TheoremBase

For a given epsilon, the balls on which f varies by less than epsilon/2 over twice the radius cover the compact set; a finite subcover and finite choice give finitely many radii, and their least element serves as delta. The compact-space case is the subset case with K = X.

Proof

Proof of (ii). Let TK\mathcal{T}_{K} be the subspace topology on KK induced by TdX\mathcal{T}_{d_X}. By Compact Topological Space and Compact Subset (ii), the hypothesis on KK says that (K,TK)(K,\mathcal{T}_{K}) is compact. By Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (i) we must show that for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a real δ>0\delta>0 such that all x,y∈Kx,y\in K with dX(x,y)<δd_X(x,y)<\delta satisfy dY(f(x),f(y))<εd_Y(f(x),f(y))<\varepsilon. The data are fixed in this order: first ε\varepsilon; then η\eta, determined by ε\varepsilon; then a finite subcover V\mathcal{V} of a cover U\mathcal{U} determined by η\eta; then a choice map φ\varphi on V\mathcal{V}; then δ\delta, determined by φ\varphi; and only then the points x,y∈Kx,y\in K, on which nothing fixed before depends.

Let ε\varepsilon be a real number with ε>0\varepsilon>0. If K=∅K=\emptyset, then δ=1\delta=1 serves, since KK has no points. Assume from now on that K≠∅K\neq\emptyset.

Step 1: a cover of KK defined by a condition. Put η=ε/2\eta=\varepsilon/2. Then 0<η0<\eta and η+η=ε\eta+\eta=\varepsilon, by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vii) applied in the ordered field R\mathbb{R} to 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Let PP be the set of all (x,r)∈K×R(x,r)\in K\times\mathbb{R} with 0<r0<r such that every z∈Kz\in K with dX(x,z)<r+rd_X(x,z)<r+r satisfies dY(f(z),f(x))<ηd_Y(f(z),f(x))<\eta. For (x,r)∈P(x,r)\in P, the open ball BdX(x,r)B_{d_X}(x,r) is a subset of XX that is open in (X,dX)(X,d_X), so it lies in TdX\mathcal{T}_{d_X} by Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (iii), and hence K∩BdX(x,r)∈TKK\cap B_{d_X}(x,r)\in\mathcal{T}_{K} by Subspace Topology (i). Let U\mathcal{U} be the set of all W∈TKW\in\mathcal{T}_{K} such that W=K∩BdX(x,r)W=K\cap B_{d_X}(x,r) for some (x,r)∈P(x,r)\in P. Thus U⊆TK\mathcal{U}\subseteq\mathcal{T}_{K}.

We show K⊆⋃UK\subseteq\bigcup\mathcal{U}. Let x∈Kx\in K. By Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (ii), ff is continuous at xx relative to KK, so Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (i), applied with η\eta in place of ε\varepsilon, gives a real δ0>0\delta_{0}>0 such that every z∈Kz\in K with dX(x,z)<δ0d_X(x,z)<\delta_{0} satisfies dY(f(z),f(x))<ηd_Y(f(z),f(x))<\eta. Put r=δ0/2r=\delta_{0}/2; then 0<r0<r and r+r=δ0r+r=\delta_{0} by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vii), so (x,r)∈P(x,r)\in P. As dX(x,x)=0<rd_X(x,x)=0<r by Metric Space (iii), x∈BdX(x,r)x\in B_{d_X}(x,r) by Open Ball in a Metric Space (ii), so x∈K∩BdX(x,r)x\in K\cap B_{d_X}(x,r), which belongs to U\mathcal{U}. The numbers δ0\delta_{0} and rr serve only to show that xx is covered: no radius is selected for each point, since PP and U\mathcal{U} are defined by conditions.

Step 2: finitely many radii and their least element. As (K,TK)(K,\mathcal{T}_{K}) is compact and U\mathcal{U} is a subset of TK\mathcal{T}_{K} with K⊆⋃UK\subseteq\bigcup\mathcal{U}, Compact Topological Space and Compact Subset (i) gives a finite subset V\mathcal{V} of U\mathcal{U} with K⊆⋃VK\subseteq\bigcup\mathcal{V}; and V≠∅\mathcal{V}\neq\emptyset, because K≠∅K\neq\emptyset. For W∈VW\in\mathcal{V} let CWC_{W} be the set of all radii r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} such that there is xx with (x,r)∈P(x,r)\in P and W=K∩BdX(x,r)W=K\cap B_{d_X}(x,r). Each CWC_{W} is a set by Sets and Maps: Ordinary Notation (iii) and a subset of R\mathbb{R}, so CW∈P(R)C_{W}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}); hence W↦CWW\mapsto C_{W} is a map from V\mathcal{V} to P(R)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), by Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (i) as in Sets and Maps: Ordinary Notation (v), that is, a family (CW)W∈V(C_{W})_{W\in\mathcal{V}} of sets. Moreover CW≠∅C_{W}\neq\emptyset for every W∈VW\in\mathcal{V}: as W∈V⊆UW\in\mathcal{V}\subseteq\mathcal{U}, there is (x,r)∈P(x,r)\in P with W=K∩BdX(x,r)W=K\cap B_{d_X}(x,r), and then r∈CWr\in C_{W}. Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (xi), applied to the finite set V\mathcal{V} and this family, gives a map φ:V→⋃W∈VCW\varphi:\mathcal{V}\to\bigcup_{W\in\mathcal{V}}C_{W} with φ(W)∈CW\varphi(W)\in C_{W} for every W∈VW\in\mathcal{V}. Only the radius φ(W)\varphi(W) is chosen; no centre is selected for WW.

Let Δ=φ(V)\Delta=\varphi(\mathcal{V}) be the image of V\mathcal{V} under φ\varphi. By The Image and the Preimage of a Class under a Class (i), its elements are the sets vv with (W,v)∈φ(W,v)\in\varphi for some W∈VW\in\mathcal{V}, that is, the values φ(W)\varphi(W) for W∈VW\in\mathcal{V} (Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (i)); as φ(W)∈CW⊆R\varphi(W)\in C_{W}\subseteq\mathbb{R}, Δ\Delta is a subset of R\mathbb{R}. It is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi), and nonempty because V\mathcal{V} is nonempty. As the order of R\mathbb{R} is a total order, Δ\Delta has a least element by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (viii), unique by Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (iii); let δ=min⁡Δ\delta=\min\Delta. Then δ∈Δ\delta\in\Delta, so δ=φ(W0)∈CW0\delta=\varphi(W_{0})\in C_{W_{0}} for some W0∈VW_{0}\in\mathcal{V}; thus (x,δ)∈P(x,\delta)\in P for some xx, and hence 0<δ0<\delta. And δ≤φ(W)\delta\le\varphi(W) for every W∈VW\in\mathcal{V}, as φ(W)∈Δ\varphi(W)\in\Delta.

Step 3: the estimate. Let x,y∈Kx,y\in K with dX(x,y)<δd_X(x,y)<\delta. As x∈K⊆⋃Vx\in K\subseteq\bigcup\mathcal{V}, there is W∈VW\in\mathcal{V} with x∈Wx\in W. Put r=φ(W)r=\varphi(W). As r∈CWr\in C_{W}, there is a point cc with (c,r)∈P(c,r)\in P and W=K∩BdX(c,r)W=K\cap B_{d_X}(c,r); it is used only in this paragraph. Then c∈Kc\in K, 0<r0<r and δ≤r\delta\le r. As x∈BdX(c,r)x\in B_{d_X}(c,r), dX(c,x)<rd_X(c,x)<r by Open Ball in a Metric Space (ii), and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (ii), applied to dX(c,x)<rd_X(c,x)<r and 0≤r0\le r, gives dX(c,x)<r+rd_X(c,x)<r+r; as x∈Kx\in K and (c,r)∈P(c,r)\in P, it follows that dY(f(x),f(c))<ηd_Y(f(x),f(c))<\eta. Next, dX(x,y)≤δ≤rd_X(x,y)\le\delta\le r, so by Metric Space (v) and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (ii), applied to dX(c,x)<rd_X(c,x)<r and dX(x,y)≤rd_X(x,y)\le r,

dX(c,y)≤dX(c,x)+dX(x,y)<r+r,d_X(c,y)\le d_X(c,x)+d_X(x,y)<r+r,

whence dX(c,y)<r+rd_X(c,y)<r+r by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (i); as y∈Ky\in K and (c,r)∈P(c,r)\in P, it follows that dY(f(y),f(c))<ηd_Y(f(y),f(c))<\eta. Finally, by Metric Space (v), Metric Space (iv) and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (ii), applied to dY(f(x),f(c))<ηd_Y(f(x),f(c))<\eta and dY(f(y),f(c))≤ηd_Y(f(y),f(c))\le\eta,

dY(f(x),f(y))≤dY(f(x),f(c))+dY(f(y),f(c))<η+η=ε,d_Y(f(x),f(y))\le d_Y(f(x),f(c))+d_Y(f(y),f(c))<\eta+\eta=\varepsilon ,

so dY(f(x),f(y))<εd_Y(f(x),f(y))<\varepsilon by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (i), with η+η=ε\eta+\eta=\varepsilon from Step 1. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, ff is uniformly continuous on KK.

Proof of (i). Let TX\mathcal{T}_{X} be the subspace topology on XX induced by TdX\mathcal{T}_{d_X}. Every U∈TdXU\in\mathcal{T}_{d_X} is a subset of XX, by Metric Spaces: Balls, the Metric Topology, and the Real and Complex Numbers as Metric Spaces (iii), so X∩U=UX\cap U=U; hence, by Subspace Topology (i), TX=TdX\mathcal{T}_{X}=\mathcal{T}_{d_X}, and (X,TX)(X,\mathcal{T}_{X}) is compact. By Compact Topological Space and Compact Subset (ii), XX is compact in (X,TdX)(X,\mathcal{T}_{d_X}). As ff is continuous, it is continuous on XX, by Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (ii). So (ii), applied with K=XK=X, shows that ff is uniformly continuous on XX, that is, uniformly continuous, by Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (i).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…