∣ek∣=1|e_{k}|=1 give, for x,y∈Xx,y\in X,

∣TF(y)−TF(x)∣≤∣y−x∣+∑k=1nak1/2 ∣φk(y)−φk(x)∣.|T_{F}(y)-T_{F}(x)|\le|y-x|+\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}\,|\varphi_{k}(y)-\varphi_{k}(x)| .

Given x∈Xx\in X and ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose for each k∈[n]k\in[n] a δk>0\delta_{k}>0 such that ∣φk(y)−φk(x)∣<ε/(2n ak1/2)|\varphi_{k}(y)-\varphi_{k}(x)|<\varepsilon/(2n\,a_{k}^{1/2}) whenever ∣y−x∣<δk|y-x|<\delta_{k}, and let δ\delta be the least of ε/2,δ1,…,δn\varepsilon/2,\delta_{1},\dots,\delta_{n}; then ∣y−x∣<δ|y-x|<\delta gives ∣TF(y)−TF(x)∣<ε/2+n⋅ε/(2n)=ε|T_{F}(y)-T_{F}(x)|<\varepsilon/2+n\cdot\varepsilon/(2n)=\varepsilon. So TFT_{F} is continuous, hence Borel; by Step 2 the same argument applies to TF−1T_{F^{-1}}. With Steps 3 and 5 this proves claim 1.

Claim 2.

Step 7 (GFG_{F} is Borel and positive). By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §regularity, ρ\rho is smooth and positive on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, hence continuous by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} being open by claim 1 there. By Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §regularity, F−1F^{-1} and u↦det⁡DF(u)u\mapsto\det DF(u) are continuous, and det⁡DF(u)>0\det DF(u)>0 for every uu, as recorded in the statement. So the functions v↦ρ(F−1(v))v\mapsto\rho(F^{-1}(v)) and v↦det⁡DF(F−1(v))v\mapsto\det DF(F^{-1}(v)) are continuous composites, the latter and ρ\rho are nowhere zero, their reciprocals are continuous by claim 2 of Continuity of the Reciprocal of a Nonvanishing Real-Valued Function on a Metric Space, and GFG_{F}, the product of ρ∘F−1\rho\circ F^{-1} with these two reciprocals, is continuous by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set, hence Borel (the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) being B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claim 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space). As a quotient of positive numbers, GF(v)>0G_{F}(v)>0 for every vv.

Step 8 (GFG_{F} is a density of F#γ~F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma} with respect to γ~\tilde{\gamma}). By Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure, γ~(B)=∫Rn1B ρ dλn\tilde{\gamma}(B)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,\rho\,d\lambda_{n} for B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), so the nonnegative Borel function ρ\rho is a density of γ~∈P(Rn)\tilde{\gamma}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) with respect to λn\lambda_{n} in the sense of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities. By Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §densities with d=nd=n, the function

v↦ρ(F−1(v))det⁡DF(F−1(v))=GF(v) ρ(v)v\mapsto\frac{\rho(F^{-1}(v))}{\det DF(F^{-1}(v))}=G_{F}(v)\,\rho(v)

is a density of F#γ~F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma} with respect to λn\lambda_{n}; here F#γ~∈P(Rn)F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward, FF being Borel. Hence for B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), using claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables with the density h=ρh=\rho (whose measure is γ~\tilde{\gamma}) and the nonnegative Borel function 1BGF\mathbf{1}_{B}G_{F},

(F#γ~)(B)=∫Rn1B GF ρ dλn=∫Rn1B GF dγ~,(F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma})(B)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,G_{F}\,\rho\,d\lambda_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,G_{F}\,d\tilde{\gamma},

so GFG_{F}, which is Borel and nonnegative by Step 7, is a density of F#γ~F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma} with respect to γ~\tilde{\gamma}.

Step 9 (Tails have vanishing head coordinates). Let N={w∈X:pn(w)≠0}N=\{w\in X:p_{n}(w)\ne0\}, the complement of the preimage of the closed set {0}\{0\} under the Borel map pnp_{n} (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity); it is Borel by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For x∈Xx\in X, the map pnp_{n} is linear, its coordinates being inner products with e1,…,ene_{1},\dots,e_{n}, and pn(pn∗(y))=yp_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(y))=y for y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity; hence pn(Qnx)=pn(x)−pn(pn∗(pn(x)))=0p_{n}(Q_{n}x)=p_{n}(x)-p_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x)))=0. So Qn−1(N)=∅Q_{n}^{-1}(N)=\emptyset and τn(N)=γc(∅)=0\tau_{n}(N)=\gamma_{c}(\emptyset)=0, by the definition of τn\tau_{n} in A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails.

Step 10 (The map on the product). Let (v,w)∈Rn×X(v,w)\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X with w∉Nw\notin N, and x=Ψn(v,w)=∑j=1naj1/2vjej+wx=\Psi_{n}(v,w)=\sum_{j=1}^{n}a_{j}^{1/2}v_{j}e_{j}+w. For k∈[n]k\in[n], orthonormality of the basis and wk=0w_{k}=0 give xk=ak1/2vkx_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}v_{k}, so rn(x)=vr_{n}(x)=v. Therefore

TF(Ψn(v,w))=x+∑k=1nak1/2(Fk(v)−vk)ek=∑k=1nak1/2Fk(v) ek+w=Ψn(F(v),w).T_{F}(\Psi_{n}(v,w))=x+\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}\bigl(F_{k}(v)-v_{k}\bigr)e_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}F_{k}(v)\,e_{k}+w=\Psi_{n}(F(v),w).

Step 11 (Product measures). Let F×id:Rn×X→Rn×XF\times\mathrm{id}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X be the map (v,w)↦(F(v),w)(v,w)\mapsto(F(v),w). For the product metric, the distance between (F(v),w)(F(v),w) and (F(v′),w′)(F(v'),w') is the maximum of ∥F(v)−F(v′)∥\lVert F(v)-F(v')\rVert and ∣w−w′∣|w-w'|, so F×idF\times\mathrm{id} is continuous because FF is: given (v,w)(v,w) and ε>0\varepsilon>0, take δ>0\delta>0 for FF at vv and ε\varepsilon; then every (v′,w′)(v',w') within distance min⁡(δ,ε)\min(\delta,\varepsilon) of (v,w)(v,w) has ∥v−v′∥<δ\lVert v-v'\rVert<\delta and ∣w−w′∣<ε|w-w'|<\varepsilon, hence image within distance ε\varepsilon of (F(v),w)(F(v),w). It is hence Borel, that is, measurable for B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails. Its image measure κ=(F×id)#(γ~⊗τn)\kappa=(F\times\mathrm{id})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n}), a measure on B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, satisfies, for A∈B(Rn)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and C∈B(X)C\in\mathcal{B}(X), κ(A×C)=(γ~⊗τn)(F−1(A)×C)=γ~(F−1(A)) τn(C)=(F#γ~)(A) τn(C)\kappa(A\times C)=(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})(F^{-1}(A)\times C)=\tilde{\gamma}(F^{-1}(A))\,\tau_{n}(C)=(F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma})(A)\,\tau_{n}(C). The probability measures F#γ~F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma} and τn\tau_{n} are finite, hence σ\sigma-finite, so the uniqueness assertion of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure gives κ=(F#γ~)⊗τn\kappa=(F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma})\otimes\tau_{n}.

Step 12 (The image of γc\gamma_{c} is a Gaussian-tail extension). By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §reconstruction and The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, γc=(Ψn)#(γ~⊗τn)\gamma_{c}=(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n}), with Ψn\Psi_{n} Borel by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §borel. Let A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X), and let S1S_{1} and S2S_{2} be the preimages of AA under the Borel maps TF∘ΨnT_{F}\circ\Psi_{n} and Ψn∘(F×id)\Psi_{n}\circ(F\times\mathrm{id}); both belong to B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X). By Step 10, a point of S1∖S2S_{1}\setminus S_{2} or of S2∖S1S_{2}\setminus S_{1} lies in Rn×N\mathbb{R}^{n}\times N, whose (γ~⊗τn)(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})-measure is γ~(Rn) τn(N)=0\tilde{\gamma}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\,\tau_{n}(N)=0 by Step 9. By additivity and monotonicity of the measure, (γ~⊗τn)(S1)=(γ~⊗τn)(S1∩S2)=(γ~⊗τn)(S2)(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})(S_{1})=(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})(S_{1}\cap S_{2})=(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})(S_{2}). Hence, by the definition of image measures (claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables), the formula for γc\gamma_{c} above, (TF∘Ψn)−1(A)=Ψn−1(TF−1(A))(T_{F}\circ\Psi_{n})^{-1}(A)=\Psi_{n}^{-1}(T_{F}^{-1}(A)) and Step 11,

((TF)#γc)(A)=γc(TF−1(A))=(γ~⊗τn)(Ψn−1(TF−1(A)))=(γ~⊗τn)(S1)=(γ~⊗τn)(S2)=κ(Ψn−1(A))=((F#γ~)⊗τn)(Ψn−1(A)),\bigl((T_{F})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)(A)=\gamma_{c}\bigl(T_{F}^{-1}(A)\bigr)=(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})\bigl(\Psi_{n}^{-1}(T_{F}^{-1}(A))\bigr)=(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})(S_{1})=(\tilde{\gamma}\otimes\tau_{n})(S_{2})=\kappa\bigl(\Psi_{n}^{-1}(A)\bigr)=\bigl((F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma})\otimes\tau_{n}\bigr)\bigl(\Psi_{n}^{-1}(A)\bigr),

and the right-hand side is En(F#γ~)(A)E_{n}(F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma})(A) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension. So (TF)#γc=En(F#γ~)(T_{F})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=E_{n}(F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma}).

Step 13 (Conclusion). By Step 8, F#γ~∈P(Rn)F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) has the density GFG_{F} with respect to γ~\tilde{\gamma}, so Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §density shows that GF∘rnG_{F}\circ r_{n} is a density of En(F#γ~)=(TF)#γcE_{n}(F_{\#}\tilde{\gamma})=(T_{F})_{\#}\gamma_{c} with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. With Step 7 this proves claim 2.

Claim 3.

Step 14. Let u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Since F−1(F(u))=uF^{-1}(F(u))=u, the definition of GFG_{F} gives GF(F(u))=ρ(u)/(ρ(F(u)) det⁡DF(u))G_{F}(F(u))=\rho(u)/\bigl(\rho(F(u))\,\det DF(u)\bigr), a quotient of positive numbers. By The Natural Logarithm, log⁡(st)=log⁡s+log⁡t\log(st)=\log s+\log t for s,t>0s,t>0; applied to s′=GF(F(u))s'=G_{F}(F(u)) and t′=ρ(F(u))det⁡DF(u)t'=\rho(F(u))\det DF(u), whose product is ρ(u)\rho(u), and then to the factors of t′t', it gives

log⁡GF(F(u))=log⁡ρ(u)−log⁡ρ(F(u))−log⁡det⁡DF(u).\log G_{F}(F(u))=\log\rho(u)-\log\rho(F(u))-\log\det DF(u).

By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density, ρ(y)=exp⁡(−12∣y∣c~(n)2−Zc~(n))\rho(y)=\exp\bigl(-\tfrac12|y|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}-Z_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}\bigr) for y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, and log⁡(exp⁡(s))=s\log(\exp(s))=s for real ss by The Natural Logarithm; so log⁡ρ(y)=−12∣y∣c~(n)2−Zc~(n)\log\rho(y)=-\tfrac12|y|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}-Z_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}. Substituting y=uy=u and y=F(u)y=F(u), the constants Zc~(n)Z_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}} cancel and

log⁡GF(F(u))=12 ∣F(u)∣c~(n)2−12 ∣u∣c~(n)2−log⁡det⁡DF(u),\log G_{F}(F(u))=\tfrac12\,|F(u)|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}-\tfrac12\,|u|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}-\log\det DF(u),

which is claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…