Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, write ρ=ρc~(n) and γ~=γ~n, let λn be Lebesgue measure on B(Rn), and write uk for the kth coordinate of u∈Rn and Fk for the kth coordinate function of F. Continuity of maps between metric spaces is that of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces. A composite β∘α of continuous maps between metric spaces is continuous, by two applications of that definition: given a point x and ε>0, choose η>0 for β at α(x) and ε, and then δ>0 for α at x and η. Maps continuous for the Borel σ-algebras of their metric spaces are Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and composites of Borel maps are Borel by claim 4 there.
Claim 1.
Step 1 (Coordinates). For u,u′∈Rn and k∈[n] we have ∣uk−uk′∣≤∥u−u′∥ by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn §coordinate, so the coordinate function u↦uk is continuous from (Rn,dE) to R. Since F is continuous by Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §regularity, each Fk is continuous as a composite, and so is u↦Fk(u)−uk, by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set (a sum of Fk and the multiple of the coordinate function by −1).
Step 2 (The inverse map satisfies the hypotheses). The map F−1 is a bijection of Rn whose inverse is F, and the components of F−1 and of F are of class C1 on Rn by hypothesis. Let v∈Rn, put u=F−1(v), A=DF(u) and C=D(F−1)(v). Since v=F(u), the hypothesis at u says that A is symmetric and positive definite (Symmetric, Positive Semidefinite, and Positive Definite Real Matrices) and that C is the inverse matrix of A, that is, AC=CA=In. First, C is symmetric: by claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Transpose of a Real Matrix, A⊤ is invertible with (A⊤)−1=(A−1)⊤; as A⊤=A, this reads C=C⊤. Second, C is positive definite: let y∈Rn be nonzero and put z=Cy. Then Az=(AC)y=Iny=y, so z=0 (otherwise y=A0=0), and, the dot product being symmetric, y⋅(Cy)=(Az)⋅z=z⋅(Az)>0 by positive definiteness of A. Third, the relations CA=AC=In say that A is an inverse of C, so A is the inverse matrix of C by the uniqueness recorded in Inverse Matrix and Invertible Real Square Matrix; and A=DF(u)=D((F−1)−1)(F−1(v)). Hence for every v the Jacobian matrix D(F−1)(v) is symmetric and positive definite and the Jacobian matrix of the inverse map F at F−1(v) is its inverse matrix: F−1 satisfies the hypotheses imposed on F, and TF−1 is defined, with (F−1)−1=F.
Step 3 (Shifted heads and tails). The map η=F−id is Borel, as recorded in the statement, so Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §shift, whose claims are in force by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §heads (for instance with μ=γc∈P2(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian; that claim does not involve μ), gives for every x∈X
rn(TF(x))=rn(x)+F(rn(x))−rn(x)=F(rn(x)),QnTF(x)=Qnx.
By Step 2, Steps 1 and 3 apply to F−1; so the same holds with F−1 in place of F.
Step 4 (A point is determined by its rescaled head and its tail). Let x∈X. By Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, x=Pnx+Qnx and Pnx=pn∗(pn(x))=∑k=1nxkek=∑k=1nak1/2(rn(x))kek, since ak1/2ak−1/2xk=xk. Hence if x,y∈X satisfy rn(x)=rn(y) and Qnx=Qny, then x=y.
Step 5 (The inverse). Let x∈X, y=TF(x) and z=TF−1(y). By Step 3, applied to F−1 and then to F, rn(z)=F−1(rn(y))=F−1(F(rn(x)))=rn(x) and Qnz=Qny=Qnx; so z=x by Step 4. Interchanging the roles of F and F−1, which is legitimate by Step 2, gives TF(TF−1(y))=y for every y∈X. Hence TF is a bijection of X and TF−1 is its inverse.
Step 6 (Continuity). For k∈[n] let φk(x)=Fk(rn(x))−(rn(x))k for x∈X; it is continuous as the composite of rn, continuous by Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §head (for instance with μ=γc∈P2(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian), with the continuous function of Step 1. By the definition of Λn in Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space, TF(x)=x+∑k=1nak1/2φk(x)ek, so the triangle inequality and ∣ek∣=1 give, for x,y∈X,
∣TF(y)−TF(x)∣≤∣y−x∣+k=1∑nak1/2∣φk(y)−φk(x)∣.
Given x∈X and ε>0, choose for each k∈[n] a δk>0 such that ∣φk(y)−φk(x)∣<ε/(2nak1/2) whenever ∣y−x∣<δk, and let δ be the least of ε/2,δ1,…,δn; then ∣y−x∣<δ gives ∣TF(y)−TF(x)∣<ε/2+n⋅ε/(2n)=ε. So TF is continuous, hence Borel; by Step 2 the same argument applies to TF−1. With Steps 3 and 5 this proves claim 1.
Claim 2.
Step 7 (GF is Borel and positive). By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space: Regularity, Gradient, Normalization, Second Moments and Exponential Moments of Diagonal Quadratic Forms §regularity, ρ is smooth and positive on Rn, hence continuous by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and Ck Maps are Continuous, Rn being open by claim 1 there. By Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §regularity, F−1 and u↦detDF(u) are continuous, and detDF(u)>0 for every u, as recorded in the statement. So the functions v↦ρ(F−1(v)) and v↦detDF(F−1(v)) are continuous composites, the latter and ρ are nowhere zero, their reciprocals are continuous by claim 2 of Continuity of the Reciprocal of a Nonvanishing Real-Valued Function on a Metric Space, and GF, the product of ρ∘F−1 with these two reciprocals, is continuous by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set, hence Borel (the Borel σ-algebra of (R,dR) being B(R) by claim 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space). As a quotient of positive numbers, GF(v)>0 for every v.
Step 8 (GF is a density of F#γ~ with respect to γ~). By Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure, γ~(B)=∫Rn1Bρdλn for B∈B(Rn), so the nonnegative Borel function ρ is a density of γ~∈P(Rn) with respect to λn in the sense of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities. By Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §densities with d=n, the function
v↦detDF(F−1(v))ρ(F−1(v))=GF(v)ρ(v)
is a density of F#γ~ with respect to λn; here F#γ~∈P(Rn) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward, F being Borel. Hence for B∈B(Rn), using claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables with the density h=ρ (whose measure is γ~) and the nonnegative Borel function 1BGF,
(F#γ~)(B)=∫Rn1BGFρdλn=∫Rn1BGFdγ~,
so GF, which is Borel and nonnegative by Step 7, is a density of F#γ~ with respect to γ~.
Step 9 (Tails have vanishing head coordinates). Let N={w∈X:pn(w)=0}, the complement of the preimage of the closed set {0} under the Borel map pn (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity); it is Borel by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For x∈X, the map pn is linear, its coordinates being inner products with e1,…,en, and pn(pn∗(y))=y for y∈Rn by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity; hence pn(Qnx)=pn(x)−pn(pn∗(pn(x)))=0. So Qn−1(N)=∅ and τn(N)=γc(∅)=0, by the definition of τn in A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails.
Step 10 (The map on the product). Let (v,w)∈Rn×X with w∈/N, and x=Ψn(v,w)=∑j=1naj1/2vjej+w. For k∈[n], orthonormality of the basis and wk=0 give xk=ak1/2vk, so rn(x)=v. Therefore
TF(Ψn(v,w))=x+k=1∑nak1/2(Fk(v)−vk)ek=k=1∑nak1/2Fk(v)ek+w=Ψn(F(v),w).
Step 11 (Product measures). Let F×id:Rn×X→Rn×X be the map (v,w)↦(F(v),w). For the product metric, the distance between (F(v),w) and (F(v′),w′) is the maximum of ∥F(v)−F(v′)∥ and ∣w−w′∣, so F×id is continuous because F is: given (v,w) and ε>0, take δ>0 for F at v and ε; then every (v′,w′) within distance min(δ,ε) of (v,w) has ∥v−v′∥<δ and ∣w−w′∣<ε, hence image within distance ε of (F(v),w). It is hence Borel, that is, measurable for B(Rn)⊗B(X) by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails. Its image measure κ=(F×id)#(γ~⊗τn), a measure on B(Rn)⊗B(X) by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, satisfies, for A∈B(Rn) and C∈B(X), κ(A×C)=(γ~⊗τn)(F−1(A)×C)=γ~(F−1(A))τn(C)=(F#γ~)(A)τn(C). The probability measures F#γ~ and τn are finite, hence σ-finite, so the uniqueness assertion of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure gives κ=(F#γ~)⊗τn.
Step 12 (The image of γc is a Gaussian-tail extension). By Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §reconstruction and The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, γc=(Ψn)#(γ~⊗τn), with Ψn Borel by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §borel. Let A∈B(X), and let S1 and S2 be the preimages of A under the Borel maps TF∘Ψn and Ψn∘(F×id); both belong to B(Rn)⊗B(X). By Step 10, a point of S1∖S2 or of S2∖S1 lies in Rn×N, whose (γ~⊗τn)-measure is γ~(Rn)τn(N)=0 by Step 9. By additivity and monotonicity of the measure, (γ~⊗τn)(S1)=(γ~⊗τn)(S1∩S2)=(γ~⊗τn)(S2). Hence, by the definition of image measures (claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables), the formula for γc above, (TF∘Ψn)−1(A)=Ψn−1(TF−1(A)) and Step 11,
((TF)#γc)(A)=γc(TF−1(A))=(γ~⊗τn)(Ψn−1(TF−1(A)))=(γ~⊗τn)(S1)=(γ~⊗τn)(S2)=κ(Ψn−1(A))=((F#γ~)⊗τn)(Ψn−1(A)),
and the right-hand side is En(F#γ~)(A) by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension. So (TF)#γc=En(F#γ~).
Step 13 (Conclusion). By Step 8, F#γ~∈P(Rn) has the density GF with respect to γ~, so Gaussian-Tail Extensions: the Gaussian Reference Measure, Marginals, Densities, Relative Entropy, Relative Score and the Noise Wasserstein Distance §density shows that GF∘rn is a density of En(F#γ~)=(TF)#γc with respect to γc. With Step 7 this proves claim 2.
Claim 3.
Step 14. Let u∈Rn. Since F−1(F(u))=u, the definition of GF gives GF(F(u))=ρ(u)/(ρ(F(u))detDF(u)), a quotient of positive numbers. By The Natural Logarithm, log(st)=logs+logt for s,t>0; applied to s′=GF(F(u)) and t′=ρ(F(u))detDF(u), whose product is ρ(u), and then to the factors of t′, it gives
logGF(F(u))=logρ(u)−logρ(F(u))−logdetDF(u).
By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density, ρ(y)=exp(−21∣y∣c~(n)2−Zc~(n)) for y∈Rn, and log(exp(s))=s for real s by The Natural Logarithm; so logρ(y)=−21∣y∣c~(n)2−Zc~(n). Substituting y=u and y=F(u), the constants Zc~(n) cancel and
logGF(F(u))=21∣F(u)∣c~(n)2−21∣u∣c~(n)2−logdetDF(u),
which is claim 3.