TheoremBase

An intermediate cutoff at which the lower bound is half the level, together with the chaos tail bound, gives superexponential lower tails uniformly in the cutoff; summing over levels gives the uniform bound, Fatou's lemma the integrability, and Hoelder's inequality the LpL^p convergence.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Let C≥0C\ge0 be the constant of The Galerkin Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potentials on the Torus of Dimension at Most Two under the Free Field: Chaos Order, Conditional Expectations, and Increments with Their Cameron-Martin Derivatives §increment, put C′=C+1>0C'=C+1>0, and let BNB_{N} be the numbers of The Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potential on the Torus of Dimension at Most Two: Limit of the Galerkin Potentials Almost Everywhere and in Every L^p, Conditional Expectations, Cameron-Martin Derivatives, and the Lower Bound at Each Cutoff §lower-bound, so that VN≥−BNV_{N}\ge-B_{N} on XX. Every VNV_{N} is Borel by Basic Properties of an Admissible Cylindrical Potential: Continuity, Growth under Noise Translations, Integrability, the Tangent Inequality and Tangency of the Noise Gradient §continuity (applicable by The Galerkin Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potential on the Torus is an Admissible Cylindrical Potential, with Semiconvexity Constant the Positive Part of Three Times the Coupling Times the Wick Constant Minus the Mass §admissible), and VV is Borel by The Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potential on the Torus of Dimension at Most Two: Limit of the Galerkin Potentials Almost Everywhere and in Every L^p, Conditional Expectations, Cameron-Martin Derivatives, and the Lower Bound at Each Cutoff §borel; for real ss the functions exp⁡(sVN)\exp(sV_{N}) and exp⁡(sV)\exp(sV) are therefore Borel and positive, exactly as in The Gibbs Measure of a Borel Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §weight. Real powers obey claims 1 and 2 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities, used without further mention; e=exp⁡(1)\mathrm{e}=\exp(1).

Step 1 (growth of BNB_{N}). Let ε=1/128\varepsilon=1/128 and S=∑k∈Znμk−(1+ε)≥0S=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}\mu_{k}^{-(1+\varepsilon)}\ge0. For N∈NN\in\mathbb{N}, CN=∑k∈ΓNμk−1C_{N}=\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{N}}\mu_{k}^{-1} by The Galerkin Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potential on the Torus is an Admissible Cylindrical Potential, with Semiconvexity Constant the Positive Part of Three Times the Coupling Times the Wick Constant Minus the Mass §wick, and since n≤2n\le2 and 1≤N21\le N^{2} we have 1+4π2nN2≤(1+8π2)N21+4\pi^{2}nN^{2}\le(1+8\pi^{2})N^{2}; so Lattice Sums of Powers of the Fourier Weights in Dimension at Most Two: Power Sums, the Growth of the Wick Constants, and the Quartic Convolution Sums §growth gives

CN≤((1+8π2)N2)1/128S=A1N1/64,A1=(1+8π2)1/128S.C_{N}\le\bigl((1+8\pi^{2})N^{2}\bigr)^{1/128}S=A_{1}N^{1/64},\qquad A_{1}=(1+8\pi^{2})^{1/128}S .

As 1≤N1/64≤N1/321\le N^{1/64}\le N^{1/32}, we get 3ϰCN+∣m∣≤(3ϰA1+∣m∣)N1/643\varkappa C_{N}+|\mathfrak{m}|\le(3\varkappa A_{1}+|\mathfrak{m}|)N^{1/64} and ∣m∣CN≤∣m∣A1N1/32|\mathfrak{m}|C_{N}\le|\mathfrak{m}|A_{1}N^{1/32}, hence, squaring the first (both sides nonnegative),

BN≤A N1/32(N∈N),A=(3ϰA1+∣m∣)24ϰ+∣m∣A12+1>0.B_{N}\le A\,N^{1/32}\quad(N\in\mathbb{N}),\qquad A=\frac{(3\varkappa A_{1}+|\mathfrak{m}|)^{2}}{4\varkappa}+\frac{|\mathfrak{m}|A_{1}}{2}+1>0 .

Step 2 (a uniform Gaussian tail). Put λ0=max⁡{2A, 8e2C′1/2, 1}\lambda_{0}=\max\{2A,\,8\mathrm{e}^{2}C'^{1/2},\,1\} and c2=2e 2−9/16C′−1/4(2A)−2>0c_{2}=\frac{2}{\mathrm{e}}\,2^{-9/16}C'^{-1/4}(2A)^{-2}>0. We claim: for every real λ≥λ0\lambda\ge\lambda_{0} and every N∈NN\in\mathbb{N},

γc({x:VN(x)<−λ})≤exp⁡(−c2λ2).\gamma_{c}\bigl(\{x:V_{N}(x)<-\lambda\}\bigr)\le\exp(-c_{2}\lambda^{2}).

Fix λ\lambda and let y=(λ/(2A))32y=(\lambda/(2A))^{32}; then y≥1y\ge1. By claim 4 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities there is n1∈Nn_{1}\in\mathbb{N} with y<n1≤y+1y<n_{1}\le y+1; as y≥1y\ge1, n1≥2n_{1}\ge2, and N′=n1−1∈NN'=n_{1}-1\in\mathbb{N} satisfies y−1<N′≤yy-1<N'\le y, hence also y<2N′y<2N' (add N′≥1N'\ge1). By Step 1, BN′≤AN′1/32≤Ay1/32=λ/2B_{N'}\le AN'^{1/32}\le Ay^{1/32}=\lambda/2.

If N≤N′N\le N', then likewise BN≤AN1/32≤AN′1/32≤λ/2B_{N}\le AN^{1/32}\le AN'^{1/32}\le\lambda/2, so VN≥−λ/2>−λV_{N}\ge-\lambda/2>-\lambda everywhere and the set is empty.

If N′<NN'<N, let f=VN−VN′f=V_{N}-V_{N'}. Its class lies in H≤4\mathcal{H}_{\le4}, by The Galerkin Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potentials on the Torus of Dimension at Most Two under the Free Field: Chaos Order, Conditional Expectations, and Increments with Their Cameron-Martin Derivatives §chaos and since H≤4\mathcal{H}_{\le4} is a linear subspace (The Wiener Chaos Decomposition: Cylindrical Hermite Polynomials Are Dense and the Gaussian Lebesgue Space Is the Orthogonal Sum of the Chaoses §subspaces); and by The Galerkin Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potentials on the Torus of Dimension at Most Two under the Free Field: Chaos Order, Conditional Expectations, and Increments with Their Cameron-Martin Derivatives §increment, ∥f∥22≤CN′−1/4≤C′N′−1/4\lVert f\rVert_{2}^{2}\le CN'^{-1/4}\le C'N'^{-1/4}, so ∥f∥2≤σ:=C′1/2N′−1/8\lVert f\rVert_{2}\le\sigma:=C'^{1/2}N'^{-1/8}, and 0<σ≤C′1/20<\sigma\le C'^{1/2} as N′≥1N'\ge1. If VN(x)<−λV_{N}(x)<-\lambda, then f(x)<−λ+BN′≤−λ/2f(x)<-\lambda+B_{N'}\le-\lambda/2, so ∣f(x)∣≥λ/2|f(x)|\ge\lambda/2. Since λ/2≥4e2C′1/2≥(2e)2σ\lambda/2\ge4\mathrm{e}^{2}C'^{1/2}\ge(2\mathrm{e})^{2}\sigma, Moment and Tail Bounds on the Wiener Chaos up to a Given Order §tail, applied with chaos order 44 and s=λ/2s=\lambda/2, gives

γc({VN<−λ})≤γc({∣f∣≥λ/2})≤exp⁡(−2e(λ2σ)1/2).\gamma_{c}(\{V_{N}<-\lambda\})\le\gamma_{c}(\{|f|\ge\lambda/2\})\le\exp\Bigl(-\frac{2}{\mathrm{e}}\Bigl(\frac{\lambda}{2\sigma}\Bigr)^{1/2}\Bigr).

Now (λ/(2σ))1/2=(λ/2)1/2C′−1/4N′1/16(\lambda/(2\sigma))^{1/2}=(\lambda/2)^{1/2}C'^{-1/4}N'^{1/16}, and N′>y/2N'>y/2 gives N′1/16≥2−1/16y1/16=2−1/16(2A)−2λ2N'^{1/16}\ge2^{-1/16}y^{1/16}=2^{-1/16}(2A)^{-2}\lambda^{2}. With λ1/2≥1\lambda^{1/2}\ge1 this yields 2e(λ/(2σ))1/2≥c2λ2\frac{2}{\mathrm{e}}(\lambda/(2\sigma))^{1/2}\ge c_{2}\lambda^{2}, and the claim follows since exp⁡\exp is increasing (claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function).

Step 3 (claim 1). Fix t>0t>0. By The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background (Archimedean property) choose R∈NR\in\mathbb{N} with R≥max⁡{λ0,(2t+1)/c2}R\ge\max\{\lambda_{0},(2t+1)/c_{2}\}, and put Et=exp⁡(tR)+1/(e−1)E_{t}=\exp(tR)+1/(\mathrm{e}-1); EtE_{t} does not depend on NN. Fix NN. Let E0={x:VN(x)≥−R}E_{0}=\{x:V_{N}(x)\ge-R\} and, for k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, Ek={x:−(R+k)≤VN(x)<−(R+k−1)}E_{k}=\{x:-(R+k)\le V_{N}(x)<-(R+k-1)\}. These are pairwise disjoint Borel sets whose union is XX (for VN(x)<−RV_{N}(x)<-R take the least kk with VN(x)≥−(R+k)V_{N}(x)\ge-(R+k)). The partial sums hK=∑k=0K1Ekexp⁡(−tVN)h_{K}=\sum_{k=0}^{K}\mathbf{1}_{E_{k}}\exp(-tV_{N}) increase pointwise to exp⁡(−tVN)\exp(-tV_{N}), so by Monotone Convergence Theorem and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative,

∫Xexp⁡(−tVN) dγc=sup⁡K∑k=0K∫X1Ekexp⁡(−tVN) dγc.\int_{X}\exp(-tV_{N})\,d\gamma_{c}=\sup_{K}\sum_{k=0}^{K}\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{E_{k}}\exp(-tV_{N})\,d\gamma_{c}.

On E0E_{0}, exp⁡(−tVN)≤exp⁡(tR)\exp(-tV_{N})\le\exp(tR), and γc(E0)≤1\gamma_{c}(E_{0})\le1, so the term k=0k=0 is at most exp⁡(tR)\exp(tR). For k≥1k\ge1 put u=R+k−1≥R≥λ0u=R+k-1\ge R\ge\lambda_{0}; on EkE_{k}, exp⁡(−tVN)≤exp⁡(t(u+1))\exp(-tV_{N})\le\exp(t(u+1)), and Ek⊆{VN<−u}E_{k}\subseteq\{V_{N}<-u\}, so by monotonicity, Step 2 and claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function,

∫X1Ekexp⁡(−tVN) dγc≤exp⁡(t(u+1))γc(Ek)≤exp⁡(t(u+1)−c2u2).\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{E_{k}}\exp(-tV_{N})\,d\gamma_{c}\le\exp(t(u+1))\gamma_{c}(E_{k})\le\exp\bigl(t(u+1)-c_{2}u^{2}\bigr).

Since u≥1u\ge1 and u≥(2t+1)/c2u\ge(2t+1)/c_{2}, c2u2≥(2t+1)u≥tu+t+uc_{2}u^{2}\ge(2t+1)u\ge tu+t+u, so t(u+1)−c2u2≤−u≤−kt(u+1)-c_{2}u^{2}\le-u\le-k and the term is at most exp⁡(−k)=ρk\exp(-k)=\rho^{k} with ρ=exp⁡(−1)∈(0,1)\rho=\exp(-1)\in(0,1) (claims 1, 2 and 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function). By Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §geometric, ∑k=1Kρk≤ρ/(1−ρ)=1/(e−1)\sum_{k=1}^{K}\rho^{k}\le\rho/(1-\rho)=1/(\mathrm{e}-1). Hence ∫Xexp⁡(−tVN) dγc≤Et\int_{X}\exp(-tV_{N})\,d\gamma_{c}\le E_{t} for every NN.

Step 4 (claim 2). Let fi=exp⁡(−tV2i)f_{i}=\exp(-tV_{2^{i}}) (i∈Ni\in\mathbb{N}), Borel and nonnegative. By The Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potential on the Torus of Dimension at Most Two: Limit of the Galerkin Potentials Almost Everywhere and in Every L^p, Conditional Expectations, Cameron-Martin Derivatives, and the Lower Bound at Each Cutoff §limit there is a null set outside which V2i(x)→V(x)V_{2^{i}}(x)\to V(x), hence −tV2i(x)→−tV(x)-tV_{2^{i}}(x)\to-tV(x) by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar and fi(x)→exp⁡(−tV(x))f_{i}(x)\to\exp(-tV(x)) by claim 3(f) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities. For a real sequence ai→aa_{i}\to a one has a≤sup⁡kinf⁡i≥kaia\le\sup_{k}\inf_{i\ge k}a_{i} (given ε>0\varepsilon>0, ai>a−εa_{i}>a-\varepsilon for all large ii). So exp⁡(−tV)≤lim inf⁡ifi\exp(-tV)\le\liminf_{i}f_{i} almost everywhere, and The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison, Fatou's Lemma and Step 3 give

∫Xexp⁡(−tV) dγc≤∫Xlim inf⁡ifi dγc≤lim inf⁡i∫Xfi dγc≤Et,\int_{X}\exp(-tV)\,d\gamma_{c}\le\int_{X}\liminf_{i}f_{i}\,d\gamma_{c}\le\liminf_{i}\int_{X}f_{i}\,d\gamma_{c}\le E_{t},

the last because every inf⁡i≥k∫Xfi dγc\inf_{i\ge k}\int_{X}f_{i}\,d\gamma_{c} is at most EtE_{t}. As exp⁡(−tV)\exp(-tV) is Borel and positive, it is integrable (Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral).

Step 5 (claim 3). Fix real p≥1p\ge1. For real uu, exp⁡(u)p=exp⁡(pu)\exp(u)^{p}=\exp(pu) by Real Power of a Positive Real Number and The Natural Logarithm; so ∫X∣exp⁡(−tVN)∣p dγc=∫Xexp⁡(−ptVN) dγc≤Ept\int_{X}|\exp(-tV_{N})|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int_{X}\exp(-ptV_{N})\,d\gamma_{c}\le E_{pt} by Step 3 with ptpt in place of tt, and ∫Xexp⁡(−ptV) dγc<∞\int_{X}\exp(-ptV)\,d\gamma_{c}<\infty by Step 4 with ptpt. Hence all these classes lie in Lp(γc)L^{p}(\gamma_{c}), and similarly, with 2p2p in place of pp, (∥exp⁡(−tVN)∥2p)2p=∫Xexp⁡(−2ptVN) dγc≤E2pt(\lVert\exp(-tV_{N})\rVert_{2p})^{2p}=\int_{X}\exp(-2ptV_{N})\,d\gamma_{c}\le E_{2pt} by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm §power, so that ∥exp⁡(−tVN)∥2p≤E2pt1/(2p)\lVert\exp(-tV_{N})\rVert_{2p}\le E_{2pt}^{1/(2p)} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §inverse, and D:=∥exp⁡(−tV)∥2p<∞D:=\lVert\exp(-tV)\rVert_{2p}<\infty.

A pointwise bound. For reals a≥ba\ge b, Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities (claim 6, with h=a−b≥0h=a-b\ge0) and claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function give ∣exp⁡(a)−exp⁡(b)∣=exp⁡(b)∣exp⁡(a−b)−1∣≤(a−b)exp⁡(a)≤∣a−b∣(exp⁡(a)+exp⁡(b))|\exp(a)-\exp(b)|=\exp(b)|\exp(a-b)-1|\le(a-b)\exp(a)\le|a-b|(\exp(a)+\exp(b)); by symmetry this holds for all reals a,ba,b. With a=−tVN(x)a=-tV_{N}(x) and b=−tV(x)b=-tV(x),

∣exp⁡(−tVN)−exp⁡(−tV)∣≤t ∣VN−V∣ (exp⁡(−tVN)+exp⁡(−tV))on X.|\exp(-tV_{N})-\exp(-tV)|\le t\,|V_{N}-V|\,\bigl(\exp(-tV_{N})+\exp(-tV)\bigr)\quad\text{on }X.

A product bound. If g,h∈L2pg,h\in\mathcal{L}^{2p}, then gh∈Lpgh\in\mathcal{L}^{p} and ∥gh∥p≤∥g∥2p∥h∥2p\lVert gh\rVert_{p}\le\lVert g\rVert_{2p}\lVert h\rVert_{2p}. Indeed, ∣g∣p,∣h∣p∈L2|g|^{p},|h|^{p}\in\mathcal{L}^{2} with ∥ ∣g∣p∥2=∥g∥2pp\lVert\,|g|^{p}\rVert_{2}=\lVert g\rVert_{2p}^{p} by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm §rescaling; ∣gh∣p=∣g∣p∣h∣p|gh|^{p}=|g|^{p}|h|^{p} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §product; and Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder with exponents 2,22,2 gives ∫X∣gh∣p dγc≤∥g∥2pp∥h∥2pp\int_{X}|gh|^{p}\,d\gamma_{c}\le\lVert g\rVert_{2p}^{p}\lVert h\rVert_{2p}^{p}; take pp-th roots by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §exponents.

Conclusion. By The Wick-Ordered Phi^4 Potential on the Torus of Dimension at Most Two: Limit of the Galerkin Potentials Almost Everywhere and in Every L^p, Conditional Expectations, Cameron-Martin Derivatives, and the Lower Bound at Each Cutoff §limit with 2p≥22p\ge2, VN−V∈L2pV_{N}-V\in\mathcal{L}^{2p} and ∥VN−V∥2p≤(2p−1)2C1/2N−1/8\lVert V_{N}-V\rVert_{2p}\le(2p-1)^{2}C^{1/2}N^{-1/8}. By Minkowski's Inequality and the Seminormed Space of Power-Integrable Functions §minkowski, ∥exp⁡(−tVN)+exp⁡(−tV)∥2p≤E2pt1/(2p)+D\lVert\exp(-tV_{N})+\exp(-tV)\rVert_{2p}\le E_{2pt}^{1/(2p)}+D. The pointwise bound, Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm §comparison, Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm §homogeneous and the product bound give

∥exp⁡(−tVN)−exp⁡(−tV)∥p≤t (2p−1)2C1/2(E2pt1/(2p)+D) N−1/8,\lVert\exp(-tV_{N})-\exp(-tV)\rVert_{p}\le t\,(2p-1)^{2}C^{1/2}\bigl(E_{2pt}^{1/(2p)}+D\bigr)\,N^{-1/8},

whose right side tends to 00 as N→∞N\to\infty by claim 3(a) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar; so the left side tends to 00 by claim 3(c) of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities with limit 00.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…