Throughout, each result cited is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement and is applied to the data named here. Write W = W T ( μ , ν ) W=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu,\nu) W = W T ( μ , ν ) and let ι R \iota_{\mathbb{R}} ι R be the canonical map from N \mathbb{N} N to R \mathbb{R} R . Integrals over R q \mathbb{R}^{q} R q are formed in the measure space ( R q , B ( R q ) , Σ n ) (\mathbb{R}^{q},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}),\Sigma_{n}) ( R q , B ( R q ) , Σ n ) and integrals over R d + d \mathbb{R}^{d+d} R d + d in ( R d + d , B ( R d + d ) , ρ n ) (\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\rho_{n}) ( R d + d , B ( R d + d ) , ρ n ) , for the measures ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n of Step 1, as in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures ; by that clause a nonnegative Borel real function is integrated as a [ 0 , ∞ ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , ∞ ] -valued map, and for a bounded one this integral is real and equals its integral as an integrable function by claim 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , each probability measure being a Borel measure of total mass 1 1 1 by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures . Composites of Borel maps are Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps . For a point u u u of R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , ∥ u ∥ 2 = ∑ i = 1 d u i 2 \lVert u\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}u_{i}^{2} ∥ u ∥ 2 = ∑ i = 1 d u i 2 and ∣ u i ∣ ≤ ∥ u ∥ |u_{i}|\le\lVert u\rVert ∣ u i ∣ ≤ ∥ u ∥ for every i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] , by claims 1 and 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n .
Step 1 (The couplings ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n and the excess a n a_{n} a n ). Fix n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N . The pairing ( X n , Y n ) : R q → R d + d (X_{n},Y_{n}):\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R}^{d+d} ( X n , Y n ) : R q → R d + d is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §pairing , and p r 1 ∘ ( X n , Y n ) = X n \mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ(X_{n},Y_{n})=X_{n} pr 1 ∘ ( X n , Y n ) = X n , p r 2 ∘ ( X n , Y n ) = Y n \mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ(X_{n},Y_{n})=Y_{n} pr 2 ∘ ( X n , Y n ) = Y n by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections . Put ρ n = ( X n , Y n ) # Σ n \rho_{n}=(X_{n},Y_{n})_{\#}\Sigma_{n} ρ n = ( X n , Y n ) # Σ n , a member of P ( R d + d ) \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) P ( R d + d ) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward . For B ∈ B ( R d ) B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) B ∈ B ( R d ) , the defining formula of the push-forward in that clause gives ρ n ( p r 1 − 1 ( B ) ) = Σ n ( ( X n , Y n ) − 1 ( p r 1 − 1 ( B ) ) ) = Σ n ( X n − 1 ( B ) ) = μ ( B ) \rho_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(B))=\Sigma_{n}((X_{n},Y_{n})^{-1}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(B)))=\Sigma_{n}(X_{n}^{-1}(B))=\mu(B) ρ n ( pr 1 − 1 ( B )) = Σ n (( X n , Y n ) − 1 ( pr 1 − 1 ( B ))) = Σ n ( X n − 1 ( B )) = μ ( B ) , and likewise ρ n ( p r 2 − 1 ( B ) ) = ν ( B ) \rho_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(B))=\nu(B) ρ n ( pr 2 − 1 ( B )) = ν ( B ) ; so ρ n ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) \rho_{n}\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) ρ n ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling .
Define on R q \mathbb{R}^{q} R q the functions
Q n ( w ) = ∥ Z n ( w ) ∥ 2 , P n ( w ) = ∥ ϖ ( Z n ( w ) ) ∥ 2 , g n ( w ) = Q n ( w ) − P n ( w ) . Q_{n}(w)=\lVert Z_{n}(w)\rVert^{2},\qquad P_{n}(w)=\lVert\varpi(Z_{n}(w))\rVert^{2},\qquad g_{n}(w)=Q_{n}(w)-P_{n}(w). Q n ( w ) = ∥ Z n ( w ) ∥ 2 , P n ( w ) = ∥ ϖ ( Z n ( w )) ∥ 2 , g n ( w ) = Q n ( w ) − P n ( w ) .
They are Borel: ϖ \varpi ϖ is Borel by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz , so Q n Q_{n} Q n and P n P_{n} P n are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions (applied on the measurable space ( R q , B ( R q ) ) (\mathbb{R}^{q},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q})) ( R q , B ( R q )) to Z n Z_{n} Z n and to ϖ ∘ Z n \varpi\circ Z_{n} ϖ ∘ Z n ), and g n g_{n} g n by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions . By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , 0 ≤ P n ≤ d / 4 0\le P_{n}\le d/4 0 ≤ P n ≤ d /4 ; by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §minimal with k = 0 k=0 k = 0 , ∥ ϖ ( Z n ( w ) ) ∥ ≤ ∥ Z n ( w ) ∥ \lVert\varpi(Z_{n}(w))\rVert\le\lVert Z_{n}(w)\rVert ∥ ϖ ( Z n ( w ))∥ ≤ ∥ Z n ( w )∥ , and squaring (both sides being nonnegative) gives P n ≤ Q n P_{n}\le Q_{n} P n ≤ Q n , that is g n ≥ 0 g_{n}\ge0 g n ≥ 0 .
Fix w ∈ R q w\in\mathbb{R}^{q} w ∈ R q and put m = Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ) − Z n ( w ) m=Y_{n}(w)-X_{n}(w)-Z_{n}(w) m = Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ) − Z n ( w ) , which lies in Z d \mathbb{Z}^{d} Z d by hypothesis. Then Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ) = Z n ( w ) + m Y_{n}(w)-X_{n}(w)=Z_{n}(w)+m Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ) = Z n ( w ) + m , so the periodicity ϖ ( z + m ) = ϖ ( z ) \varpi(z+m)=\varpi(z) ϖ ( z + m ) = ϖ ( z ) of The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range and The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance give
d T ( X n ( w ) , Y n ( w ) ) = ∥ ϖ ( Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ) ) ∥ = ∥ ϖ ( Z n ( w ) ) ∥ , ϖ ( Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ) ) = ϖ ( Z n ( w ) ) . (1) d_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl(X_{n}(w),Y_{n}(w)\bigr)=\lVert\varpi(Y_{n}(w)-X_{n}(w))\rVert=\lVert\varpi(Z_{n}(w))\rVert,\qquad\varpi\bigl(Y_{n}(w)-X_{n}(w)\bigr)=\varpi\bigl(Z_{n}(w)\bigr). \tag{1} d T ( X n ( w ) , Y n ( w ) ) = ∥ ϖ ( Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ))∥ = ∥ ϖ ( Z n ( w ))∥ , ϖ ( Y n ( w ) − X n ( w ) ) = ϖ ( Z n ( w ) ) . ( 1 )
The integrand of the torus cost is a bounded nonnegative Borel function on R d + d \mathbb{R}^{d+d} R d + d ; by the change-of-variables formula and ( 1 ) (1) ( 1 ) ,
I T ( ρ n ) = ∫ R q d T ( X n ( w ) , Y n ( w ) ) 2 Σ n ( d w ) = ∫ R q P n d Σ n . I_{\mathbb{T}}(\rho_{n})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}d_{\mathbb{T}}\bigl(X_{n}(w),Y_{n}(w)\bigr)^{2}\,\Sigma_{n}(dw)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}P_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}. I T ( ρ n ) = ∫ R q d T ( X n ( w ) , Y n ( w ) ) 2 Σ n ( d w ) = ∫ R q P n d Σ n .
By hypothesis ∫ Q n d Σ n < ∞ \int Q_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}<\infty ∫ Q n d Σ n < ∞ . Since Q n = g n + P n Q_{n}=g_{n}+P_{n} Q n = g n + P n with both summands nonnegative Borel, claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral gives ∫ Q n d Σ n = ∫ g n d Σ n + ∫ P n d Σ n \int Q_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}=\int g_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}+\int P_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n} ∫ Q n d Σ n = ∫ g n d Σ n + ∫ P n d Σ n , so both integrals on the right are real and
a n : = ∫ R q g n d Σ n = ∫ R q Q n d Σ n − I T ( ρ n ) ≥ 0 , I T ( ρ n ) ≤ ∫ R q Q n d Σ n . a_{n}:=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}g_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}Q_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}-I_{\mathbb{T}}(\rho_{n})\ge0,\qquad I_{\mathbb{T}}(\rho_{n})\le\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}Q_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}. a n := ∫ R q g n d Σ n = ∫ R q Q n d Σ n − I T ( ρ n ) ≥ 0 , I T ( ρ n ) ≤ ∫ R q Q n d Σ n .
By Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §distance , W W W is the nonnegative square root of the greatest lower bound of { I T ( γ ) : γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) } \{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma):\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu)\} { I T ( γ ) : γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν )} , so W 2 ≤ I T ( ρ n ) W^{2}\le I_{\mathbb{T}}(\rho_{n}) W 2 ≤ I T ( ρ n ) .
Now let ε \varepsilon ε be a positive real number. By hypothesis, applied with ε / 2 \varepsilon/2 ε /2 , there is N ∈ N N\in\mathbb{N} N ∈ N with ∫ Q n d Σ n ≤ W 2 + ε / 2 \int Q_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n}\le W^{2}+\varepsilon/2 ∫ Q n d Σ n ≤ W 2 + ε /2 for every n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N ; for such n n n ,
W 2 ≤ I T ( ρ n ) ≤ W 2 + ε 2 , 0 ≤ a n ≤ W 2 + ε 2 − W 2 < ε . W^{2}\le I_{\mathbb{T}}(\rho_{n})\le W^{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2},\qquad 0\le a_{n}\le W^{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}-W^{2}<\varepsilon . W 2 ≤ I T ( ρ n ) ≤ W 2 + 2 ε , 0 ≤ a n ≤ W 2 + 2 ε − W 2 < ε .
So ∣ I T ( ρ n ) − W 2 ∣ < ε |I_{\mathbb{T}}(\rho_{n})-W^{2}|<\varepsilon ∣ I T ( ρ n ) − W 2 ∣ < ε and ∣ a n − 0 ∣ < ε |a_{n}-0|<\varepsilon ∣ a n − 0∣ < ε for n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N , and by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers the sequence ( I T ( ρ n ) ) n ∈ N (I_{\mathbb{T}}(\rho_{n}))_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( I T ( ρ n ) ) n ∈ N converges to W 2 W^{2} W 2 and ( a n ) n ∈ N (a_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( a n ) n ∈ N converges to 0 0 0 .
Step 2 (The wrapped part converges). As μ \mu μ is absolutely continuous, the pair ( μ , ν ) (\mu,\nu) ( μ , ν ) is uniquely mapped on the torus by McCann's Theorem on the Flat Torus: Optimal Couplings out of an Absolutely Continuous Measure are Induced by a Unique Map with a Periodic Potential §map . So Stability of the Optimal Map and of the Displacement on the Torus Along Couplings of Nearly Optimal Cost §displacement applies to μ \mu μ , ν \nu ν , the optimal map T T T and the sequence ( ρ n ) n ∈ N (\rho_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( ρ n ) n ∈ N in Π ( μ , ν ) \Pi(\mu,\nu) Π ( μ , ν ) , whose costs converge to W 2 W^{2} W 2 by Step 1: the sequence of integrals over R d + d \mathbb{R}^{d+d} R d + d of the bounded nonnegative Borel function u ↦ ∥ ϖ ( p r 2 ( u ) − p r 1 ( u ) ) − v T ( p r 1 ( u ) ) ∥ 2 u\mapsto\lVert\varpi(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(u)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u))-v_{T}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u))\rVert^{2} u ↦ ∥ ϖ ( pr 2 ( u ) − pr 1 ( u )) − v T ( pr 1 ( u )) ∥ 2 against ρ n \rho_{n} ρ n converges to 0 0 0 . By the change-of-variables formula and ( 1 ) (1) ( 1 ) this integral equals
b n : = ∫ R q f n d Σ n , f n ( w ) = ∥ ϖ ( Z n ( w ) ) − v T ( X n ( w ) ) ∥ 2 , b_{n}:=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}f_{n}\,d\Sigma_{n},\qquad f_{n}(w)=\bigl\lVert\varpi(Z_{n}(w))-v_{T}(X_{n}(w))\bigr\rVert^{2}, b n := ∫ R q f n d Σ n , f n ( w ) = ϖ ( Z n ( w )) − v T ( X n ( w )) 2 ,
so ( b n ) n ∈ N (b_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( b n ) n ∈ N converges to 0 0 0 . Here f n f_{n} f n is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions , v T v_{T} v T being Borel by Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement , and 0 ≤ f n ≤ d 0\le f_{n}\le d 0 ≤ f n ≤ d by the first inequality of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions and The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , recalling v T ( x ) = ϖ ( T ( x ) − x ) v_{T}(x)=\varpi(T(x)-x) v T ( x ) = ϖ ( T ( x ) − x ) .
Step 3 (A gap for unwrapped points). Let r r r be the function of The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §regular . Let z ∈ R d z\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z ∈ R d , put t = ϖ ( z ) t=\varpi(z) t = ϖ ( z ) and k = z − t k=z-t k = z − t , which lies in Z d \mathbb{Z}^{d} Z d by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , and suppose k ≠ 0 k\ne0 k = 0 . We show
∥ z ∥ 2 − ∥ t ∥ 2 ≥ 4 r ( z ) 2 . (2) \lVert z\rVert^{2}-\lVert t\rVert^{2}\ge4\,r(z)^{2}. \tag{2} ∥ z ∥ 2 − ∥ t ∥ 2 ≥ 4 r ( z ) 2 . ( 2 )
We have ∥ z ∥ 2 − ∥ t ∥ 2 = ∑ i = 1 d ( ( t i + k i ) 2 − t i 2 ) \lVert z\rVert^{2}-\lVert t\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\bigl((t_{i}+k_{i})^{2}-t_{i}^{2}\bigr) ∥ z ∥ 2 − ∥ t ∥ 2 = ∑ i = 1 d ( ( t i + k i ) 2 − t i 2 ) . Fix i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] . By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , − 1 2 ≤ t i < 1 2 -\tfrac12\le t_{i}<\tfrac12 − 2 1 ≤ t i < 2 1 , so ∣ t i ∣ ≤ 1 2 |t_{i}|\le\tfrac12 ∣ t i ∣ ≤ 2 1 by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ; and by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §regular , r ( z ) ≥ 0 r(z)\ge0 r ( z ) ≥ 0 and, r ( z ) r(z) r ( z ) being the least of the numbers 1 2 − ∣ t j ∣ \tfrac12-|t_{j}| 2 1 − ∣ t j ∣ , r ( z ) ≤ 1 2 − ∣ t i ∣ r(z)\le\tfrac12-|t_{i}| r ( z ) ≤ 2 1 − ∣ t i ∣ . If k i = 0 k_{i}=0 k i = 0 , the i i i th summand is 0 0 0 . If k i ≠ 0 k_{i}\ne0 k i = 0 , then k i k_{i} k i is a nonzero integer, so ∣ k i ∣ ≥ 1 |k_{i}|\ge1 ∣ k i ∣ ≥ 1 , and by claims 3 and 7 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ,
∣ t i + k i ∣ ≥ ∣ k i ∣ − ∣ t i ∣ ≥ 1 − ∣ t i ∣ = ∣ t i ∣ + 2 ( 1 2 − ∣ t i ∣ ) ≥ ∣ t i ∣ + 2 r ( z ) ≥ 0. |t_{i}+k_{i}|\ge|k_{i}|-|t_{i}|\ge1-|t_{i}|=|t_{i}|+2\bigl(\tfrac12-|t_{i}|\bigr)\ge|t_{i}|+2r(z)\ge0 . ∣ t i + k i ∣ ≥ ∣ k i ∣ − ∣ t i ∣ ≥ 1 − ∣ t i ∣ = ∣ t i ∣ + 2 ( 2 1 − ∣ t i ∣ ) ≥ ∣ t i ∣ + 2 r ( z ) ≥ 0.
Squaring these nonnegative numbers and using ∣ a ∣ 2 = a 2 |a|^{2}=a^{2} ∣ a ∣ 2 = a 2 (claim 4 there),
( t i + k i ) 2 − t i 2 ≥ ( ∣ t i ∣ + 2 r ( z ) ) 2 − t i 2 = 4 ∣ t i ∣ r ( z ) + 4 r ( z ) 2 ≥ 4 r ( z ) 2 . (t_{i}+k_{i})^{2}-t_{i}^{2}\ge\bigl(|t_{i}|+2r(z)\bigr)^{2}-t_{i}^{2}=4|t_{i}|\,r(z)+4r(z)^{2}\ge4r(z)^{2}. ( t i + k i ) 2 − t i 2 ≥ ( ∣ t i ∣ + 2 r ( z ) ) 2 − t i 2 = 4∣ t i ∣ r ( z ) + 4 r ( z ) 2 ≥ 4 r ( z ) 2 .
Thus every summand is nonnegative, and since k ≠ 0 k\ne0 k = 0 some k i k_{i} k i is nonzero, whose summand is at least 4 r ( z ) 2 4r(z)^{2} 4 r ( z ) 2 ; this proves ( 2 ) (2) ( 2 ) .
Step 4 (The regularity radius along T T T ). By McCann's Theorem on the Flat Torus: Optimal Couplings out of an Absolutely Continuous Measure are Induced by a Unique Map with a Periodic Potential §potential , applied to the optimal map T T T , there is D ∈ B ( R d ) D\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) D ∈ B ( R d ) with μ ( D ) = 1 \mu(D)=1 μ ( D ) = 1 such that T ( x ) − x T(x)-x T ( x ) − x is regular for every x ∈ D x\in D x ∈ D . Put ρ ( x ) = r ( T ( x ) − x ) \rho(x)=r(T(x)-x) ρ ( x ) = r ( T ( x ) − x ) for x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d . The map ρ \rho ρ is Borel: r r r is Borel by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §regular , and T − i d T-\mathrm{id} T − id is Borel as recorded in Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement . By The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §regular , ρ ( x ) > 0 \rho(x)>0 ρ ( x ) > 0 for x ∈ D x\in D x ∈ D . Since v T ( x ) = ϖ ( T ( x ) − x ) v_{T}(x)=\varpi(T(x)-x) v T ( x ) = ϖ ( T ( x ) − x ) by Optimal Maps on the Torus, Uniquely Mapped Pairs and the Displacement Field of a Map §displacement , ρ ( x ) \rho(x) ρ ( x ) is the least of the numbers 1 2 − ∣ v T ( x ) j ∣ \tfrac12-|v_{T}(x)_{j}| 2 1 − ∣ v T ( x ) j ∣ , j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] .
We record: for z , x ∈ R d z,x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z , x ∈ R d , with t = ϖ ( z ) t=\varpi(z) t = ϖ ( z ) and e = t − v T ( x ) e=t-v_{T}(x) e = t − v T ( x ) ,
r ( z ) ≥ ρ ( x ) − ∥ e ∥ . (3) r(z)\ge\rho(x)-\lVert e\rVert. \tag{3} r ( z ) ≥ ρ ( x ) − ∥ e ∥ . ( 3 )
Indeed, for each i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] , claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and the coordinate bound give ∣ t i ∣ ≤ ∣ v T ( x ) i ∣ + ∣ e i ∣ ≤ ∣ v T ( x ) i ∣ + ∥ e ∥ |t_{i}|\le|v_{T}(x)_{i}|+|e_{i}|\le|v_{T}(x)_{i}|+\lVert e\rVert ∣ t i ∣ ≤ ∣ v T ( x ) i ∣ + ∣ e i ∣ ≤ ∣ v T ( x ) i ∣ + ∥ e ∥ , hence 1 2 − ∣ t i ∣ ≥ 1 2 − ∣ v T ( x ) i ∣ − ∥ e ∥ ≥ ρ ( x ) − ∥ e ∥ \tfrac12-|t_{i}|\ge\tfrac12-|v_{T}(x)_{i}|-\lVert e\rVert\ge\rho(x)-\lVert e\rVert 2 1 − ∣ t i ∣ ≥ 2 1 − ∣ v T ( x ) i ∣ − ∥ e ∥ ≥ ρ ( x ) − ∥ e ∥ ; and r ( z ) r(z) r ( z ) is one of the numbers 1 2 − ∣ t i ∣ \tfrac12-|t_{i}| 2 1 − ∣ t i ∣ .
For m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N put η m = ι R ( m ) − 1 \eta_{m}=\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(m)^{-1} η m = ι R ( m ) − 1 , a positive real by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field , and
A m = { x ∈ D : 2 η m < ρ ( x ) } , A_{m}=\{x\in D:2\eta_{m}<\rho(x)\}, A m = { x ∈ D : 2 η m < ρ ( x )} ,
which belongs to B ( R d ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) B ( R d ) because { x : 2 η m < ρ ( x ) } \{x:2\eta_{m}<\rho(x)\} { x : 2 η m < ρ ( x )} does, by the criterion of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §measurable for the measurable space ( R d , B ( R d ) ) (\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d})) ( R d , B ( R d )) .
Step 5 (A pointwise bound). Fix m , n ∈ N m,n\in\mathbb{N} m , n ∈ N , write η = η m \eta=\eta_{m} η = η m , A = A m A=A_{m} A = A m , C = 4 + 2 d η − 2 C=4+2d\,\eta^{-2} C = 4 + 2 d η − 2 , and put B = X n − 1 ( R d ∖ A ) ∈ B ( R q ) B=X_{n}^{-1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A)\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) B = X n − 1 ( R d ∖ A ) ∈ B ( R q ) (X n X_{n} X n being Borel) and
F n ( w ) = ∥ Z n ( w ) − v T ( X n ( w ) ) ∥ 2 ( w ∈ R q ) , F_{n}(w)=\bigl\lVert Z_{n}(w)-v_{T}(X_{n}(w))\bigr\rVert^{2}\qquad(w\in\mathbb{R}^{q}), F n ( w ) = Z n ( w ) − v T ( X n ( w )) 2 ( w ∈ R q ) ,
a Borel function by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions . We show that for every w ∈ R q w\in\mathbb{R}^{q} w ∈ R q
F n ( w ) ≤ C g n ( w ) + C f n ( w ) + 2 d 1 B ( w ) . (4) F_{n}(w)\le C\,g_{n}(w)+C\,f_{n}(w)+2d\,\mathbf{1}_{B}(w). \tag{4} F n ( w ) ≤ C g n ( w ) + C f n ( w ) + 2 d 1 B ( w ) . ( 4 )
Fix w w w and write z = Z n ( w ) z=Z_{n}(w) z = Z n ( w ) , x = X n ( w ) x=X_{n}(w) x = X n ( w ) , t = ϖ ( z ) t=\varpi(z) t = ϖ ( z ) , k = z − t ∈ Z d k=z-t\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} k = z − t ∈ Z d and e = t − v T ( x ) e=t-v_{T}(x) e = t − v T ( x ) , so that g n ( w ) = ∥ z ∥ 2 − ∥ t ∥ 2 g_{n}(w)=\lVert z\rVert^{2}-\lVert t\rVert^{2} g n ( w ) = ∥ z ∥ 2 − ∥ t ∥ 2 , f n ( w ) = ∥ e ∥ 2 f_{n}(w)=\lVert e\rVert^{2} f n ( w ) = ∥ e ∥ 2 and z − v T ( x ) = k + e z-v_{T}(x)=k+e z − v T ( x ) = k + e . By the first inequality of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions , applied to k k k and − e -e − e (note ∥ − e ∥ = ∥ e ∥ \lVert-e\rVert=\lVert e\rVert ∥ − e ∥ = ∥ e ∥ by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n ),
F n ( w ) ≤ 2 ∥ k ∥ 2 + 2 f n ( w ) . F_{n}(w)\le2\lVert k\rVert^{2}+2f_{n}(w). F n ( w ) ≤ 2 ∥ k ∥ 2 + 2 f n ( w ) .
All terms on the right of ( 4 ) (4) ( 4 ) are nonnegative, g n ≥ 0 g_{n}\ge0 g n ≥ 0 by Step 1, and C ≥ 2 C\ge2 C ≥ 2 . If k = 0 k=0 k = 0 , then F n ( w ) ≤ 2 f n ( w ) ≤ C f n ( w ) F_{n}(w)\le2f_{n}(w)\le C f_{n}(w) F n ( w ) ≤ 2 f n ( w ) ≤ C f n ( w ) and ( 4 ) (4) ( 4 ) holds. Let k ≠ 0 k\ne0 k = 0 . The same inequality, applied to z z z and t t t , together with ∥ t ∥ 2 ≤ d / 4 \lVert t\rVert^{2}\le d/4 ∥ t ∥ 2 ≤ d /4 from The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , gives ∥ k ∥ 2 ≤ 2 ∥ z ∥ 2 + 2 ∥ t ∥ 2 = 2 g n ( w ) + 4 ∥ t ∥ 2 ≤ 2 g n ( w ) + d \lVert k\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert z\rVert^{2}+2\lVert t\rVert^{2}=2g_{n}(w)+4\lVert t\rVert^{2}\le2g_{n}(w)+d ∥ k ∥ 2 ≤ 2 ∥ z ∥ 2 + 2 ∥ t ∥ 2 = 2 g n ( w ) + 4 ∥ t ∥ 2 ≤ 2 g n ( w ) + d , hence
F n ( w ) ≤ 4 g n ( w ) + 2 f n ( w ) + 2 d . F_{n}(w)\le4g_{n}(w)+2f_{n}(w)+2d . F n ( w ) ≤ 4 g n ( w ) + 2 f n ( w ) + 2 d .
We bound 1 1 1 by one of three nonnegative quantities. (i) If x ∉ A x\notin A x ∈ / A , then w ∈ B w\in B w ∈ B and 1 = 1 B ( w ) 1=\mathbf{1}_{B}(w) 1 = 1 B ( w ) . (ii) If x ∈ A x\in A x ∈ A and η ≤ ∥ e ∥ \eta\le\lVert e\rVert η ≤ ∥ e ∥ , then squaring gives η 2 ≤ f n ( w ) \eta^{2}\le f_{n}(w) η 2 ≤ f n ( w ) , so 1 ≤ η − 2 f n ( w ) 1\le\eta^{-2}f_{n}(w) 1 ≤ η − 2 f n ( w ) . (iii) If x ∈ A x\in A x ∈ A and ∥ e ∥ < η \lVert e\rVert<\eta ∥ e ∥ < η , then 2 η < ρ ( x ) 2\eta<\rho(x) 2 η < ρ ( x ) , so ( 3 ) (3) ( 3 ) gives r ( z ) > 2 η − η = η > 0 r(z)>2\eta-\eta=\eta>0 r ( z ) > 2 η − η = η > 0 ; as k ≠ 0 k\ne0 k = 0 , ( 2 ) (2) ( 2 ) gives g n ( w ) ≥ 4 r ( z ) 2 ≥ 4 η 2 g_{n}(w)\ge4r(z)^{2}\ge4\eta^{2} g n ( w ) ≥ 4 r ( z ) 2 ≥ 4 η 2 , so 1 ≤ 1 4 η − 2 g n ( w ) 1\le\tfrac14\eta^{-2}g_{n}(w) 1 ≤ 4 1 η − 2 g n ( w ) . In every case 1 ≤ 1 B ( w ) + η − 2 f n ( w ) + 1 4 η − 2 g n ( w ) 1\le\mathbf{1}_{B}(w)+\eta^{-2}f_{n}(w)+\tfrac14\eta^{-2}g_{n}(w) 1 ≤ 1 B ( w ) + η − 2 f n ( w ) + 4 1 η − 2 g n ( w ) , and therefore
F n ( w ) ≤ ( 4 + 1 2 d η − 2 ) g n ( w ) + ( 2 + 2 d η − 2 ) f n ( w ) + 2 d 1 B ( w ) , F_{n}(w)\le\bigl(4+\tfrac12d\,\eta^{-2}\bigr)g_{n}(w)+\bigl(2+2d\,\eta^{-2}\bigr)f_{n}(w)+2d\,\mathbf{1}_{B}(w), F n ( w ) ≤ ( 4 + 2 1 d η − 2 ) g n ( w ) + ( 2 + 2 d η − 2 ) f n ( w ) + 2 d 1 B ( w ) ,
which implies ( 4 ) (4) ( 4 ) because both coefficients are at most C C C and g n ( w ) , f n ( w ) ≥ 0 g_{n}(w),f_{n}(w)\ge0 g n ( w ) , f n ( w ) ≥ 0 .
The right side of ( 4 ) (4) ( 4 ) is a sum of nonnegative Borel functions (claim 1 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions for the indicator). Integrating ( 4 ) (4) ( 4 ) against Σ n \Sigma_{n} Σ n with claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral , and using The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set together with Σ n ( X n − 1 ( R d ∖ A ) ) = ( ( X n ) # Σ n ) ( R d ∖ A ) = μ ( R d ∖ A ) \Sigma_{n}(X_{n}^{-1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A))=((X_{n})_{\#}\Sigma_{n})(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A)=\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A) Σ n ( X n − 1 ( R d ∖ A )) = (( X n ) # Σ n ) ( R d ∖ A ) = μ ( R d ∖ A ) from Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward , we obtain for all m , n ∈ N m,n\in\mathbb{N} m , n ∈ N
0 ≤ c n : = ∫ R q ∥ Z n − v T ∘ X n ∥ 2 d Σ n ≤ ( 4 + 2 d η m − 2 ) ( a n + b n ) + 2 d μ ( R d ∖ A m ) . (5) 0\le c_{n}:=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\bigl\lVert Z_{n}-v_{T}\circ X_{n}\bigr\rVert^{2}\,d\Sigma_{n}\le\bigl(4+2d\,\eta_{m}^{-2}\bigr)(a_{n}+b_{n})+2d\,\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A_{m}). \tag{5} 0 ≤ c n := ∫ R q Z n − v T ∘ X n 2 d Σ n ≤ ( 4 + 2 d η m − 2 ) ( a n + b n ) + 2 d μ ( R d ∖ A m ) . ( 5 )
In particular each c n c_{n} c n is a real number.
Step 6 (The exceptional set is small). By claims 1 and 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field , 0 < ι R ( m ) < ι R ( m ) + 1 = ι R ( m + 1 ) 0<\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(m)<\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(m)+1=\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(m+1) 0 < ι R ( m ) < ι R ( m ) + 1 = ι R ( m + 1 ) , so η m + 1 ≤ η m \eta_{m+1}\le\eta_{m} η m + 1 ≤ η m by Order Reversal under Reciprocals, and Summability of the Reciprocals of the Squares §reciprocal , applied with a = ι R ( m ) a=\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(m) a = ι R ( m ) and b = ι R ( m + 1 ) b=\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(m+1) b = ι R ( m + 1 ) ; therefore A m ⊆ A m + 1 A_{m}\subseteq A_{m+1} A m ⊆ A m + 1 . Every A m A_{m} A m is contained in D D D ; conversely, for x ∈ D x\in D x ∈ D one has ρ ( x ) / 2 > 0 \rho(x)/2>0 ρ ( x ) /2 > 0 (Step 4), and claim 3 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers gives l ∈ N l\in\mathbb{N} l ∈ N with 0 < ι R ( l ) − 1 < ρ ( x ) / 2 0<\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(l)^{-1}<\rho(x)/2 0 < ι R ( l ) − 1 < ρ ( x ) /2 , so x ∈ A l x\in A_{l} x ∈ A l . Hence ⋃ m A m = D \bigcup_{m}A_{m}=D ⋃ m A m = D . Each μ ( A m ) \mu(A_{m}) μ ( A m ) is a real number at most μ ( R d ) = 1 \mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1 μ ( R d ) = 1 , by claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure , so claim 5 there (continuity from below) shows that ( μ ( A m ) ) m (\mu(A_{m}))_{m} ( μ ( A m ) ) m converges to μ ( D ) = 1 \mu(D)=1 μ ( D ) = 1 ; and μ ( R d ∖ A m ) = 1 − μ ( A m ) \mu(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A_{m})=1-\mu(A_{m}) μ ( R d ∖ A m ) = 1 − μ ( A m ) by claim 3 there. Hence ( μ ( R d ∖ A m ) ) m ∈ N (\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A_{m}))_{m\in\mathbb{N}} ( μ ( R d ∖ A m ) ) m ∈ N converges to 0 0 0 .
Step 7 (Conclusion). Let ε \varepsilon ε be a positive real number. By Step 6 choose m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N with μ ( R d ∖ A m ) < ε / ( 4 d ) \mu(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A_{m})<\varepsilon/(4d) μ ( R d ∖ A m ) < ε / ( 4 d ) , and put C = 4 + 2 d η m − 2 C=4+2d\,\eta_{m}^{-2} C = 4 + 2 d η m − 2 , a positive real. By Steps 1 and 2 choose N 1 , N 2 ∈ N N_{1},N_{2}\in\mathbb{N} N 1 , N 2 ∈ N with a n < ε / ( 4 C ) a_{n}<\varepsilon/(4C) a n < ε / ( 4 C ) for every n ≥ N 1 n\ge N_{1} n ≥ N 1 and b n < ε / ( 4 C ) b_{n}<\varepsilon/(4C) b n < ε / ( 4 C ) for every n ≥ N 2 n\ge N_{2} n ≥ N 2 , and let N N N be the larger of N 1 N_{1} N 1 and N 2 N_{2} N 2 . The order of choice is ε \varepsilon ε , then m m m , then N 1 N_{1} N 1 and N 2 N_{2} N 2 . For every n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N , ( 5 ) (5) ( 5 ) gives
∣ c n − 0 ∣ = c n < C ( ε 4 C + ε 4 C ) + 2 d ⋅ ε 4 d = ε . |c_{n}-0|=c_{n}<C\Bigl(\frac{\varepsilon}{4C}+\frac{\varepsilon}{4C}\Bigr)+2d\cdot\frac{\varepsilon}{4d}=\varepsilon . ∣ c n − 0∣ = c n < C ( 4 C ε + 4 C ε ) + 2 d ⋅ 4 d ε = ε .
By Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers the sequence ( c n ) n ∈ N (c_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} ( c n ) n ∈ N converges to 0 0 0 , which is claim 1.