Proof of A Weighted Young Inequality and the Splitting of a Quadratic Form
lemmalem:quadratic-form-splitting-2026aThe Young inequality follows by expanding the nonnegative squared norm of a scaled difference; the splitting inequality follows by expanding the quadratic form at the sum of the second point and the increment and estimating the cross term by the Young inequality.
Throughout we use the notation of the statement, and we use freely that for and one has : this is immediate if , and otherwise is claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
Claim 1. Let and let . By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on and claims 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on ,
where and the nonnegativity is claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on together with claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Hence
Now let be positive and take ; multiplying the resulting inequality by the positive number , which exists by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and using gives
Claim 2. By Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix §square the matrix lies in . By claim 1 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure the scalar multiple and then the sum are again symmetric, so .
Claim 3. Let and put , so that . Since , claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Transpose of a Real Matrix together with claim 1 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on gives . Using , which is claim 3 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum, and expanding with claims 2 and 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on ,
Apply claim 1 with , and , noting that is positive and that its multiplicative inverse is ; this gives
and by Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix §square. Moreover, by claim 2 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix and claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field,
Combining the three displays,
Finally, by claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on ,
while distributivity in gives . Substituting these two identities and into the previous display gives the asserted inequality.
Loading…
Prerequisites
5a03f8e6-6688-4dc5-ad86-42b4a2f1955c